Royal shake-up: King Charles III cuts financial ties with another royal amid scandal and tension
- Replies 31
A newly released book has stirred up significant buzz by shedding light on the financial dynamics within the British royal family.
With insights into the intricate monetary dealings and relationships, this book promises to captivate readers with its revelations.
Discover the untold stories and financial secrets that have long been kept under wraps, offering a fresh perspective on the lives of some of the most talked-about figures in the world.
In a move that has sent shockwaves through the royal family, King Charles III has made the decisive move to cut off the annual allowance of his brother, Prince Andrew, amidst ongoing tensions and scandals.
This financial severance, believed to be around £1 million (almost 2 million AUD), marks a significant shift in the royal dynamic and underscores the King's commitment to reshaping the monarchy's public image.
‘The duke is no longer a financial burden on the King,’ a source confirmed.
An updated biography by Robert Hardman, an acclaimed royal writer, has revealed the details of this royal rift.
The book Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story reveals the intricate and often strained relationships within the royal family, particularly in the wake of Prince Andrew's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Recently, the King directed the Keeper of the Privy Purse—the monarchy’s finance director—to cut off his troubled younger brother’s annual personal allowance and ceased funding his seven-figure private security costs.
King Charles's decision to cut the financial cord is not just about money; it's a statement about accountability and the future direction of the monarchy.
The King has also expressed his desire for Prince Andrew to vacate his 30-room mansion at Windsor, Royal Lodge, placing the onus on his brother to make the next move.
By taking this action, he has—for the first time, as revealed by Hardman—fulfilled his late mother's resolve to address the ‘Andrew issue’ definitively.
This bold action seems to be in line with the late Queen Elizabeth II's wishes, who, according to sources, would have pushed for Prince Andrew to downsize to Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, had she lived another year.
The updated edition of Hardman's biography, published earlier this year, is not just about Prince Andrew; it also delves into the strained relationship between King Charles and Prince Harry.
The book details how Prince Harry's insistence on pursuing legal action against the Home Office for withdrawing his security detail has further complicated father-son relations.
The King reportedly fears that any reconciliation could entangle him in legal proceedings, a situation he is keen to avoid.
Moreover, royal insiders have countered claims that Meghan Markle was not supported when she joined the Royal Family. They assert that every effort was made to assist her, but their offers were rebuffed.
The book also touches on the delicate subject of rapprochement with the Sussexes. Despite the criticism King Charles has faced, he is not opposed to mending fences, though the process has been anything but straightforward.
When Prince Harry came back to the UK in May, the two did not meet. Although he was offered a room at Buckingham Palace, he opted to stay in a hotel instead.
‘We were told it was for security reasons,’ a member of the King’s staff said.
‘I’m not sure you could get anywhere more secure than the Palace.’
As for Prince Andrew, his attempts to maintain his lifestyle and residence have hit a wall. His belief in a ‘cast-iron’ lease on Royal Lodge and his refusal to move to the more modest Frogmore Cottage have put him at odds with the King's vision for a streamlined monarchy.
Sources close to the Duke of York have consistently maintained that he holds a secure, long-term lease on the late Queen Mother’s former residence in Windsor Great Park.
Despite no longer performing royal duties, having been stripped of his patronages and military associations, and being effectively barred from using his HRH title in public due to his connection with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the Duke remains resolute in holding on to the remnants of his former life, particularly his home.
He has emphatically informed the King’s advisers that they have no authority to make him downsize and has firmly refused suggestions to relocate to nearby Frogmore Cottage.
Despite its seemingly sufficient five bedrooms and location within Windsor Castle’s secure ‘ring of steel’, he remains adamant.
Now that the King has effectively challenged his stance, Prince Andrew will need to secure funds to maintain his expansive property and security detail despite lacking any apparent independent income.
According to Hardman, this evidently encompasses the expenses for safeguarding numerous valuable and historical artworks and furniture pieces borrowed from the Royal Collection, a repository of antiques held in trust by the monarch for the nation.
Prince Andrew has consistently maintained that he can fund his own upkeep, asserting that he has discovered ‘other sources of income’ through his connections in international trade, which he claims are sufficient to cover all his expenses.
However, His Majesty will be observing this with keen interest.
‘If he can find the money, then that is up to him, but if not, he will find that the King does not have unlimited patience,’ an insider stated.
Family friends reported that while the issue has been temporarily settled, Prince Andrew's ‘obstinacy’ has ‘soured’ family relationships.
What are your thoughts on this royal shake-up? Do you believe King Charles is taking the right steps towards modernising the monarchy, or do you feel there's more to the story? Share your opinions with us, and let's discuss the future of the Royal Family in these changing times.
