Discover how Peter Dutton's latest Centrelink proposal could affect your benefits!

Navigating the complexities of Centrelink can be a challenge for many Australians, especially our senior community members who rely on welfare for their livelihood.

It's crucial to stay informed about any changes that could impact your benefits. Recently, Peter Dutton, the leader of the opposition, has made headlines with his pledge to reintroduce a controversial measure that could significantly alter the way welfare is managed for recipients in Indigenous communities.

This proposal has sparked widespread debate, with supporters arguing it promotes responsible spending, while critics raise concerns about its potential to condemn vulnerable groups. As discussions continue, understanding the implications of such policies becomes increasingly crucial for all affected individuals.


The cashless welfare card, a system initially rolled out in 2016, is designed to restrict how welfare payments can be spent.

The card aims to prevent money from being used on alcohol, gambling, and tobacco by quarantining up to 80 per cent of welfare payments.


1736816755088.png
Peter Dutton's proposal reintroduced the cashless debit card for welfare recipients in Indigenous communities. Credit: Depositphotos


Only the remaining 20 per cent is deposited into recipients' bank accounts, ensuring the bulk of the funds are spent on essentials like groceries.

During its trial between 2019 and 2021 in the Bundaberg and Hervey Bay region, the card reportedly blocked over $400,000 from spending on prohibited items.

Proponents of the card argue that it helps to reduce substance abuse and associated social issues within vulnerable communities.


However, the card has been a subject of intense debate. Critics, including the current Labor government, argue that it infringes on personal autonomy and has failed to achieve its goals.

Social Services Minister Amanda Rishworth pointed out that the card's restrictions adversely affected many people's lives.

‘So many people's lives were adversely affected because they couldn't access enough cash...to be able to live their life,’ she claimed.

The Labor government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, scrapped the welfare card shortly after coming into power in 2022.

The move was supported by findings from the Parliamentary Budget Office, which projected a saving of almost $290 million over four years by discontinuing the card.


Despite the opposition from the government, Peter Dutton is steadfast in his commitment to reintroduce the cashless debit card, particularly in Indigenous communities.

He believed that, with proper consultation, the card can ensure that children receive the support they deserve from their parents.

Dutton has also promised to hold a Royal Commission into sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and to conduct a full audit of spending on Indigenous programs to address inefficiencies.

‘There are communities where safety, housing, health, education and employment are critical issues,’ he said.

‘That's where our efforts must be targeted.’


As the federal election looms, with a date yet to be set but required by 17 May at the latest, Dutton and Albanese are hitting the campaign trail with their respective promises and policy proposals.

For our members who are Centrelink recipients, it's essential to understand how these potential changes could affect you.

While the cashless welfare card is unavailable, its reintroduction could significantly shift how you receive and spend your benefits.

It's a reminder of the importance of staying engaged with political developments and advocating for policies that respect the dignity and autonomy of all individuals, regardless of their financial situation.
Key Takeaways

  • Peter Dutton has proposed the reintroduction of the cashless debit card for welfare recipients in Indigenous communities to prevent spending on alcohol and gambling.
  • The card quarantines 80 per cent of a recipient's income and blocked over $400,000 on prohibited items during a Bundaberg and Hervey Bay trial from 2019 to 2021.
  • The current government led by Anthony Albanese scrapped the welfare card shortly after coming to power in 2022, with Social Services Minister Amanda Rishworth stating it was 'time to give people their autonomy back'.
  • Dutton's plans are part of his campaign promises as he and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese are on the election trail, with an election to be held no later than 17 May.
Have you or someone you know been affected by the cashless welfare system? What are your concerns or opinions on the proposed reintroduction of the card? Your insights are valuable. Feel free to share them in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Who said it is going to be across the board - you are reading more into the Cash Management Card than is reality - I find this story over the top and a dose of misinformation!
I don't know why you say that - it most certainly is discriminatory and racist. No, it not ok to have one rule for 'white' and one for indigenous. Pretty sure, in terms of numbers, more 'white' welfare recipients are spending of drugs and alcohol and neglecting kids. I can most certainly see Dutton bringing it in for all welfare recipients in future...bit by bit.
 
I agree totally with Koda: in
regard to the distress and anxiety it causes . The
question is does anybody
have a better idea to solve
these harsh rules. Yes the
hope is to curb purchasing
goods that are detriment
all round . Also hoping that
that might encourage people to look after their families better
and in the process give the
opportunity for the people who are the culprits to reconsider the benefits to themselves as far as it goes . Ideal probably not ,
but any alternative measures
to present. Bring it on, don't
criticize people who are trying
to benefit people affected by the
results of what has been
causing disastrous consequences. If you can
improve the thoughts behind this Policy bring forward your
Improved good processes to a good end .
We are all ears , to hear your
Proposals , what you don't have
any ? Where does that leave us and them ?
Because it's just not that simple. Get rid of drug dealers/importers and ban alcohol.
 
