Council rules spoil camping plans as local landowners slam new restrictions

For many Aussies, there’s nothing quite like packing up the caravan, hitting the open road, and spending a night under the stars.

Camping is a beloved tradition, especially among over-60s who cherish the freedom, affordability, and connection to nature it offers.

But as camping popularity has soared in recent years, a new battle is brewing between local councils and the landowners who make these adventures possible.


With traditional campgrounds often booked out or charging sky-high fees, more and more travellers have turned to private landowners—especially farmers—who open up their properties for overnight stays.

It’s a win-win: campers get a unique, affordable experience, and landowners earn a little extra income to help keep their properties afloat during tough times.

But in Queensland and other states, councils have started enforcing strict compliance rules that many say are simply unworkable.


1746062715473.png
Landowners and farmers in Queensland are being forced to stop offering private land as campsites due to costly and burdensome council regulations. Credit: Facebook


Farmers and camping advocates are calling the new requirements 'ridiculous', claiming they threaten the future of rural tourism and the livelihoods of those who rely on it.

Take Steven Moriarty, a farmer in Queensland’s Scenic Rim region.

He used to welcome campers to eight sites on his 300-acre property, but he was forced to shut up shop after council regulations changed.


The new rules require landowners to submit development applications, conduct expensive flood and fire assessments, and meet a laundry list of safety requirements.

'When you start looking at tens of thousands of dollars for a few campsites, it makes it practically impossible for people to comply,' Steven said.

He’s not alone. Debra Symes, co-founder of Caravan Overnight Farmstays—a platform connecting campers with farmers—says she’s heard from many landowners facing similar struggles.

One member was hit with a 28-page application just to get started and then quoted $70,000 for fire hydrants, toilets, lighting, muster points, and fencing.

'It’s ridiculous,' Debra said.

'Wouldn’t it be better to have a policy that allowed a small number of self-contained vans on a property and have a small licence fee for a farmer so we’re supporting tourism?'


Councils argue that safety and environmental concerns tie their hands. The Scenic Rim Regional Council points to 'natural hazards or other impediments' that could endanger campers, such as floods, fires, and access issues.

They say each site must be assessed individually, considering traffic safety, infrastructure, environmental impacts, and the effect on neighbouring properties.

A council spokesperson said, 'There will be cases where achieving compliance is difficult, but this will usually be due to safety or access-related issues.

The council is, and continues to be, supportive of growing our rural tourism market and providing additional income streams for farmers.'

To their credit, some councils are working with industry representatives to find a solution, but for now, many landowners feel the rules are simply too onerous.

It’s no wonder this issue has come to a head. According to federal government data, camping and caravan trips jumped by a whopping 19 per cent in 2021 compared to the previous year, with 12.6 million extra trips taken.


The trend has only continued since the pandemic, as Aussies rediscover the joys of local travel.

But this surge in demand has put pressure on both public and private campsites.

National parks in Queensland, New South Wales, and Victoria have introduced booking systems to manage the crowds.

However, this has led to new problems—like 'ghost camping', where people book sites and don’t show up, leaving spots empty but unavailable to others.

Meanwhile, increased illegal camping has forced councils to take a hard line.

Some, like the NSW Central Coast Council, have threatened fines of up to $110,000 for repeat offenders who camp on public land without permission.

Many in the camping community believe there’s a middle ground.


They agree that safety and environmental protection are essential but argue that the rules should be scaled to the size and nature of the operation.

For example, a farmer hosting a handful of self-contained caravans shouldn’t face the exact requirements of a large commercial campground.

Some have suggested a tiered permit system with lower fees and simpler requirements for small-scale operators.

Others want to see more support and guidance from councils rather than just enforcement.

If you love camping on private land, these changes could mean fewer options and higher prices in the future.


It’s a good idea to check ahead before planning your trip and to support landowners who are following the rules.

If you’re a landowner thinking about opening your property to campers, make sure you understand your local council’s requirements—and don’t be afraid to speak up if you think the rules are unfair.
Key Takeaways

  • Landowners and farmers in Queensland who were offering their private land as campsites are struggling to comply with expensive and onerous council regulations, forcing many to stop the practice.
  • Some property owners and camping platform operators have labelled the council rules—such as costly development applications, flood and fire assessments, and infrastructure requirements—as 'ridiculous' and unworkable for small-scale sites.
  • While councils insist strict regulations are necessary for camper safety (considering hazards and neighbour impacts), there are calls for more flexible permit systems to support rural tourism and provide extra income for farmers.
  • The surge in camping demand since the pandemic has led to increased pressure on formal campgrounds, a rise in illegal camping, and stricter council enforcement, with some locations threatening hefty fines for non-compliance.
Have you run into red tape when camping or hosting campers? Do you think councils are being too strict, or are the rules necessary for safety? We’d love to hear your stories and opinions—share your thoughts in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Yes, my son has 122 acres out of Grafton
and had considered doing this but decided against it because of the worry of bushfire.
Not such a worry about floods as they are far enough out of Grafton and higher up but nonetheless they were stranded during the last storm as they couldn't get into Grafton as the lower roads were flooded.
All in all he decided it was too much hassle and worry.
Yes and we have to work with the lowest denominator and there are many people below even average intelligence (which is quite low) amongst us …frightening but true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mylittletibbies
Really !! Wolf Creek is based on a true story as is Texas chainsaw massacre. There are crazy people out there 😳
How are a few expensive council regulations going to stop the crazies out there. The police, law and order and the court system can’t stop them.
 
