Will this notorious killer be set free? The truth is more shocking than you think: Karl Stefanovic weighs in

The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


Screen Shot 2023-04-13 at 3.10.35 PM.png
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


Screen Shot 2023-04-13 at 3.10.49 PM.png
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!
 
Sponsored
It would appear the sentencing Judge is responsible for what may happen, (quote) "A technicality in his original sentencing." How could a sentencing Judge make an error that would allow this coward to receive consideration for early release? What an ass! WHY CAN'T SENTENCES REFLECT THE CRIME? Does the Court System care more about the perpetrators that the victims or the victim's relatives? It would appear so. Some people are in prison for non-payment of fines. These people should be put to work doing unpaid work instead of sitting on their behind at a cost of $200,000 / year or more.

I believe Denyer is a recidivist (having seen many when doing that job) & will prove this with a repeat of the terrible crime he was jailed for.

If he were in the USA l believe none of this would be happening! Three life term means exactly that! Never to be released & die in prison.

I am a Christian but l cannot condone what Denyer has done to these poor ladies, taken in the prime of their lives & show no remorse.
 
The chilling news of a notorious serial killer potentially walking free from prison has sent shockwaves through the community. Paul Denyer, the man who cold-bloodedly took the lives of three innocent young women three decades ago in Melbourne, is now facing the possibility of release.

The gruesome details of his heinous crimes still haunt those who remember the brutal murders of 18-year-old Elizabeth Stevens, 22-year-old Deborah Fream, and 17-year-old Natalie Russell.



The magnitude of Denyer's actions cannot be understated. He showed no mercy as he ruthlessly ended the lives of his victims — bright young women with their whole lives ahead of them: a promising TAFE student, a new mother who had just given birth, and a schoolgirl with her whole life ahead of her.

Their families and loved ones were left understandably shattered, and their lives were forever changed by the senseless acts of violence committed.


View attachment 17370
Serial killer Paul Denyer, who killed three young women in Frankston 30 years ago, could be released from jail soon. Credit: Facebook.



After a technicality in his original sentencing, Denyer could potentially be released from prison, serving only 30 years of his three-life sentences.

This has sent shockwaves of fear and anger throughout the community, leaving many concerned citizens asking: How could someone who committed such horrific crimes against innocent young women be allowed to walk free?



The news of Paul Denyer's potential release from prison has struck a chord with many, including prominent TV personality Karl Stefanovic of the Today morning show. Stefanovic, known for his charismatic and affable demeanour, couldn't hide his distress as he spoke out passionately against the criminal being set free.

In a powerful and emotional statement, Stefanovic didn't mince words; he boldly echoed the sentiments of many who are appalled by Denyer's heinous crimes and the possibility of him roaming the streets once again.



'Paul Denyer stalked the streets of Melbourne. Plucking young women at random and brutally killing them,' Stefanovic said; he was unapologetically blunt in his assessment of Denyer, calling him a threat to society.

Stefanovic further emphasised that Denyer has never shown remorse for his actions and has never provided a reason for his senseless killings. With three murders to his name and 30 years behind bars, he argued that the crimes should not be swept under the rug.

'Now, he's eligible for parole. Can you believe it?' the TV host went on to say.


View attachment 17371
Denyer was originally given three life sentences for the brutal murders of Natalie Russell, Elizabeth Stevens, and Deborah Fream - and an additional eight years for another attempted killing. Credit: Facebook.



The horrific details of Paul Denyer's crimes are chilling and heartbreaking. His victims were young women who were simply going about their daily lives. Elizabeth Stevens, just 18 years old, was on her way home from the library when Denyer attacked her, strangling her and slashing her throat.

Deborah Fream, only 22 years old and a new mother to a baby boy named Jake, was brutally abducted and strangled to death by Denyer while she was out buying milk to make dinner — robbing her of the chance to raise her son.

