Major supermarkets provide body-worn cameras to staff over surge in violent customer incidents

The Australian retail landscape is changing, not just in the way we shop but also in the way stores are ensuring the safety of their staff.

In a move that reflects the growing concern over workplace safety, some of Australia's retail giants—Bunnings, Coles, and Woolworths—have taken a firm stance against the alarming rise in violent customer incidents.



These retailers have responded by equipping their staff with body-worn cameras to protect employees from the surge of aggressive behaviour they face.

This initiative comes after a series of troubling events that have highlighted the need for increased security measures within the retail sector.


shutterstock_1438248014.jpg
Major supermarkets provide their staff with body-worn cameras amid the rise of violent customer incidents. Credit: John Gomez / Shutterstock


Bunnings has been at the forefront of this initiative. After facing criticism for breaching privacy laws by using facial recognition technology, Bunnings has shifted its focus to 'team safety cameras' to deter and document instances of customer aggression.

The company began trialling these cameras in 2022, and the move has since been justified by the release of compilation footage showing staff members being threatened with weapons and physically attacked.

This footage spanned incidents across Australia and New Zealand.

Similarly, Coles has confirmed that it has equipped employees in certain stores with body cameras as of September, in response to a spike in theft and customer abuse.

‘It's important to note that the majority of customers do the right thing in store. Measures like this are for the ones who don't,’ a Coles spokesperson said.

‘The safety of our team members and customers is our top priority, and we have a range of security measures in place to reduce theft from our stores including security personnel and surveillance technologies such as CCTV.’



Coles clarified that it does not use facial recognition technology.

According to the spokesperson, staff members have the option to activate body cameras if they feel unsafe.

‘They can easily request emergency assistance in the event of an emergency or threatening situation,’ the spokesperson said.

‘Every effort will be made to inform the customer that they are turning it on for safety.’

‘The body-worn cameras have been well received by team members, who feel that the technology benefits them if faced with a threatening situation.’



Woolworths, another supermarket heavyweight, initiated a staff body camera trial in 2021 to address incidents of physical and sexual assault.

‘Team safety cameras have been introduced across a number of our stores around the country,’ the Woolworths spokesperson said.

‘We're always looking at different methods to ensure the safety of our team and customers.’

Woolworths also doesn’t use facial recognition technology in its stores.

With around 700,000 retail crime events reported in the 12 months ending in April 2024, the urgency for action is clear.



Queensland has taken legislative steps to enforce stronger penalties for violent customers, including those in the retail sector.

However, the Australian Retailers Association (ARA) is advocating for more to be done at a national level, with Chief Executive Paul Zahra calling for harsher penalties for violence in retail-specific work settings.

‘We want to see harsher penalties for people committing violence in retail-specific work settings,’ Zahra said.

‘No one should go to work fearing for their safety, but unfortunately, this is the reality for many retail workers.’
Key Takeaways
  • Bunnings, Coles, and Woolworths have introduced staff-worn body cameras in reaction to an increase in violent incidents involving customers.
  • Bunnings has released CCTV footage displaying confrontations between staff and customers after being criticised for using facial recognition technology.
  • Coles began deploying body-worn cameras in September to tackle theft and customer abuse, affirming that staff safety is a priority.
  • Woolworths confirmed the use of body cameras in some stores, and there is a national discussion about implementing tougher penalties for violence against retail workers.
Have you or someone you know encountered aggressive behaviour while shopping or working in retail? What are your views on staff using body-worn cameras? Let us know in the comments below!
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
If those that work there are at risk so is every person who enters the store. would Having security staff be more productive. A body camera is over the top for goodness sake these are retail workers paid to serve the store patron. Perhaps some training in customer service and basic training in de-escalation of difficult to deal with people and situations would be more appropriate. Big stores don’t want to deal with face to face customers, customers are now seen as a problem and treated as such with no value. Stores remain open to take the money of those who don’t like or use technology to shop, with the focus on online sales that generate much greater profit margins.
Retailers are making the in store shopping experience as unpleasant as possible as way of changing our shopping habits. Pick and pack staff constantly clogging the isles and access to shelves. You’re lucky if you can use a staffed checkout or even interact with a staff member. As we all age social interaction and human engagement is so important and in the past it was recognised the weekly trip to the shops, bank, Tatts lotto agency ect… the only contact outside the home someone has for the week staff were aware of and understood this.
I also fear any footage saved on the device is open to miss use and I bet my bottom dollar we will start seeing shoppers being used for the amusement of others on social media.
 
