Super tax breaks face review as government weighs impact on retirement savings

If you’ve been following the headlines, you may have seen the growing debate around superannuation and tax breaks for retirees.

The government’s recent three-day productivity roundtable put the spotlight on the future of retirement savings, with younger Australians pushing for a 'fair go' in the tax system.

The discussion has raised big questions about how changes could affect your financial future and what they might mean for your retirement plans. Here’s a closer look at what’s driving the debate.


Treasurer Jim Chalmers has come out swinging in defence of retirees, saying that concessional (favourable) tax treatment on superannuation is here to stay—for now, at least.

According to Chalmers, these tax breaks are crucial to encourage Australians to save for their retirement, and the government isn’t planning to change them any time soon.


1756091435251.png
Tax concessions on superannuation for retirees were said to be deserved, with no current plans for changes announced. Credit: sarah1810 / iStock


'They still deserve concessional treatment to encourage people to be in superannuation, and that’s not something that we have been proposing to change,' Chalmers said.

That’s a sigh of relief for many of us who’ve spent decades building up our super, counting on those tax breaks to make our savings last.

But it’s not all smooth sailing. The roundtable also highlighted growing concerns about 'intergenerational equity'—in other words, making sure the tax system is fair for both older and younger Australians.


With the cost of living rising and home ownership slipping out of reach for many young people, some are calling for changes to things like capital gains tax, negative gearing, and even the GST.

Chalmers acknowledged these concerns, saying, 'We need to ensure, collectively as Australians, that the fair go is the defining part of our future and not just the defining part of our past.'

But don’t worry—he also made it clear that the government won’t be rushing into any major reforms.

'The best way to work out any additional steps beyond that is to do that in the government’s usual consultative and considered way, which is what we’re doing,' he said.

You might have heard about the government’s proposed changes to tax on super balances over $3 million.


Chalmers described this as a 'modest but meaningful' change to make the system more sustainable.

The good news? It won’t be coming into effect until the second half of next year, and it’s not being rushed through parliament.

For most retirees, this won’t make a difference—only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected. But it’s a sign that the government is looking for ways to balance the books without hitting everyday Aussies too hard.

The roundtable also discussed other possible tax reforms, like a road user charge for electric vehicle drivers.

Chalmers was quick to reassure petrol car owners that they won’t be taxed twice if such a measure is introduced.


Meanwhile, the opposition is keeping a close eye on government spending. Shadow treasurer Ted O’Brien warned that if the government keeps spending, new taxes might be on the cards.

'When you can’t control your spending, you’re just going to increase debt and increase taxes. That’s pretty clear,' he said.

For now, the message from the government is clear: retirees’ super tax breaks are safe, and any changes will be made slowly and with plenty of consultation.

But with ongoing debates about fairness between generations, it’s wise to keep an eye on the news and stay informed about any potential changes.

Superannuation is one of the cornerstones of retirement planning in Australia. The concessional tax treatment—meaning you pay less tax on your super contributions and earnings—helps your savings grow faster, giving you more to live on in your golden years.


For many over-60s, these tax breaks are the difference between a comfortable retirement and just scraping by.

But as Australia’s population ages and the government faces increasing pressure to fund health, aged care, and other services, the debate over how to pay for it all is only going to get louder.
Key Takeaways
  • Treasurer Jim Chalmers says retirees still deserve tax concessions on their superannuation, with no current plans to change these measures.
  • The government is considering fairness for younger Australians in any future tax reforms, but won’t rush into changes, emphasising a consultative approach.
  • While there are calls for broader tax reform—including changes to capital gains tax and negative gearing—the treasurer confirmed policies in these areas remain unchanged for now.
  • Proposed changes to tax on super balances over $3 million will not be introduced to parliament in the upcoming sitting fortnight, but will be brought forward eventually.
Have you been following the debate? Are you concerned about possible changes to your super? Or do you think it’s time for a shake-up to make things fairer for younger Aussies? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Read more: ‘The new super tax has been designed to excuse long-serving politicians': And it’s causing outrage
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
They are not touching my hard earned life savings... all pollies put us in debt -they should not get pay rises for the next 10yrs & no retirement perks when they retire ...
 
Agree withe the generational inequity. Any grandparent would be.
The tax on 3 million plus super is a good idea also need to review negative gearing on more than one property. However while all the attention is on these options I'm not hearing boo about the pilfering of our gas resources or any mention of the off road diesel subsidies. So if we're talking equity let's start with those doing the bulk of the rip offs.
 
