A 70-year-old driver claims 'bad intentions' after receiving $603 parking fine

70-year-old driver, Doria Coral, is fuming with anger after being slapped with a jaw-dropping $603 parking fine and losing a precious demerit point. But she's not taking it lying down. Doria insists that the punishment is not only excessive but also 'unfair and unjust'.

The local council, however, begs to differ, and the stage is set for a showdown between the aggrieved driver and the authorities.



The incident unfolded when Doria drove to the library in Gosford, a picturesque town on the Central Coast of New South Wales. The parking lot was packed, and Doria had to circle around for a while before she found a vacant spot.

As luck would have it, just as Doria was about to park, an elderly couple pulled out of their spot nearby. Without thinking twice, Doria pulled into the disabled parking bay for only five seconds, with her car's engine running, to allow the couple to manoeuvre their car out of the tight spot.

But little did she know that her actions would land her in hot water with the authorities.


Screen Shot 2023-04-25 at 1.47.48 PM.png
A NSW driver claims she received an 'unfair and unjust' $603 parking fine and lost one demerit point for momentarily stopping in a disabled parking spot. Credit: Shutterstock.



Three weeks later, Doria received a shocking surprise in the mail — a hefty $603 fine for parking in a disabled bay, complete with photographs taken by a sneaky parking inspector.

Needless to say, she was utterly flabbergasted, as she claims she never saw the inspector taking the pictures. How could she have known that her brief stop in the disabled bay would result in such a severe penalty?



According to Doria, if the inspector had been there taking photos, he would have seen that she was in her car with the engine running, and giving way to an elderly couple struggling to leave their spot.

In her eyes, this could only mean one thing: the inspector had 'bad intentions' and deliberately overlooked her act of kindness. Doria is adamant that she did nothing wrong and is now digging in her heels to clear her name.


Credit: Department of Social Services, Australian Government.


While Doria insists that the blurry photographs show her hand on the steering wheel, the council is standing firm in their position.

According to a council spokesperson, the parking officer confirmed that the car was unlawfully parked in a disabled bay and that no person was present in the vehicle at the time, contradicting Doria's claim that she was simply reversing and stopped for a few seconds.



Despite the council's rejection of her appeal, Doria is not one to back down. Determined to clear her name, she's gearing up for a legal battle and plans to fight the fine in court.

The tension between Doria and the council has reached new heights, with both sides holding their ground and refusing to back down.

To view the photos taken by the parking inspector, check out the original report made by A Current Affair by clicking this link.

Key Takeaways

  • A 70-year-old driver named Doria Coral found herself in a dispute with the Central Coast Council over a parking fine.
  • Doria claims that she stopped briefly in a disabled parking bay to give way to an elderly couple, but the council issued her a hefty $603 fine for parking unlawfully in the space.
  • Despite the council's rejection of her appeal, Doria is fighting the fine in court, setting the stage for a dramatic legal battle.

The social media sphere is buzzing with opinions, and it seems that the majority of people are siding with the council in this parking fine dispute.

Many were quick to point out that disabled parking spots are reserved for those with permits, and anyone else using them — even temporarily — is in violation of the law.


Screen Shot 2023-04-25 at 1.47.39 PM.png
Disabled parking spaces are specially designated spots where disabled people can more easily access the facilities they need. Credit: Pexels/Jakub Pabis.



Comments on Facebook are pouring in, with some expressing frustration at the misuse of disabled parking bays. One person stated, 'My understanding is it's a disabled parking spot. You can't use it for any purpose unless you have a permit.'

Another user added, 'More people need to be fined for parking in disabled spots. They are not a drop-off point or a waiting zone, and secondly, learn to park properly. Pay it, and don't do it again. Easy.'

The sentiment was echoed by others, with a call for stricter enforcement and more fines for those who misuse disabled parking bays. 'There should be more fines handed out. Too many people use these Disability parking bays when they don't have a permit,' commented a third user.



Members, where do you stand on this issue? Do you think Doria Coral was in the wrong, or do you believe that the council was too harsh in their punishment? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below!
 
Sponsored
70-year-old driver, Doria Coral, is fuming with anger after being slapped with a jaw-dropping $603 parking fine and losing a precious demerit point. But she's not taking it lying down. Doria insists that the punishment is not only excessive but also 'unfair and unjust'.

The local council, however, begs to differ, and the stage is set for a showdown between the aggrieved driver and the authorities.



The incident unfolded when Doria drove to the library in Gosford, a picturesque town on the Central Coast of New South Wales. The parking lot was packed, and Doria had to circle around for a while before she found a vacant spot.

As luck would have it, just as Doria was about to park, an elderly couple pulled out of their spot nearby. Without thinking twice, Doria pulled into the disabled parking bay for only five seconds, with her car's engine running, to allow the couple to manoeuvre their car out of the tight spot.

But little did she know that her actions would land her in hot water with the authorities.


View attachment 18261
A NSW driver claims she received an 'unfair and unjust' $603 parking fine and lost one demerit point for momentarily stopping in a disabled parking spot. Credit: Shutterstock.



