‘Australia’s worst female serial killer’ finally free: Kathleen Folbigg shares her story and gives an inside look at her life outside prison

Content warning: This article mentions infanticide, which may be triggering for some readers. Discretion is advised.

For the first time in 20 years, Kathleen Folbigg will be able to enjoy the simple pleasures of life outside prison after being granted an unconditional pardon in a surprise turn of events.

Once branded as ‘Australia’s worst female serial killer’, the 55-year-old Folbigg, who had been serving a 25-year sentence for the murder of her four children, was pardoned on Monday after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.



The shocking news, no doubt a relief to her and her supporters, sheds light on a controversial and heart-wrenching case that has captivated the nation for two decades.

As we all know, the comfort of home is invaluable. Nothing compares to being surrounded by loved ones, indulging in a perfectly brewed cup of tea, and settling down in a warm, cosy bed. And it's precisely these simple acts of freedom that Kathleen Folbigg has been denied for so long.

Her first moments as a free woman were documented in a candid video shared with the public. The footage shows her embracing her long-time friend and unwavering supporter, Tracey Chapman, at her Glenreagh residence.


crime1.jpg
Kathleen Folbigg was in prison for over 20 years. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

Kathleen's first activities may seem trivial, yet they hold a deep significance. She took pleasure in stirring her tea with a metal spoon, exclaiming, ‘I haven’t had a metal one in 20 years.’

This small yet precious moment speaks to the broader experience of reclaiming her freedom.

Kathleen's plans for her first night outside prison included a delicious T-bone steak, new pyjamas, and the comfort of a regular bed – luxuries denied to her during her incarceration.



‘I can’t thank everybody enough for all the support and hard work that has gone into reaching this moment,’ Folbigg said in the video.

‘I’m beyond happy. It’s ridiculous. I’m in shock, so thank you.’

The remarkable turn of events came after an inquiry found reasonable doubt about her guilt. Kathleen Folbigg was originally convicted of killing her children, Sarah, Caleb, Laura, and Patrick, between 1989 and 1999.

Kathleen has always maintained her innocence, saying her children died of natural causes.


crime2.jpg
The decision was revealed on Monday morning. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley revealed the decision to release Folbigg, saying: ‘This morning, I met with the governor. I recommended that the governor exercise the royal prerogative of mercy and grant Ms Folbigg an unconditional pardon. The governor agreed. Ms Folbigg has now been pardoned.’

The subsequent inquiry considered new scientific and psychiatric evidence, leading to Chief Justice Tom Bathurst concluding there was reasonable doubt about her guilt in each of the crimes.



According to reports, Kathleen was just 20 years old when she met and married Craig Folbigg, her now ex-husband. Within a year, she became pregnant with Caleb – the couple’s first son, born in February 1989. Caleb lived for 19 days.

The following year, Patrick was born. He passed at eight months.

Two years later, the couple had a daughter, Sarah, who lived for only 10 months. In 1999, the couple’s fourth and longest-lived child, Laura, was born. She later passed away at only 18 months old.

Police investigated the deaths of all four children when Laura passed away. But it was more than two years after that Kathleen was arrested and charged. However, an examination of the remains of the children failed to find any physical evidence that foul play was involved in their deaths.

But without any other plausible explanation for their deaths, Kathleen remained the suspect as she was their mother and primary carer.

In 2003, she was charged with 40 years in prison. The judge at the time recalled her troubled past and said that Kathleen’s prospects of rehabilitation were ‘negligible’.



A team of immunologists at the most recent inquiry revealed that Kathleen’s daughters possessed a genetic mutation called CALM2 G114R, which can cause sudden cardiac arrest.

Evidence also revealed that her sons possessed a different genetic mutation – one linked to sudden-onset epilepsy in mice.

With her newfound freedom, Folbigg will begin to rebuild her life and regain the experiences she has lost over the past 20 years. Her case has sparked debate about the need for an independent body to review miscarriages of justice in Australia.

Her lawyer, Rhanee Rego, commented on the case, stating, ‘This case reminds us that we are all human and our legal system can make mistakes. It also reminds us that we have the capacity to do great things in the pursuit of truth.’