We had to put into our superannuation, young ones have the superannuation guarantee where their employers pay it not them !!! Young ones want everything given to them and not spend a penny for their future. Maybe when they reach retirement age there will not be any pension at all and they will be destitute and living in parks and under bridges because they have nothing.
 
Chalmers is a greedy pig. I hope you don’t have a spare room, because you will be taxed on it! I have never heard anything more ridiculous in my life. We will have to invent a sewing room, student weekend accommodation, and some other arrangement. How dare this greedy mongrel, tax our fully paid family home, which serves as a holiday home for my wheelchair bound daughter who has MS. A specially designed rebuilt home, with wide corridors to accommodate her needs. This is the greediest government ever. I hope they burn in hell!
 
Chalmers is a greedy pig. I hope you don’t have a spare room, because you will be taxed on it! I have never heard anything more ridiculous in my life. We will have to invent a sewing room, student weekend accommodation, and some other arrangement. How dare this greedy mongrel, tax our fully paid family home, which serves as a holiday home for my wheelchair bound daughter who has MS. A specially designed rebuilt home, with wide corridors to accommodate her needs. This is the greediest government ever. I hope they burn in hell!
Anyone who can afford to have a holiday home should pay tax on it. So many people can't afford even one home so a 2nd home is, in effect, income producing. If someone in your family, including you, the owner, uses it for holidays then that should be taxed as income which you have gained by not paying for your holiday accommodation. I do sympathise with your daughter & agree she should be able to have holidays, but the rent/accommodation fees she would have paid elsewhere is hidden income for you.
 
I have to laugh just a tad.
With Albo's BIG announcement for 1st home buyers, with a 5% deposit.
With the price of any reasonable house of $1m, how many younger house buyers can save $50k's.
By the time they save up that money, no doubt, the price of houses will have jumped quite considerably.
 
Chalmers is a greedy pig. I hope you don’t have a spare room, because you will be taxed on it! I have never heard anything more ridiculous in my life. We will have to invent a sewing room, student weekend accommodation, and some other arrangement. How dare this greedy mongrel, tax our fully paid family home, which serves as a holiday home for my wheelchair bound daughter who has MS. A specially designed rebuilt home, with wide corridors to accommodate her needs. This is the greediest government ever. I hope they burn in hell!
Hi Gezzabel,

Good one by you.
"Luv" your 1st 2 & your last 2 sentences.
I couldn't put it any better.
Keep it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
Anyone who can afford to have a holiday home should pay tax on it. So many people can't afford even one home so a 2nd home is, in effect, income producing. If someone in your family, including you, the owner, uses it for holidays then that should be taxed as income which you have gained by not paying for your holiday accommodation. I do sympathise with your daughter & agree she should be able to have holidays, but the rent/accommodation fees she would have paid elsewhere is hidden income for you.
Hi elaine41,
You may have to re read Gezzabel's posting.
"G" doesn't mention anything about owning a holiday home.
It's their own home, where her wheel chair bound daughter comes to visit for a holiday.
 
Agree withe the generational inequity. Any grandparent would be.
The tax on 3 million plus super is a good idea also need to review negative gearing on more than one property. However while all the attention is on these options I'm not hearing boo about the pilfering of our gas resources or any mention of the off road diesel subsidies. So if we're talking equity let's start with those doing the bulk of the rip offs.
The tax on $3 mil plus super is NOT a good idea, because the proposal is to impose it on unrealised gains, and that is patently stupid and will do massive harm to the overall economy. It was tried in 3 other countries and slashed the total tax take and GDP, because investors took their money off-shore. Imposed here, it will drive venture capital (and therefore innovation and inventions) and startup enterprises (the ones that would otherwise grow rapidly) off shore. It's been sold with a lot of dishonesty, making people believe it will only. impact the rich. It will impact the poor far more, by reducing productivity and potentially costing much more than it yields. (The idea was touted in the US and abandoned because it was calculated to impose a cost more than double what It would yield - and that was without knowing just how much investment would reduce.)

Why are diesel subsidies mad? Do you want to bankrupt the farmers who produce our fresh food? Personally, I think we should be supporting farmers. We need them. Sure, there are some who are very rich, but most are battling. A lot have been forced off their land by anti-farmer government policies.
 