If those that work there are at risk so is every person who enters the store. would Having security staff be more productive. A body camera is over the top for goodness sake these are retail workers paid to serve the store patron. Perhaps some training in customer service and basic training in de-escalation of difficult to deal with people and situations would be more appropriate. Big stores don’t want to deal with face to face customers, customers are now seen as a problem and treated as such with no value. Stores remain open to take the money of those who don’t like or use technology to shop, with the focus on online sales that generate much greater profit margins.
Retailers are making the in store shopping experience as unpleasant as possible as way of changing our shopping habits. Pick and pack staff constantly clogging the isles and access to shelves. You’re lucky if you can use a staffed checkout or even interact with a staff member. As we all age social interaction and human engagement is so important and in the past it was recognised the weekly trip to the shops, bank, Tatts lotto agency ect… the only contact outside the home someone has for the week staff were aware of and understood this.
I also fear any footage saved on the device is open to miss use and I bet my bottom dollar we will start seeing shoppers being used for the amusement of others on social media.
If it wasn't for abusive and violent customers these types of technology wouldn't be necessary.
Staff shouldn't have to put up with this sort of behaviour when going to work.
Our weak legal system has a lot to answer for, people can abuse staff, threaten them with knives, even physically assault them and get nothing more than a smack on the hand.
Pick and pack staff offer a needed service to disabled people and others who for different reasons can't get to the store.
Perhaps you should realise that everything isn't always necessarily about "you" and different services are offered for everybody's needs.
 
If those that work there are at risk so is every person who enters the store. would Having security staff be more productive. A body camera is over the top for goodness sake these are retail workers paid to serve the store patron. Perhaps some training in customer service and basic training in de-escalation of difficult to deal with people and situations would be more appropriate. Big stores don’t want to deal with face to face customers, customers are now seen as a problem and treated as such with no value. Stores remain open to take the money of those who don’t like or use technology to shop, with the focus on online sales that generate much greater profit margins.
Retailers are making the in store shopping experience as unpleasant as possible as way of changing our shopping habits. Pick and pack staff constantly clogging the isles and access to shelves. You’re lucky if you can use a staffed checkout or even interact with a staff member. As we all age social interaction and human engagement is so important and in the past it was recognised the weekly trip to the shops, bank, Tatts lotto agency ect… the only contact outside the home someone has for the week staff were aware of and understood this.
I also fear any footage saved on the device is open to miss use and I bet my bottom dollar we will start seeing shoppers being used for the amusement of others on social media.
Bringing up not being served by a worker, people not being able to socialise and everything else you want to rant about has nothing to do with the cameras they are wearing for not only their safety but other people who have been attacked or verbally abused as this can be used in the legal system as evidence. Before you go on about saved footage going social media, these cameras are the property of the supermarket and only they are able to download any footage plus they have a short recording loop and will only save the recording once the save unit is activated. Next time you want to air your grievances stick to the issue and research what you are going on about or alternatively change supermarkets.
 
Bringing up not being served by a worker, people not being able to socialise and everything else you want to rant about has nothing to do with the cameras they are wearing for not only their safety but other people who have been attacked or verbally abused as this can be used in the legal system as evidence. Before you go on about saved footage going social media, these cameras are the property of the supermarket and only they are able to download any footage plus they have a short recording loop and will only save the recording once the save unit is activated. Next time you want to air your grievances stick to the issue and research what you are going on about or alternatively change supermarkets.
I was thinking exactly the same.
 