As for Kathleen Folbigg, the road to healing and adjusting to her new life outside prison will no doubt be challenging, but the support and love of friends will help her persevere.

In a touching tribute, Chapman fondly remembered the children, expressing how much they are missed every day. For Kathleen and those closest to her, this new chapter will be marked by the memory of those four precious lives lost, as well as the determination to seek truth and justice within the legal system.
Key Takeaways
  • Kathleen Folbigg was pardoned of her 2003 murder conviction and released from prison after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.
  • She has always maintained her innocence, claiming her children died from natural causes.
  • Folbigg's lawyer, Rhanee Rego, emphasised the need for Australia to consider implementing an independent body for reviewing miscarriages of justice.
Do you have any comments or thoughts about this story? Let us know in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
I hate to say this but I feel she is guilty. I know science is saying the girls suffered a genetic mutation but the boys didn't have this they had a epileptic mutation which I believe you don't die from

Her ex husband still believes she did it.

I actually thought she would have responded differently when released. If I had just spent 20 years in jail for murdering all my children and I was innocent , for one it would have broke me and on my release I would have been angry and when interviewed I would have said this and the wrong injustice against me. She was almost smug in her interview, almost happy she is out after what she did

I always thought Lindy Chamberlain was innocent and you even saw this in her interviews after her release , she wasn't happy , she lost so much including her marriage and those years couldn't be given back . She didn't make comments smiling and saying how good it was to use a metal spoon.

I believe this lady did murdered her 4 children as the judge said lightening doesn't strike 4 times
 
Last edited:
Content warning: This article mentions infanticide, which may be triggering for some readers. Discretion is advised.

For the first time in 20 years, Kathleen Folbigg will be able to enjoy the simple pleasures of life outside prison after being granted an unconditional pardon in a surprise turn of events.

Once branded as ‘Australia’s worst female serial killer’, the 55-year-old Folbigg, who had been serving a 25-year sentence for the murder of her four children, was pardoned on Monday after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.



The shocking news, no doubt a relief to her and her supporters, sheds light on a controversial and heart-wrenching case that has captivated the nation for two decades.

As we all know, the comfort of home is invaluable. Nothing compares to being surrounded by loved ones, indulging in a perfectly brewed cup of tea, and settling down in a warm, cosy bed. And it's precisely these simple acts of freedom that Kathleen Folbigg has been denied for so long.

Her first moments as a free woman were documented in a candid video shared with the public. The footage shows her embracing her long-time friend and unwavering supporter, Tracey Chapman, at her Glenreagh residence.


View attachment 21617
Kathleen Folbigg was in prison for over 20 years. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

Kathleen's first activities may seem trivial, yet they hold a deep significance. She took pleasure in stirring her tea with a metal spoon, exclaiming, ‘I haven’t had a metal one in 20 years.’

This small yet precious moment speaks to the broader experience of reclaiming her freedom.

Kathleen's plans for her first night outside prison included a delicious T-bone steak, new pyjamas, and the comfort of a regular bed – luxuries denied to her during her incarceration.



‘I can’t thank everybody enough for all the support and hard work that has gone into reaching this moment,’ Folbigg said in the video.

‘I’m beyond happy. It’s ridiculous. I’m in shock, so thank you.’

The remarkable turn of events came after an inquiry found reasonable doubt about her guilt. Kathleen Folbigg was originally convicted of killing her children, Sarah, Caleb, Laura, and Patrick, between 1989 and 1999.

Kathleen has always maintained her innocence, saying her children died of natural causes.


View attachment 21618
The decision was revealed on Monday morning. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley revealed the decision to release Folbigg, saying: ‘This morning, I met with the governor. I recommended that the governor exercise the royal prerogative of mercy and grant Ms Folbigg an unconditional pardon. The governor agreed. Ms Folbigg has now been pardoned.’

The subsequent inquiry considered new scientific and psychiatric evidence, leading to Chief Justice Tom Bathurst concluding there was reasonable doubt about her guilt in each of the crimes.



