Massive Medicare overhaul proposal could drain taxpayers $12 billion—is it worth it?

Access to dental care has long been a sore subject for many Australians.

Under the current system, visiting the dentist and paying for treatments can put a big dent in many household budgets.

Now, a massive Medicare shake-up is being proposed that could change all that.



Medicare's potential expansion to include free dental care for all Australians is a monumental proposal that could redefine healthcare in the country.

However, this ambitious plan comes with a hefty price tag—an additional $12 billion per year from taxpayers' pockets.


SDC 3 .png
A proposal to include dental healthcare under Medicare’s coverage has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler. Image source: prostooleh on Freepik.


The proposal, which has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler, is the result of a senate inquiry into the current state of dental care in Australia.

The inquiry's findings have highlighted a significant gap in the healthcare system, with many Australians forgoing necessary dental treatments due to the prohibitive costs.

As it stands, except for children under 17 who meet certain criteria and some concession cardholders, dental services are not covered by Medicare, leaving the majority of patients to pay out of pocket.



Grattan Institute's 2023 report painted a concerning picture: 32 per cent of Australians who needed dental care chose to skip it, with cost being the primary deterrent for half of them.

This equates to millions of Australians neglecting their dental health, which can have far-reaching consequences for their overall well-being.

The report suggested that the upcoming revision of the National Health Reform Agreement could serve as a platform to negotiate a new dental scheme between federal and state governments.

The Parliamentary Budget Office has explored various models to integrate dental care into Medicare as part of a Greens-led inquiry, which also involved representatives from both Labor and the Coalition.



Four different systems were costed, with both capped and uncapped benefit options.

The most comprehensive approach, which offers coverage for all Medicare cardholders, would require an investment of $8.3 billion over five years for the capped version and $11.6 billion for the uncapped.

Another approach is the means-tested model which will target those on income support and pensioners would cost between $3 billion for the capped version and $4 billion for the uncapped version.

The third approach will provide full coverage exclusively for those over 65 and would cost $1.7 billion to $2 billion, while the fourth approach, which is a preventive care-only option, would range from $2.7 billion to $3.8 billion.



To put these figures into perspective, Medicare's budget for the last financial year was $31 billion, and the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) had a $37 billion cost.

The inclusion of dental treatments in Medicare has been a long-standing consideration, dating back to the program's inception in the 1970s, but was ultimately excluded due to budgetary constraints.

The average Australian currently pays around $230 for a standard dentist visit, according to health directory Cleanbill.

This cost barrier has led to a significant portion of the population neglecting their dental health, which can lead to more severe health issues down the line.
Key Takeaways

  • A Senate inquiry has proposed that Medicare in Australia be expanded to include free dental care, which could cost taxpayers an extra $12 billion a year.
  • Under the current system, most dental treatments are not covered by Medicare, with exceptions for certain children under 17 years old and concession card holders.
  • A range of options for expanding dental coverage under Medicare has been costed, including both capped and uncapped versions of across-the-board coverage, means-tested rebates, over-65s coverage, and preventive care coverage.
  • Dental treatments were originally intended to be included in Medicare when it was established in the 1970s but were cut due to budgetary reasons.
Members, what are your thoughts on this update to Medicare coverage? Let us know in the comments below!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored
Access to dental care has long been a sore subject for many Australians.

Under the current system, visiting the dentist and paying for treatments can put a big dent in many household budgets.

Now, a massive Medicare shake-up is being proposed that could change all that.



Medicare's potential expansion to include free dental care for all Australians is a monumental proposal that could redefine healthcare in the country.

However, this ambitious plan comes with a hefty price tag—an additional $12 billion per year from taxpayers' pockets.


View attachment 39025
A proposal to include dental healthcare under Medicare’s coverage has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler. Image source: prostooleh on Freepik.


The proposal, which has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler, is the result of a senate inquiry into the current state of dental care in Australia.

The inquiry's findings have highlighted a significant gap in the healthcare system, with many Australians forgoing necessary dental treatments due to the prohibitive costs.

As it stands, except for children under 17 who meet certain criteria and some concession cardholders, dental services are not covered by Medicare, leaving the majority of patients to pay out of pocket.



Grattan Institute's 2023 report painted a concerning picture: 32 per cent of Australians who needed dental care chose to skip it, with cost being the primary deterrent for half of them.

