Shocking Medical Error: Surgeon's Career on the Line After Removing Wrong Organ Leads to 70-Year-Old's Death

Disclaimer: This article contains distressing topics related to hospitalisation and death. Reader discretion is advised.

In a harrowing incident that has sent shockwaves through the medical community and beyond, a surgeon's critical mistake has resulted in the tragic loss of a 70-year-old patient and the subsequent suspension of his medical license. The case, which unfolded in Florida, has raised serious questions about surgical standards, emergency protocols, and the accountability of medical professionals.

William Bryan, a 70-year-old Vietnam War veteran, was enjoying a vacation with his wife Beverly in Destin, Florida, when he was suddenly struck by severe abdominal pain. The pain, which was later attributed to an enlarged spleen, necessitated an urgent trip to the hospital. It was there that Dr Thomas Shaknovsky was to perform what should have been a routine splenectomy. However, in a turn of events that seems almost unfathomable, Shaknovsky allegedly removed Bryan's liver instead, leading to the patient's death on the operating table.


The gravity of the situation is underscored by the fact that the operating room staff had reportedly expressed concerns about Shaknovsky's ability to carry out the complex procedure. Despite these reservations and the fact that only a skeletal crew was present due to the late hour, the surgery proceeded. During the operation, Shaknovsky claimed to have discovered a splenic artery aneurysm that he initially said he managed to control. However, this narrative unraveled when he later admitted to never having controlled the aneurysm and instead, in a desperate attempt to stem severe hemorrhaging, he completed the splenectomy after Bryan had been in cardiac arrest for 15 minutes.


compressed-surgery.jpeg
Surgeons need to practice caution when operating on patients. Image Credit: Pexels/Anna Shvets


The aftermath of the surgery revealed a series of alarming discoveries. An autopsy performed on Bryan found no evidence of the alleged aneurysm. Instead, it was determined that Shaknovsky had mistakenly dissected Bryan's inferior vena cava, the largest vein in the body, causing the fatal bleeding. The autopsy also revealed that Bryan's spleen was intact and in its normal position, untouched by the surgery.


The Florida Department of Health, in an emergency suspension of Shaknovsky's license, highlighted the stark anatomical differences between the liver and spleen, noting that even an enlarged spleen would only weigh a fraction of the liver's mass. The report also accused Shaknovsky of engaging in deception to cover up his error, stating that such dishonesty is incompatible with the integrity required to practice medicine.

This incident is not only a personal tragedy for the Bryan family, who are now mourning a beloved husband, father, and grandfather, but it also serves as a stark reminder of the potential perils of surgical procedures. It underscores the importance of rigorous checks and balances within the healthcare system to prevent such catastrophic errors.

For our readers at the Seniors Discount Club, this story is a sobering reminder to always advocate for your health and safety. It is crucial to ask questions, seek second opinions, and ensure that the medical professionals you entrust with your care have the requisite skills and experience. While the vast majority of medical procedures are performed safely and successfully, it is important to be aware of the risks and to know your rights as a patient.


We extend our deepest condolences to the Bryan family and hope that this tragic event will lead to improved safety standards in the medical field. If you or a loved one are facing surgery, remember to discuss all concerns with your healthcare provider and do not hesitate to ask about the qualifications of all medical staff involved in the procedure.
Key Takeaways

  • An Alabama man died on the operating table after a surgeon allegedly removed his liver instead of his spleen.
  • The surgeon's medical license has been suspended following the incident.
  • The widow of the deceased has filed a lawsuit seeking justice for her husband's death.
  • An autopsy revealed significant discrepancies between the surgeon’s account of the surgery and the actual cause of death.
Have you or someone you know ever experienced a medical error? How did you handle the situation? Share your stories and thoughts in the comments below, as they could help others navigate similar challenges.
 
Sponsored
My surgeon removed my appendix without my consent, during a routine gynae operation. His reason was “while I was in that region, I thought better out than in”
Many years later, I found out I could have sued him for damages and unlawful removal of a healthy appendage. To be brutaly honest, I was happy when he contracted Hepatitis, and had to retire at a young age.
 
Hi there, Veggie,
Once again, you're very quick & off the starting blocks with you're quirky comments.

There are plenty of "Litigation" lawyers in the U.S.A. I can see them making a "Killing" for the family on this one, big time.
 
Basic anatomy and physiology 101. I cannot fathom how any so-called surgeon could mistake a person's liver for their spleen. Size, weight, position within the body and even the colour of the liver versus the spleen.
 
My surgeon removed my appendix without my consent, during a routine gynae operation. His reason was “while I was in that region, I thought better out than in”
Many years later, I found out I could have sued him for damages and unlawful removal of a healthy appendage. To be brutaly honest, I was happy when he contracted Hepatitis, and had to retire at a young age.
I have herd of some surgeons doing the same thing. The classic excuse to justify charging more for their services. However, you have every right to sue these people if they do perform untheorized medical procedures. I am surprised the medical facility did not say anything to you at the time. Probably trying to cover their own backsides in the hope the issue would just fade away. You may still have a case against the facility where the procedure was performed. I am not sure if there is a statute of limitations on these sorts of lawsuits. The facility has an obligation and duty of care to you as a patient in their facility and they are just as responsible as the surgeon who performed the unauthorized procedure. The facility has an obligation to ensure rouge surgeon follow procedures and are not performing surgeries on patient without proper authorization and cause. It may be worth your while looking it to this. Surgeons need to be held accountable for their actions, you as a patient are not a Guinea pig for them to practice. I herd of one such story of a surgeon doing hysterectomy on an eighty-year-old patient just for the practice. The patient elderly later died of other health related complications.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BeautifulMousey
I have herd of some surgeons doing the same thing. The classic excuse to justify charging more for their services. However, you have every right to sue these people if they do perform untheorized medical procedures. I am surprised the medical facility did not say anything to you at the time. Probably trying to cover their own backsides in the hope the issue would just fade away. You may still have a case against the facility where the procedure was performed. I am not sure if there is a statute of limitations on these sorts of lawsuits. The facility has an obligation and duty of care to you as a patient in their facility and they are just as responsible as the surgeon who performed the unauthorized procedure. The facility has an obligation to ensure rouge surgeon follow procedures and are not performing surgeries on patient without proper authorization and cause. It may be worth your while looking it to this. Surgeons need to be held accountable for their actions, you as a patient are not a Guinea pig for them to practice. I herd of one such story of a surgeon doing hysterectomy on an eighty-year-old patient just for the practice. The patient elderly later died of other health related complications.
Thank you so much for your concern. Unfortunately it was in the seventies, the Dr. was a Macquarie st specialist in Sydney, and the time frame to proceed for suing was within ten years, so it was in those days. When I tell people these days what went on at work, doctors, solicitors, they are gobsmacked. Yep, Australia was like the Wild West, truly. Cheers cobber!
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×