Woolworths CEO threatened with contempt charge in Senate supermarket price inquiry
- Replies 51
In a dramatic turn of events that has captured the attention of consumers and industry watchers alike, Woolworths CEO Brad Banducci found himself in hot water during a Senate inquiry, facing threats of jail time and fines for his reticence in discussing the supermarket giant's substantial profits.
The Senate inquiry, which has been delving into the pricing practices of Australia's major supermarkets, sought to uncover the details behind Woolworths' impressive $1.7 billion profit after tax in the most recent financial year.
Senators were particularly interested in the company's return on equity—a vital indicator of profitability.
However, Banducci sidestepped these inquiries, choosing instead to discuss another metric.
'We measure return on investment, which we think is the right way of measuring profitability in a company,' Banducci stated.
Return on investment (ROI) measures how profitable an investment is compared to its cost.
On the other hand, return on equity (ROE) checks how well a company uses its shareholders' money to make profits.
Banducci’s response did not satisfy inquiry chair Greens senator Nick McKim, who then issued a warning.
‘I feel compelled to advise you that it is open to the Senate to hold a witness in contempt when they refuse to answer a legitimate question,’ he said.
This serious charge carries a fine of up to $5000 and a potential six-month prison sentence.
The standoff led to a suspension of the hearings, highlighting the intense scrutiny over the profit margins of Woolworths and its main competitor, Coles.
The two supermarkets, which command about two-thirds of Australia's supermarket sector, have been accused of price gouging.
Senator McKim did not mince words when he accused Banducci of selectively presenting data to downplay the company's profitability.
'The fact that (Woolworths' return on equity) is 26 per cent in a year where you made $1.7 billion in profits shows that your company is making off like bandits and effectively has a licence to print money,' McKim said.
He accused Woolworths of using its market dominance to pressure suppliers, including farmers, to reduce wages, compromise staff safety, and overcharge customers.
Banducci denied any allegations of price gouging, stating, 'It’s very hard to say that we have price gouging. I would respectfully submit that this is an incredibly competitive market and that is good for consumers.'
He attributed the rising prices at the checkout to grocery inflation, which he claimed was driven by cost increases from global consumer goods suppliers and the cyclical impacts on domestic fresh food markets.
Despite the CEO's assurances, the inquiry comes at a time when many Australians are feeling the pinch of the cost of living crisis.
Banducci's comments about grocery inflation and the competitive market did little to assuage concerns about the affordability of everyday essentials.
This Senate inquiry is not the only challenge Banducci has faced recently.
His resignation from the top job was announced in February following an interview with ABC's Four Corners, where he struggled to answer questions about Woolworths' market share.
Banducci is set to step down as chief executive at the end of August.
Source: YouTube/ABC News (Australia)
As the inquiry continues, with Coles chief executive Leah Weckert also scheduled to appear, the spotlight remains on the practices of Australia's supermarket behemoths.
The inquiry's timing coincides with a review of the voluntary Food and Grocery Code of Conduct, which governs the relationship between supermarkets and suppliers.
The review has recommended that the code be made mandatory, with significant financial penalties for breaches.
For many, this unfolding story is more than just corporate drama—it's a matter that hits close to home.
Have price increases affected your budget? Do you feel that the market is as competitive as it should be? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
The Senate inquiry, which has been delving into the pricing practices of Australia's major supermarkets, sought to uncover the details behind Woolworths' impressive $1.7 billion profit after tax in the most recent financial year.
Senators were particularly interested in the company's return on equity—a vital indicator of profitability.
However, Banducci sidestepped these inquiries, choosing instead to discuss another metric.
Outgoing Woolworths CEO Brad Banducci earned the ire of a Greens senator over his response to a question on the supermarket’s return on equity. Image Credit: YouTube/ABC News (Australia)
'We measure return on investment, which we think is the right way of measuring profitability in a company,' Banducci stated.
Return on investment (ROI) measures how profitable an investment is compared to its cost.
On the other hand, return on equity (ROE) checks how well a company uses its shareholders' money to make profits.
Banducci’s response did not satisfy inquiry chair Greens senator Nick McKim, who then issued a warning.
‘I feel compelled to advise you that it is open to the Senate to hold a witness in contempt when they refuse to answer a legitimate question,’ he said.
This serious charge carries a fine of up to $5000 and a potential six-month prison sentence.
The standoff led to a suspension of the hearings, highlighting the intense scrutiny over the profit margins of Woolworths and its main competitor, Coles.
The two supermarkets, which command about two-thirds of Australia's supermarket sector, have been accused of price gouging.
Senator McKim did not mince words when he accused Banducci of selectively presenting data to downplay the company's profitability.
'The fact that (Woolworths' return on equity) is 26 per cent in a year where you made $1.7 billion in profits shows that your company is making off like bandits and effectively has a licence to print money,' McKim said.
He accused Woolworths of using its market dominance to pressure suppliers, including farmers, to reduce wages, compromise staff safety, and overcharge customers.
Banducci denied any allegations of price gouging, stating, 'It’s very hard to say that we have price gouging. I would respectfully submit that this is an incredibly competitive market and that is good for consumers.'
He attributed the rising prices at the checkout to grocery inflation, which he claimed was driven by cost increases from global consumer goods suppliers and the cyclical impacts on domestic fresh food markets.
Despite the CEO's assurances, the inquiry comes at a time when many Australians are feeling the pinch of the cost of living crisis.
Banducci's comments about grocery inflation and the competitive market did little to assuage concerns about the affordability of everyday essentials.
This Senate inquiry is not the only challenge Banducci has faced recently.
His resignation from the top job was announced in February following an interview with ABC's Four Corners, where he struggled to answer questions about Woolworths' market share.
Banducci is set to step down as chief executive at the end of August.
Source: YouTube/ABC News (Australia)
As the inquiry continues, with Coles chief executive Leah Weckert also scheduled to appear, the spotlight remains on the practices of Australia's supermarket behemoths.
The inquiry's timing coincides with a review of the voluntary Food and Grocery Code of Conduct, which governs the relationship between supermarkets and suppliers.
The review has recommended that the code be made mandatory, with significant financial penalties for breaches.
Have price increases affected your budget? Do you feel that the market is as competitive as it should be? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
.png){kind=icon}
