Socceroos icon and Australian of the Year’s public snub of King Charles’ invite sparks debate

The world of sports and politics collided with a thunderous roar as Socceroos legend and former Australian of the Year Craig Foster made headlines with a bold public statement.

The incident has sparked a heated debate about respect for the monarchy and the push for an Australian republic.



Socceroos legend and former Australian of the Year Craig Foster publicly declined an invitation to an event attended by King Charles III.

Foster, a respected figure in Australian football and a vocal advocate for human rights, shared his decision on social media.


Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 10.23.39 AM.png
Socceroos icon and Australian of the Year Craig Foster publicly snubbed King Charles’ invite. Credit: @craigfosterfootball / Instagram


The invitation, extended by NSW Premier Chris Minns, would have seen Foster in the casual setting of a 'BBQ' with the monarch. However, Foster's response was anything but warm.

'Thanks, Anna and @ChrisMinnsMP, but no thanks,' Foster wrote on social media.

'I look forward to being “in the presence of” our first Aussie Head of State. When we put our big pants on, as a country.'

This public refusal has divided opinions among Australians.

Some see Foster's act as a bold statement supporting Australia's journey towards becoming a republic.



In contrast, others view it as a disrespectful gesture that undermines the current head of state's role and the work he champions.

‘Why the need to decline so publicly?’ Entertainment reporter Peter Ford said.

Former Victorian Labor MP Philip Dalidakis also criticised Foster's public declination.

‘What a self-indulgent little child you are, Craig Foster,’ Dalidakis said.

‘Firstly, to big note yourself by showing everyone you were invited to the State’s community reception for the King. Hopefully, they don’t make that mistake again.’



‘Secondly, to share the invite publicly and embarrass Chris Minns and Mrs Minns by refusing the invite.’

‘Thirdly, whatever you think of Charles and the monarchy, he is still deserving of respect for the work he does and the causes he champions. I, too, am an Australian Republic supporter and look forward to the day we have our own head of state, but until (then) try to show a little bit of class.’

‘Don’t see the need to go public with this, except for your own self-indulgence. Ordinary bloke,’ Tennis commentator Todd Scoullar wrote.



On the other hand, Foster's post, which garnered over 370,000 views, also received a wave of support from those who admire his stance on human rights and his advocacy for an Australian republic.

‘Thank you for speaking on behalf of most Australians. Why are we wasting tax on these parasites?’ one user wrote.

‘Stunning. Brave,’ another said.

‘Well said, Craig. A man of principle. It's nearly 250 years, and we're still tied to our colonial masters and an antiquated monarchy that is a relic of feudal times,’ a third added.



Foster, who replaced Peter FitzSimons as chair of the Australian Republic Movement in 2022 before stepping down in May, has been a prominent critic of the monarchy's place in Australia's system of government.

Foster's commitment to social justice is well-documented. He has campaigned tirelessly for refugee rights, ‘promotes anti-racism, allyship and what he calls ‘active multiculturalism’—communities protecting each other’, according to the NSW Government’s 2023 Australian of the Year announcement.

His advocacy efforts have not gone unnoticed, as evidenced by his appointment as a Member of the Order of Australia in 2021 for his service to multiculturalism, human rights, and refugee support.

You may see Foster’s post below:

Key Takeaways
  • Socceroos legend and former Australian of the Year Craig Foster publicly declined an invitation to an event with King Charles III.
  • Foster's refusal of the invite was shared on social media, sparking a debate on republicanism and respect for the Monarchy.
  • Critics called Foster's public snub self-indulgent, while supporters praised him for taking a stand.
  • Foster, an advocate for human rights and various social causes, has been recognised for his work.
What do you think about Craig Foster's public refusal of the invitation? Share your thoughts and experiences with us in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Disgusted that someone who is allegedly a role model would respond in such a harsh and disrespectful manner. I don't understand the objection to the monarchy. They say it is a waste of tax payers' money, but what is the alternative? A Biden/Trump country? Communist or autonomy rule? Perhaps not.
I believe though much comes from the "public purse" the monarchy generates more from its own holdings. I don't think Australia foots any of the bill. I don't know. Anyone know for sure?
 
