Winds of change: Prince William contemplates radical overhaul of British Monarchy

The British monarchy, an institution steeped in centuries of tradition, is no stranger to change.

However, recent reports suggest that the winds of change are blowing with unprecedented force, as Prince William, the Prince of Wales, is said to be considering a radical overhaul of the royal family's future.

This news has sent ripples through the corridors of Buckingham Palace and beyond, reaching all the way to our shores here in Australia, where the monarchy still holds a place in our constitutional framework and public interest.


The concept of a ‘slimmed-down’ monarchy isn't entirely new. King Charles III has long been an advocate for a more streamlined royal family, focusing on the core members and reducing the public cost.

However, the departure of Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, to the United States has accelerated this process, leaving Prince William as the sole working royal of his generation among the Queen's grandchildren.


Screenshot 2024-06-26 090742.jpg
Prince William was reportedly considering a major shift towards a more streamlined monarchy. Credit: Instagram / The Prince and Princess of Wales


The implications of this are significant. With fewer royals to carry out the thousands of official engagements each year, the burden on the remaining members could be immense.

Yet, Prince William's vision, as reported by friends and royal commentators, suggested he is in ‘full agreement’ with his father's lean approach.

This could mean that in the future, when William ascends the throne, the Royal Family might shrink even further.


The traditional image of the royal family, with its balcony appearances and grand ceremonies, could be set for a transformation.

Prince William was reportedly considering whether his own children, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, should even take on full-time royal roles.

‘When the older members of the family retire, [William] won’t be inviting anyone else to become working royals. It remains to be seen if he will even want his two younger children to be working royals,’ a source said.

This is a significant departure from the past, where royal duties were often seen as a birthright and obligation.


The Beast's Tom Sykes supports the idea that the younger Wales children might eventually have ‘jobs’ and ‘lives’.

According to another source, ‘The option isn’t there for George, of course, but the children have been kept at arm’s length from royal life. They are exposed to the minimum possible publicity, and that is a deliberate strategy to let Charlotte and Louis choose their own destiny.’

Prince William's reasoning was said to have been influenced by the turmoil and trauma caused by ‘Megxit’.

‘Although he absolutely puts the blame on Meghan and Harry, he does of course, also appreciate that the whole system, where one of your kids is less important than the other due to an accident of birth, had a massive part to play in what happened and how it happened,’ a friend told Sykes.

‘[The Prince of Wales] doesn’t want to put them through a human mincer that is going to cause everyone misery. He and Catherine adore the children, and their whole lives are about the children. I think they want to find a practical solution to the ‘spare’ problem that has bedevilled the family for generations.’


The ‘spare’ dilemma, as it has been termed, has plagued the royal family for generations. The role of the monarch's second-born has often been fraught with difficulty and dissatisfaction.

History is littered with examples, from Princess Margaret's well-documented struggles to Prince Andrew's recent controversies.

‘I’m sure William and Catherine don’t want history to repeat itself,’ another Royal Family friend told Sykes.

This approach is not without its challenges. Prince George, as the future king, will one day bear the weight of the monarchy on his shoulders.

With a potentially reduced team of working royals, the question arises: How will the institution manage its responsibilities? Will the public accept a monarchy that is less visible and arguably less accessible?


The leaner monarchy might struggle to maintain its workload, which included over 2,000 official engagements last year.

Future palace balcony scenes could be significantly less populated, projecting an image of efficiency but potentially lacking sufficient support.

Princess Anne, in a TV interview, expressed scepticism about the ‘slimmed down’ approach, stating, ‘Well, I think the “slimmed down” was said in a day when there were a few more people around.’

‘It doesn’t sound like a good idea from where I’m standing, I would say. I’m not quite sure what else we can do.’


As Prince William envisions a streamlined future for the monarchy, focusing on a leaner and more efficient royal family, this strategic shift aligns with recent developments within the royal household.

In a significant move that underscores this transformation, King Charles has bestowed exclusive new titles on Prince William and Princess Catherine.

