Tech mogul claps back at Anthony Albanese after announcing this bill

In a world where social media has been used by almost everyone in the world, the Australian government's latest move to regulate its use among children has sparked a fiery debate.

The conversation took an unexpected turn when tech mogul Elon Musk weighed in, delivering a sharp critique that has sent ripples through the internet.



Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's announcement of a bill that would require Australians to be over 16 to use many popular social media apps, including Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, and X (a platform owned by Musk), has been met with mixed reactions.

Musk, who has been vocal about his stance on free speech and the open internet, took to social media to express his concerns.


photo.jpg
Elon Musk replied to Anthony Albanese’s announcement of a bill on restricting social media to children under 16. Credit: @elonmusk / Twitter and @albomp / Instagram


'Seems like a backdoor way to control access to the Internet by all Australians,' Musk said.

Musk's comments come at a time when the balance between protecting young internet users and preserving digital freedoms is being hotly contested.

The tech billionaire, who famously acquired X (formerly known as Twitter) in 2022, has been dubbed 'First Buddy' due to his rapport with United States President-elect Donald Trump.

The proposed ban has raised practical questions about its enforcement, with Greens senator David Shoebridge inquiring in a Senate Committee hearing whether it would necessitate age verification for all Australian social media users.



The response from James Chisolm, Deputy Secretary of Communications and Media, was a simple 'yes’.

The government has assured that tech companies would be prohibited from retaining information collected during the verification process, but concerns about privacy and data security persist.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland has defended the bill, stating that it aims to redefine the role of social media in Australian society, particularly for the younger generation.

‘This bill seeks to set a new normative value in society that accessing social media is not the defining feature of growing up in Australia,' she said.

'There is wide acknowledgement that something must be done in the immediate term to help prevent young teens and children from being exposed to streams of unfiltered content.’



As the details of the ban continue to be hashed out in Parliament, tech companies are being put on notice. Those that fail to comply with the new regulations could face hefty fines of up to $50 million.

The legislation, if passed, would give platforms a year to establish and implement age verification processes.

Certain services, such as Messenger Kids, WhatsApp, Kids Helpline, Google Classroom, and YouTube, are expected to be exempt from the ban or considered ‘out-of-scope services’.

Opposition communications spokesman David Coleman has accused social media companies that they had ‘ 'abrogated their responsibility to care about Australian children' for too long.

'We look forward to working constructively on this legislation with a view to seeing it passed through the parliament next week,' he said.



The eSafety Commissioner's office has highlighted the importance of age assurance but also calls for a comprehensive approach.

'We must also continue working to ensure online services are safe by design and to build children's digital literacy, resilience and critical reasoning skills so that when they are of age to use these services...they are equipped for the online world,' it said.

The Australian Human Rights Commission has voiced concerns about the potential human rights implications of the ban on young people, pointing to the need for a balanced approach that safeguards children without unduly restricting their freedoms.
Key Takeaways
  • Elon Musk criticises the Australian government's plan to impose a social media ban for children, suggesting it could lead to broader internet restrictions.
  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has introduced a bill that would require users to be over 16 for many popular social media apps.
  • There is bipartisan political support for the proposed social media ban, although some debate exists over its effectiveness.
  • The bill, which is set to reshape Australia's relationship with social media, will enforce age verification and include potential fines for companies that fail to comply.
What are your thoughts on this contentious issue? Do you agree with Musk's perspective, or do you believe the government's proposed ban is a necessary step to protect children? Share your views with us in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
I think the move is yet another disaster from the Albanese Govt.'s vacuous think tank. What happened to parents? If they are concerned about what their children may be watching - then take away their phones and computers. The schools ban mobile phones - where is the parent's responsibility in guiding and monitoring their children's behavious? As to the fines - the govt. will reap another payday for doing nothing - that is what they are good at; and, frankly, why is it the tec companies' responsibility to monitor other people's children. Is parenthood now "no care and no responsibility" - blame someone else! I think the proposal is appalling and just another example of the govt. dumbing down its citizens and placing another big brother hand on our shoulders under the pretense of "concern".
Couldn't have put it better myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mOiOz
Problem is most parents today don't Police the usage of the internet by their kids . So long as the kids are out from under their feet they don't care!
How will parents police their children's access to the internet when they can resource it through the school environment, public libraries and public wi-fi which is available in shopping centres and the like?

That is the dilemma that many people do not consider.

I am sure that there are squillions of teenagers out there who are way more tech savvy out there who are capable of circumventing the system.
 
Here is one megalomaniac and hypocritical psycho called Elon Musk trying to call the shots for a whole country?

Meanwhile, this f**kwit has Tesla manufacturing plants in China - one of the world's most oppressive regimes when it comes to free speech, censorship and the internet.

A case of wanting his cake and eat it too. This prick is better off dead.
Do you remember when he built that battery bank in S.A. a few years back, if I remember correctly it was after S.A. was completely blacked out in 2016.
The battery bank was supposed to be a game changer for us but all it basically did was give surrounding areas an extra 20 minutes of power.
Here's a photo of me when I was nude, I took it during the blackout 😂
 

Attachments

  • nude photo blackout.jpg
    nude photo blackout.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Any initiative to limit the dangerous side of social media for children is a good thing as far as I am concerned. Nothing is perfect, but that should not mean that we don’t keep trying. I can’t say I understand the objections. As for Trump’s ‘First Buddy’ - Musk is his own buddy. Forget about crash test dummies - he is happy is use human test dummies!
 
This is just the beginning of the destruction of free speech!
Although there is no such thing as free speech in Australia anymore.
Once this is implemented the. It will not be long before the age is lifted to 18.
This is what l was trying to put across and no-one should tell you what you can and cannot do.lt's up to the parents to control what what their children can have.
 
