This $806 mistake could cost you next time you're at the beach—learn what NOT to do!

For many, a day at the beach with our furry friends can be one of life's simple pleasures. The sun, the sand, and the sea create a perfect backdrop for making memories with our beloved pets.

However, dog owners must stay informed about local regulations to avoid turning a day of fun into a costly affair.

This is a lesson that one resident learned the hard way, resulting in a fine that has left the dog-loving community talking.


Gold Coast dog owner John's routine of taking his pet poodle, Emma, for a kayak ride at Budds Beach in Surfers Paradise has been a staple of their lives for over a decade.

However, a recent outing ended with a shock when John was fined for having Emma unrestrained during their short walk from his van to the water's edge.

The $806 fine wasn't for the kayaking itself but for the brief moment when Emma was off-leash on the beach.


Screenshot 2024-11-05 103922.jpg
A Gold Coast dog owner was fined $806 for walking his dog off-lead for 10 metres to the beach, despite doing so without incident for 11 years. Credit: YouTube / 9 News Australia


This hefty fine is part of a statewide crackdown in Queensland, where authorities are taking a firmer stance on dog control in public spaces.

The crackdown follows a rise in serious dog attacks, prompting the government to more than double on-the-spot fines from $322 to $806.

The message is clear: dog owners must ensure their pets are under effective control at all times in public areas.


The enforcement of these rules can sometimes feel heavy-handed, as was the case for another Queensland business owner, Robyn, who faced the same fine for having her dog on a lead under her foot rather than in her hand while taking a coffee break outside her store in Moffat Beach on the Sunshine Coast

Similar to Robyn, John was confused about how the council determined he was being irresponsible.

He described the situation as ‘very unfair’, arguing that it involved just a few metres and had never been a problem before.

‘Just before I got to the water, [the council worker] ran up with his partner and said “Hey mate, stop, I wanna talk to you,” and he just swopped in and started asking me questions,’ he recounted.

The council officer reportedly requested his name and address but did not mention anything about a fine.

Therefore, John was taken aback when he received a phone call days later informing him that he was ‘guilty of having a dog off a lead’.

It was at that point that he received an $806 fine for ‘failure to exercise effective control of a non-regulated dog in a public place’.


There are reportedly signs further down the beach indicating that dogs must be leashed at all times. However, during their walk, John insists that Emma is always on a lead.

‘But I wasn't wandering along a footpath or in public areas. I was just travelling a few metres from the car to the water. I really didn't think that I was doing anything wrong,’ he explained.

According to the Gold Coast City Council, ‘Officers will provide both an enforcement and educational approach when issuing infringements.’

However, John feels that a warning would have been more appropriate, given his clean history with Emma.


The recent hefty fine imposed on John for having his dog off-lead at the beach has sparked a debate about pet regulations and enforcement.

Many dog owners feel frustrated and unfairly targeted, particularly during a statewide crackdown on leash rules.

This situation has led to a broader discussion about the balance between public safety and pet ownership rights, as more dog lovers voice their concerns about strict regulations, like those seen in a controversial beach ban that has ignited outrage among pet owners.
Key Takeaways
  • A dog owner on the Gold Coast received a substantial $806 fine for walking his dog unrestrained for 10 metres to the beach, despite having done so for 11 years without issue.
  • The fine was part of a statewide crackdown in Queensland following a rise in serious dog attacks, with fines more than doubling for not controlling dogs in public spaces.
  • The dog owner believes he did nothing wrong as he was only moving from the car to the water, where the dog would usually be on a leash or in the kayak.
  • The Gold Coast City Council stated that their officers aim to both educate and enforce when issuing fines, but the dog owner argues that a warning would have been more appropriate in his case.
At the Seniors Discount Club, we understand that many of our members enjoy the companionship of their pets and the joy of outdoor activities. We encourage you to share your thoughts and experiences on this topic.

Have you encountered similar regulations in your area? How do you ensure that a day out with your pet remains enjoyable and fine-free? Let's discuss this in the comments below and help each other stay informed and prepared for our next beach adventure with our four-legged friends.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Yes I can understand that dogs need to be on a lead, but it's the high penalties for relatively minor offences that are ridiculous!
Another case of soft targets being stung harder than what the real criminals are getting these days (been several car thefts/home invasions in my small town in the last few short weeks, including a case of a shot being fired at police & these scumbags are getting let off on bail (which they then breach) - I'm not sure they even got charged for the firearm offence, (possibly due to one of the thugs evading police & the firearm unable to be located) but rather a dangerous driving charge & off they go & continue to do the same crap again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes
Yes I was quite traumatised by an incident at my local beach involving my Jack Russell Rosie. My husband and I were at an isolated beach in Perth going for an early morning swim Along came a ranger and a policeman. They literally swooped on Rosie and very aggressively advised we should have her on a lead. We have used this small rocky cove for years - there wereno signs prohibiting dogs, Rosie was well behaved and she was swimming with us. I did complain about the way they approached us and later received a fine. Can’t remember how much but it meant we were out of pocket and we had to stop taking our little dog for a swim. Another example of people not having controlled dogs affecting those who are no trouble to anyone. It was quite a few years ago but it was quite traumatic
Yes what's most annoying is the ones offending that do attack seem to get off with nothing or a slap on the wrist! Law seems to protect the crims these days & target the weaker generally law obiding community members .. doesn't make sense!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes and what
These fines are not about public safety, but about the Government trying to fill their coffers after out of control spending, trying to get reelected. The expenditure didn't work so it is now time to look at the enormity of the fines and reduce them to a reasonable level which is commensurate with the "crime"
Yep, it's all about revenue raising, so councils and governments can squander it on fripperies. 😣😫🤮
 
  • Like
Reactions: what
how else do you expect The Gold Coast City Council is going to make more money.In this case with a little poodle i think a warning should have been enough
Most fines are money grubbing for councils, bunch of officious rangers. Probably get a kick back for fining people over almost nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes
This was ridiculous when you see bigger vicious dogs attacking people and other small dogs....Emma has probably done this same thing for so long and all she would be thinking of is getting to the water, not attacking someone !!
Some breeds of dogs should be banned in Australia, whether they are used as guard dogs or not, they're dangerous animals and a lot of the time their owners train them to attack.
How many small dogs have been attacked by these dangerous dogs when they break free from their
backyard !! And not forgetting the number of humans attacked by these vicious mongrels, including small children.
These are the owners the councils should be concentrating on, not responsible owners who do the right thing with their dogs 99% of the time! 😡
I am absolutely disgusted with this comment about big dogs always being the attacker, I walk big dogs and the amount of times I have had to protect the dog I'm walking from some little shit dog that has a chip on it's shoulder and wants to take on the world. The stats show which is the aggressor, usually the little mongrels, but it is always the big dog that gets the blame because they protect them selves and of cause the little shit is going to come off second best. It is about time people didn't think it is funny when little ones barking and carry on at big dogs and CONTROLLED THEM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes
Beautifully flowery ideals. I think most of us live in the real world.
Maybe I grew up in a different reality, in a country where people learn to be responsible and take the consequences of their actions, instead of constantly blaming others ... "the council should have put a sign up here, not 2 m away where I couldnt see it" is one of my favourites. Then jumping head first in and if get hurt claim for compensation... But I suppose its not the real world anymore to expect common sense, consideration and responsibility.... sad, isnt it?
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×