Super tax breaks face review as government weighs impact on retirement savings

If you’ve been following the headlines, you may have seen the growing debate around superannuation and tax breaks for retirees.

The government’s recent three-day productivity roundtable put the spotlight on the future of retirement savings, with younger Australians pushing for a 'fair go' in the tax system.

The discussion has raised big questions about how changes could affect your financial future and what they might mean for your retirement plans. Here’s a closer look at what’s driving the debate.


Treasurer Jim Chalmers has come out swinging in defence of retirees, saying that concessional (favourable) tax treatment on superannuation is here to stay—for now, at least.

According to Chalmers, these tax breaks are crucial to encourage Australians to save for their retirement, and the government isn’t planning to change them any time soon.


1756091435251.png
Tax concessions on superannuation for retirees were said to be deserved, with no current plans for changes announced. Credit: sarah1810 / iStock


'They still deserve concessional treatment to encourage people to be in superannuation, and that’s not something that we have been proposing to change,' Chalmers said.

That’s a sigh of relief for many of us who’ve spent decades building up our super, counting on those tax breaks to make our savings last.

But it’s not all smooth sailing. The roundtable also highlighted growing concerns about 'intergenerational equity'—in other words, making sure the tax system is fair for both older and younger Australians.


With the cost of living rising and home ownership slipping out of reach for many young people, some are calling for changes to things like capital gains tax, negative gearing, and even the GST.

Chalmers acknowledged these concerns, saying, 'We need to ensure, collectively as Australians, that the fair go is the defining part of our future and not just the defining part of our past.'

But don’t worry—he also made it clear that the government won’t be rushing into any major reforms.

'The best way to work out any additional steps beyond that is to do that in the government’s usual consultative and considered way, which is what we’re doing,' he said.

You might have heard about the government’s proposed changes to tax on super balances over $3 million.


Chalmers described this as a 'modest but meaningful' change to make the system more sustainable.

The good news? It won’t be coming into effect until the second half of next year, and it’s not being rushed through parliament.

For most retirees, this won’t make a difference—only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected. But it’s a sign that the government is looking for ways to balance the books without hitting everyday Aussies too hard.

The roundtable also discussed other possible tax reforms, like a road user charge for electric vehicle drivers.

Chalmers was quick to reassure petrol car owners that they won’t be taxed twice if such a measure is introduced.


Meanwhile, the opposition is keeping a close eye on government spending. Shadow treasurer Ted O’Brien warned that if the government keeps spending, new taxes might be on the cards.

'When you can’t control your spending, you’re just going to increase debt and increase taxes. That’s pretty clear,' he said.

For now, the message from the government is clear: retirees’ super tax breaks are safe, and any changes will be made slowly and with plenty of consultation.

But with ongoing debates about fairness between generations, it’s wise to keep an eye on the news and stay informed about any potential changes.

Superannuation is one of the cornerstones of retirement planning in Australia. The concessional tax treatment—meaning you pay less tax on your super contributions and earnings—helps your savings grow faster, giving you more to live on in your golden years.


For many over-60s, these tax breaks are the difference between a comfortable retirement and just scraping by.

But as Australia’s population ages and the government faces increasing pressure to fund health, aged care, and other services, the debate over how to pay for it all is only going to get louder.
Key Takeaways
  • Treasurer Jim Chalmers says retirees still deserve tax concessions on their superannuation, with no current plans to change these measures.
  • The government is considering fairness for younger Australians in any future tax reforms, but won’t rush into changes, emphasising a consultative approach.
  • While there are calls for broader tax reform—including changes to capital gains tax and negative gearing—the treasurer confirmed policies in these areas remain unchanged for now.
  • Proposed changes to tax on super balances over $3 million will not be introduced to parliament in the upcoming sitting fortnight, but will be brought forward eventually.
Have you been following the debate? Are you concerned about possible changes to your super? Or do you think it’s time for a shake-up to make things fairer for younger Aussies? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Read more: ‘The new super tax has been designed to excuse long-serving politicians': And it’s causing outrage
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
"...only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected."