According to reports, Kathleen was just 20 years old when she met and married Craig Folbigg, her now ex-husband. Within a year, she became pregnant with Caleb – the couple’s first son, born in February 1989. Caleb lived for 19 days.

The following year, Patrick was born. He passed at eight months.

Two years later, the couple had a daughter, Sarah, who lived for only 10 months. In 1999, the couple’s fourth and longest-lived child, Laura, was born. She later passed away at only 18 months old.

Police investigated the deaths of all four children when Laura passed away. But it was more than two years after that Kathleen was arrested and charged. However, an examination of the remains of the children failed to find any physical evidence that foul play was involved in their deaths.

But without any other plausible explanation for their deaths, Kathleen remained the suspect as she was their mother and primary carer.

In 2003, she was charged with 40 years in prison. The judge at the time recalled her troubled past and said that Kathleen’s prospects of rehabilitation were ‘negligible’.



A team of immunologists at the most recent inquiry revealed that Kathleen’s daughters possessed a genetic mutation called CALM2 G114R, which can cause sudden cardiac arrest.

Evidence also revealed that her sons possessed a different genetic mutation – one linked to sudden-onset epilepsy in mice.

With her newfound freedom, Folbigg will begin to rebuild her life and regain the experiences she has lost over the past 20 years. Her case has sparked debate about the need for an independent body to review miscarriages of justice in Australia.

Her lawyer, Rhanee Rego, commented on the case, stating, ‘This case reminds us that we are all human and our legal system can make mistakes. It also reminds us that we have the capacity to do great things in the pursuit of truth.’

As for Kathleen Folbigg, the road to healing and adjusting to her new life outside prison will no doubt be challenging, but the support and love of friends will help her persevere.

In a touching tribute, Chapman fondly remembered the children, expressing how much they are missed every day. For Kathleen and those closest to her, this new chapter will be marked by the memory of those four precious lives lost, as well as the determination to seek truth and justice within the legal system.
Key Takeaways

  • Kathleen Folbigg was pardoned of her 2003 murder conviction and released from prison after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.
  • She has always maintained her innocence, claiming her children died from natural causes.
  • Folbigg's lawyer, Rhanee Rego, emphasised the need for Australia to consider implementing an independent body for reviewing miscarriages of justice.
Do you have any comments or thoughts about this story? Let us know in the comments below.
I just hope the Government pay for the time she has lost in prison! Apparently the 4 babies had some kind of problem that meant they would never live beyond the time they did! This should have been discovered in the beginning. The poor woman going to prison for something she did not do. Why discover it now after 20 years!
 
I remember the story at the time. The police said there was no evidence of suffocation or anything like that.
I don't respect her ex husband, as he refused to partake doing a DNA. This was asked when two Australian based scientists found a new and rare gene mutation. This was the catalyst for the inquiry. Our Australian research scientists are hoping that science will be welcome again in the future, for the judicial system nationally.
 
Content warning: This article mentions infanticide, which may be triggering for some readers. Discretion is advised.

For the first time in 20 years, Kathleen Folbigg will be able to enjoy the simple pleasures of life outside prison after being granted an unconditional pardon in a surprise turn of events.

Once branded as ‘Australia’s worst female serial killer’, the 55-year-old Folbigg, who had been serving a 25-year sentence for the murder of her four children, was pardoned on Monday after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.



The shocking news, no doubt a relief to her and her supporters, sheds light on a controversial and heart-wrenching case that has captivated the nation for two decades.

As we all know, the comfort of home is invaluable. Nothing compares to being surrounded by loved ones, indulging in a perfectly brewed cup of tea, and settling down in a warm, cosy bed. And it's precisely these simple acts of freedom that Kathleen Folbigg has been denied for so long.

Her first moments as a free woman were documented in a candid video shared with the public. The footage shows her embracing her long-time friend and unwavering supporter, Tracey Chapman, at her Glenreagh residence.


View attachment 21617
Kathleen Folbigg was in prison for over 20 years. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

Kathleen's first activities may seem trivial, yet they hold a deep significance. She took pleasure in stirring her tea with a metal spoon, exclaiming, ‘I haven’t had a metal one in 20 years.’

This small yet precious moment speaks to the broader experience of reclaiming her freedom.

