Tech mogul claps back at Anthony Albanese after announcing this bill

In a world where social media has been used by almost everyone in the world, the Australian government's latest move to regulate its use among children has sparked a fiery debate.

The conversation took an unexpected turn when tech mogul Elon Musk weighed in, delivering a sharp critique that has sent ripples through the internet.



Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's announcement of a bill that would require Australians to be over 16 to use many popular social media apps, including Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, and X (a platform owned by Musk), has been met with mixed reactions.

Musk, who has been vocal about his stance on free speech and the open internet, took to social media to express his concerns.


photo.jpg
Elon Musk replied to Anthony Albanese’s announcement of a bill on restricting social media to children under 16. Credit: @elonmusk / Twitter and @albomp / Instagram


'Seems like a backdoor way to control access to the Internet by all Australians,' Musk said.

Musk's comments come at a time when the balance between protecting young internet users and preserving digital freedoms is being hotly contested.

The tech billionaire, who famously acquired X (formerly known as Twitter) in 2022, has been dubbed 'First Buddy' due to his rapport with United States President-elect Donald Trump.

The proposed ban has raised practical questions about its enforcement, with Greens senator David Shoebridge inquiring in a Senate Committee hearing whether it would necessitate age verification for all Australian social media users.



The response from James Chisolm, Deputy Secretary of Communications and Media, was a simple 'yes’.

The government has assured that tech companies would be prohibited from retaining information collected during the verification process, but concerns about privacy and data security persist.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland has defended the bill, stating that it aims to redefine the role of social media in Australian society, particularly for the younger generation.

‘This bill seeks to set a new normative value in society that accessing social media is not the defining feature of growing up in Australia,' she said.

'There is wide acknowledgement that something must be done in the immediate term to help prevent young teens and children from being exposed to streams of unfiltered content.’



As the details of the ban continue to be hashed out in Parliament, tech companies are being put on notice. Those that fail to comply with the new regulations could face hefty fines of up to $50 million.

The legislation, if passed, would give platforms a year to establish and implement age verification processes.

Certain services, such as Messenger Kids, WhatsApp, Kids Helpline, Google Classroom, and YouTube, are expected to be exempt from the ban or considered ‘out-of-scope services’.

Opposition communications spokesman David Coleman has accused social media companies that they had ‘ 'abrogated their responsibility to care about Australian children' for too long.

'We look forward to working constructively on this legislation with a view to seeing it passed through the parliament next week,' he said.



The eSafety Commissioner's office has highlighted the importance of age assurance but also calls for a comprehensive approach.

'We must also continue working to ensure online services are safe by design and to build children's digital literacy, resilience and critical reasoning skills so that when they are of age to use these services...they are equipped for the online world,' it said.

The Australian Human Rights Commission has voiced concerns about the potential human rights implications of the ban on young people, pointing to the need for a balanced approach that safeguards children without unduly restricting their freedoms.
Key Takeaways
  • Elon Musk criticises the Australian government's plan to impose a social media ban for children, suggesting it could lead to broader internet restrictions.
  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has introduced a bill that would require users to be over 16 for many popular social media apps.
  • There is bipartisan political support for the proposed social media ban, although some debate exists over its effectiveness.
  • The bill, which is set to reshape Australia's relationship with social media, will enforce age verification and include potential fines for companies that fail to comply.
What are your thoughts on this contentious issue? Do you agree with Musk's perspective, or do you believe the government's proposed ban is a necessary step to protect children? Share your views with us in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
I was fortunate when my children were young, Atari was the game played by most kids. Fortunately, they still preferred to go outside and play with the other kids. But children are entitled now and expect to get their own way, which often happens, and they are addicted to computer games and media. It will be difficult to stop them.
 
Musk? Trump does NOT “preside” over his own country just yet, thus his cohorts’ arrogant abuse of his yet to be sworn role is inconsequential to Australia’s politics.
Perhaps Musks’ real issue is his bottomline and how his new role will swell his coffers, and certainly not the welfare of any nations’ youth and their families.
 
