Tech mogul claps back at Anthony Albanese after announcing this bill

In a world where social media has been used by almost everyone in the world, the Australian government's latest move to regulate its use among children has sparked a fiery debate.

The conversation took an unexpected turn when tech mogul Elon Musk weighed in, delivering a sharp critique that has sent ripples through the internet.



Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's announcement of a bill that would require Australians to be over 16 to use many popular social media apps, including Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, and X (a platform owned by Musk), has been met with mixed reactions.

Musk, who has been vocal about his stance on free speech and the open internet, took to social media to express his concerns.


photo.jpg
Elon Musk replied to Anthony Albanese’s announcement of a bill on restricting social media to children under 16. Credit: @elonmusk / Twitter and @albomp / Instagram


'Seems like a backdoor way to control access to the Internet by all Australians,' Musk said.

Musk's comments come at a time when the balance between protecting young internet users and preserving digital freedoms is being hotly contested.

The tech billionaire, who famously acquired X (formerly known as Twitter) in 2022, has been dubbed 'First Buddy' due to his rapport with United States President-elect Donald Trump.

The proposed ban has raised practical questions about its enforcement, with Greens senator David Shoebridge inquiring in a Senate Committee hearing whether it would necessitate age verification for all Australian social media users.



The response from James Chisolm, Deputy Secretary of Communications and Media, was a simple 'yes’.

The government has assured that tech companies would be prohibited from retaining information collected during the verification process, but concerns about privacy and data security persist.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland has defended the bill, stating that it aims to redefine the role of social media in Australian society, particularly for the younger generation.

‘This bill seeks to set a new normative value in society that accessing social media is not the defining feature of growing up in Australia,' she said.

'There is wide acknowledgement that something must be done in the immediate term to help prevent young teens and children from being exposed to streams of unfiltered content.’



As the details of the ban continue to be hashed out in Parliament, tech companies are being put on notice. Those that fail to comply with the new regulations could face hefty fines of up to $50 million.

The legislation, if passed, would give platforms a year to establish and implement age verification processes.

Certain services, such as Messenger Kids, WhatsApp, Kids Helpline, Google Classroom, and YouTube, are expected to be exempt from the ban or considered ‘out-of-scope services’.

Opposition communications spokesman David Coleman has accused social media companies that they had ‘ 'abrogated their responsibility to care about Australian children' for too long.

'We look forward to working constructively on this legislation with a view to seeing it passed through the parliament next week,' he said.



The eSafety Commissioner's office has highlighted the importance of age assurance but also calls for a comprehensive approach.

'We must also continue working to ensure online services are safe by design and to build children's digital literacy, resilience and critical reasoning skills so that when they are of age to use these services...they are equipped for the online world,' it said.

The Australian Human Rights Commission has voiced concerns about the potential human rights implications of the ban on young people, pointing to the need for a balanced approach that safeguards children without unduly restricting their freedoms.
Key Takeaways
  • Elon Musk criticises the Australian government's plan to impose a social media ban for children, suggesting it could lead to broader internet restrictions.
  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has introduced a bill that would require users to be over 16 for many popular social media apps.
  • There is bipartisan political support for the proposed social media ban, although some debate exists over its effectiveness.
  • The bill, which is set to reshape Australia's relationship with social media, will enforce age verification and include potential fines for companies that fail to comply.
What are your thoughts on this contentious issue? Do you agree with Musk's perspective, or do you believe the government's proposed ban is a necessary step to protect children? Share your views with us in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
haha High praise, coming from you. However, my question was legit. I would really like to know what that slogan actually means. I would like to know what era is considered to be 'great' and why.
Ronald Reagan was the President that made America great again.
He cut taxes yet the government had more money. Brought the country out of Jimmy Carter's horrible economy back to boom times. He brought world-wide respect for America back again, He brought down the Soviet Union.
Among many other things, and that's coming straight from the 'horses mouth', so to speak!
 
That's how they get rich... hypocrisy (democratically saying) - more commonly known as lies!!
he seems to achieve some real big deals. I never saw NASA .have a rocket actually land, for reuse...the best thing is ...he isn't a politician, he ACTUALLY does things and. succeeds....unfortunately he will always have to live the TALL POPPY life
 
Ronald Reagan was the President that made America great again.
He cut taxes yet the government had more money. Brought the country out of Jimmy Carter's horrible economy back to boom times. He brought world-wide respect for America back again, He brought down the Soviet Union.
Among many other things, and that's coming straight from the 'horses mouth', so to speak!
Ah, yes, what I expected. Even as a ‘brain-dead,’ I see the parallel, albeit through a much different lens. Thanks for sharing that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deni67
Hey Mr/miss/Mrs Braindead who will Australian rely on when, not if, we are invaded?
It won’t be China, Russia, North Korea ect.
I just noticed the second part of your comment - got caught up in the initial rudeness. Not really like you, but hey!

