Council rules spoil camping plans as local landowners slam new restrictions

For many Aussies, there’s nothing quite like packing up the caravan, hitting the open road, and spending a night under the stars.

Camping is a beloved tradition, especially among over-60s who cherish the freedom, affordability, and connection to nature it offers.

But as camping popularity has soared in recent years, a new battle is brewing between local councils and the landowners who make these adventures possible.


With traditional campgrounds often booked out or charging sky-high fees, more and more travellers have turned to private landowners—especially farmers—who open up their properties for overnight stays.

It’s a win-win: campers get a unique, affordable experience, and landowners earn a little extra income to help keep their properties afloat during tough times.

But in Queensland and other states, councils have started enforcing strict compliance rules that many say are simply unworkable.


1746062715473.png
Landowners and farmers in Queensland are being forced to stop offering private land as campsites due to costly and burdensome council regulations. Credit: Facebook


Farmers and camping advocates are calling the new requirements 'ridiculous', claiming they threaten the future of rural tourism and the livelihoods of those who rely on it.

Take Steven Moriarty, a farmer in Queensland’s Scenic Rim region.

He used to welcome campers to eight sites on his 300-acre property, but he was forced to shut up shop after council regulations changed.


The new rules require landowners to submit development applications, conduct expensive flood and fire assessments, and meet a laundry list of safety requirements.

'When you start looking at tens of thousands of dollars for a few campsites, it makes it practically impossible for people to comply,' Steven said.

He’s not alone. Debra Symes, co-founder of Caravan Overnight Farmstays—a platform connecting campers with farmers—says she’s heard from many landowners facing similar struggles.

One member was hit with a 28-page application just to get started and then quoted $70,000 for fire hydrants, toilets, lighting, muster points, and fencing.

'It’s ridiculous,' Debra said.

'Wouldn’t it be better to have a policy that allowed a small number of self-contained vans on a property and have a small licence fee for a farmer so we’re supporting tourism?'


Councils argue that safety and environmental concerns tie their hands. The Scenic Rim Regional Council points to 'natural hazards or other impediments' that could endanger campers, such as floods, fires, and access issues.

They say each site must be assessed individually, considering traffic safety, infrastructure, environmental impacts, and the effect on neighbouring properties.

A council spokesperson said, 'There will be cases where achieving compliance is difficult, but this will usually be due to safety or access-related issues.

The council is, and continues to be, supportive of growing our rural tourism market and providing additional income streams for farmers.'

To their credit, some councils are working with industry representatives to find a solution, but for now, many landowners feel the rules are simply too onerous.

It’s no wonder this issue has come to a head. According to federal government data, camping and caravan trips jumped by a whopping 19 per cent in 2021 compared to the previous year, with 12.6 million extra trips taken.


The trend has only continued since the pandemic, as Aussies rediscover the joys of local travel.

But this surge in demand has put pressure on both public and private campsites.

National parks in Queensland, New South Wales, and Victoria have introduced booking systems to manage the crowds.

However, this has led to new problems—like 'ghost camping', where people book sites and don’t show up, leaving spots empty but unavailable to others.

Meanwhile, increased illegal camping has forced councils to take a hard line.

Some, like the NSW Central Coast Council, have threatened fines of up to $110,000 for repeat offenders who camp on public land without permission.

Many in the camping community believe there’s a middle ground.


They agree that safety and environmental protection are essential but argue that the rules should be scaled to the size and nature of the operation.

For example, a farmer hosting a handful of self-contained caravans shouldn’t face the exact requirements of a large commercial campground.

Some have suggested a tiered permit system with lower fees and simpler requirements for small-scale operators.

Others want to see more support and guidance from councils rather than just enforcement.

If you love camping on private land, these changes could mean fewer options and higher prices in the future.


It’s a good idea to check ahead before planning your trip and to support landowners who are following the rules.