Disgusted that someone who is allegedly a role model would respond in such a harsh and disrespectful manner. I don't understand the objection to the monarchy. They say it is a waste of tax payers' money, but what is the alternative? A Biden/Trump country? Communist or autonomy rule? Perhaps not.
We've got Albanese and his gloomy band of bloody idiots?
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
Craig Foster??
Shows ignorance and full of himself.
As for Kman. well , Barnsie did admit he was wrong , stupid, and had the attention span of a soap bar
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
Freedom of choice is what Australians want so I am puzzled as to what the problem is. I would have declined the invitation also. We need to break free from the monarchy and be an independant nation free from the shackes of Britian archaic traditions.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Jo Piper3
Perhaps the real question is if he were a monarchist why accept an Order of Australia? Being staunchly Republican why return an *Australian* honour?
The Order of Australia is an Australian honour that recognises Australian citizens and other persons for outstanding achievement and service.[1] It was established on 14 February 1975 by Elizabeth II, Queen of Australia, on the advice of then prime minister Gough Whitlam. Before the establishment of the order, Australians could receive British honours, which continued to be issued in parallel until 1992.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAl6164
I agree. I respect the Royal Family for who they are & wish them no harm. However I wait anxiously until we have our own HOS.
Australia has a mixed system of government. It is a: Representative democracy—Australians vote for members of parliament to make laws on their behalf. Constitutional monarchy—The King is Australia's head of state but does not have absolute power and is required to follow the Australian Constitution. Also The King's only necessary constitutional function is to appoint the Governor-General, and in doing this the King acts as advised by the Australian Prime Minister. Since the 1940s at the latest, the Australian monarchy has been a distinct office and in that capacity, they act exclusively upon the advice of Australian state and federal ministers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAl6164
I believe though much comes from the "public purse" the monarchy generates more from its own holdings. I don't think Australia foots any of the bill. I don't know. Anyone know for sure?
The only time Australia pays any money towards the royal family is when they visit Australia.

Though we do pay for Australian politicians travelling to royal events in the UK, such as the funeral of QEII and the coronation of KCIII, but it is highly unlikely that us becoming a Republic will stop Aussie Polies from attending such events.

Also if we become a Republic we will be fully responsible for all costs associated with our new head of state, and I would not trust any of our politicians to keep those costs down.


Also we receive money from the royal purse for all charities and organisations that have Royal in their title or otherwise having royal charters:
List of Aus Royal chartered Organisations
 
Doesn't matter whether you are Republican or not, this was purely a matter of courtesy. As "Australian of the year" he embarrassed both himself and Australia. How childish. Any Diplomat knows sometimes you have to meet people with whom you are not totally aligned either ethically or politically, but that is part of the courtesy shown to visiting dignitaries. For the record I am not a Royalist.
 
The only time Australia pays any money towards the royal family is when they visit Australia.

Though we do pay for Australian politicians travelling to royal events in the UK, such as the funeral of QEII and the coronation of KCIII, but it is highly unlikely that us becoming a Republic will stop Aussie Polies from attending such events.

Also if we become a Republic we will be fully responsible for all costs associated with our new head of state, and I would not trust any of our politicians to keep those costs down.


Also we receive money from the royal purse for all charities and organisations that have Royal in their title or otherwise having royal charters:
List of Aus Royal chartered Organisations
Thank you for this clear response.
 
His behaviour is so dangerous to himself and others. Jimmy should have learned some respect for road rules by now.
It wasn’t recent it was years ago I’m sure he drives to the rules now. After all no one should crucify someone who did something wrong probably when they were still growing up 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
Initially, I thought Foster's public declining of the invitation was self-indulgent and unnecessary, but given his standing as a ranking official in the Australian Republican Movement, it makes some sense. I would have preferred a more gracious rejection but Foster no doubt stands by his words. One important point: I don't know where Charles stands on the issue of Australia becoming a Republic, but his mother definitely expressed a certain impatience with us and wondered why we "didn't get on with it" and become a nation in our own right. Anger at the monarchy is thoroughly misplaced!
Interesting. I wasn't aware of QEII's stance on Aus becoming a Republic.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×