With insights into the intricate monetary dealings and relationships, this book promises to captivate readers with its revelations.
Discover the untold stories and financial secrets that have long been kept under wraps, offering a fresh perspective on the lives of some of the most talked-about figures in the world.
In a move that has sent shockwaves through the royal family, King Charles III has made the decisive move to cut off the annual allowance of his brother, Prince Andrew, amidst ongoing tensions and scandals.
This financial severance, believed to be around £1 million (almost 2 million AUD), marks a significant shift in the royal dynamic and underscores the King's commitment to reshaping the monarchy's public image.
‘The duke is no longer a financial burden on the King,’ a source confirmed.
King Charles has terminated Prince Andrew's annual allowance of approximately £1 million (nearly 2 million AUD) and stopped funding his private security, reflecting a strained brotherly relationship. Credit: Facebook / The Royal Family
An updated biography by Robert Hardman, an acclaimed royal writer, has revealed the details of this royal rift.
The book Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story reveals the intricate and often strained relationships within the royal family, particularly in the wake of Prince Andrew's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Recently, the King directed the Keeper of the Privy Purse—the monarchy’s finance director—to cut off his troubled younger brother’s annual personal allowance and ceased funding his seven-figure private security costs.
King Charles's decision to cut the financial cord is not just about money; it's a statement about accountability and the future direction of the monarchy.
The King has also expressed his desire for Prince Andrew to vacate his 30-room mansion at Windsor, Royal Lodge, placing the onus on his brother to make the next move.
By taking this action, he has—for the first time, as revealed by Hardman—fulfilled his late mother's resolve to address the ‘Andrew issue’ definitively.
This bold action seems to be in line with the late Queen Elizabeth II's wishes, who, according to sources, would have pushed for Prince Andrew to downsize to Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, had she lived another year.
The updated edition of Hardman's biography, published earlier this year, is not just about Prince Andrew; it also delves into the strained relationship between King Charles and Prince Harry.
The book details how Prince Harry's insistence on pursuing legal action against the Home Office for withdrawing his security detail has further complicated father-son relations.
The King reportedly fears that any reconciliation could entangle him in legal proceedings, a situation he is keen to avoid.
Moreover, royal insiders have countered claims that Meghan Markle was not supported when she joined the Royal Family. They assert that every effort was made to assist her, but their offers were rebuffed.
The book also touches on the delicate subject of rapprochement with the Sussexes. Despite the criticism King Charles has faced, he is not opposed to mending fences, though the process has been anything but straightforward.
When Prince Harry came back to the UK in May, the two did not meet. Although he was offered a room at Buckingham Palace, he opted to stay in a hotel instead.
‘We were told it was for security reasons,’ a member of the King’s staff said.
‘I’m not sure you could get anywhere more secure than the Palace.’
As for Prince Andrew, his attempts to maintain his lifestyle and residence have hit a wall. His belief in a ‘cast-iron’ lease on Royal Lodge and his refusal to move to the more modest Frogmore Cottage have put him at odds with the King's vision for a streamlined monarchy.
Sources close to the Duke of York have consistently maintained that he holds a secure, long-term lease on the late Queen Mother’s former residence in Windsor Great Park.
Despite no longer performing royal duties, having been stripped of his patronages and military associations, and being effectively barred from using his HRH title in public due to his connection with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the Duke remains resolute in holding on to the remnants of his former life, particularly his home.
He has emphatically informed the King’s advisers that they have no authority to make him downsize and has firmly refused suggestions to relocate to nearby Frogmore Cottage.
Despite its seemingly sufficient five bedrooms and location within Windsor Castle’s secure ‘ring of steel’, he remains adamant.
Now that the King has effectively challenged his stance, Prince Andrew will need to secure funds to maintain his expansive property and security detail despite lacking any apparent independent income.
According to Hardman, this evidently encompasses the expenses for safeguarding numerous valuable and historical artworks and furniture pieces borrowed from the Royal Collection, a repository of antiques held in trust by the monarch for the nation.
Prince Andrew has consistently maintained that he can fund his own upkeep, asserting that he has discovered ‘other sources of income’ through his connections in international trade, which he claims are sufficient to cover all his expenses.
However, His Majesty will be observing this with keen interest.
‘If he can find the money, then that is up to him, but if not, he will find that the King does not have unlimited patience,’ an insider stated.
Family friends reported that while the issue has been temporarily settled, Prince Andrew's ‘obstinacy’ has ‘soured’ family relationships.
.png){kind=icon}