If it wasn't for abusive and violent customers these types of technology wouldn't be necessary.
Staff shouldn't have to put up with this sort of behaviour when going to work.
Our weak legal system has a lot to answer for, people can abuse staff, threaten them with knives, even physically assault them and get nothing more than a smack on the hand.
Pick and pack staff offer a needed service to disabled people and others who for different reasons can't get to the store.
Perhaps you should realise that everything isn't always necessarily about "you" and different services are offered for everybody's needs.
I fully agree with you, in this so called lucky country of ours, the laws stinks, and when these lowlife crims are caught all, they get is a tap on the wrist. We should see how Singapore treats their crims, you are safe to walk the streets at any time of the day and night, and they are also taught to respect it each other, this country could learn a lot from them.
 
If it wasn't for abusive and violent customers these types of technology wouldn't be necessary.
Staff shouldn't have to put up with this sort of behaviour when going to work.
Our weak legal system has a lot to answer for, people can abuse staff, threaten them with knives, even physically assault them and get nothing more than a smack on the hand.
Pick and pack staff offer a needed service to disabled people and others who for different reasons can't get to the store.
Perhaps you should realise that everything isn't always necessarily about "you" and different services are offered for everybody's needs.
Are you saying there are more people shopping in store that are abusive and aggressive than not?
Personally I dont have an issue with click and collect. However I don’t appreciate not being able to move around a store and easily access shelves and I would like service from a shop assistant when I need it. Yes I use the term shop assistant because a major part of the role is to assist customers disabled or not. I do not think body cameras are even a deterrent and pose serious incident’s of miss use. Shop assistant are not first responders, security is always visible and available to deal with and remove poorly behaved customers. They also have the option to call police. I do not think or believe shop assistants should be using body camera. As a recently retired person who worked as a first responders on the streets without a body camera confident in the training and following best practice I did not consider myself to be exposed to high risk yes there was risk there always is everyday for everyone, but body cameras for shop assistants is a step too far and put innocent people at risk Of footage miss use. The body camera it’s self will have negative effects on some and trigger an unwanted response in some situations. Next thing we know body cameras will be worn by everyone just like carrying a mobile phone and we have witnessed what happens with footage captured on those.
 
Not personally but saw it , the poor check out lady was stunned at the abuse because customer thought she wasn’t moving fast enough and she was in a hurry.
Quite frankly I have nothing to hide I don’t care what they use to ensure their safety, in this case. Bring on big brother.
 
If those that work there are at risk so is every person who enters the store. would Having security staff be more productive. A body camera is over the top for goodness sake these are retail workers paid to serve the store patron. Perhaps some training in customer service and basic training in de-escalation of difficult to deal with people and situations would be more appropriate. Big stores don’t want to deal with face to face customers, customers are now seen as a problem and treated as such with no value. Stores remain open to take the money of those who don’t like or use technology to shop, with the focus on online sales that generate much greater profit margins.
Retailers are making the in store shopping experience as unpleasant as possible as way of changing our shopping habits. Pick and pack staff constantly clogging the isles and access to shelves. You’re lucky if you can use a staffed checkout or even interact with a staff member. As we all age social interaction and human engagement is so important and in the past it was recognised the weekly trip to the shops, bank, Tatts lotto agency ect… the only contact outside the home someone has for the week staff were aware of and understood this.
I also fear any footage saved on the device is open to miss use and I bet my bottom dollar we will start seeing shoppers being used for the amusement of others on social media.
Can agree with some of your comments. But, times they are a changing can’t stop it, have to deal with it. I have been behind a cash register. There are people that are bullies and you shouldn’t have to deal with it. Being reasonable with them is considered weakness and they double their efforts.
At u4 I wish for more human interaction but AI will become a way of life in this tech world.
 