This equates to millions of Australians neglecting their dental health, which can have far-reaching consequences for their overall well-being.

The report suggested that the upcoming revision of the National Health Reform Agreement could serve as a platform to negotiate a new dental scheme between federal and state governments.

The Parliamentary Budget Office has explored various models to integrate dental care into Medicare as part of a Greens-led inquiry, which also involved representatives from both Labor and the Coalition.



Four different systems were costed, with both capped and uncapped benefit options.

The most comprehensive approach, which offers coverage for all Medicare cardholders, would require an investment of $8.3 billion over five years for the capped version and $11.6 billion for the uncapped.

Another approach is the means-tested model which will target those on income support and pensioners would cost between $3 billion for the capped version and $4 billion for the uncapped version.

The third approach will provide full coverage exclusively for those over 65 and would cost $1.7 billion to $2 billion, while the fourth approach, which is a preventive care-only option, would range from $2.7 billion to $3.8 billion.



To put these figures into perspective, Medicare's budget for the last financial year was $31 billion, and the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) had a $37 billion cost.

The inclusion of dental treatments in Medicare has been a long-standing consideration, dating back to the program's inception in the 1970s, but was ultimately excluded due to budgetary constraints.

The average Australian currently pays around $230 for a standard dentist visit, according to health directory Cleanbill.

This cost barrier has led to a significant portion of the population neglecting their dental health, which can lead to more severe health issues down the line.
Key Takeaways

  • A Senate inquiry has proposed that Medicare in Australia be expanded to include free dental care, which could cost taxpayers an extra $12 billion a year.
  • Under the current system, most dental treatments are not covered by Medicare, with exceptions for certain children under 17 years old and concession card holders.
  • A range of options for expanding dental coverage under Medicare has been costed, including both capped and uncapped versions of across-the-board coverage, means-tested rebates, over-65s coverage, and preventive care coverage.
  • Dental treatments were originally intended to be included in Medicare when it was established in the 1970s but were cut due to budgetary reasons.
Members, what are your thoughts on this update to Medicare coverage? Let us know in the comments below!
I am on a full single pensioner, with Private Healthcare Extras Cover. I have just paid $940 on dental treatment over the last two weeks. This did not involve any major treatment and was over and above my Private Cover. Jenny
 
How about start taxing religious organisations and other companies not paying their taxes! That would pay for it easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
Access to dental care has long been a sore subject for many Australians.

Under the current system, visiting the dentist and paying for treatments can put a big dent in many household budgets.

Now, a massive Medicare shake-up is being proposed that could change all that.



Medicare's potential expansion to include free dental care for all Australians is a monumental proposal that could redefine healthcare in the country.

However, this ambitious plan comes with a hefty price tag—an additional $12 billion per year from taxpayers' pockets.


View attachment 39025
A proposal to include dental healthcare under Medicare’s coverage has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler. Image source: prostooleh on Freepik.


The proposal, which has been presented to Health Minister Mark Butler, is the result of a senate inquiry into the current state of dental care in Australia.

The inquiry's findings have highlighted a significant gap in the healthcare system, with many Australians forgoing necessary dental treatments due to the prohibitive costs.

As it stands, except for children under 17 who meet certain criteria and some concession cardholders, dental services are not covered by Medicare, leaving the majority of patients to pay out of pocket.



Grattan Institute's 2023 report painted a concerning picture: 32 per cent of Australians who needed dental care chose to skip it, with cost being the primary deterrent for half of them.

This equates to millions of Australians neglecting their dental health, which can have far-reaching consequences for their overall well-being.

The report suggested that the upcoming revision of the National Health Reform Agreement could serve as a platform to negotiate a new dental scheme between federal and state governments.

The Parliamentary Budget Office has explored various models to integrate dental care into Medicare as part of a Greens-led inquiry, which also involved representatives from both Labor and the Coalition.



Four different systems were costed, with both capped and uncapped benefit options.

The most comprehensive approach, which offers coverage for all Medicare cardholders, would require an investment of $8.3 billion over five years for the capped version and $11.6 billion for the uncapped.

Another approach is the means-tested model which will target those on income support and pensioners would cost between $3 billion for the capped version and $4 billion for the uncapped version.

The third approach will provide full coverage exclusively for those over 65 and would cost $1.7 billion to $2 billion, while the fourth approach, which is a preventive care-only option, would range from $2.7 billion to $3.8 billion.