Musk you are a gatekeeper to the abuse to our young children and their minds worldwide. Your so-called platform only opens the pathways to created NON-THINKING humans or Yes people. Most of your platforms DO NOT encourage Free-Thinking but it does encourage hate, bigotry, self-importance, racism, fake news, and so many other things that are not good for young minds.
 
This is just the beginning of the destruction of free speech!
Although there is no such thing as free speech in Australia anymore.
Once this is implemented the. It will not be long before the age is lifted to 18.
 
Shouldn't the government leave the parenting to the parents. While I agree with their reasoning that children should not have access to these sites it's really the parents who are enabling them. I think that parents should be held more accountable for their children's actions and the government should stay out of it. We live in a democracy and this looks more like dictatorship to me.
 
Elon Musk is not someone that I have any respect for. The man throws millions of $$$ into space (yes some of it is useful to Joe Average). If he really wanted to make a name for himself, and a respected one at that, he could probably end world hunger and still be filthy rich. He should also keep his gold-lined snout out of other nations politics.
 
Sadly Albasleazy, it sounds like a good idea but...
Here I go again with my 'negativity',... well... I call it 'REALITY'!

Do you recall that alcohol, cigarettes and driving are also age-restricted?
Have you noticed that the theft of these items stolen by youngsters has absolutely exploded in the past few years - and is constantly increasing?

WELL - HOLD ONTO YOUR PHONES PEOPLE!!!!!!
You can now add this to the list.
 
Musk you are a gatekeeper to the abuse to our young children and their minds worldwide. Your so-called platform only opens the pathways to created NON-THINKING humans or Yes people. Most of your platforms DO NOT encourage Free-Thinking but it does encourage hate, bigotry, self-importance, racism, fake news, and so many other things that are not good for young minds.
Very well said, here here👏👏👏
 
Here is one megalomaniac and hypocritical psycho called Elon Musk trying to call the shots for a whole country?

Meanwhile, this f**kwit has Tesla manufacturing plants in China - one of the world's most oppressive regimes when it comes to free speech, censorship and the internet.

A case of wanting his cake and eat it too. This prick is better off dead.
 
Here is one megalomaniac and hypocritical psycho called Elon Musk trying to call the shots for a whole country?

Meanwhile, this f**kwit has Tesla manufacturing plants in China - one of the world's most oppressive regimes when it comes to free speech, censorship and the internet.

A case of wanting his cake and eat it too. This prick is better off dead.
That's how they get rich... hypocrisy (democratically saying) - more commonly known as lies!!
 
Shouldn't the government leave the parenting to the parents. While I agree with their reasoning that children should not have access to these sites it's really the parents who are enabling them. I think that parents should be held more accountable for their children's actions and the government should stay out of it. We live in a democracy and this looks more like dictatorship to me.
Problem is most parents today don't Police the usage of the internet by their kids . So long as the kids are out from under their feet they don't care!
 
I think the move is yet another disaster from the Albanese Govt.'s vacuous think tank. What happened to parents? If they are concerned about what their children may be watching - then take away their phones and computers. The schools ban mobile phones - where is the parent's responsibility in guiding and monitoring their children's behavious? As to the fines - the govt. will reap another payday for doing nothing - that is what they are good at; and, frankly, why is it the tec companies' responsibility to monitor other people's children. Is parenthood now "no care and no responsibility" - blame someone else! I think the proposal is appalling and just another example of the govt. dumbing down its citizens and placing another big brother hand on our shoulders under the pretense of "concern".
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie1 and Jennie
Musk might be rich but I'm sure he's off his rocker and God help America and the rest of the world. If Trump takes advice from him and the rest of his cohorts it's going to be a disaster. It's already proved a mess with one of his picks gone
 
I wont be abiding by any of it if it goes thru, Albasleazy can go to hell in a pig basket along with all his bullshit ideas that has jammed into his idiot head by the WHO & the WEF morons
Oh dear! Would you like the country completely run by cyber invasive regimes such as China and Russia, all the while they infiltrate our very own internet infrastructure?

If that is your train of thought, take a short course in simplified Chinese. NOW!

May Springvale turn into Chingvale, Hurstville turn into Hongville, Fortitude Valley into Fortune Cookie Valley and Box Hill morph into Bok Hill. At your wishes....
 
  • Love
Reactions: deni67

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×