Are you making the same costly mistake as this young Aussie? Avoid a $500 fine!

Navigating the roads can be a tricky business, and even the most seasoned drivers can sometimes find themselves in a bit of a pickle when it comes to interpreting traffic signals.

However, these situations can be particularly daunting and expensive for younger drivers who may not have the same level of experience.

This was what one young Aussie driver recently discovered after copping a fine for a traffic offence she claimed she had not committed, but not everyone agreed with her.


Charli, an 18-year-old year 12 student from Melbourne, found herself in hot water after making a turn at a traffic light on Fitzroy Street.

She was slapped with a $500 fine and docked three demerit points for what was alleged to be running a red light.

Charli, however, was adamant that the light was green when she followed several cars turning right during the incident.


image (55).jpg
Eighteen-year-old Australian driver Charli received a $500 fine and three demerit points for allegedly running a red light while turning right. Credit: Tiktok / @charliijjane


‘I’m turning right, it’s a green light. It’s safe to go,’ she insisted in a video she posted online.

‘They want me to pay $500 and lose three demerit points. I’m a year 12 student and I’m 18.’

‘One, I don’t have the money for that and I can’t lose demerit points, and I didn’t do anything wrong,' Charli continued.

Despite her conviction, Charli's appeal was denied, and she said she is considering taking the matter to court.


The evidence provided to her by transport authorities—a grainy image—left Australians divided over whether she should pay the fine or fight back.

‘Green light is to go straight, you turned right on a red arrow,’ one viewer commented. However, some disagreed and encouraged her to pursue legal action.

‘That intersection is the actual worst,’ another commenter wrote, noting that many others experience the same issue.

In a follow-up video, Charli expressed her resignation to the situation, sharing she would ‘have to pay it’.

‘Apparently, it’s a red arrow. I didn’t know that. You can't see it in the photos,’ she said.

‘It is what it is. I guess I’ll have to pay [for] it. It’s $500 and three demerit points later, but [because] I was halfway through the intersection, and my back tyres were not fully in, that’s triggered the camera.’


Charli's experience is not an isolated one. Red-light cameras across Australia have caught numerous drivers making similar mistakes.

In New South Wales, a driver faced a $544 fine for entering an ‘intersection after the light turned red’.

The ‘photographic evidence’ in that situation allegedly suggested the driver was turning right and ran a red light.

However, the driver contended they were just waiting for the cars in front to move so they could go straight through the green light.

Nevertheless, the city insisted they pay the fine, arguing that the motorist had attempted to turn right despite a clear red arrow.

Another Victorian driver received a $481 fine and three demerit points for going through a red light just after it changed, in a frantic effort to avoid a fire engine.


The penalties for running a red light differ by state.

In Victoria, disregarding traffic signals—both red lights and red arrows—results in a fine of $494 and three demerit points.

In Queensland, the cost is higher, with a $575 fine and three demerit points for the same offence.


As young drivers face hefty fines for common traffic light errors, the conversation around road safety becomes even more pressing.

This issue resonates deeply, especially for older Australians, who may find themselves navigating similar challenges on the roads.

In a heart-wrenching plea, an elderly driver has shared their experience following a tragic red-light accident, highlighting the critical need for awareness and understanding among all road users.
Key Takeaways
  • An 18-year-old Australian driver named Charli was fined $500 and docked three demerit points for allegedly running a red light while turning right.
  • Charli claimed the light was green and she didn't commit the offence, following several cars during the incident.
  • Her appeal was denied, strongly dividing public opinion over the fairness of the fine and the clarity of traffic signals at the intersection.
  • Red light camera fines are contentious in Australia, with various drivers facing hefty penalties, and the fines and demerit points varying across the states.
Have you or someone you know been caught out by a tricky traffic signal? How did you handle it? Share your stories and tips in the comments below to help fellow drivers navigate these confusing situations.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
It is difficult to see any other traffic lights other than the green light in the image. However, turning lanes usually have their own go (green) or stop (red) lights to indicate a clear to go through or no turn through an intersection. If the traffic authority cannot show a clearer image of all of the traffic lights at the intersection then I think the traffic authority should withdraw the fine. In this day and age, grainy images can be a sign of incompetence and or simply misleading.
 
Because the Albosleazy government is all about revenue. Every time they do something to make make us believe they care, they start revenue raising to make up for the lost money. Cops are corrupt and are only there to charge people with as many fines as possible to get as much money as they can. This always happens when Labor is in power. How else are they going to cover tax cuts and other rebates without revenue raising. Queensland has some of the most expensive fines in Australia and they push hard to hand out as fines as possible out to get the money. Labor is forever finding new ways to get money out of us.
LOTTO the biggest scam out there.
how do you fleece the peasants where they willing, like lambs to slaughter, to throw their hard earned money at you mmm?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Veggiepatch
A driving instructor, and the relevance of that? You teach them to pass a test and never seen them again, so how do you know what happens decades later.

And I said 7 people, that is my immediate family that I can quickly think of, probably far more, and what does it matter anyway. You said most people have had at least one fine, AND?????
 
At least I am not entitled, have a brain and can think, and know that there is NO confidence in a sample of 7. Try remembering your high school statistics, if you even passed high school. Do your supposed 7 even have a licence and drive
 
LOTTO the biggest scam out there.
how do you fleece the peasants where they willing, like lambs to slaughter, to throw their hard earned money at you mmm?
And how does this relate to a traffic infringement?
 
How did she get her licence if she did not know she could not turn on a RED arrow.
She did not state she didn't know you couldn't turn on a red arrow, but she did says, 'Apparently, it's was a red arrow. I didn't know that'. Like many members here, she also spoke about the clarity of the photo. I can't see a red arrow anywhere either & the explanation about the wheel being inside the line & may have triggered the camera, possibly came from the authorities as a way of saying, 'yes you are correct & we are wrong but do you know what it takes to rescind a fine, together with losses of revenue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch
Here's an idea if you don't break the Law you won't get fined for anything.
Not a good idea. Do you even drive a car? I prefer to watch the road more often than the speedo. It's so easy to go over the speed limit down a hill, or if looking for a turn-off, or if the speed limit changes, etc. Why don't they paint the centre line in different colours to designate different speeds. That would be a start.
 
Not a good idea. Do you even drive a car? I prefer to watch the road more often than the speedo. It's so easy to go over the speed limit down a hill, or if looking for a turn-off, or if the speed limit changes, etc. Why don't they paint the centre line in different colours to designate different speeds. That would be a start.
What an Idiot comment, Don't break the Law, is not a good idea. Yes I do drive and guess what I watch the road and traffic and I can keep an eye on my speed , must be a Female thing multi tasking, I'm sure you've heard of it.
 
Agree. You can represent yourself as it is only magistrates court. Doubt there would be much to lose taking it there. Even if still found guilty would probably have fine reduced.
I have represented myself at a NSW District Court on appeal of an excessive penalty exacted by a Magistrate.

No problems. The penalty was substantially reduced.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×