While I might not like my landlord, I am sure that Albo has a spare bedroom or two in his new house that should be available. How and where do I apply to rent it?
Let's also be supplied with bedrooms available in the houses of ALL the parliamentarians who are in favour of taxing "spare" bedrooms
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie and Squizzy1
It's nice to hear that retiree super is safe - for now - but reform to tax on super in accumulation mode is long overdue. Not that this govt is likely to care about the huge inequity it creates. The high income earners are winning, so they are not likely to fix the problem. But the cost of superannuation tax concessions in earning phase is almost as high as the total cost of the aged pension, and 80% of it goes to the wealthy. High income earners are paying 30% less tax on their super contributions and earnings than on their income, while low income earners pay more on their super contributions and earnings than on their wages. How is that fair?
This 'generational inequity' is a myth. It's not generational. It's class-based. A lot of older folk are living in poverty. The majority are struggling.

And Chalmers is lying to everyone claiming he's only impacting the wealthy with taxes on super over $3 million. He is not telling us how much harm taxing unrealised gains threatens to the overall economy and total tax take. It's been proven a disaster in 3 other countries. The US proposed it and quickly abandoned the idea when they realised it would drastically reduce the total tax take by driving innovation and new enterprise off shore. But Chalmers declares "we don't typically look at what happens in other countries". No. Stupid is as stupid does - or maybe the goal is to destroy our economy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
I have to laugh just a tad.
With Albo's BIG announcement for 1st home buyers, with a 5% deposit.
With the price of any reasonable house of $1m, how many younger house buyers can save $50k's.
By the time they save up that money, no doubt, the price of houses will have jumped quite considerably.
I agree the 5% deposit policy is dumb, but this claim that any reasonable house costs $1m is just nonsense. There are estates popping up all around my in Nth Brisbane with homes being bought by young ordinary working couples for prices from $515,000. That's for 3 bed, 2 bath, single garage - brand new brick and tile in nice estates with parkland and facilities. Half the problem with home affordability is unrealistic expectations. Past generations of working class folk didn't even dream of butler pantries, ensuites, multiple living areas... much less landscaped yards and new furniture and newest SUVs in the garage. Most regarded it as quite normal for the kids to share bedrooms.
I could buy land in good quality suburbs in Brisbane today and build a brand new 4-bedroom 2.5 bath home with 3 living areas and a butler pantry and covered alfresco and upmarket fittings and fixtures for well under $1 million. The same is true of most cities. And in country towns the prices are much lower.

How many young folk can save $50K? Wow! My granddaughter is still at school and has saved enough from a part time job to holiday in Fiji at the end of this year and still have considerable savings left over. My grandson spend a year abroad before starting uni, fully funded from his savings working part time while still at school. So I reckon workers should be able to easily save $50K over a few years between school and marriage. Certainly couples with both working should put that much away very quickly between marriage and starting a family. Live on one wage and save the other. Should be easily achievable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squizzy1
We had to put into our superannuation, young ones have the superannuation guarantee where their employers pay it not them !!! Young ones want everything given to them and not spend a penny for their future. Maybe when they reach retirement age there will not be any pension at all and they will be destitute and living in parks and under bridges because they have nothing.
I think part of the problem young folk face (those on lower incomes) is that 12% of their income is taken for super, leaving a lot less to save for a home. It makes no sense. It's well recognised that a home of one's own is the best security one can have in retirement. Let them draw from their super to buy a very first modest home, with a proviso that they must put more in later, when they are established, to compensate. They would be far better off in retirement. Having saved decades of ever-increasing rent, they could easily accrue far more in super than if they were forced to rent, and buying earlier in life means they pay only a fraction of the cost. What is the use of $1 m in super if they have to spend most of it to buy a home on retirement? It's crazy.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Squizzy1
I have to laugh just a tad.
With Albo's BIG announcement for 1st home buyers, with a 5% deposit.
With the price of any reasonable house of $1m, how many younger house buyers can save $50k's.
By the time they save up that money, no doubt, the price of houses will have jumped quite considerably.
So your fix is??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squizzy1
"...only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected."

Don't be fooled - it STARTS with only those with $3 million, but next it will be $1 million, then it will be $500K... The filthy effers can't seem to keep their hands off our money...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
They are not touching my hard earned life savings... all pollies put us in debt -they should not get pay rises for the next 10yrs & no retirement perks when they retire ...
Funny, don't touch mine, but I would love to touch your super, perks, etc.
 
"...only those with super balances above $3 million will be affected."

Don't be fooled - it STARTS with only those with $3 million, but next it will be $1 million, then it will be $500K... The filthy effers can't seem to keep their hands off our money...
So u agree +$3m should still enjoy concessions?
 
Hi Gezzabel,

Good one by you.
"Luv" your 1st 2 & your last 2 sentences.
I couldn't put it any better.
Keep it up.
Chalmers is not proposing such a tax, ur wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Miss Chris

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×