If you’re a landowner thinking about opening your property to campers, make sure you understand your local council’s requirements—and don’t be afraid to speak up if you think the rules are unfair.
Key Takeaways

  • Landowners and farmers in Queensland who were offering their private land as campsites are struggling to comply with expensive and onerous council regulations, forcing many to stop the practice.
  • Some property owners and camping platform operators have labelled the council rules—such as costly development applications, flood and fire assessments, and infrastructure requirements—as 'ridiculous' and unworkable for small-scale sites.
  • While councils insist strict regulations are necessary for camper safety (considering hazards and neighbour impacts), there are calls for more flexible permit systems to support rural tourism and provide extra income for farmers.
  • The surge in camping demand since the pandemic has led to increased pressure on formal campgrounds, a rise in illegal camping, and stricter council enforcement, with some locations threatening hefty fines for non-compliance.
Have you run into red tape when camping or hosting campers? Do you think councils are being too strict, or are the rules necessary for safety? We’d love to hear your stories and opinions—share your thoughts in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
At the end of the day this is all about greedy councils and revenue raising they don’t offer any solutions unless it means rules & made up laws and large costings where as they are simply jumping on a trend and want in from the money aspect , we need a referendum saying we don’t need councils everything should be run from our state government .
 
At the end of the day, farm land is private property and the farmer gets to say who can , who cannot and where they park their vans.A farmer to allows a van on that is not fully self contained is asking for trouble and that would be a condition of entry for all vans if the farmer is half smart
Safety risks are done by the farmer and he would have an insurance cover against accidents that are likely to impact on him-- But again , he should have an indemnity form that the travelers have to sign relieving him of all responsibility before they come on to his land
This act from councils are just a greedy money grab using reasons of safety etc as a smoke screen and should be challenged in courts if necessary by a collection of farmers who are allowing the camping
Farmers land , farmers responsibility
Council land council responsibility and one should not impinge on the other
 
I actually have to agree with the councils.

I think it makes sense with needing a fire and flood certificate.
If a flood or fire happened and the camper was injured or van damaged would the camper then sue the farmer.
I'm sure insurance companies would want to see a safety certificate before insuring .

Farmers have leased their land for concerts where people could also camp. This could be a huge problem if not done right. Including being a distance to the neighbours farm

I'm sure there would be an alternative solution based on similar as Airbnbs.

I've heard people argue ,why should they need council permission before building on their own property or putting in a swimming pool. It all comes down peoples safety and neighbours.

Many years ago my neighbour put in a pool without council approval, then it started leaking. We had seen our vegetable garden had a white powder through it, vegetables were dying or not growing and it was because of the neighbors pool leaking.

So when it comes to what you do on your own land where do you draw the line
 
Last edited:
I actually have to agree with the councils.

I think it makes sense with needing a fire and flood certificate.
If a flood or fire happened and the camper was injured or van damaged would the camper then sue the farmer.
I'm sure insurance companies would want to see a safety certificate before insuring .

Farmers have leased their land for concerts where people could also camp. This could be a huge problem if not done right. Including being a distance to the neighbours farm

I'm sure there would be an alternative solution based on similar as Airbnbs.

I've heard people argue ,why should they need council permission before building on their own property or putting in a swimming pool. It all comes down peoples safety and neighbours.

Many years ago my neighbour put in a pool without council approval, then it started leaking. We had seen our vegetable garden had a white powder through it, vegetables were dying or not growing and it was because of the neighbors pool leaking.

So when it comes to what you do on your own land where do you draw the line
we not in the USA and Australians can be held responsible for their own actions and suing people is not the done thing
Your experience is from a neighbour just meters from your boundary but with a farm it is hundreds of acres and hundreds of meters apart-There is no reference to permits for erecting permanent buildings or pools or anything else-- just a place to stop for a day or 2 to break the caravanning experience
The total stupidity is this when a traveler stops , they spend money in the district and this sort of crap from a council means no money spent because not traveler is allowed to stop
 
Well THANKYOU, looks like now I will either be couch surfing or homeless, thanks to these changes.

Don't get me wrong I do believe some restrictions should be put in place for safety, but at the same time a lot of these changes have gone overboard.

Once again, another reason, why I would be better off with "End of Life" choice.
 
