'I own that mistake.': Did a NSW minister go too far with taxpayers’ money?

What started as a simple trip for a New South Wales (NSW) minister has sparked a fierce debate about the use of taxpayer money and public accountability.

What seemed like a minor misstep has led to widespread scrutiny, with both public officials and the community questioning the boundaries between personal and professional conduct.

As the details of this controversial decision come to light, it’s clear that this incident has ignited a firestorm of criticism.


NSW Transport Minister Jo Haylen faced backlash after it was revealed she used a taxpayer-funded ministerial driver for a private trip over the Australia Day long weekend.

The trip, which lasted almost 13 hours and covered 446 kilometres, involved the driver travelling from Sydney to Caves Beach, where Ms Haylen had been staying.

She and her friends, including Housing Minister Rose Jackson, were then driven to a Hunter Valley winery for a private lunch on 25 January.


image1.png
Minister faces backlash over taxpayer-funded private trip. Image source: Jo Haylen


Ms Jackson had recently sparked her own controversy, claiming Sydney rental prices were 'a couple hundred bucks'.

In a 2 February press conference, Ms Haylen admitted her actions ‘did not meet the pub test’ and took full responsibility for the decision.

The Transport Minister confirmed she would pay back the $750 cost of the trip, acknowledging that while it adhered to the rules, it fell short of public expectations.

She said: ‘I acknowledge it doesn't pass the pub test because it is purely for private purposes. It is within the rules, but I don't think that meets public expectations.’

‘Last weekend, I travelled with some friends to a private lunch in the Hunter Valley. My ministerial driver drove us to and from that lunch.’

‘Now, while that travel was within the rules, it doesn't meet the pub test and I fully acknowledge that and I own that mistake.’


Ms Haylen explained there was a ‘bit of a grey area’ between work and personal life because her job was 24/7.

When asked whether this was the first time she had used taxpayer-funded travel for personal reasons, she avoided providing a direct answer.

‘Look, I'm not going to comment about other instances or indeed how other ministers might use their entitlements,’ she said.

‘I'm owning it. And I think that people understand sometimes that you make mistakes. I've made a mistake here, and that's why I'm apologising. And we're paying the cost.’

Her apology came only after details of the trip were made public.


The scandal led to strong criticism from the opposition, with NSW Liberal leader Mark Speakman calling for her resignation.

‘Jo Haylen and Rose Jackson had shown utter contempt for the NSW taxpayer and must resign,’ Mr Speakman said.

‘Now that they’ve been caught, Minister Haylen said she’ll ‘pay it back’—that’s not accountability, that’s an admission of guilt.’

‘And worse, they forced a government driver into a gruelling 13-hour shift.’

Ms Haylen has since ruled out stepping down from her position.


Watch Mark Speakman’s full statement below.



Key Takeaways
  • NSW Transport Minister Jo Haylen used a taxpayer-funded driver for a private trip, causing controversy over the use of public resources.
  • The trip, which lasted almost 13 hours, included a journey from Sydney to Caves Beach and a private lunch in the Hunter Valley with friends, including Housing Minister Rose Jackson.
  • In a press conference, Ms Haylen admitted her actions ‘did not meet the pub test’ and took full responsibility, agreeing to repay the $750 cost.
  • The opposition called for her resignation, but Ms Haylen ruled out stepping down, maintaining she would pay for the mistake.

With a growing debate over how taxpayer funds should be used, do you think politicians should be held to stricter standards when it comes to personal travel on the public dime?

Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Politicians get paid well and receive excelleDnt allowance packages, yet they still feel the need to rip off the tax payer. This is politicians from all sides and they continue to learn nothing. IT IS NOT THEIR MONEY TO ABUSE!!!!. This needs to be motitored more closely and needs to be a sackable offence. Massive fines are required and they should be banned from running at the next election. What they are doing amounts to stealing and it needs to be treated that way.
 
