Nearly half of Aussies support legalising cannabis—do you?

Something once considered taboo is now edging closer to mainstream acceptance—and it's dividing opinions across the country.

A new wave of support is rising, backed by surprising data and strong voices on both sides of the debate.

So what’s changed—and why are more Australians starting to reconsider what was once off-limits?


Public opinion on cannabis has shifted dramatically in recent years, and the numbers don’t lie. Once considered taboo, marijuana is now at the centre of a national conversation—one that continues to stir strong views across the country.

A recent Roy Morgan survey revealed that 48 per cent of Australians supported the legalisation of cannabis, a sharp increase of 15 percentage points over the past decade.

Out of the 70,000 people surveyed, nearly half said they believed marijuana should be made legal nationwide.


image1.png
Public support for cannabis legalisation hits 48 per cent. Image source: Pexels/Alexander Grey


At present, medicinal cannabis remains tightly regulated, available only by prescription in all states and territories except the ACT. The ACT went a step further in 2020, legalising not only use but also the sale of marijuana.

Interestingly, the push for reform appeared to have stronger support among certain groups. Men were slightly more in favour than women, with 51 per cent backing legalisation compared to 45 per cent of women.

Australians aged 18 to 49 were the most supportive demographic, while the 35 to 49 bracket showed 51 per cent in favour.

The highest levels of support came from the Northern Territory and the ACT, where 57 and 56 per cent of respondents respectively backed legalisation. Meanwhile, 41 per cent of those surveyed still believed marijuana should remain illegal in Australia.

‘With nearly half of Australians now in favour, the national mood has shifted significantly over the past decade,’ Roy Morgan CEO Michele Levine said.


Although younger adults led the charge for change, there remained notable opposition—particularly among teenagers and older Australians.

The Legalise Cannabis Party said the results were no surprise.

‘According to the latest National Drug Strategy Household survey, 80 per cent of the population believe that possession of cannabis should not be a criminal offence,’ campaign manager Suzette Luyken shared.

‘The party believes that a staged implementation is the best way to achieve acceptance.

‘People should be free to grow their own cannabis and not be forced to be reliant on expensive, unregulated, imported products when it comes to their physical and mental wellbeing.’


Despite the growing public support, not everyone agreed that legalisation was the right path. In 2023, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) submitted a formal response to a Senate inquiry, voicing its opposition to a bill that proposed legalising cannabis.

AMA President Professor Steve Robson said: ‘Legalising cannabis for recreational purposes sends the wrong signal to the public, and especially to young Australians, that cannabis use is not harmful.’

‘We see poor mental health outcomes from cannabis use including anxiety, panic attacks, paranoia, memory loss and an increased incidence of schizophrenia.

‘Cannabis use can lead to physical ill-health conditions such as bronchitis or cancer, cardiovascular system damage, and impaired reaction time and brain function.’


While many acknowledged the drug’s potential benefits—such as its role in easing nausea and managing chronic pain—experts warned that marijuana use could also cause lung damage and cognitive decline.

AMA and Drug Free Australia have been contacted for further comment.

For a deeper dive, check out this insightful clip where a senator challenges outdated cannabis laws—it's a conversation many older Aussies are now part of too.

How does hearing this wider perspective change your view? Jump into the discussion below—we’d love to hear from you!

Could legalising cannabis really boost the budget? Here's what one party claims it could mean for everyday Australians.

Watch the clip now.


Source: Youtube/ABC News (Australia)​


Key Takeaways
  • Support for legalising cannabis in Australia has grown, with 48 per cent of 70,000 surveyed now in favour.
  • The strongest backing came from men, younger adults, and residents of the Northern Territory and ACT.
  • The Legalise Cannabis Party welcomed the shift, calling for a phased rollout and home-growing rights.
  • The AMA opposed legalisation, warning of mental and physical health risks tied to cannabis use.

As more Australians warm to the idea of legal cannabis, it's clear the conversation is far from over—especially for those who've seen the country shift over decades.

Have your views on marijuana changed over the years, or do you still feel the same? Tell us what you think in the comments.

In an earlier story, we looked at how soaring cigarette costs are nudging older Australians towards cannabis as an alternative.

With many seniors finding themselves reassessing long-held habits, the growing support for legalisation now offers another layer to that ongoing shift.