Three weeks later, Doria received a shocking surprise in the mail — a hefty $603 fine for parking in a disabled bay, complete with photographs taken by a sneaky parking inspector.

Needless to say, she was utterly flabbergasted, as she claims she never saw the inspector taking the pictures. How could she have known that her brief stop in the disabled bay would result in such a severe penalty?



According to Doria, if the inspector had been there taking photos, he would have seen that she was in her car with the engine running, and giving way to an elderly couple struggling to leave their spot.

In her eyes, this could only mean one thing: the inspector had 'bad intentions' and deliberately overlooked her act of kindness. Doria is adamant that she did nothing wrong and is now digging in her heels to clear her name.


Credit: Department of Social Services, Australian Government.


While Doria insists that the blurry photographs show her hand on the steering wheel, the council is standing firm in their position.

According to a council spokesperson, the parking officer confirmed that the car was unlawfully parked in a disabled bay and that no person was present in the vehicle at the time, contradicting Doria's claim that she was simply reversing and stopped for a few seconds.



Despite the council's rejection of her appeal, Doria is not one to back down. Determined to clear her name, she's gearing up for a legal battle and plans to fight the fine in court.

The tension between Doria and the council has reached new heights, with both sides holding their ground and refusing to back down.

To view the photos taken by the parking inspector, check out the original report made by A Current Affair by clicking this link.

Key Takeaways

  • A 70-year-old driver named Doria Coral found herself in a dispute with the Central Coast Council over a parking fine.
  • Doria claims that she stopped briefly in a disabled parking bay to give way to an elderly couple, but the council issued her a hefty $603 fine for parking unlawfully in the space.
  • Despite the council's rejection of her appeal, Doria is fighting the fine in court, setting the stage for a dramatic legal battle.

The social media sphere is buzzing with opinions, and it seems that the majority of people are siding with the council in this parking fine dispute.

Many were quick to point out that disabled parking spots are reserved for those with permits, and anyone else using them — even temporarily — is in violation of the law.


View attachment 18262
Disabled parking spaces are specially designated spots where disabled people can more easily access the facilities they need. Credit: Pexels/Jakub Pabis.



Comments on Facebook are pouring in, with some expressing frustration at the misuse of disabled parking bays. One person stated, 'My understanding is it's a disabled parking spot. You can't use it for any purpose unless you have a permit.'

Another user added, 'More people need to be fined for parking in disabled spots. They are not a drop-off point or a waiting zone, and secondly, learn to park properly. Pay it, and don't do it again. Easy.'

The sentiment was echoed by others, with a call for stricter enforcement and more fines for those who misuse disabled parking bays. 'There should be more fines handed out. Too many people use these Disability parking bays when they don't have a permit,' commented a third user.



Members, where do you stand on this issue? Do you think Doria Coral was in the wrong, or do you believe that the council was too harsh in their punishment? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below!

I fully agree with agree with the fine imposed on Doris Coral She was definitely in the wrong I wish there were “PARKING INSPECTORS “ in the shopping Centres they would be doing us
DISABLED PERMIT holders a big favour ..
 
No she is not in the wrong. The parking inspector must have seen her and could have just told her to move. That's just council being greedy again! Any chance to get money from people!
 
No she is not in the wrong. The parking inspector must have seen her and could have just told her to move. That's just council being greedy again! Any chance to get money from people!
If that is the case, how did she not see him, as she claims? I suspect she was caught on CCTV. There is a CCTV camera on a pole adjacent to that area.
 
If that is the case, how did she not see him, as she claims? I suspect she was caught on CCTV. There is a CCTV camera on a pole adjacent to that area.
Still does not justify the cost. It is just a parking. She was not putting anybody's life in danger. She was not speeding. Nanny state evidence! Let's get our priority right. There are people dying of hunger in other countries!
 
Still does not justify the cost. It is just a parking. She was not putting anybody's life in danger. She was not speeding. Nanny state evidence! Let's get our priority right. There are people dying of hunger in other countries!
The cost is mandated by the state, not the local council. The reason the government raised the fines was because non-entitled people were severely abusing these parking spots - it was done as a deterrent. The fines would not be what they are if people didn't break the laws - but everybody has an excuse - "I was only there 5 seconds", etc. The fact that people are dying of hunger in other countries, whilst tragic, is totally irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
I entered a comment for the first time as a result of 'We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below!' at the end of the article. I was not expecting MY opinion being analyzed and replied to by other members. If I wanted that I would go to Facebook. Too old for this. I don't think I will be commenting again!
 
I entered a comment for the first time as a result of 'We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below!' at the end of the article. I was not expecting MY opinion being analyzed and replied to by other members. If I wanted that I would go to Facebook. Too old for this. I don't think I will be commenting again!
I'm sorry you feel that way but discussion, provision of information and alternative points of view are what forums are all about. If you can't handle people differing with your opinion or commenting on it, you are probably right to refrain from posting.
 
Last edited:

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×