Will this notorious killer be set free? The truth is more shocking than you think: Karl Stefanovic weighs in

The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


Screen Shot 2023-04-13 at 3.10.35 PM.png
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


Screen Shot 2023-04-13 at 3.10.49 PM.png
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!
 
Sponsored
The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


View attachment 17370
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


View attachment 17371
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below

bring back the rope may not deter but will stop reoffending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
Thank goodness this pompous, self-opinionated television commentator is not on the state parole board. The board requires its members to be professionally trained , with relevant understanding of the issues involved, not merely screech out expressions of knee jerk reaction simply because the opportunity presents itself. Our criminal justice system provides for more than that.
As you have stated the board requires its members to be professionally trained, they are after all armed with all the evidence, facts, the persons life history since birth, this has them in a good position for making & being responsible for sound decisions. The rest of us will have the, what you call-knee jerk reactions as we are only human and the media presents coverage of affairs in the way that they want to portray it. We are coming from an emotional response in the first instance. Above all else the right & carefully considered decisions need to be made on all fronts. No one can ever truly know what another person is thinking and how this then can affect there behaviour - we look to the ones that are trained for the right action to be implemented. It would not be an easy job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


View attachment 17370
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


View attachment 17371
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!
 
Thank goodness this pompous, self-opinionated television commentator is not on the state parole board. The board requires its members to be professionally trained , with relevant understanding of the issues involved, not merely screech out expressions of knee jerk reaction simply because the opportunity presents itself. Our criminal justice system provides for more than that.
Did you read the article in its entirety ? I'm not a fan of Karl Stefanovic but he was actually saying he couldn't believe this criminal could actually walk free. He is against him being released
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Cats
I agree with your sentiments 110% Death penalty if proven without a doubt of subsequent murder as in this case & that of other serial killers, Ivan Milat eg: The cost to the Australian Tax Payer could be better spent elsewhere. If you take another’s life, you have abandoned any rights to live in a civil society. Sometimes, an animal forfeits their rights by attacking/killing a human & is immediately “put down” without trial, in this case, Denyer should have also been “put down” only 29.5 years ago!
 
K
The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


View attachment 17370
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


View attachment 17371
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!

Keep this creep behind bars. He should never be released from prison. He took the lives of 3 innocent young girls that were just going about their daily business. How many other lives would he have destroyed had he not been caught.? He was given 3 life terms,life means life,NOT 30 years.😠 The victims families must be so upset by the news that he could be released. My thoughts are with them.🙁
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
Did you read the article in its entirety ? I'm not a fan of Karl Stefanovic but he was actually saying he couldn't believe this criminal could actually walk free. He is against him being released
Thats right Suzanne.Did this person who was having a go at Karl,read the whole article.??🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
Unfortunately I agree with the majority that he should remain in prison for life. His crime was not a crime of passion etc but merely a compulsion to kill. I don't feel that this is something that he would "get over". It is intrinsic. The pressure and stress of attempting to live a normal life would be difficult for him on release and may cause him to reoffend. Would any of you who believe he should be released, especially with daughters, seriously be happy for him to be released and live in your neighbourhood.
 
The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


View attachment 17370
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


View attachment 17371
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!

30 year's for 3 murders that's bullshit the judge didn’t do his job correctly should have been 30 year's for each murder that equals 90 year's that's what this parasite should have got pity the death penalty was abolished years ago 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
Did you read the article in its entirety ? I'm not a fan of Karl Stefanovic but he was actually saying he couldn't believe this criminal could actually walk free. He is against him being released
Yes, that is KS's opinion. What I am writing is that KS's opinion doesn't matter because he is only a TV commentator with no expertise on which to base such an opinion. Leave it to those who do.
 
As you have stated the board requires its members to be professionally trained, they are after all armed with all the evidence, facts, the persons life history since birth, this has them in a good position for making & being responsible for sound decisions. The rest of us will have the, what you call-knee jerk reactions as we are only human and the media presents coverage of affairs in the way that they want to portray it. We are coming from an emotional response in the first instance. Above all else the right & carefully considered decisions need to be made on all fronts. No one can ever truly know what another person is thinking and how this then can affect there behaviour - we look to the ones that are trained for the right action to be implemented. It would not be an easy job.
I am in complete agreement.
 
It must be so hard for the families of this monsters victims to think he might be released back into society. I’m sure they would be tempted to track him down and do to him what he did to their family member and no one could blame them. Hopefully he will spend the rest of his life behind bars, his papers should be marked “Never to be Released”, he has forfeited his right to a life outside prison.
 
How about a deal with some of the countries that believe in real punishment, they don't mollycoddle their prisoners instead making it a very unpleasant experience that they won't forget. And when they say life they mean it.
What purpose would such a "deal" serve", and do many countries have a justice system, including judiciaries that are better than those in Australia? I think not.
 
It must be so hard for the families of this monsters victims to think he might be released back into society. I’m sure they would be tempted to track him down and do to him what he did to their family member and no one could blame them. Hopefully he will spend the rest of his life behind bars, his papers should be marked “Never to be Released”, he has forfeited his right to a life outside prison.
It is easy to write those remarks Gsr, but on what bases do you do so? I can understand your emotive response, but our criminal justice system is based on something more than blind emotion.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: MindyMac
The family of be the victims should waiting and do what needs to be done. Our family would. In fact, many of us would have dealt with this evil already and he'd already be 666ft Under.

Many of us have already discussed this and we have a saying and that is "Some things are really worth going to jail for. Do anything to one of our family like this, rape, paedophile and that person will land themselves in a box & 666 feet under."

Our family will absolutely support that family member that had to do what they had to do. Australian law is PATHETIC and I'm utterly disgusted.

He should come out in a box. In fact, I believe in The Death Penalty when there is 'absolute proof of guilt' like this Filth. Like Ivan Milat. Evil filths and others like them. Paedophiles = The Death Penalty as far as I'm concerned. Harm animals = The Death Penalty as well.
 
It is easy to write those remarks Gsr, but on what bases do you do so? I can understand your emotive response, but our criminal justice system is based on something more than blind emotion.
What!!!! Our Criminal justice system is failing us as well as the Parole board. Many more victims from people released again & again and some released yet again. Vicki Barton would be my age today if the evil creep that raped & killed was kept locked up. But no, he got early release and he goes and plans his next attack. That was Vicki Barton.
 
And you do.??????????🤔
Yes, that is KS's opinion. What I am writing is that KS's opinion doesn't matter because he is only a TV commentator with no expertise on which to base such an opinion. Leave it to those who do.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×