This elevation not only cements their central roles in the monarchy's future but also reflects the evolving dynamics and responsibilities that come with William's planned palace overhaul.
Key Takeaways
  • Prince William is contemplating a significant change to the monarchy, focusing on a leaner royal family structure.
  • The Prince of Wales was reported to be in agreement with King Charles's vision of a streamlined royal family and is not expected to reverse this approach when he ascends the throne.
  • There was reportedly an indication that Prince William and Princess Kate might prefer that their younger children, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, not undertake full-time royal duties, allowing them a chance at more normal lives.
  • Concerns were raised about the future roles and responsibilities of the working royals, especially considering the large number of engagements the family traditionally fulfils, suggesting challenges for Prince George as the future king.
Do you believe a ‘slimmed-down’ monarchy is the right path forward? How do you think these changes will affect the royal family's connection with Australia? We invite you to share your thoughts on this royal revelation in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
when you have the people to do the work why not use them. No one, no matter how strong can cover 2,000 appearances in a year every year without falling apart. Unless Catherine recovers completely and is proven to have no more cancer cells lurking in hidden corners the full weight will land on Charles, CamIlla, Anne and William. It’s time to use the royal cousins in a parttime capacity to help carry out those roles that do not require a senior royal. Why not. make use of Prince Edward and Sophie. They rarely get a mention. I am beginning to wonder if the king has gone a bit power mad. He is 75 and if he keeps up his mother’s pace will drop dead one day in the 5 years. He is also recovering from some sort of less serious cancer. If they become too slim lined people will lose interest in them and see them as hogging the limelight. Not a good idea. Harry and MM got what they deserved. It’s a pity it took so long for it to happen. He was given plenty of chances to repent and apologise and tell the world that what he said was rubbish due to his wife’s mental manipulation of him. But all he did was invent a new “poor me” story
that held no water and was the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back. They are no longer members of the British Royal Family and she hates her own family, which leaves them with nothing.
 
Winds of change: Prince William contemplates radical overhaul of British Monarchy

There was real hope in that headline.
Such as the complete dissolution of the monarchy.

Oh well! One can only dream....
Dissolution might be a step too far.

A significant reduction in the members with titles and public roles would slim down cost and take away a lot of the unnecessary properties, staff and the associated pomp and ceremony.

Royalists, please resist going on the attack, we all have the right to a POV.
 
The Monarchy can't sack the government, the Prime Minister informs the King that he wants to call an election and only then does the Monarch dissolve Parliament in the same way that cannot strip the gruesome twosome of their titles, although they were bestowed by his grandmother they can only taken away by an act of Parliament. The same goes for his Prince of the blood the king can request the government strip them of those as well all his father can do is disown them?
"The Monarchy can't sack the government, the Prime Minister informs the King.........." Yes, I know and that is a most unfortunate state of affairs given the utter anti-social bloody fools whom the Conservative Party, and no-one else, has "recommended" to the Monarch as the Monarch's Prime Minister since 1979. It is the British political party of the day which recommends to the Crown who are to be "Ministers" of the Crown . We voters have no say in that.

Ministers of the Crown are are otherwise merely Members of Parliament voted for by their constituents. Appalling as perhaps seems was the sacking of Gough Whitlam, one hopes that it has set an Australian precedent that future Governors-General will be able to follow if necessary. The Crown commands the Army; the Parliament votes the money for the Army. An important separation of powers harking back to 1660 and one also in Spain, where it helped prevent a Francoist takeover by the military not that long after Franco, and Fascism, had died.
 
.We had a referendum in 1999 on becoming a Republic, but the political parties at the time didn't have an alternative to the Monarchy. I think there talk of a President that would over the job of the Governor General unfortunately there wasn't a coherent idea as to how you could have a neutral one, Labour wanted Labour Liberals wanted Liberal etc etc.
John Howard, a Royalist, was responsible for the failure of the Republican Referendum because of the way he worded the question. He wanted it to fail..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bellclare
There is no doubt that life for the two boys growing into men would have had challenges/pressures that don't exist in the a normal world. It is true I am biased towards Harry. The weak link is Charles, prior to his unfortunate illness, I mean.

I just don't think that either Charles, nor William did enough in the interests of the family. Even now, I think both (esp William) need to think more deeply about this situation. Your first post has good suggestions, once voiced seem obvious. So, does that mean none are interested, which could suggest Harry was the one targeted for blame amongst a dwindling level of support for the RF within their own ranks. No free lunches, so an expectation that some will step up. Would Harry respond. Is he that bad, when viewed against what others have done, yet not proven? Who is lying and who is not.
Is it all just a matter of perspectives.