To put these figures into perspective, Medicare's budget for the last financial year was $31 billion, and the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) had a $37 billion cost.

The inclusion of dental treatments in Medicare has been a long-standing consideration, dating back to the program's inception in the 1970s, but was ultimately excluded due to budgetary constraints.

The average Australian currently pays around $230 for a standard dentist visit, according to health directory Cleanbill.

This cost barrier has led to a significant portion of the population neglecting their dental health, which can lead to more severe health issues down the line.
Key Takeaways

  • A Senate inquiry has proposed that Medicare in Australia be expanded to include free dental care, which could cost taxpayers an extra $12 billion a year.
  • Under the current system, most dental treatments are not covered by Medicare, with exceptions for certain children under 17 years old and concession card holders.
  • A range of options for expanding dental coverage under Medicare has been costed, including both capped and uncapped versions of across-the-board coverage, means-tested rebates, over-65s coverage, and preventive care coverage.
  • Dental treatments were originally intended to be included in Medicare when it was established in the 1970s but were cut due to budgetary reasons.
Members, what are your thoughts on this update to Medicare coverage? Let us know in the comments below!
About time, Dentists have had it way too good for way too long.
 
This would be wonderful! I have spent a small fortune the last few years due to cost of visiting a dodgy dentist who over looked gum desease! Fortunately I am now being treated by a periodontist,after finally put in the right direction by my local dentist. but have spent thousands! Hopefully something can be done and dental is free!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suzanne rose
Just for the heck of it, my Grandson had to have a Molar taken out. He is a Disability Pensioner, the cost of taking out one tooth was $500 Dollars.
1 tooth for 500 Dollars. That is approximately half of one Pension..
It should have been gold plated.
That little expense was taken out on last Thursday.
No he couldn't wait that long
The nerve was exposed, and causing a lot of pain for him. No doubt there is a waiting list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
No he couldn't wait that long
The nerve was exposed, and causing a lot of pain for him. No doubt there is a waiting list.
Nothing worse than nerve pain. I knew a guy in tassie who pulled his own tooth out with a pair of pliers🙀he couldn’t stand the pain.🤢mind you he got blind drunk to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
I am on a full single pensioner, with Private Healthcare Extras Cover. I have just paid $940 on dental treatment over the last two weeks. This did not involve any major treatment and was over and above my Private Cover. Jenny
Why don't you claim for public dental and forget your private health care cover

If you are on a full pension you only pay 25%. and you would save the money you pay for private dental cover.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Well I agree with you there, my husband calls me the spelling police, but most people reading these newsletters aren't interested in having a spelling or English lesson IMO, but I maybe wrong.
Obviously, the poor spelling shown in the replies on the SDC page can mean one of these things: we have a shocking standard of education these days; people don't read what they write; they don't re-read what they write; they don't use any kind of spell checking for their comments; they just don't know what they put down or they just don't care.
Pick one, or maybe all.
Perhaps one of your responders was named Smith, but continually received mail addressed to Smath, or Smeth, or Smoth, or Smuth. What's the problem? They're only vowels on a keyboard.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Obviously, the poor spelling shown in the replies on the SDC page can mean one of these things: we have a shocking standard of education these days; people don't read what they write; they don't re-read what they write; they don't use any kind of spell checking for their comments; they just don't know what they put down or they just don't care.
Pick one, or maybe all.
And saying this is bad manners
 
Obviously, the poor spelling shown in the replies on the SDC page can mean one of these things: we have a shocking standard of education these days; people don't read what they write; they don't re-read what they write; they don't use any kind of spell checking for their comments; they just don't know what they put down or they just don't care.
Pick one, or maybe all.
As I said, I agree with that, nonetheless the average person reading this newsletter is not doing it in order to get an English lesson
Not everyone has had the advantage of a good education and it is not your place or anyone else's to criticise them.
My husband came from Italy at the age of 11. They were a poor family and we're all sent to work the moment they turned 14, two and a half years to learn the language and get an education, such as it was.
Be grateful that you obviously got a good education, read this newsletter in the vein it was written and keep critical comments to yourself.
There is no need to be rude, which is worse than a few spelling or English errors
Perhaps that's something you didn't learn. Now I'm being rude, I apologise, perhaps you didn't have parents who taught you manners. Much worse than grammatical errors. JMO
 
Last edited:

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×