Read more: Are rising cigarette prices driving older Aussies to try cannabis?
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Experienced the effects of weed on my ex-defective - he ended up totally schizophrenic and irrational. I had a fractured jaw to prove it - b--tard! Keep it illegal and for God's sake, take a pro-active approach to enacting this law - not ignore it as they do now. Nobody gets charged anymore for marijuana, cocaine, ice etc. it is just the norm out there!
Yep I can relate to what you went through with second husband and drinking alcohol with it doesn’t help.😾
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
Good on you for speaking up. You hear stories like this about personality change, and violence from the most unlikely people. Maybe a coffee shop where they can sell their it legally . The place would stink. As I said,if you have a medical done, and they check for marijuana in your system, for my husband’s staff, it’s a sackable offence, because of the legal risk of having it it in your system for months. That’s apparently why a lot of young people use coccaine/ice, because it’s out of your system 24 hours later. Marijuana lurks for 6 months since last used. Try to figure that one out??? Gezzabel.
 
Absolutely! Back when Gillard started fiddling w Cigarette packaging and the prices vastly increased ( thanks LABOR), a lot of ppl said that by making ‘smokes’ too expensive to buy would sent the use of marijuana skyrocketing.
We were sooo right.
The thing is that w cigarettes you are not so brain fuddled that you smash into children on a footpath - but on Marijuana, Psychosis, Schizophrenia and other previously hidden or unactivated illnesses can bloom and flourish.
Cigarettes, Vapes, Smoking Pot, taking idiot pills so by a creep in a pub will and can all kill you.
Human bodies contain cancer cells - it is unlucky if yours activate into “having cancer”.
Pot, illicit drugs, and Vapes in any form will kill you faster than smoking cigarettes.
The bloody government will always take the easiest and most profitable way for them - they chose tobacco.
They ignored the fact that by the yr 2000, the majority of cigarettes had filters.
All through both world wars there were few filters used in cigarettes - that was a big cancer reason.

Now they push being healthy so hard that we have ppl dying through taking excessive amounts of Vitamins and ProteinPowders to have the healthy body. Ppl immobilised with severe nerve damage from excess Vit B6, or D.
Ppl have ended up in wheelchairs through excessive vitamin use - to be healthy.

Regardless of what is banned, humans will always take something to excess - it is what they do best - greed + stupidity.

If any government here had a brain, Domestic Science would be taught from age 11-12 as a regular mandatory subject. This would prepare and inform all children for so much more in life instead of speaking Chinese or playing violin.
Domestic Science taught all about the body, vitamin and mineral used, good foods, do a budget, how to survive.
Dear member BabsL, thankyou for posting your very valuable and informative post. There is so much we can learn here. And yes, Domestic Science taught at an earlier age at school, is far more beneficial to one health, than as you say speaking Chinese or playing the violin. Its almost as though the government allows our youth to complete their schooling, without knowledge of healthy survival skills and choices, therefore more chance of people becoming ill, and then requiring medical intervention. This then gives vast employment to all people working in the field of medicine and health and wellbing. God bless, 🙏🦋
 
Some people get true benefits from cannabis in the medical sense.

Take a look at prescription medication. There are always risks with any medication that can potentially affect some people and not others. So the argument that cannabis is so bad for everyone, is moot.

Peanuts can be deadly for some people. Should those people be protected by making peanuts an illegal product?

Legalise cannabis? Yes. 👍🏻
Dear member DLHM, thankyou for your post. I respect your opinion, however, people who take prescription medicine or those who find peanuts to be deadly, do not put on balaklavas and take weapons, and then go and rob stores and people in private houses. The prescription medicine and peanuts do not create a thought of crime to threaten another person's life, in return for money that has come to be stollen. Researched studies indicate that Cannabis has been shown to have an associate with violent criminal behaviour in both in males and females. These crimes include assaults and attacks with weapons. Yes, you have a right to your opinion with your statement that people benefit from cannabis in the medical sense, but the criminal activity associated with the use of cannabis is too heavy to be ignored. If you have time, do some research on studies that show a correlation between crime and prescription medicine and peanuts, and then look at the correlation between crime and cannabis. God bless, 🙏🦋
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DLHM
Dear member DLHM, thankyou for your post. I respect your opinion, however, people who take prescription medicine or those who find peanuts to be deadly, do not put on balaklavas and take weapons, and then go and rob stores and people in private houses. The prescription medicine and peanuts do not create a thought of crime to threaten another person's life, in return for money that has come to be stollen. Researched studies indicate that Cannabis has been shown to have an associate with violent criminal behaviour in both in males and females. These crimes include assaults and attacks with weapons. Yes, you have a right to your opinion with your statement that people benefit from cannabis in the medical sense, but the criminal activity associated with the use of cannabis is too heavy to be ignored. If you have time, do some research on studies that show a correlation between crime and prescription medicine and peanuts, and then look at the correlation between crime and cannabis. God bless, 🙏🦋
There have been so many “studies” done over the years with varying results.

