Beloved Australian ice cream brand announces product ‘shrinkflation’ amidst cost of living crisis - Here’s what you need to know

As the current cost of living continues to increase, it’s no surprise that more and more households and businesses are feeling the pinch.

In order to help cope with the financial pressures that come with rising supplies and production costs, some companies have resorted to reducing the size and weight of their products to help offset them - a method often referred to as 'shrinkflation' or 'size-reduction'.

And now, our beloved Maxibon ice creams have become the latest item to join the club of scaling-down sizes.



Unlike other affected products, Maxibon's parent company, Peters, has taken a unique, transparent approach to forewarn customers of the eventual size reduction expected to occur this month.

In a post on its social media channels, the company said: 'It's not the news you'll want to cop, but we had to let you know first. Tough times mean tough changes.'

The company confirmed that the size reduction ‘won't affect the cost’ (other than us having to pay the same price for less) of the delectable ice cream treats.


286024713_5175121655904627_2815659116188576974_n.jpg
Peters announced its plans to ‘shrinkflate’ Maxibon, informing customers that the size reduction of the product will be implemented later this month. Credit: Facebook/Maxibon.



‘From this month, you'll notice the changes, but our Maxibons will have the same taste you know and love,’ the statement continued.

‘We're sure there are a few thoughts going through your head, so we thought we'd beat you to it.’

Unsurprisingly, reactions to the news have been overwhelmingly adverse, with customers expressing their disappointment at the idea of getting less for the same cost.



One user wrote: ‘I find it insulting that you are downgrading a national treasure in the Maxibon while keeping the price the same.’

‘Yes, sales will drop. Last time I'll be buying any Maxibons,’ another said.

‘I don't buy or support any company that downsizes products and keeps the same price tag.’


329988018_191214760277442_8650986140970302044_n.jpg
Maxibon took to social media to share the important announcement. Credit: Maxibon/Facebook.



Some customers urged the company to also drop the cost of the treat.

One comment read: ‘Put the price down then!’

‘I suppose the price should go down a “touch” too, then?’ Another questioned.



Others suggested that the brand change its name if it offers a ‘different’ product.

One person said: ‘You got to change the name MINIBON now.’

Meanwhile, other consumers praised the company for being transparent about the changes in the product.

‘Kudos for not trying to sneak it past consumers without anyone noticing. Understandable given CPI,’ one user praised.

Key Takeaways
  • Maxibon ice creams are becoming the latest products to experience shrinkflation, with the size of the treat being reduced but the cost of it remaining the same.
  • There has been an overwhelmingly negative reaction from consumers, with many expressing dissatisfaction at getting less for the same cost.
  • Shrinkflation is a common way for companies to compensate for rising costs and avoid the negative press associated with raising prices.
  • The rising cost of production is the most common cause behind the fluctuation of food prices, with inputs such as land, labour and equipment costs all factored into the final cost of goods.



Changes in the prices of goods and services, such as food, can result from various factors.

One of the most common causes is the increase in production costs. As inputs for food production, such as labour, land, and equipment costs, rise, so does the cost of producing food, which can cause consumer prices to rise.

In the case of Maxibon's decision to shrink the size of their ice cream, the company appears to be attempting to mitigate this rising cost of production by reducing the size while keeping the price the same.



The move toward shrinkflation is a common way for companies to make up for rising costs. With companies across the globe cutting the sizes of various products, it can be an effective way to recoup losses while avoiding the negative press associated with raising prices.

This is not the first time a food product has been the target of shrinkflation, and it likely won't be the last.

As production costs continue to rise, more companies may consider following in Maxibon's footsteps to avoid raising prices and potentially losing customers.

Members, we’d love to know what you think about Maxibon’s decision. Do you think it’s necessary, or should prices also decrease to at least partly offset the size reduction? Have you had any experiences with other food products that have undergone shrinkflation recently? Let us know in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
I also don’t buy any products that are made smaller with no price reduction or an increased price. If they remained the same size and the price increased reasonably I would still consider buying them, sometimes when this happens the prices rise exhorbitantly and then I cross them off my list as well unless they are an essential item I can’t do without or substitute.
 
As the current cost of living continues to increase, it’s no surprise that more and more households and businesses are feeling the pinch.

