$97K light show sparks outrage among residents over spending priorities

As the city of Sydney prepares to roll out the red carpet for King Charles and Queen Camilla's arrival, a lavish welcome gesture has ignited a fiery debate among Australians.

The royal couple, set to embark on a nine-day tour down under, will be greeted with a grand spectacle that has left some citizens questioning the use of public funds.


In a display of pomp and pageantry, the iconic sails of the Sydney Opera House will be illuminated with a curated photo montage for four minutes from 8 pm, showcasing images from previous royal visits.

This grand gesture, intended to celebrate King Charles's first visit to New South Wales as Sovereign, costs $97,030.


1729208273656.png
A celebratory welcome is to be received by King Charles and Queen Camilla, with the Sydney Opera House sails illuminated by images of previous royal visits. Credit: Shutterstock


Premier Chris Minns has expressed that the light show is a 'fitting tribute' to welcome Their Majesties and to commemorate this historic moment.

The public is invited to witness the projection and even catch a glimpse of the King and Queen as they engage with the crowd on the Sydney Opera House Forecourt.

The royal visit will also feature a Fleet Review on Sydney Harbour, complete with an Australian Defence Force flypast and an on-water review of His Majesty’s Australian ships.


These events offer additional opportunities for the public to partake in the celebrations from various vantage points around the city.

However, the decision to spend nearly $100,000 on the light show has sparked outrage among many Australians, who have taken to social media to voice their concerns.

Critics argue that the funds could have been better allocated to address pressing issues such as the housing crisis, overcrowded hospitals, and the rising cost of living.

One Facebook user lamented the waste of taxpayer money on a visit by millionaires, while another questioned the excitement of 'battling Aussies' over such an extravagant expenditure.

Many echoed the sentiment of channelling funds to the needy, highlighting the disconnect between royal fanfare and the everyday struggles of the Australian people.


On the flip side, royal enthusiasts have expressed their excitement and support for the visit, with some planning to bring their families to the festivities.

Monarchists, in particular, look forward to warmly welcoming the King and Queen, showcasing the divide in public opinion.

As we delve into this contentious issue, it's essential to consider the broader implications of such expenditures.

While royal visits can boost tourism and international relations, they also raise questions about government spending priorities, especially in economic hardship for many citizens.
Key Takeaways
  • King Charles and Queen Camilla are set to receive a celebratory welcome with the Sydney Opera House sails to be illuminated with images of previous royal visits.
  • The NSW Government curated the photo montage to commemorate the King's first visit as Sovereign for $97,030.
  • Public members have expressed mixed reactions to the cost, with some criticising the expense during economic hardship.
  • Despite the controversy, some Australians are enthusiastic about the royal visit, planning to welcome the King and Queen in person.
Do you think the $97K light show is an excellent tribute to the royal visit, or is it a waste of money? How else could that money benefit Australians? Let us know in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
It takes two to tango. Diana certainly wasn't perfect either.
You can't compare Diana to Charles . She did what she did years after Charles did it. She did it to cover her pain from what Charles did to her.

He should never had married Diana , he ruined her life.

She was only 19 !!
 
Ccomplete and utter waste . His the King of England not Australia. Ask everyday struggles how that amount of money could be spent . Instead of going up in smoke. Can't believe whoever thought this up😡😡😡
History tells us YOU are WRONG! I accept you do not care for this history but you cannot alter that and nor, for the sake of common decency, should you pour contempt upon it.
 
Do you really believe that? If so, you should get to grips with the facts.

As I enter my 80th year, it appalls me to see the bitterness and judgement being thrown around by women. Rarely men. Two things: why does Charles not deserve to be happy? Had the queen not forbidden their marriage in the first place, Diana would have married some aristocratic socialite and we'd never have heard of her.

Secondly, is your friend and family circle so lily-white that you know nobody who's been divorced or had a bit of a dalliance on the side? If so, you're one in a million! And I'm sitting next to my husband of 56 years, so I have no personal experience of divorce, but I know many who have, and I don't judge them.
Well said!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
it would be more fitting if he attended the royal reception.i did think he was one of the more intelligent of premiers but have my doubts at the rudeness shown, not just by minns but the whole lot. i doubt the king is going to go loopy over old photos of himself. remember people the king did not ask for this expense.
 
She was 20 minutes away from us the last time she was out here. I never bothered to go there. Why would I . Marriage wrecker.
get it correct. she was always his selection but due to royal protocol he had to go with the insipid one. NOW he has his happiness and you and many others object with rubbish comments. not a pleasant bone in your body for our King and QUEEN.
 
:mad::mad: :mad:
Do you really believe that? If so, you should get to grips with the facts.

As I enter my 80th year, it appalls me to see the bitterness and judgement being thrown around by women. Rarely men. Two things: why does Charles not deserve to be happy? Had the queen not forbidden their marriage in the first place, Diana would have married some aristocratic socialite and we'd never have heard of her.