Why did Harry really choose to leave.
Why did others choose not to support him prior to his decision.
Sure, all families have issues, but the RF have an expectation put on them by the public who support them.
The blame for the dwindling level of support for the RF was that they were not very transparent, the best thing the late Queen did for the royal family was to all stand outside Buckingham Palace bowing their heads as Princess Diana's coffin went by, that is when I believe that support for the RF again was reignited because they were showing respect for the people's princess. Harry has always been much like his great aunt Princess Margaret loving parties, having a great time.
It is true it is a matter of perception, I think Harry chose to leave because Meghan didn't want to be part of the family business because there are rules that they follow as representatives of the RF that she perhaps wasn't comfortable with, didn't know much about or indeed wanted to follow again speculation as we will never really know the real story.
However for me it is the lies that Harry has come out with regarding his childhood and adult life, how no one showed him love, how he found being the second child hard when photo's, film footage, pictures taking by the media show him enjoying himself with his mother, father and brother, at his parties even all the wonderful things he has done when he and his brother wanted to continue helping those countries that still have mines that were killing and maiming children and adults taking over what their mother started.
I am not sure how this will ever be resolved, I am an ordinary person and I myself do not talk to half my family, the difference is I don't air my grievances in the public forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyFlatrock
John Howard, a Royalist, was responsible for the failure of the Republican Referendum because of the way he worded the question. He wanted it to fail..
And that was the one sensible thing he did for Australia.

Having the Head of State ensconced in Mother England and paid for by rents from assorted places in which live assorted loyal subjects means that we don't have to tolerate the hysterical and extremely expensive stupidity that gets inflicted on the citizens of the USA every 4 years. What does it cost to get elected as President of the USA? Umpteen billions of corporate support (sorry corruption), let alone what everyone else contributes.
 
Princess Anne, in a TV interview, expressed scepticism about the ‘slimmed down’ approach, stating, ‘Well, I think the “slimmed down” was said in a day when there were a few more people around.’

‘It doesn’t sound like a good idea from where I’m standing, I would say.

(Sounds like something someone else said a short while back!)

Yep, I agree with her. At least she has both feet on the ground (well at least while she's not falling off a horse!) and not wrapped around a tree somewhere like Chas.

As far as Willy goes,

"Although he absolutely puts the blame on Meghan and Harry, he does of course, also appreciate that the whole system, where one of your kids is less important than the other due to an accident of birth, had a massive part to play in what happened and how it happened,’ a friend told Sykes.

(me - sounds like he is acknowledging the whole thing is a sham based on an accident of birth, but isn't that the thing about the whole RF??).

‘[The Prince of Wales] doesn’t want to put them through a human mincer that is going to cause everyone misery. He and Catherine adore the children, and their whole lives are about the children. I think they want to find a practical solution to the ‘spare’ problem that has bedevilled the family for generations.’"

So they never listened to the concerns Harry was expressing and now they voice those very same concerns about their own children. He's a rippa this bloke!

Should have listened to Harry a while back and Willy might not be in this sticky situation he finds himself. Like Chas, it would seem Willy is coming unstuck by the course of his own actions and his lack of strength in supporting those family members when they needed it.

No good crying about it and blaming others, fix it mate.
Foot stamping, chest-beating and tearing down the very fabric of how the RF works, is that what is happening or is Willy making a genuine attempt to modernise so he no longer has to do the hard yards expected by Pomgollians, of the RF.

Poor form to blame others Willy. Swings and roundabouts mate. Your father didn't do enough to protect your mother and you did not do enough to protect your brother.
Harry is lucky; 600 years ago his head would have been on the block and possibly rolling in the gutter (or displayed on a pike) had he lost the brotherly argument. I wonder if the Tower of London still has facilities to accommodate stroppy younger brothers?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DLHM
Harry is lucky; 600 years ago his head would have been on the block and possibly rolling in the gutter (or displayed on a pike) had he lost the brotherly argument. I wonder if the Tower of London still has facilities to accommodate stroppy younger brothers?
I think the last person that enjoyed what the tower had to offer was William Joyce AKA Lord Haw Haw?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob44
I think the last person that enjoyed what the tower had to offer was William Joyce AKA Lord Haw Haw?
Ah well; Harold Wannabee IX only wore a Nazi armband to a fancy-dress party when a young tyke. A poor sense of humour, if I recall correctly; and perhaps the same lack of judgement about American women as had Grand-uncle Edward. One simply does not do that sort of thing!
 