From personal experience, I’ve known and do know many people who partake in cannabis. Without exception, the results show the people being more mellow, certainly not violent.

I’ve never known anyone who resorts to violent crime and thuggery, whether they are an occasional user or daily. If fact, quite the opposite.

Research is a very broad field and much is unreliable. Studies can be conducted to sway thoughts one way or the other.
 
There have been so many “studies” done over the years with varying results.

From personal experience, I’ve known and do know many people who partake in cannabis. Without exception, the results show the people being more mellow, certainly not violent.

I’ve never known anyone who resorts to violent crime and thuggery, whether they are an occasional user or daily. If fact, quite the opposite.

Research is a very broad field and much is unreliable. Studies can be conducted to sway thoughts one way or the other.
Dear member DLHM, I respect your opinion. However, how many times have people been arrested for eating peanuts or for taking their prescription. Second, laws have been put in place that prohibit the use of cannabis, not because people become more mellow as you put it, but rather because those arrested for violence and armed robbery were found to be intoxicated with cannabis. Also there are multiple studies, not one, but multiple studies conducted by reliable medical departments, that were conducted, showing clear correlation between the use of cannabis and illegal behaviour like armed robbery and violence. Wishing you a pleasant day, God bless, 🙏🦋
 
Last edited:
Dear member DLHM, thankyou for your post. I respect your opinion, however, people who take prescription medicine or those who find peanuts to be deadly, do not put on balaklavas and take weapons, and then go and rob stores and people in private houses. The prescription medicine and peanuts do not create a thought of crime to threaten another person's life, in return for money that has come to be stollen. Researched studies indicate that Cannabis has been shown to have an associate with violent criminal behaviour in both in males and females. These crimes include assaults and attacks with weapons. Yes, you have a right to your opinion with your statement that people benefit from cannabis in the medical sense, but the criminal activity associated with the use of cannabis is too heavy to be ignored. If you have time, do some research on studies that show a correlation between crime and prescription medicine and peanuts, and then look at the correlation between crime and cannabis. God bless, 🙏🦋
In my brief literature survey of scholarly studies in the correlation between cannabis use and violent crime shows a limited connection.

From Does cannabis use predict aggressive or violent behavior in psychiatric populations? A systematic review (2022) from Maryam Sorkhou, et al.

Although cannabis use is associated with aggression or violence in individuals with PTSD or psychotic-spectrum disorders, causal conclusions cannot be drawn due to methodological limitations observed in the current literature.

 
In my brief literature survey of scholarly studies in the correlation between cannabis use and violent crime shows a limited connection.

From Does cannabis use predict aggressive or violent behavior in psychiatric populations? A systematic review (2022) from Maryam Sorkhou, et al.

Although cannabis use is associated with aggression or violence in individuals with PTSD or psychotic-spectrum disorders, causal conclusions cannot be drawn due to methodological limitations observed in the current literature.

Dear member Veggipatch, thankyou for your post. Your sourses of information are far more advanced than mine and I thankyou for sharing this information. But how do we explain the laws that are made for cannabis and no laws made for prescriptions and peanuts. Wishing you a pleasant afternoon, God bless, 🙏🦋
 
Dear member Veggipatch, thankyou for your post. Your sourses of information are far more advanced than mine and I thankyou for sharing this information. But how do we explain the laws that are made for cannabis and no laws made for prescriptions and peanuts. Wishing you a pleasant afternoon, God bless, 🙏🦋
There is another thing about this issue.

Driving with a prescribed level of alcohol is an offence which is determined quantitatively and the penalty handed down is determined by the level.

However, no quantitative measure is assigned to illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, MDMA and amphetamines). Just a blanket penalty, regardless of the amount one has ingested, injected or smoked.