I am getting tired of misleading stories here - can't make up my mind on whether it is intentional or misguided - the writer must have some understanding of the true intent and who it is going to affect and not suggest it is also aimed at retirees!
Say what? It is only going to affect ‘them’ - not ‘us’...such a toxic thing to say.
I would not be so sure that it won’t affect all welfare recipients.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colette 3799
Not exactly,
EG. My ex father in law, an alcoholic, spent most of his life on the dole, reached retirement age and immediately qualified for the age pension.
On the other hand
My stepfather arrived in Australia with next to nothing, slaved his arse off doing cleaning. Over many years he built his efforts into a large cleaning company employing over 100 people. He paid a fortune in tax and all the people he provided work for paid their taxes.
When he retired he didn't qualify for a pension. When he passed he was
85 years and had never received a cent, not that he expected one, he didn't need it.
Weird system that penalises those contributing and rewarding those who contribute nothing.
I believe all people who worked and paid their taxes should receive the age pension irregardless of their financial
situation and you should not have your pension reduced if you wish to continue working.
This happens in other countries, why not here?
If our pollies , whichever side, didn't have their noses so far in the trough there might be more left over for the everyday worker.
My daughter is intellectually disabled and receives a disability pension, so obviously there are many people like her, who can't contribute through no fault of their own.
They automatically qualify for an age pension.
Why should people who can well afford to look after themselves be given a pension - aka welfare. Welfare is for people who do not have the funds to look after themselves. What - should they take it with them to their grave or is it that family are looking forward to the inheritance?
 
But why not? Plenty of pensioners drink, smoke and take drugs - then complain they can only afford to eat dog food!
Well age pensioners, by that time have no dependant children and if they have a partner who is silly enough to have stayed with them that long I don't have any sympathy for them.
It's aged pension I am talking about.
Taxes were taken from everybody's income, to go to pay their age pension, long ago. Then the pollies of that time raided that war chest and included it into general revenue, but that tax was never removed. Everybody who works and pays taxes, still pays that tax, and should be entitled to the age pension that it was paid for. I don't class the age pension as welfare, you might as well say that superannuation is welfare. And the pollies have got their sticky fingers well into that as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colette 3799
We drove through Alice Springs about 15 years ago and they had something similar in place. The indigenous could go to the service station and they could spend a certain amount every week in that service station. I am not sure where else they could spend their money but I was told they couldn't spend it on alcohol. There was no crime like there is now in Alice Springs and we didn't feel unsafe there. After reading about how it is now I don't want to go back there. So it could be a good thing if implemented properly.
Have you ever known the government to do anything properly??? Over budget and two years later!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colette 3799
Well age pensioners, by that time have no dependant children and if they have a partner who is silly enough to have stayed with them that long I don't have any sympathy for them.
It's aged pension I am talking about.
Taxes were taken from everybody's income, to go to pay their age pension, long ago. Then the pollies of that time raided that war chest and included it into general revenue, but that tax was never removed. Everybody who works and pays taxes, still pays that tax, and should be entitled to the age pension that it was paid for. I don't class the age pension as welfare, you might as well say that superannuation is welfare. And the pollies have got their sticky fingers well into that as well.
Re pension - I don't remember ever thinking that tax paid for retirement. When was it considered so? When super started I was well aware it was to fund my own retirement. I believed taxes paid for our Medicare system and general welfare, etc.
In relation to welfare recipients - so they should any make this controlled spending card for Indigenous with children?
 
Good idea for certain communities/people. At least the children could be fed and clothed, and the money notspent on drugs and alcohol. May stop alot of the crime and bashings in these areas.
Surely crime would increase if the drug and alcohol adicts couldn’t use the money from their benifits. There’s no way they would chose to do without, they would get the money for their addiction by robbing others
 
Totally agree with all you say. Dutton has spent tha last 3 years blocking legislation and dividing the ccountry and creating fear amongst the Australian people. He said hd willl not fly the Indiginous flag at prress conferences. Because it divides the country. What a joke. Everything he does is aimed at dividing the country. The man is pure scum.
Totally agree. He has no policies of his own but does exactly what Abbott did in opposition, block everything - good idea or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAN3005 and Knell
As All my bills are paid by direct debit, including all my insurances, car rego, licence, I fear this card system would not leave enough in my bank account to cover all my bills. Also, I deplore cards & prefer to use cash in all my dealings. Cards cost too much in fees & charges, robbing us of what little we save by shopping thriftily
I WILL NOT vote for anyone suggesting this.
 
Re pension - I don't remember ever thinking that tax paid for retirement. When was it considered so? When super started I was well aware it was to fund my own retirement. I believed taxes paid for our Medicare system and general welfare, etc.
In relation to welfare recipients - so they should any make this controlled spending card for Indigenous with children?
I didn't say that. I don't necessarily think it's a good idea. but something needs to be done. but I have no idea what. It will
end up in the too hard basket I guess
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×