I don'g give a rats about them, and what they do & don't. They are the wealthiest people on Welfare in the world. Their "working" are going to functions and expensive parties & going to TY TY concerts and movie premieres plus travelling the world.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Veggiepatch
I don'g give a rats about them, and what they do & don't. They are the wealthiest people on Welfare in the world. Their "working" are going to functions and expensive parties & going to TY TY concerts and movie premieres plus travelling the world.
What people don't seem to realise just how they make for the country and that the people want them, which doesn't cost anybody in Australia anything.
 
Princess Anne, in a TV interview, expressed scepticism about the ‘slimmed down’ approach, stating, ‘Well, I think the “slimmed down” was said in a day when there were a few more people around.’

‘It doesn’t sound like a good idea from where I’m standing, I would say.

(Sounds like something someone else said a short while back!)

Yep, I agree with her. At least she has both feet on the ground (well at least while she's not falling off a horse!) and not wrapped around a tree somewhere like Chas.

As far as Willy goes,

"Although he absolutely puts the blame on Meghan and Harry, he does of course, also appreciate that the whole system, where one of your kids is less important than the other due to an accident of birth, had a massive part to play in what happened and how it happened,’ a friend told Sykes.

(me - sounds like he is acknowledging the whole thing is a sham based on an accident of birth, but isn't that the thing about the whole RF??).

‘[The Prince of Wales] doesn’t want to put them through a human mincer that is going to cause everyone misery. He and Catherine adore the children, and their whole lives are about the children. I think they want to find a practical solution to the ‘spare’ problem that has bedevilled the family for generations.’"

So they never listened to the concerns Harry was expressing and now they voice those very same concerns about their own children. He's a rippa this bloke!

Should have listened to Harry a while back and Willy might not be in this sticky situation he finds himself. Like Chas, it would seem Willy is coming unstuck by the course of his own actions and his lack of strength in supporting those family members when they needed it.

No good crying about it and blaming others, fix it mate.
Foot stamping, chest-beating and tearing down the very fabric of how the RF works, is that what is happening or is Willy making a genuine attempt to modernise so he no longer has to do the hard yards expected by Pomgollians, of the RF.

Poor form to blame others Willy. Swings and roundabouts mate. Your father didn't do enough to protect your mother and you did not do enough to protect your brother.
Chas III may hug trees; El wannabe Presidente PC Dutton wants to hug 7 nuclear reactors. I go for the bloke that wants to hug trees.
 
Chas III may hug trees; El wannabe Presidente PC Dutton wants to hug 7 nuclear reactors. I go for the bloke that wants to hug trees.

Huh, I would abstain or find another.

I could behave in a supercilious manner and suggest they could both have hugged their sons more than that mentioned, but I can't.

As a tree hugger, Charlie is the Douglas fir of the UK tree world, although an unlikely venue for his final chosen species the drop-bear. As a leader of of any sort, family included, he has failed, not just his family, but also a nation. He does not possess the firs spine.

Pedro the fisherman does not want to hug nuclear reactors, his casual, yet titillating embrace is purely based on lessons learnt during the Yes campaign and by watching within and elsewhere.

If you trump up with enough spin and treat lies as facts you can confuse enough mugs to win.

If you bait the other into wandering down ur simple path, then his/the complex fix can easily be challenged with factlies. Fat lies meant to say.😎

The arrogance of the failed marketer already forgotten and replaced with a new arrogance, directly in the face of the masses who threw out the arrogant embracer of things trump.

Very difficult to embrace something if you have nfi about it.
 
Not using royals who are being a burden on the coffers of the general public is one thing but scaling down to almost no one will only I believe end the royal family and they will become like many other royal families around the world just in title only. I am a royalist and think that would be tragic, but I do think that Andrews children should be doing something to earn their keep considering their father is no longer wanted due to his past connections. I also think that Princess Anne's children should be included as well, it is all well and good that they go to the races but there must be other events that they can attend to take some of the burden off those who are always attending events. Prince Edward's children as they get older could also help out with events as their son and daughter would inherit his wealth.
Prince Andrews girls have "real jobs out in the real world" as well as royal duties, I'm not sure about Zara does other than {it seems to me} party and have a podcast
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×