State unlocks $100 million funding for its healthcare system! See how these changes can benefit senior Aussies

As we age, healthcare plays a vital role in our lives.

Regular checkups are essential when it comes to managing chronic conditions.

A state announced their plan to improve healthcare services for its citizens soon, especially for those awaiting surgery.


The Queensland government revealed a $100 million funding injection aimed at reducing the elective surgery backlog.

This financial commitment could benefit about 10,000 Queenslanders over the next six months.

Queenslanders awaiting procedures such as knee replacements and tonsillectomies could see this financial boost as a boon for their conditions.


compressed-QLD Health.jpeg
Patients with pending surgeries may get the services they need soon thanks to Surgery Connect. Image Credit: Queensland Health


The initiative, called Surgery Connect, was a collaborative effort between public and private healthcare sectors.

It should allow patients from the public health system to access elective surgeries in private hospitals.

Surgery Connect could alleviate the pressure on public facilities and expedite patient care.


The recent statistics underscored the urgency of this measure.

As of the December quarter, 66,632 Queenslanders have been on the elective surgery wait list—indicating a 2,000-patient increase from the previous quarter.

Health Minister Tim Nicholls confidently shared that the additional funding will deliver around 10,000 extra surgeries by the end of June.

'We will be working with more than 60 private partners to help deliver the boost to Surgery Connect across ENT, general surgery, orthopaedics, urology, ophthalmology, gynaecology and plastics,' Minister Nicholls stated.

'Within weeks, if not days, the private hospital system can ramp up to accept those patients.'


Despite the proactive steps, several figures criticised the initiative.

Shadow Health Minister Mark Bailey believed that the start of the LNP's term was 'disappointing'.

'More than 2,500 extra Queenslanders are waiting for surgery; a huge surge of eight per cent of people waiting for surgery beyond the clinically recommended times,' Minister Bailey pointed out.

Ramsay Health's Chief Executive Carmel Monaghan highlighted Queensland as the national benchmark for elective surgeries, even with the recent uptick in wait times.

'It is one thing that Queensland does get right,' Ms Monaghan said.


Australian Medical Association Queensland's president, Dr Nick Yim, welcomed the $100 million investment.

However, Dr Yim still called for systemic changes to address the backlog fundamentally.

'This includes expanding operating hours and surgical scheduling to deliver all-day lists and seven-day elective surgeries where workforce permits, and enable private patients with private billings to be treated in public hospitals,' Dr Yim expounded.

'We also need to see the doctors from rural and regional areas prioritised in specialist trainee selection processes and increases in specialist and subspecialty training in the regions.'

In addition to the elective surgery funding, Queensland saw a decline in ambulance ramping figures.

The prevalence of ramped patients dropped to 39.1 per cent in the December quarter, down from 41.6 per cent in the September quarter.

The ambulance ramping rate in Queensland reached an all-time high of 44.7 per cent in June last year.


Health Minister Nicholls attributed these improvements to seasonal factors and the government's efforts.

Minister Nicholls also announced that ramping figures should now be released monthly instead of quarterly to provide timely and accurate data.

The LNP committed to reducing ambulance ramping below 30 per cent by the end of its first term.

However, Minister Bailey still urged the government to include real-time data on ramping.

For seniors who are due for surgery soon, these developments could mean shorter wait times for necessary surgeries and improved emergency services.

If you or a loved one is awaiting elective surgery, this funding boost could be the key to receiving timely medical attention.
Key Takeaways

  • The Queensland government committed $100 million for elective surgery, which could benefit 10,000 Queenslanders in the next six months.
  • Surgery Connect should facilitate elective surgeries for public health patients in private hospitals, helping address the increasing elective surgery waitlist.
  • Queensland Health Minister and health industry professionals believed that the funding could aid the situation. However, systemic reforms could also create more sustainable solutions to the problem at hand.
  • Queensland showed a decrease in ambulance ramping figures, with the latest data indicating a fall to 39.1 per cent.
We encourage you to discuss with your healthcare provider how this initiative might impact your treatment plan. How do you feel about the government's approach to tackling the elective surgery backlog and ambulance ramping? We invite you to share your thoughts and experiences with the healthcare system in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Great precedent set by Qld. Come on and quickly follow suit all you other States! There is a problem in every State with elective surgery with a lot of those surgeries not deemed 'elective' by the patients suffering pain.
 