Don't be fooled - it STARTS with only those with $3 million, but next it will be $1 million, then it will be $500K... The filthy effers can't seem to keep their hands off our money...
It's not just the risk of the level reducing, or inflation pushing everyone above $3 mil. It's the economic harm that is inevitable from taxing unrealised gains, which is unbelievably stupid and has been proven to wipe out innovation and new enterprise and actually REDUCE the total tax take because of the investors fleeing the country. Three other nations have tried it and all have suffered. Two reversed very quickly when they saw the harm it did. One is struggling with a total tax take having reduced dramatically. The US considered it and abandoned the idea when they realised how much harm it would do

People need to stop hating the rich and thinking attacking them in any way we can is smart. It's STUPID. And people need to look past the lies politicians tell to push their agenda and understand what the real consequences of a policy will be. It's never what those pushing it claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I agree the 5% deposit policy is dumb, but this claim that any reasonable house costs $1m is just nonsense. There are estates popping up all around my in Nth Brisbane with homes being bought by young ordinary working couples for prices from $515,000. That's for 3 bed, 2 bath, single garage - brand new brick and tile in nice estates with parkland and facilities. Half the problem with home affordability is unrealistic expectations. Past generations of working class folk didn't even dream of butler pantries, ensuites, multiple living areas... much less landscaped yards and new furniture and newest SUVs in the garage. Most regarded it as quite normal for the kids to share bedrooms.
I could buy land in good quality suburbs in Brisbane today and build a brand new 4-bedroom 2.5 bath home with 3 living areas and a butler pantry and covered alfresco and upmarket fittings and fixtures for well under $1 million. The same is true of most cities. And in country towns the prices are much lower.

How many young folk can save $50K? Wow! My granddaughter is still at school and has saved enough from a part time job to holiday in Fiji at the end of this year and still have considerable savings left over. My grandson spend a year abroad before starting uni, fully funded from his savings working part time while still at school. So I reckon workers should be able to easily save $50K over a few years between school and marriage. Certainly couples with both working should put that much away very quickly between marriage and starting a family. Live on one wage and save the other. Should be easily achievable.
They can’t save as they are too busy spending having a good time ,not thinking about their future , it will dawn on them when it’s too late that they have wasted their life and money .
 
Politicians should not be treated any different tn other taxpayers like police or other high risk jobs. At the moment they can retire with very little time spent as a politician and still work at a highly paid job and receive the pension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
Chalmers is a greedy pig. I hope you don’t have a spare room, because you will be taxed on it! I have never heard anything more ridiculous in my life. We will have to invent a sewing room, student weekend accommodation, and some other arrangement. How dare this greedy mongrel, tax our fully paid family home, which serves as a holiday home for my wheelchair bound daughter who has MS. A specially designed rebuilt home, with wide corridors to accommodate her needs. This is the greediest government ever. I hope they burn in hell!
In WWII , I was a child . If you had a spare room it was compulsary to take in a boarder. My parents had to let a room to a wife of one of the airmen stationed at the airfield in our rural town in Sth Aust jay2
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I would sincerely hope that those of us who are already retired and elderly see no changes in the super rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
so the only super to be effected will be those super funds over $3 million in about 4/5yrs that will be almost every superfund. when I retired I had the enormous sum of $300 000 in my super, today thats basic poverty level retirement wise (my son earns $130 000 pa as a mechanic....I figure every home owner is at present a millionaire or will be within a couple of years, god help the singles coming up in a country full millionaires and most property sales are to people with 2,3,or 4 properties and why not. buying another property is better than paying tax why is a second property tax deductible and not a first, the odds are against the the home dweller and for the property accumilater by way of negative gearing, so which would anyone prefer to pay $$$$tax...or same amount to pay for tax deductable2nd house purchase, one COSTS money and the other MAKES money...the rich get richer......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I would sincerely hope that those of us who are already retired and elderly see no changes in the super rules.
ha ha ha ...good one
 
"...only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected."

Don't be fooled - it STARTS with only those with $3 million, but next it will be $1 million, then it will be $500K... The filthy effers can't seem to keep their hands off our money...
I remember when they were going to tax the houses of the rich....that was when a Sydney house could be bought for around $80 000, rich folk were buying houses for around. $4 /500 000
 
The tax on $3 mil plus super is NOT a good idea, because the proposal is to impose it on unrealised gains, and that is patently stupid and will do massive harm to the overall economy. It was tried in 3 other countries and slashed the total tax take and GDP, because investors took their money off-shore. Imposed here, it will drive venture capital (and therefore innovation and inventions) and startup enterprises (the ones that would otherwise grow rapidly) off shore. It's been sold with a lot of dishonesty, making people believe it will only. impact the rich. It will impact the poor far more, by reducing productivity and potentially costing much more than it yields. (The idea was touted in the US and abandoned because it was calculated to impose a cost more than double what It would yield - and that was without knowing just how much investment would reduce.)

Why are diesel subsidies mad? Do you want to bankrupt the farmers who produce our fresh food? Personally, I think we should be supporting farmers. We need them. Sure, there are some who are very rich, but most are battling. A lot have been forced off their land by anti-farmer government policies.
how long will it be till $3 mil is the price of the average home(bearing in mind the average person over 30 in australia is /or nearly is a millionaire....aussie the land of millionairs
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×