Are you saying there are more people shopping in store that are abusive and aggressive than not?
Personally I dont have an issue with click and collect. However I don’t appreciate not being able to move around a store and easily access shelves and I would like service from a shop assistant when I need it. Yes I use the term shop assistant because a major part of the role is to assist customers disabled or not. I do not think body cameras are even a deterrent and pose serious incident’s of miss use. Shop assistant are not first responders, security is always visible and available to deal with and remove poorly behaved customers. They also have the option to call police. I do not think or believe shop assistants should be using body camera. As a recently retired person who worked as a first responders on the streets without a body camera confident in the training and following best practice I did not consider myself to be exposed to high risk yes there was risk there always is everyday for everyone, but body cameras for shop assistants is a step too far and put innocent people at risk Of footage miss use. The body camera it’s self will have negative effects on some and trigger an unwanted response in some situations. Next thing we know body cameras will be worn by everyone just like carrying a mobile phone and we have witnessed what happens with footage captured on those.
My, you sound absolutely paranoid.
First responders wear cameras as well today, don't they?
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67 and PattiB
Are you saying there are more people shopping in store that are abusive and aggressive than not?
Personally I dont have an issue with click and collect. However I don’t appreciate not being able to move around a store and easily access shelves and I would like service from a shop assistant when I need it. Yes I use the term shop assistant because a major part of the role is to assist customers disabled or not. I do not think body cameras are even a deterrent and pose serious incident’s of miss use. Shop assistant are not first responders, security is always visible and available to deal with and remove poorly behaved customers. They also have the option to call police. I do not think or believe shop assistants should be using body camera. As a recently retired person who worked as a first responders on the streets without a body camera confident in the training and following best practice I did not consider myself to be exposed to high risk yes there was risk there always is everyday for everyone, but body cameras for shop assistants is a step too far and put innocent people at risk Of footage miss use. The body camera it’s self will have negative effects on some and trigger an unwanted response in some situations. Next thing we know body cameras will be worn by everyone just like carrying a mobile phone and we have witnessed what happens with footage captured on those.
Interesting to hear from someone who has been in the field. Thankyou
 
I was thinking exactly the same.
Issue, they are not at any higher risk than any other person who deals with public. They are certainly not trained to respond to a person in crisis and should call for someone who is immediately the same if they feel unsafe. What’s a body camera going to do that the store security cameras can’t if one is assuming the recoding will be used after the fact if an incident arises it’s the voice recording necessary to identify a assailant Or make them think twice. If a person is unable to control their emotional regulation no camera will help chances are the camera will escalate the situation. Let’s face facts the majority of consumers show and treat all others including shop assistants with respect. Yet all consumers are seen and treated as a threat. Keeping telling people something long enough it is believed as true regardless of statistical fact.
 
Issue, they are not at any higher risk than any other person who deals with public. They are certainly not trained to respond to a person in crisis and should call for someone who is immediately the same if they feel unsafe. What’s a body camera going to do that the store security cameras can’t if one is assuming the recoding will be used after the fact if an incident arises it’s the voice recording necessary to identify a assailant Or make them think twice. If a person is unable to control their emotional regulation no camera will help chances are the camera will escalate the situation. Let’s face facts the majority of consumers show and treat all others including shop assistants with respect. Yet all consumers are seen and treated as a threat. Keeping telling people something long enough it is believed as true regardless of statistical fact.
It doesn't worry me, whatever it takes.
People who are worried about it can always shop online, but then they will have to worry about being scammed
Take your choice, lol.
 
I can add to this my last job was Transfer Station Operater in the town where I live, every time the local council put up the price by 50 cents I was the one to cop the abuse I tell them to go to the office in town and complain as I am following there orders the people who complained are the people with plenty of money all the workers etc just paid the money no problems and it was the same ones who complained every single time the price was increased by 50 cents
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×