Hopefully surgeries are not on a huge wait list for those that can afford private doctors and hospitals. General hospitals, however, seem to have made huge progress even though percentage figures are relatively low. Keep going Queensland and hopefully it won’t be long before other states in this situation will be able to follow suit soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie and Nantes
Just curious... if I have Tonsilitus and my doctor says the only effective long term treatment is removal, having it operated on (removed) before it becomes much more serious or so infected it becomes seriously life altering.
How is that classed as "elective" surgery... ?

How is having Cataracts that are causing blindness and making you a long term burden on the Health system classed as "elective" surgery?

How is joint replacement (Hip/knee etc...) surgery diagnosed as necessary to restore independant function and/or mobility classed as "elective" surgery?

How are so many other life saving or independence and mobility reinstating surgeries classed as "elective" surgery?

"Elective" surgery is surgery you have for no other reason than you "choose" (elect) to, for no medical/Health reinstating reason... ie "Most" Cosmetic/Plastic surgery and the like.
JMHO
 
Not the first time a new elected Qld Liberals government have done this. Labor could of done this when in power, they were their for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
Just curious... if I have Tonsilitus and my doctor says the only effective long term treatment is removal, having it operated on (removed) before it becomes much more serious or so infected it becomes seriously life altering.
How is that classed as "elective" surgery... ?

How is having Cataracts that are causing blindness and making you a long term burden on the Health system classed as "elective" surgery?

How is joint replacement (Hip/knee etc...) surgery diagnosed as necessary to restore independant function and/or mobility classed as "elective" surgery?

How are so many other life saving or independence and mobility reinstating surgeries classed as "elective" surgery?

"Elective" surgery is surgery you have for no other reason than you "choose" (elect) to, for no medical/Health reinstating reason... ie "Most" Cosmetic/Plastic surgery and the like.
JMHO
Anything not an emergency is classed as "elective" - a misnomer I know .
 
Well, I knew it wouldn't be Victoria. This rabble government is only interested in sending Victoria broke. It's about the only thing they've been successful at. 🙁😣😫🤮
 
  • Like
Reactions: SandyM
Now I know as soon as I read the Headline that its not Victoria, but how many times have you received a legitimate request to name the state involved.
How will the naming of the state matter here?

I’m certain that if a change or improvement in a state’s medical system was to be introduced for the betterment of its surgery/medical system it will be announced as a HEADLINE because it would put that political party way up there in the headlines.

There are certain issues on varying topics that may have implications if directly named. Let SDC determine what they CAN or CANNOT name. Their reputation could be at stake if naming something and then it turns out to be incorrect. Find out yourself by asking your local member if you really must know all the ins and outs of political issues, especially.
 
Just curious... if I have Tonsilitus and my doctor says the only effective long term treatment is removal, having it operated on (removed) before it becomes much more serious or so infected it becomes seriously life altering.
How is that classed as "elective" surgery... ?

How is having Cataracts that are causing blindness and making you a long term burden on the Health system classed as "elective" surgery?

How is joint replacement (Hip/knee etc...) surgery diagnosed as necessary to restore independant function and/or mobility classed as "elective" surgery?

How are so many other life saving or independence and mobility reinstating surgeries classed as "elective" surgery?