I really don't care which side the pollie is on , but I do have to say with the amount they get a year, you think that it would be enough. So many of them on both sides whether its councils to Federal they think for whatever reason to take advantage of using money that is not included in the pay,but decides to be a sneak and hoping not to be caught out.
To all the greedy pollies on both sides out there, eventually your true colors will shine through.
 
Politicians get paid well and receive excelleDnt allowance packages, yet they still feel the need to rip off the tax payer. This is politicians from all sides and they continue to learn nothing. IT IS NOT THEIR MONEY TO ABUSE!!!!. This needs to be motitored more closely and needs to be a sackable offence. Massive fines are required and they should be banned from running at the next election. What they are doing amounts to stealing and it needs to be treated that way.
I agree wholeheartly
 
Politicians get paid well and receive excelleDnt allowance packages, yet they still feel the need to rip off the tax payer. This is politicians from all sides and they continue to learn nothing. IT IS NOT THEIR MONEY TO ABUSE!!!!. This needs to be motitored more closely and needs to be a sackable offence. Massive fines are required and they should be banned from running at the next election. What they are doing amounts to stealing and it needs to be treated that way.
Sorry, while all that may be true, apparently it is within the rules, and that is where the focus should be imo.
 
WHY YJE BIG DEAL ABOUT USING TAXPAYERS MONEY
MORRISSON USED OVER A MILLION DOLLARS IN TAX PAYERS MONEY TO GO ON HIS HOLIDAY TO HAWIA WHEN AUSTRALIA HAD THE BUSHFIRES NOYJING WAS SAID ABOUT THAT
WHY
HE ALSO USED TAXPAYERS MONEY TO BUY AND INSTALL HUMIDIFIERS IN HIS PRIVATE HOUSE AT TAXPAYERS EXPENCE AND ONCE AGAIN NOTHING SAID SO WHY PICK ON LITTLE THIEVES WHEN BIGGER ONES ARE AROUND
 
  • Love
Reactions: PattiB
The question that I would like an answer to is what if she didn't get caught, would she have paid back the money that she abused and took out of the public money fund. NO.... not likely, for her to NOW PAY BACK THE MONEY is only because it has hit the papers and everyone is talking about it. She has also admitted that on other occasions she has done similar conduct and it is because the guidelines are very loosely written and not clearly defined. Here is an idea..... make the rules... not guidelines... more defined, if they continue to breach these they receive a 'double pay-back' fine ie: the initial cost plus the same again. A very close mate of mine worked in Parliament House, Sydney, on one occasion he witnessed a late sitting of the Assembly. As the speaker was about to close the meeting a sitting member stood up and asked the speaker to 'not close the Parliament for another 8 minutes. This delay would allow all the members to 'claim a taxi allowance' to get home, even if they didn't travel by taxi. It was an easy few dollars straight into their pockets. Many members had a 'good laugh' with others clapping the Member, for his 'thoughtful proposal.' Parliament sat down and had a talk and after the time had elapsed the Speaker closed the session and all the Members received their little 'bonus'. It is all recorded in Hansards. These 'blood-suckers' are only there to keep their 'snouts in the trough', this is not the first incident of this type, it has been going on for years and nothing will be done about it because the ones who can 'fix the problem' don't want to.
 
Politicians get paid well and receive excelleDnt allowance packages, yet they still feel the need to rip off the tax payer. This is politicians from all sides and they continue to learn nothing. IT IS NOT THEIR MONEY TO ABUSE!!!!. This needs to be motitored more closely and needs to be a sackable offence. Massive fines are required and they should be banned from running at the next election. What they are doing amounts to stealing and it needs to be treated that way.
As if they can't afford it on their salaries alone!!!!
 
The entitled politicians believe they can use taxpayers money for anything they can get away with I’m sick of these issues being exposed. If we did something like this we’d be charged with “stealing as a servant” but no they just apologise
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×