How will parents police their children's access to the internet when they can resource it through the school environment, public libraries and public wi-fi which is available in shopping centres and the like?

That is the dilemma that many people do not consider.

I am sure that there are squillions of teenagers out there who are way more tech savvy out there who are capable of circumventing the system.
Exactly my thoughts... if they can steal the items they can get access - it is literally impossible to keep kids away from social media.
Most kids know more about it than their parents!
Kids over the age of 13 will still be bullied too and they are just as vulnerable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and deni67
This is just the beginning of the destruction of free speech!
Although there is no such thing as free speech in Australia anymore.
Once this is implemented the. It will not be long before the age is lifted to 18.
You're right, there is no such thing as free speech in Australia, it's not on our constitution, unlike America who's first amendment is freedom of speech.
We only have "implied" free speech, which doesn't say it's legal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and mOiOz
Regardless of what is said, I believe Musk is a result of his pomposity.
In my opinion, he is a prime example of the rich wanting more, no matter how much they have.
If this law was implemented world wide, he might lose a few dollars.
To me, that is it in a nut shell.
I have no liking for this man and ask the American public to remember what they wished for when they voted Trump back in. Or should I say Donald Musk-Trump. Hand in hand they go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and Knell
You're right, there is no such thing as free speech in Australia, it's not on our constitution, unlike America who's first amendment is freedom of speech.
We only have "implied" free speech, which doesn't say it's legal.
Sounds possible, but I wouldn't go as far as "Free Speech" - it's more like "SEECTIVE Free Speech"... some people are permitted.... others not!
The Gaza Protests are a good example!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and deni67
Do you remember when he built that battery bank in S.A. a few years back, if I remember correctly it was after S.A. was completely blacked out in 2016.
The battery bank was supposed to be a game changer for us but all it basically did was give surrounding areas and extra 20 minutes of power.
Here's a photo of me when I was nude, I took it during the blackout 😂
😳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deni67
Regardless of what is said, I believe Musk is a result of his pomposity.
In my opinion, he is a prime example of the rich wanting more, no matter how much they have.
If this law was implemented world wide, he might lose a few dollars.
To me, that is it in a nut shell.
I have no liking for this man and ask the American public to remember what they wished for when they voted Trump back in. Or should I say Donald Musk-Trump. Hand in hand they go.
A country run like a Corporation! Good luck everyday Americans!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MariaG
You're right, there is no such thing as free speech in Australia, it's not on our constitution, unlike America who's first amendment is freedom of speech.
We only have "implied" free speech, which doesn't say it's legal.
Regardless of what is said, I believe Musk is a result of his pomposity.
In my opinion, he is a prime example of the rich wanting more, no matter how much they have.
If this law was implemented world wide, he might lose a few dollars.
To me, that is it in a nut shell.
I have no liking for this man and ask the American public to remember what they wished for when they voted Trump back in. Or should I say Donald Musk-Trump. Hand in hand they go.
Regardless of what is said, I believe Musk is a result of his pomposity.
In my opinion, he is a prime example of the rich wanting more, no matter how much they have.
If this law was implemented world wide, he might lose a few dollars.
To me, that is it in a nut shell.
I have no liking for this man and ask the American public to remember what they wished for when they voted Trump back in. Or should I say Donald Musk-Trump. Hand in hand they go.
Trump will make America great again!
 
Oh dear! Would you like the country completely run by cyber invasive regimes such as China and Russia, all the while they infiltrate our very own internet infrastructure?

If that is your train of thought, take a short course in simplified Chinese. NOW!

May Springvale turn into Chingvale, Hurstville turn into Hongville, Fortitude Valley into Fortune Cookie Valley and Box Hill morph into Bok Hill. At your wishes....
crawl back into your idiot moronic hole,
 
What does 'make America great again' mean? When was America considered 'great'?
Hey Mr/miss/Mrs Braindead who will Australian rely on when, not if, we are invaded?
It won’t be China, Russia, North Korea ect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
Hey Mr/miss/Mrs Braindead who will Australian rely on when, not if, we are invaded?
It won’t be China, Russia, North Korea ect.
haha High praise, coming from you. However, my question was legit. I would really like to know what that slogan actually means. I would like to know what era is considered to be 'great' and why.
 
haha High praise, coming from you. However, my question was legit. I would really like to know what that slogan actually means. I would like to know what era is considered to be 'great' and why.
Do some friggin reasearch!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knell
Do some friggin reasearch!
Given your aggressive response to a simple question, I can only assume you don’t know…just advertising perhaps, and means nothing more than a slogan like…“what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”?

I guess this type of propaganda works to sell utopia to some.

Research needs a reference point?

Possibilities - post WW2 when Americans had the feeling of power - winning a war? Opportunities for financial gains and employment due to the fact that others were flattened?

Or perhaps the loser feeling - vis-a-vis…Afghanistan/Korean/Vietnam…again wars?

Or even, for some, it might be the time prior to the Civil Rights Movement?

I'm sure it was never 'great' for all.
 
Given your aggressive response to a simple question, I can only assume you don’t know…just advertising perhaps, and means nothing more than a slogan like…“what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”?

I guess this type of propaganda works to sell utopia to some.

Research needs a reference point?

Possibilities - post WW2 when Americans had the feeling of power - winning a war? Opportunities for financial gains and employment due to the fact that others were flattened?

Or perhaps the loser feeling - vis-a-vis…Afghanistan/Korean/Vietnam…again wars?

Or even, for some, it might be the time prior to the Civil Rights Movement?

I'm sure it was never 'great' for all.
I give aggressive responses to moronic questions!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knell

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×