Natalie Russell, just 17 years old, was walking home from school when Denyer dragged her from train tracks, stabbed her, and hid her in scrubland. There were other women who were attacked by him but fortunately survived.



The serial killer's impact is still felt to this day; it's believed he may have taken even more lives had police not caught him a few weeks after the three murders.

With Denyer potentially being a threat to the public, Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that a mere 30 years isn't enough for the families of the victims, who are obviously still in pain from the loss of their loved ones.


Credit: 7NEWS Australia.


As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, government officials are grappling with the complexities of the legal system and the emotional toll on the victims' families.

Federal Minister Bill Shorten acknowledged that despite 30 years being a significant amount of time, it may not feel long enough for the families who have lost their loved ones to Denyer's heinous crimes.

The pain and emptiness left by the senseless murders are immeasurable, and the families continue to carry the burden of that loss every day.



When asked about Denyer's release, Government Minister Mary-Anne Thomas declined to comment, stating that the workings of the parole board are beyond her jurisdiction. She explained that the delicate balance between justice for the victims and the legal process is a sensitive matter that requires careful consideration.

The Department of Justice and Community Safety has also cited confidentiality laws, preventing them from confirming or notifying the public about parole decisions. The lack of transparency adds to the uncertainty and unease surrounding Denyer's potential release, leaving the community in a state of anticipation and concern.



As the potential release of Paul Denyer looms, family and friends of the victims are left grappling for answers. Demanding more information, they claim to have been kept in the dark, adding to the suspense and uncertainty surrounding this chilling case.

Will Denyer walk free? Will justice be served? The families, along with the public, anxiously await answers, seeking closure and clarity in the aftermath of these heinous crimes.

Key Takeaways

  • The potential release of infamous serial killer Paul Denyer, who was sentenced to three life terms for the brutal murders of three young women 30 years ago, has alarmed and stunned the public.
  • Despite the passage of time, the pain and emptiness felt by the victims' families remain immeasurable, and government officials acknowledge that 30 years may not feel long enough for them.
  • The legal process and parole decisions surrounding Denyer's release are complex and confidential, adding to the uncertainty and unease in the community.

The potential release of Paul Denyer, the infamous serial killer responsible for the cruel murders of three young women, has sparked widespread concern and disbelief.

As the legal system navigates the complexities of parole decisions and the victims' families continue to grapple with the pain of their loss, questions linger in the air. Will justice be served? Can society ever truly be safe from the threat of such heinous crimes? And how do we balance the need for accountability with the complexities of the legal system?



Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the story of Paul Denyer serves as a stark reminder of the lasting impact of horrific crimes on individuals, families, and communities alike.

What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you remember the media coverage when the crimes took place? Let us know in the comments below!

The animal belongs in a cage, never to be released.
 
We, the taxpayer should not have to pay to keep him in prison when a bullet is cheaper. He in jail would be living a less worrisome life than most pensioners these days. Free medical for whatever ails him free dental & free media. All these things are out of the reach of most pensioners. Hang him as the rope is cheaper than a bullet. I have no hangups regarding corporal punishment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuckerRobynFreckles
This is a state thing, unfortunately we don't deal with crimes like this federally. Because if we did maximum security could be somewhere in outback Australia where the location probably be as much as a deterrent of the crime as breaking out of prison.
And, these young ladies were girls, two of them were still children, and what of the others who managed to get away. Surely there has to be a victim impact statement from the you man who grew up without his mother.
They removed the death penalty because mistakes got made and the innocent were framed by the guilty. If you want to re-enact the death penalty you had better make sure, someone pure of heart is standing there as a witness, telling the jury exactly what they saw the defendant do.
 
Losing a child changes you forever. When our daughter died we spent months and months just walking around the house like zombies. It never leaves you. What was once a happy household is no longer. Its time that the law looked after the victims and not the perpetrators. What is he going to do when he gets out? What are the chances of him reoffending again. Lock him up and throw away the key never to be released
I agree never let him out
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×