Really !! Wolf Creek is based on a true story as is Texas chainsaw massacre. There are crazy people out there 😳
@Veggiepatch introduced me to the movie Wolf Creek, (even though it was released in 2005). We watched it on tv a couple of months ago. John Jarratt, who portrayed Mick Taylor played his part well. And Veggiepatch does a good impression of Mick’s laugh.

Sorry…guess I got off topic. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch
Really !! Wolf Creek is based on a true story as is Texas chainsaw massacre. There are crazy people out there 😳
Wolf Creek had many similarities to the murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio and the Belanglo State Forest murders by Ivan Milat.

The Northern Territory Government even tried to ban the showing of Wolf Creek in fear that it may influence to outcome of Bradley Murdoch's trial in the Falconio case.
 
Last edited:
Wolf Creek had many similarities to the murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio and the Belanglo State Forest murders by Ivan Milat.

The Northern Territory Government even tried to ban the showing of Wolf Creek in fear that it may influence to outcome of Barry Murdoch's trial in the Falconio case.
Exactly!!
 
Exactly!!
Remember Joanne Lees? Falconio's companion when he disappeared?

I clearly recall when she was interviewed just after he went missing. There was the look of guilt all over her face! She definitely had some hand in the disappearance of Falconio, whose body has never been found.

Then Lees had the audacity to accept a $100000 payment from Martin Bashir in the early 2000s along with other interviews and even wrote a book about her "ordeal".

She is guilty as f**k!!
 
Remember Joanne Lees? Falconio's companion when he disappeared?

I clearly recall when she was interviewed just after he went missing. There was the look of guilt all over her face! She definitely had some hand in the disappearance of Falconio, whose body has never been found.

Then Lees had the audacity to accept a $100000 payment from Martin Bashir in the early 2000s along with other interviews and even wrote a book about her "ordeal".

She is guilty as f**k!!
Yes agree...I have always been sus on her! The whole story just did not make sense.
 
All I am say to that is if farmers have to go through hoops like that to give travellers a safe and ideally overnight stay, then they should be puttingi the say at all truck parking bays in the state As you cannot have on rule for property owners and another for councils.
These greedy councils need to lead by example🤬
 
They always find a way to hamstring legitimate, enterprising ideas. Ridiculous indeed!
Just like the 10 year old kid setting up a lemonade stall in his front yard in Queensland.

Like the "police", who pick on the vulnerable and those unable to speak up for themselves.

Nothing but a bunch of gutless cowards who should be exterminated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
Yes it is a money grab by the Council, but by the same token, why put your property at rise of fire, littering, garbage dump, noise, falling trees etc. Irrespective if a contract is signed and a waiver executed, you can bet your bottom dollar that a loop hole will be found by some shyster lawyer and the landowner be sued and lose everything just for the sake of a couple of dollars.
If a bushfire is caused by these "renters" can the property owner's neighbors sue the land owner for loss and damages? You bet this would raise its ugly head quick smart this day & age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: June E and DLHM
Yes it is a money grab by the Council, but by the same token, why put your property at rise of fire, littering, garbage dump, noise, falling trees etc. Irrespective if a contract is signed and a waiver executed, you can bet your bottom dollar that a loop hole will be found by some shyster lawyer and the landowner be sued and lose everything just for the sake of a couple of dollars.
If a bushfire is caused by these "renters" can the property owner's neighbors sue the land owner for loss and damages? You bet this would raise its ugly head quick smart this day & age.
Yes, far too many legal risks involved.
 
It's all about liability folks.
Council doesn't want to get sued because they have failed to make a place safe.
Just think about it.....a camper family with a 1 year old baby? The baby crawls to the nearby creek and drowns.
Who is liable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
it's probably about compliance for insurance companies.
They would need Public Liability Insurance, "public" toilets including legal plumbing etc and legal disabled ramp entry for them. Also contamination prevention. They would have to get Council approval to construct the toilets, plumbing etc. How is the farmer going to dispose of rubbish within those rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
They would need Public Liability Insurance, "public" toilets including legal plumbing etc and legal disabled ramp entry for them. Also contamination prevention. They would have to get Council approval to construct the toilets, plumbing etc. How is the farmer going to dispose of rubbish within those rules.
Yes,I agree,far more complicated than it seems.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×