Which begs another question. Why is there no diagnostic tool for detecting heroin or LSD in one's system? These substances also impair driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and 7777
There is another thing about this issue.

Driving with a prescribed level of alcohol is an offence which is determined quantitatively and the penalty handed down is determined by the level.

However, no quantitative measure is assigned to illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, MDMA and amphetamines). Just a blanket penalty, regardless of the amount one has ingested, injected or smoked.

Which begs another question. Why is there no diagnostic tool for detecting heroin or LSD in one's system? These substances also impair driving.
Dear member Veggiepatch, thankyou for your post. Do the police vans on the roads, who check drivers for alcohol, also have in place drug testing. And if the driver is found to have taken illegal drugs, are the legal consequences more harsh than the driver who is found to be over .05. The driver with an over.05 alcohol test would get demerit points and a hefty fine. Where as the driver with drugs in their blood stream, via a request by police for a blood test, would get demerit points, a hefty fine as well as a penalty for drug consumption. God bless, 🙏🦋
 
There is another thing about this issue.

Driving with a prescribed level of alcohol is an offence which is determined quantitatively and the penalty handed down is determined by the level.

However, no quantitative measure is assigned to illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, MDMA and amphetamines). Just a blanket penalty, regardless of the amount one has ingested, injected or smoked.

Which begs another question. Why is there no diagnostic tool for detecting heroin or LSD in one's system? These substances also impair driving.
Dear member Veggiepatch, thankyou for your post. Do the police vans on the roads, who check drivers for alcohol, also have in place drug testing. And if the driver is found to have taken illegal drugs, are the legal consequences more harsh than the driver who is found to be over .05. The driver with an over.05 alcohol test would get demerit points and a hefty fine. Where as the driver with drugs in their blood stream, via a request by police for a blood test, would get demerit points, a hefty fine as well as a penalty for drug consumption. God bless, 🙏🦋
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch
There have been so many “studies” done over the years with varying results.

From personal experience, I’ve known and do know many people who partake in cannabis. Without exception, the results show the people being more mellow, certainly not violent.

I’ve never known anyone who resorts to violent crime and thuggery, whether they are an occasional user or daily. If fact, quite the opposite.

Research is a very broad field and much is unreliable. Studies can be conducted to sway thoughts one way or the other.
The only problems I ever came across was when some rotten git wouldn't pass the toke, always wanting the extra couple of hits shitehawk.
 
Dear member Veggiepatch, thankyou for your post. Do the police vans on the roads, who check drivers for alcohol, also have in place drug testing. And if the driver is found to have taken illegal drugs, are the legal consequences more harsh than the driver who is found to be over .05. The driver with an over.05 alcohol test would get demerit points and a hefty fine. Where as the driver with drugs in their blood stream, via a request by police for a blood test, would get demerit points, a hefty fine as well as a penalty for drug consumption. God bless, 🙏🦋
The penalty imposed on drug drivers are invariably a three or six month loss of licence and a $704 fine, regardless of the level of impairment.

Things are different for drink drivers. In New South Wales, court imposed fines range from $704 to $5500 and licence suspension from three months to unlimited loss of licence, dependent on the blood alcohol reading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
The penalty imposed on drug drivers are invariably a three or six month loss of licence and a $704 fine, regardless of the level of impairment.

Things are different for drink drivers. In New South Wales, court imposed fines range from $704 to $5500 and licence suspension from three months to unlimited loss of licence, dependent on the blood alcohol reading.
Dear member Veggipatch, thankyou for the information that you provided in your post. Wishing you an enjoyable and pleasant afternoon, God bless, 🙏🦋
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
Why is Canberra aloud to make laws that only meaningfully for them They can have 5 plants for themselves but if you live in Wagga Wagga Wollongong or Windsor you would get into trouble for growing 5 plants People who live in Canberra also get cheap electricity amoung other things it's a joke
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and 7777
Why is Canberra aloud to make laws that only meaningfully for them They can have 5 plants for themselves but if you live in Wagga Wagga Wollongong or Windsor you would get into trouble for growing 5 plants People who live in Canberra also get cheap electricity amoung other things it's a joke
Dear member Crestwood 96, thankyou for your post. Perhaps the big people who sit on their high chairs, have made these laws, to protect themselves from breaking the law, when using up to 5 plants. Wishing you a pleasant evening. God bless, 🙏🦋
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×