The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles III sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

 

[Chrissie1761]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

Another gossip monger

 

[Shane/#]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

Charles and his dragon Camilla living the fine life off mummies fortune time Australia becomes a stand alone Republic and get away from these Leeches remember Australia was the dumping ground for the English undesirable people so why give them millions for nothing when the country could put this money to good use here not there monarchy inbred parasites

 

[Kman]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

They are humans after all. However, there could be a great deal of truth in this. He did wait for a long time before becoming King. Maybe he has already become a little addle brained.

Oh, I am not particularly this pedantic, however, spotted a typo error at the beginning. Charles III, not II.

 

[ToniaKisliakov]

The Englsh

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

Do not understand even read any stupid gossip about the royal family. It is their own business. Whilst I do respect King Charles & his royals (not harry of course) , I do not bother to read any gossips about them at all.

After all a King is much better than what govt we have here now

 

[Hel]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

Easy to see Harry and Meghan's hands in this. Not telling the truth again. Charles was prepared for his role from birth, his mother saw to that. Harry's jealousy of his brother shines through everything he does and says. Charles is the opposite of everything this book portrays him as - he was laughed at in the 70's for speaking to his vegetables, he's always been portrayed as a simple man who cared about the planet. Ecology was his middle name. What happened to that? I don't believe anything I read about him lately, there is an agenda behind it all. Get rid of the monarchy, use Harry to do it. He's obviously an idiot or he wouldn't be with Meghan the manipulator.

 

[Suzanne rose]

Not a new story, everyone knew for years that The Queen didn't think Charles was ready or would ever be King.
He only became King because The Queen Died.
Before marrying Diana he was know as the playboy Prince.
Remember He was having an affair with a still married woman with children, which The Queen knew about and was why she pushed for him to find a young single bride.

The title of King should have gone straight to William

 

[PattiB]

I can’t imagine why anyone would buy this book let alone waste time reading it. Once again it’s a Harry & Meghan sob story. You can’t fake the warmth shown by the Princess of Wales and at least she’s not always looking for the camera like her sister-in-law. Leave them alone to get on with their lives. Who really cares anyway. And no, I’m most definitely not a monarchist!

 

[gamiry]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

I wonder what you will do with this because EVERY BIT OF IT IS TRUE. Phillip was a womaniser for good reason. He did NOT want to marry Elizabeth because he was engaged to a specialist doctor's daughter from Abbotsford in Sydney. They tried to put the girl off and, typical Aussie, she told them "if he can't stand on his two feet he can go to hell". When this was learned Phillip was arrested, locked in the brig with my cousin for company (he was part of the crew) until their arrival in England and the wedding was over. They are interbred with the House of Hanover and the Greek Royals). Charles was sent to school in OZ 3 three times in the hope he'd grow up, He was an embarrassment because he only spoke to trees and flowers. Remember the day Lizzie arrived back from a sea trip she hugged her mother and shook hands with her 3 year old son. This was shown on the tv news. It was well known that she spent no more than half an hour each day with her children.. The Queen made it clear that Camilla WAS NOT TO BE A QUEEN. As usual Charlie did his own thing. It didn't even matter to him that he had a huge part in Dianna's behaviour and death. William is no better. That mob has been puting the boot into Harry since he was tiny because he had red hair. I also feel sorry for young George who his father calls "" a king in training". For heaven's sake when will he be allowed to be a child? This isn't the first time this mob has hunted one of their own out of the country.....remember Mrs Wallis Simpson? Lizzie also screwed up her sister's life by not allowing Margaret's marriage to the love of her life (Group Captain Peter Townsend) yet allowed her son to screw someone else's wife and mother. Look at your history books and learn how far the rot goes back.
Sorry folks but I'm 81 and have lived through this stuff. I'm sick of paying for these parasites holidays here and anything else they want. We deserve our own country. They didn't even discover us. The Dutch were here well before the Poms and a plate in a museum in China has a map showing Australia still joined to Tassie and it's from the 1400's. By the way I haven't read Harry's book. I've lived through this stuff.

 

[PattiB]

Do people really care about whatever the royals do? Australia should have become a republic years ago!