Secondly, is your friend and family circle so lily-white that you know nobody who's been divorced or had a bit of a dalliance on the side? If so, you're one in a million! And I'm sitting next to my husband of 56 years, so I have no personal experience of divorce, but I know many who have, and I don't judge them.
you are a very smart lady. maybe these women have had a tragic marriage, boring and unhappy so the Queen gets it taken out on her as she is now a happy person. I have experienced divorce. I do dislike the oh! so holier than thou people.
Ccomplete and utter waste . His the King of England not Australia. Ask everyday struggles how that amount of money could be spent . Instead of going up in smoke. Can't believe whoever thought this up😡😡😡
read up. he is our king.
 
I guess you have a crush on Charles otherwise you would recognise what he and Camilla did.

He gets paid for being King and remember he isn't God
I guess you have a crush on Charles otherwise you would recognise what he and Camilla did.

He gets paid for being King and remember he isn't God

Where in the hell did you get that from.

He met Camilla and her husband the same time.
She was already married with two young kids.

It wasn't that she wasn't a virgin it was because she was married! It was adultery !!!
Numerous sources, if you have the intestinal fortitude to look them up and then apologise. I was slightly over enthusiastic re their ages when they met. They were actually in their early 20s.

'Shand (Camilla) reportedly met Prince Charles in mid 1971. Andrew Parker Bowles had ended his relationship with Shand in 1970 and was courting Princess Anne.......... They (Charles and Camilla) became close friends and eventually began a romantic relationship, which was well known within their social circle. ................ As the relationship grew more serious, Charles met Shand's family in Plumpton, and he introduced her to some members of his family. The relationship was put on hold after Charles travelled overseas to join the Royal Navy in early 1973, and ended abruptly afterward.'

'After an on-and-off relationship for years, Parker Bowles and Shand's engagement was announced in The Times in 1973. ........... They married on 4 July 1973.' Wikipedia.

Now even a rudimentary knowledge of maths will show that Camilla married two years after she met Charles. Her son Tom was born in December 1974 and daughter Laura in January 1978. They certainly were young in 1971 - so young they didn't exist.

I hope this teaches you that when you view events through the eyes of bitterness and hatred, you don't have the facts!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
I think it is a lovely and very beautiful gesture and shame on those cromwellians and woke people… the grinches Of this world … mealy mouthed individuals who probably are never happy about anything. millions are spent every year on a few minutes worth of firworks on NYE, WHICH COULD BE BETTER SPENT ON THE HOMELESS ETC. The BRF is not paid to visit this Country… certainly NOT the legitimate Working Royals… scrooges… prepared to pay that Indian business man a kings ransom to actually destroy a part of Australia… KCIII has fond memories of Australi where he has spent a lot of time… this is his farewell down memory lane vist… give him that… without begrudgemen.
 
Numerous sources, if you have the intestinal fortitude to look them up and then apologise. I was slightly over enthusiastic re their ages when they met. They were actually in their early 20s.

'Shand (Camilla) reportedly met Prince Charles in mid 1971. Andrew Parker Bowles had ended his relationship with Shand in 1970 and was courting Princess Anne.......... They (Charles and Camilla) became close friends and eventually began a romantic relationship, which was well known within their social circle. ................ As the relationship grew more serious, Charles met Shand's family in Plumpton, and he introduced her to some members of his family. The relationship was put on hold after Charles travelled overseas to join the Royal Navy in early 1973, and ended abruptly afterward.'

'After an on-and-off relationship for years, Parker Bowles and Shand's engagement was announced in The Times in 1973. ........... They married on 4 July 1973.' Wikipedia.

Now even a rudimentary knowledge of maths will show that Camilla married two years after she met Charles. Her son Tom was born in December 1974 and daughter Laura in January 1978. They certainly were young in 1971 - so young they didn't exist.

I hope this teaches you that when you view events through the eyes of bitterness and hatred, you don't have the facts!
thank you and i am right with you on these unintelligent remarks from such nasty people. it must make them feel good to be rude to a higher up position. one they will never traverse. ;)
 
I think it is a lovely and very beautiful gesture and shame on those cromwellians and woke people… the grinches Of this world … mealy mouthed individuals who probably are never happy about anything. millions are spent every year on a few minutes worth of firworks on NYE, WHICH COULD BE BETTER SPENT ON THE HOMELESS ETC. The BRF is not paid to visit this Country… certainly NOT the legitimate Working Royals… scrooges… prepared to pay that Indian business man a kings ransom to actually destroy a part of Australia… KCIII has fond memories of Australi where he has spent a lot of time… this is his farewell down memory lane vist… give him that… without begrudgemen.
pleasantness is so nice and thank you. can't help the whinging australians who are so rude.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×