"Elective" surgery is surgery you have for no other reason than you "choose" (elect) to, for no medical/Health reinstating reason... ie "Most" Cosmetic/Plastic surgery and the like.
JMHO
The word "elective" is just a euphemism used by governments to extenuate important medical procedures, and placate those who may vote for them. (Yes, I am a cynic). 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
Not the first time a new elected Qld Liberals government have done this. Labor could of done this when in power, they were their for a long time.
Typical of the labor govt with the now shadow health minister criticising the current govt who have been in power for 2 months. At least they are doing something to alleviate the waiting list whereas under his "guidance" the labor bastards did nothing for 12 YEARS = YES 12 YEARS. Good on you LNP you are leading the way.
 
No pain if you have a health fund. one should prioritise as I have done.
Not everyone can afford private health fund costs, especially some elderly who for whatever their reason are unable or have had to ditch perhaps previous private health.

My husband and I are still lucky enough to be able afford it but there could come a time when something could happen and we too may have to ditch it.

Don’t assume everyone has your means and don’t be critical of others’ means.
 
No pain if you have a health fund. one should prioritise as I have done.
In September I had a blunt force trauma to my lower leg, causing a large
Haematoma , taken to ED then sent to h /bay ,spent 3 days in surgical ward , sent home and given appointment for outpatients for 3 weeks,then told to go back to my GP, this was covered by my health fund except the appointments my GP said they didn’t know what to do with me.
 
In September I had a blunt force trauma to my lower leg, causing a large
Haematoma , taken to ED then sent to h /bay ,spent 3 days in surgical ward , sent home and given appointment for outpatients for 3 weeks,then told to go back to my GP, this was covered by my health fund except the appointments my GP said they didn’t know what to do with me. Waited for an appointment with surgeon ,then weeks waiting for a bed in the private hospital. And am still recovering from all I went through. The public hospital is quick to jump on you to sign over your health fund, as for Dr Yim saying the hospital could look after private patients with health funds where has he been when it’s the first thing they do is pounce on your fund. As for not being to afford health insurance, it depends on your lifestyle some just waste their money knowing the public system will take care of you. I am a single pensioner, and my fund comes first even if giving up on a lot of other life styles. At least our government is finally doing what needs to be done,looking after the people of our state, after years of neglect by the useless Labor mob.
I
In September I had a blunt force trauma to my lower leg, causing a large
Haematoma , taken to ED then sent to h /bay ,spent 3 days in surgical ward , sent home and given appointment for outpatients for 3 weeks,then told to go back to my GP, this was covered by my health fund except the appointments my GP said they didn’t know what to do with me.
 
Not everyone can afford private health fund costs, especially some elderly who for whatever their reason are unable or have had to ditch perhaps previous private health.

My husband and I are still lucky enough to be able afford it but there could come a time when something could happen and we too may have to ditch it.

Don’t assume everyone has your means and don’t be critical of others’ means.
i have assumed nothing. read again.
 
i have assumed nothing. read again.
I read a news item that private health cover is going up 6% this year it’s time to stop the gouging of members. We are being priced out of cover .
I struggle to keep mine as you can’t be without it , Medicare rebates need to be increased, i have an appointment coming up with a surgeon and the charge is $300 with rebate $84 .
 
Typical of the labor govt with the now shadow health minister criticising the current govt who have been in power for 2 months. At least they are doing something to alleviate the waiting list whereas under his "guidance" the labor bastards did nothing for 12 YEARS = YES 12 YEARS. Good on you LNP you are leading the way.
She was useless in all portfolios she held, before criticising the newly elected government she should look at her own performances , the same as Dick he is also a whinger , and was no better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
i have assumed nothing. read again.
I have read it again, and again, and again, and your statement clearly states: “No pain if you have a health fund. one should prioritise as I have done.”

What exactly do you mean by ONE SHOULD PRIORITISE and AS I HAVE DONE? (? Presumably prioritised ?). What were you saying by these two quotes from your original post especially “one should prioritise”.

I said not everyone can afford private health or for whatever reason may have had to cancel that and that was in direct reference to your statement of “one should prioritise”. I’m not going to get into a running battle of words with you but just ask that you clarify what exactly you meant by “one should prioritise”, in your original post. That was why I said we should not presume everyone can afford things and services that others can afford.
 
Last edited:

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×