I can understand you perception as it is another overboard reaction from councils who are flat out running their own business efficiently but if you want change , we must all get together and tell the councils to stick their regulations up where their brains are and leave it up to the travelers and farms to act responsibily
 
It does sound like a money grab and dozens of pages of paperwork would put most farmers off from going any further from what could be a simple fix if they put their heads together. Bureacracy gets in the way of most things these days.
 
we not in the USA and Australians can be held responsible for their own actions and suing people is not the done thing
Your experience is from a neighbour just meters from your boundary but with a farm it is hundreds of acres and hundreds of meters apart-There is no reference to permits for erecting permanent buildings or pools or anything else-- just a place to stop for a day or 2 to break the caravanning experience
The total stupidity is this when a traveler stops , they spend money in the district and this sort of crap from a council means no money spent because not traveler is allowed to stop
I had a lot of damage and no I didn't sue my neighbour nor take any money from him even though it took alot of new soil and money as well as a lot of work to fix my garden. This would not have happened it he went down the right chanels.

If you want to have campers on your property then why not do it correct.
They actually charge people to camp overnight and I'm guessing it's not being reported as income
 
At the end of the day this is all about greedy councils and revenue raising they don’t offer any solutions unless it means rules & made up laws and large costings where as they are simply jumping on a trend and want in from the money aspect , we need a referendum saying we don’t need councils everything should be run from our state government .
Councils should be shut down we don't need 3 levels of government
 
I actually have to agree with the councils.

I think it makes sense with needing a fire and flood certificate.
If a flood or fire happened and the camper was injured or van damaged would the camper then sue the farmer.
I'm sure insurance companies would want to see a safety certificate before insuring .

Farmers have leased their land for concerts where people could also camp. This could be a huge problem if not done right. Including being a distance to the neighbours farm

I'm sure there would be an alternative solution based on similar as Airbnbs.

I've heard people argue ,why should they need council permission before building on their own property or putting in a swimming pool. It all comes down peoples safety and neighbours.

Many years ago my neighbour put in a pool without council approval, then it started leaking. We had seen our vegetable garden had a white powder through it, vegetables were dying or not growing and it was because of the neighbors pool leaking.

So when it comes to what you do on your own land where do you draw the line
Agree.. Wonder how many destructive bush fires have started because of people making a camp fire etc.?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PattiB and Ricci
I actually have to agree with the councils.

I think it makes sense with needing a fire and flood certificate.
If a flood or fire happened and the camper was injured or van damaged would the camper then sue the farmer.
I'm sure insurance companies would want to see a safety certificate before insuring .

Farmers have leased their land for concerts where people could also camp. This could be a huge problem if not done right. Including being a distance to the neighbours farm

I'm sure there would be an alternative solution based on similar as Airbnbs.

I've heard people argue ,why should they need council permission before building on their own property or putting in a swimming pool. It all comes down peoples safety and neighbours.

Many years ago my neighbour put in a pool without council approval, then it started leaking. We had seen our vegetable garden had a white powder through it, vegetables were dying or not growing and it was because of the neighbors pool leaking.

So when it comes to what you do on your own land where do you draw the line
Councils are just greedy. Can tell you are a city slicker. Honestly, if it was wet weather with creeks rising, farmers would not let people camp in that area & move them to higher ground or tell them to go. If there were fires in the area, same thing. You must have been very close to your neighbors pool so in the country
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricci
At the end of the day this is all about greedy councils and revenue raising they don’t offer any solutions unless it means rules & made up laws and large costings where as they are simply jumping on a trend and want in from the money aspect , we need a referendum saying we don’t need councils everything should be run from our state government .
it's probably about compliance for insurance companies.
 
Agree.. Wonder how many destructive bush fires have started because of people making a camp fire etc.?
Yes, my son has 122 acres out of Grafton
and had considered doing this but decided against it because of the worry of bushfire.
Not such a worry about floods as they are far enough out of Grafton and higher up but nonetheless they were stranded during the last storm as they couldn't get into Grafton as the lower roads were flooded.
All in all he decided it was too much hassle and worry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PattiB and Knell
Yes, my son has 122 acres out of Grafton
and had considered doing this but decided against it because of the worry of bushfire.
Not such a worry about floods as they are far enough out of Grafton and higher up but nonetheless they were stranded during the last storm as they couldn't get into Grafton as the lower roads were flooded.
All in all he decided it was too much hassle and worry.
If he got sued, he could lose everything. o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube and PattiB

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×