 

[Useless]

I agree it’s time to move on from all the so called truth that is put out by the so called Sussex pair,what happened to the so called move to be out of the spotlight ha ha,it is like a three ring circus but by one in particular who has her sights on notoriety at all costs

 

[ElizaKaye]

It seems that the author of this book has taken too much notice of Meghan and Harry. And Harry will do naything to save his marriage and children even if it means going along with Meghans self centred ways. I feel sorry for Harry he is megin manipulated - for the worst.

 

[Lochiedog]

If you believe this rubbish you probably believe in the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairy. It should have been called The Witch and The Prince seek revenge.

 

[Jest]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

who is this scobie. scoobie scoobie doo??? It is a remark made often and i would say to anyone who says they wouldn't, you are a liar. Charles has his back up against a wall, with all and sundry denigrading him. A book from these two nasty individuals should be left on the shelf, BUT no it will not be as there are too many nasty people like the winger and ginger breathing. I wish everyone would just shut up about these two miserable yanks.

 

[Jest]

If you believe this rubbish you probably believe in the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairy. It should have been called The Witch and The Prince seek revenge.

thank you for your logic.

 

[Jest]

I wonder what you will do with this because EVERY BIT OF IT IS TRUE. Phillip was a womaniser for good reason. He did NOT want to marry Elizabeth because he was engaged to a specialist doctor's daughter from Abbotsford in Sydney. They tried to put the girl off and, typical Aussie, she told them "if he can't stand on his two feet he can go to hell". When this was learned Phillip was arrested, locked in the brig with my cousin for company (he was part of the crew) until their arrival in England and the wedding was over. They are interbred with the House of Hanover and the Greek Royals). Charles was sent to school in OZ 3 three times in the hope he'd grow up, He was an embarrassment because he only spoke to trees and flowers. Remember the day Lizzie arrived back from a sea trip she hugged her mother and shook hands with her 3 year old son. This was shown on the tv news. It was well known that she spent no more than half an hour each day with her children.. The Queen made it clear that Camilla WAS NOT TO BE A QUEEN. As usual Charlie did his own thing. It didn't even matter to him that he had a huge part in Dianna's behaviour and death. William is no better. That mob has been puting the boot into Harry since he was tiny because he had red hair. I also feel sorry for young George who his father calls "" a king in training". For heaven's sake when will he be allowed to be a child? This isn't the first time this mob has hunted one of their own out of the country.....remember Mrs Wallis Simpson? Lizzie also screwed up her sister's life by not allowing Margaret's marriage to the love of her life (Group Captain Peter Townsend) yet allowed her son to screw someone else's wife and mother. Look at your history books and learn how far the rot goes back.
Sorry folks but I'm 81 and have lived through this stuff. I'm sick of paying for these parasites holidays here and anything else they want. We deserve our own country. They didn't even discover us. The Dutch were here well before the Poms and a plate in a museum in China has a map showing Australia still joined to Tassie and it's from the 1400's. By the way I haven't read Harry's book. I've lived through this stuff.

you do not pay for these parasites, we have our own country it is called australia and run by the australian government. do not blame the royals for rules set down by others. At least you have some notoriety your cousin sharing a CELL with Philip. Please do not blame a persons character for being a botonist. not everyone is a rude, rough aussie. with the typical black singlet. By the way I am 84 years of age and I am Royalist. and proud of it.

 

[wendell]

The Englsh

After all a King is much better than what govt we have here now

Both tarred with the one brush greedy

 

[Brody]

The people of the Commonwealth have long celebrated Queen Elizabeth's reign, but some say the future of the monarchy is now uncertain as her son King Charles II sits on the throne.

Omid Scobie's latest book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival, is set to shed light on revelations from insiders about King Charles and the Queen's relationship.

It is understood that those close to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry spoke with Scobie for his book, though sources took care to say that the pair had no hand in its creation.

According to Scobie, Queen Elizabeth had little faith in her son's ability to rule as he was enjoying the glamour being raised within the royal family.

View attachment 36104

The new book Endgame is said to reveal some insider claims about the monarch. Image: X / @omidscoobie

In 2001, the Queen supposedly referred to new Lord Chamberlain, Andrew Parker, as her 'new CEO', which some perceive as a pointed reference to her feelings towards her son.