In relation to the question “who would Australia rely on if/when invaded”…my opinion = no-one really. I think the question is more about how America will negotiate with China re Taiwan at this time…because if that goes badly, with or without us (preferably without) - I fear we would be buggered anyway!
 
I just noticed the second part of your comment - got caught up in the initial rudeness. Not really like you, but hey!

In relation to the question “who would Australia rely on if/when invaded”…my opinion = no-one really. I think the question is more about how America will negotiate with China re Taiwan at this time…because if that goes badly, with or without us (preferably without) - I fear we would be buggered anyway!
I guess we can agree on this point!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyberchook
Sadly Albasleazy, it sounds like a good idea but...
Here I go again with my 'negativity',... well... I call it 'REALITY'!

Do you recall that alcohol, cigarettes and driving are also age-restricted?
Have you noticed that the theft of these items stolen by youngsters has absolutely exploded in the past few years - and is constantly increasing?

WELL - HOLD ONTO YOUR PHONES PEOPLE!!!!!!
You can now add this to the list.
I do not know just how they can implement and monitor 16 years and under, accessing their addictive social media how do the sites know the real age of the members on Social Media and others, as they only have to tick the box to ascertain they are over a certain age, no follow-ups of confirming so many addresses of those are 16 years or under. The parents need to be more vigilant as most young teens can and do look at porn and any adult or "friends'' on their phones.
I agree the youth today find ways to get around the many real attitudes and behaviours as commented on this post.
I also think some parents who give their phones to babies in strollers to keep them quiet would be averse to altering their children's full attention on their mobile phones to keep them occupied, few maybe, but this happens as social media is non-stop and kids get swiftly addicted.
 
Last edited:
I do not know just how they can implement and monitor 16 years and under, accessing their addictive social media how do the sites know the real age of the members on Social Media and others, as they only have to tick the box to ascertain they are over a certain age, no follow-ups of confirming so many addresses of those are 16 years or under. The parents need to be more vigilant as most young teens can and do look at porn and any adult or "friends'' on their phones.
I agree the youth today find ways to get around the many real attitudes and behaviours as commented on this post.
I also think some parents who give their phones to babies in strollers to keep them quiet would be averse to altering their children's full attention on their mobile phones to keep them occupied, few maybe, but this happens as social media is non-stop and kids get swiftly addicted.
Maybe they should start to get proof of ID cards uploaded to these sites, the ones with their photos, date of birth, their address etc.
 
Last edited:
This is just the beginning of the destruction of free speech!
Although there is no such thing as free speech in Australia anymore.
Once this is implemented the. It will not be long before the age is lifted to 18.
That would be even better!
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
No, because then I wouldn't be able to keep in touch with my daughter, family in England, and my original friends in Perth, let alone the dozens of close friends from overseas iv'e made in the past.
No, because then I wouldn't be able to keep in touch with my daughter, family in England, and my original friends in Perth, let alone the dozens of close friends from overseas iv'e made in the past.
I agree with you.
Banning under 16 year olds would have a similar effect on you people who keep in touch with family (grandparents etc) who live overseas.
This whole legislation is once again a knee jerk Albanese legislation that will not work.
It is all about power and control and restriction of peoples rights.
It is about time parents took control of their children‘s activities.
But then again parents are unable to discipline their children anymore due to government legislation!
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
I agree with you.
Banning under 16 year olds would have a similar effect on you people who keep in touch with family (grandparents etc) who live overseas.
This whole legislation is once again a knee jerk Albanese legislation that will not work.
It is all about power and control and restriction of peoples rights.
It is about time parents took control of their children‘s activities.
But then again parents are unable to discipline their children anymore due to government legislation!
I have to agree with that, I was lucky, I brought my kids up in the 80s and 90s when they still liked playing outside, even in their adult years they weren't interested in social media, games etc, they loved getting out and about.
Although my son did serve a prison term for 18 months, he's since passed away, but I don't condone what he did but I kind of understand why he did it, which I won't go into here, but I loved him no less and it wasn't the fact that he had a bad upbringing, I wished I was my own child, if that makes sense, I made their lives fun most of the time, with strict rules.
Parents now days don't give a toss or are helpless to do anything due to Government rules regarding punishing your child.
Not spanking your child for one, unheard of in my days, if my kids deserved a smacked leg or backside they got one!
 
I have to agree with that, I was lucky, I brought my kids up in the 80s and 90s when they still liked playing outside, even in their adult years they weren't interested in social media, games etc, they loved getting out and about.
Although my son did serve a prison term for 18 months, he's since passed away, but I don't condone what he did but I kind of understand why he did it, which I won't go into here, but I loved him no less and it wasn't the fact that he had a bad upbringing, I wished I was my own child, if that makes sense, I made their lives fun most of the time, with strict rules.
Parents now days don't give a toss or are helpless to do anything due to Government rules regarding punishing your child.
Not spanking your child for one, unheard of in my days, if my kids deserved a smacked leg or backside they got one!
Very true
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
I very much doubt some of the articles on TicTok are appropriate - especially when they make fun of people with a potentially terminal illness.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: deni67

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×