In order to help cope with the financial pressures that come with rising supplies and production costs, some companies have resorted to reducing the size and weight of their products to help offset them - a method often referred to as 'shrinkflation' or 'size-reduction'.

And now, our beloved Maxibon ice creams have become the latest item to join the club of scaling-down sizes.



Unlike other affected products, Maxibon's parent company, Peters, has taken a unique, transparent approach to forewarn customers of the eventual size reduction expected to occur this month.

In a post on its social media channels, the company said: 'It's not the news you'll want to cop, but we had to let you know first. Tough times mean tough changes.'

The company confirmed that the size reduction ‘won't affect the cost’ (other than us having to pay the same price for less) of the delectable ice cream treats.


View attachment 15439
Peters announced its plans to ‘shrinkflate’ Maxibon, informing customers that the size reduction of the product will be implemented later this month. Credit: Facebook/Maxibon.



‘From this month, you'll notice the changes, but our Maxibons will have the same taste you know and love,’ the statement continued.

‘We're sure there are a few thoughts going through your head, so we thought we'd beat you to it.’

Unsurprisingly, reactions to the news have been overwhelmingly adverse, with customers expressing their disappointment at the idea of getting less for the same cost.



One user wrote: ‘I find it insulting that you are downgrading a national treasure in the Maxibon while keeping the price the same.’

‘Yes, sales will drop. Last time I'll be buying any Maxibons,’ another said.

‘I don't buy or support any company that downsizes products and keeps the same price tag.’


View attachment 15440
Maxibon took to social media to share the important announcement. Credit: Maxibon/Facebook.



Some customers urged the company to also drop the cost of the treat.

One comment read: ‘Put the price down then!’

‘I suppose the price should go down a “touch” too, then?’ Another questioned.



Others suggested that the brand change its name if it offers a ‘different’ product.

One person said: ‘You got to change the name MINIBON now.’

Meanwhile, other consumers praised the company for being transparent about the changes in the product.

‘Kudos for not trying to sneak it past consumers without anyone noticing. Understandable given CPI,’ one user praised.

Key Takeaways

  • Maxibon ice creams are becoming the latest products to experience shrinkflation, with the size of the treat being reduced but the cost of it remaining the same.
  • There has been an overwhelmingly negative reaction from consumers, with many expressing dissatisfaction at getting less for the same cost.
  • Shrinkflation is a common way for companies to compensate for rising costs and avoid the negative press associated with raising prices.
  • The rising cost of production is the most common cause behind the fluctuation of food prices, with inputs such as land, labour and equipment costs all factored into the final cost of goods.



Changes in the prices of goods and services, such as food, can result from various factors.

One of the most common causes is the increase in production costs. As inputs for food production, such as labour, land, and equipment costs, rise, so does the cost of producing food, which can cause consumer prices to rise.

In the case of Maxibon's decision to shrink the size of their ice cream, the company appears to be attempting to mitigate this rising cost of production by reducing the size while keeping the price the same.



The move toward shrinkflation is a common way for companies to make up for rising costs. With companies across the globe cutting the sizes of various products, it can be an effective way to recoup losses while avoiding the negative press associated with raising prices.

This is not the first time a food product has been the target of shrinkflation, and it likely won't be the last.

As production costs continue to rise, more companies may consider following in Maxibon's footsteps to avoid raising prices and potentially losing customers.

Members, we’d love to know what you think about Maxibon’s decision. Do you think it’s necessary, or should prices also decrease to at least partly offset the size reduction? Have you had any experiences with other food products that have undergone shrinkflation recently? Let us know in the comments below.
There has to be some added cost associated with this advertising campaign, tooling up for the new size and producing new wrappers

However having never been a fan of icecream treats that include soggy biscuits it won't affect me

But I still think they are theiving b*st*rds
 
When are people going to realise that increased wages, Superannuation, transport costs, rents and all associated costs in the manufacturing process have to be covered somehow.
Manufacturers are not a charity, they are businesses. I am a pensioner and, as such, don't have much leftover after paying for the essentials. This is a confectionery item, a treat, not an essential. If you don't want to pay for the smaller item don't buy it. Simple🤔
And yet they made a record profit this past 6 months.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×