'There was a slight lack of faith in her son,' alleges Scobie in his book. He also states that the Queen was vocal in criticising Charles' 'extravagantly luxurious lifestyle'.

This year, King Charles' coronation cost upwards of $191 million—a stark juxtaposition to his work advocating for those in the UK struggling with living costs.

It was reportedly on his 75th birthday that King Charles visited a food bank in the UK to speak with families who depend on it.

Prince William has also been a leading figure in homelessness campaigns in the country.

Scobie goes on to divulge yet more revelations. 'A source close to the Queen has said that the monarch needed someone who could be trusted to be her eyes and ears,' says Scobie in his book.

'The Queen reportedly did not think Charles was the right man for such a role—and many senior royals share this sentiment today.'

The book also states the views of those with a vested interest in the Monarchy's survival post-Elizabeth are also not in favour of the new King, and that his successors—including the young Prince George—hold the key to ‘mak(ing) the royals great again’.

The biography also paints a picture of a monarchy heading for a 'potentially uneventful era', implying that Charles will never be able to replicate his mother's greatly-loved standing with the public.

Scobie even makes reference to 'tampon-gate', which is a controversial intimate leaked recording wherein the then-Prince stated his sexual desire for his lover.

Just as Scobie released his book, other insiders from Buckingham Palace recently hinted that relations between the King and his youngest son were still icy.

According to recent reports, King Charles feels that Prince Harry has caused him ‘great pain’, particularly over his conduct in Queen Elizabeth’s last years and perceived insults toward Queen Consort Camilla. You can read more about it here.

Key Takeaways

• A new royal book has made claims that Queen Elizabeth lacked faith in King Charles' ability to rule, claiming she thought he was too preoccupied with royal luxuries.
• The book, by Omid Scobie, alleges that the late Queen's lack of confidence in Charles remains a common sentiment among senior royals, and that there is disappointment in his reign.
• The book controversially refers to the infamous 'tampon-gate' controversy, further painting a critical portrayal of King Charles.

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments below!

I unfortunately have a negative response to King Charles and Camilla. Queen Elizabeth's reign is likely to be the last
Royal to have had a positive impact and affection for all those under her rule.
Charlie's on the other hand has not left a good impression on the Monarchy. Making Camilla, Queen will be the Rock he will perish on. Prince William may not be quite ready to take on the Crown, but with Catherine on his side I think he will do very well. However will he get the chance ? Not in the short term, I hazard to guess.
Our push toward becoming a Republican
Society will no doubt be in the forefront
of our largest proposal to become, what the large proportion of our population are wanting to move into,that less expensive option of having a larger push for this to happen. Coupled with more freedom to expand our own Preferred Government. , and our own point of view, as to where we want our Country to head.
If we can vote in a responsible Government that reflects our concern for the future of Australia we can only go from strength to strength.

.

 

[Brody]

I unfortunately have a negative response to King Charles and Camilla. Queen Elizabeth's reign is likely to be the last
Royal to have had a positive impact and affection for all those under her rule.
Charlie's on the other hand has not left a good impression on the Monarchy. Making Camilla, Queen will be the Rock he will perish on. Prince William may not be quite ready to take on the Crown, but with Catherine on his side I think he will do very well. However will he get the chance ? Not in the short term, I hazard to guess.
Our push toward becoming a Republican
Society will no doubt be in the forefront
of our largest proposal to become, what the large proportion of our population are wanting to move into,that less expensive option of having a larger push for this to happen. Coupled with more freedom to expand our own Preferred Government. , and our own point of view, as to where we want our Country to head.
If we can vote in a responsible Government that reflects our concern for the future of Australia we can only go from strength to strength.

 

[Jest]

Both tarred with the one brush greedy

Not a new story, everyone knew for years that The Queen didn't think Charles was ready or would ever be King.
He only became King because The Queen Died.
Before marrying Diana he was know as the playboy Prince.
Remember He was having an affair with a still married woman with children, which The Queen knew about and was why she pushed for him to find a young single bride.

The title of King should have gone straight to William

they have rules just in case you did not know. next in line carries the crown. so many wise and knowlegable people replying. I do not confess to being that, but i do understand rules. stating "everyone" is a bit hard to swallow.