Kathleen's plans for her first night outside prison included a delicious T-bone steak, new pyjamas, and the comfort of a regular bed – luxuries denied to her during her incarceration.



‘I can’t thank everybody enough for all the support and hard work that has gone into reaching this moment,’ Folbigg said in the video.

‘I’m beyond happy. It’s ridiculous. I’m in shock, so thank you.’

The remarkable turn of events came after an inquiry found reasonable doubt about her guilt. Kathleen Folbigg was originally convicted of killing her children, Sarah, Caleb, Laura, and Patrick, between 1989 and 1999.

Kathleen has always maintained her innocence, saying her children died of natural causes.


View attachment 21618
The decision was revealed on Monday morning. Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley revealed the decision to release Folbigg, saying: ‘This morning, I met with the governor. I recommended that the governor exercise the royal prerogative of mercy and grant Ms Folbigg an unconditional pardon. The governor agreed. Ms Folbigg has now been pardoned.’

The subsequent inquiry considered new scientific and psychiatric evidence, leading to Chief Justice Tom Bathurst concluding there was reasonable doubt about her guilt in each of the crimes.



According to reports, Kathleen was just 20 years old when she met and married Craig Folbigg, her now ex-husband. Within a year, she became pregnant with Caleb – the couple’s first son, born in February 1989. Caleb lived for 19 days.

The following year, Patrick was born. He passed at eight months.

Two years later, the couple had a daughter, Sarah, who lived for only 10 months. In 1999, the couple’s fourth and longest-lived child, Laura, was born. She later passed away at only 18 months old.

Police investigated the deaths of all four children when Laura passed away. But it was more than two years after that Kathleen was arrested and charged. However, an examination of the remains of the children failed to find any physical evidence that foul play was involved in their deaths.

But without any other plausible explanation for their deaths, Kathleen remained the suspect as she was their mother and primary carer.

In 2003, she was charged with 40 years in prison. The judge at the time recalled her troubled past and said that Kathleen’s prospects of rehabilitation were ‘negligible’.



A team of immunologists at the most recent inquiry revealed that Kathleen’s daughters possessed a genetic mutation called CALM2 G114R, which can cause sudden cardiac arrest.

Evidence also revealed that her sons possessed a different genetic mutation – one linked to sudden-onset epilepsy in mice.

With her newfound freedom, Folbigg will begin to rebuild her life and regain the experiences she has lost over the past 20 years. Her case has sparked debate about the need for an independent body to review miscarriages of justice in Australia.

Her lawyer, Rhanee Rego, commented on the case, stating, ‘This case reminds us that we are all human and our legal system can make mistakes. It also reminds us that we have the capacity to do great things in the pursuit of truth.’

As for Kathleen Folbigg, the road to healing and adjusting to her new life outside prison will no doubt be challenging, but the support and love of friends will help her persevere.

In a touching tribute, Chapman fondly remembered the children, expressing how much they are missed every day. For Kathleen and those closest to her, this new chapter will be marked by the memory of those four precious lives lost, as well as the determination to seek truth and justice within the legal system.
Key Takeaways

  • Kathleen Folbigg was pardoned of her 2003 murder conviction and released from prison after an inquiry found reasonable doubt regarding her guilt.
  • She has always maintained her innocence, claiming her children died from natural causes.
  • Folbigg's lawyer, Rhanee Rego, emphasised the need for Australia to consider implementing an independent body for reviewing miscarriages of justice.
Do you have any comments or thoughts about this story? Let us know in the comments below.
I don’t believe she was guilty after speaking with several legal people years ago. People ask why use scientific evidence now not before? The answer is simply that the knowledge wasn’t available then. I would think that the people who feel she’s guilty would have little to complain about her release now as she has served the time she was sentenced for and would have been released on parole shortly anyway. So guilty sayers you got 20 years of her life and innocent sayers she’s been pardoned. At the moment you should all be happy. Of course what is going to happen next will definitely start the debates all over again.
 
I hate to say this but I feel she is guilty. I know science is saying the girls suffered a genetic mutation but the boys didn't have this they had a epileptic mutation which I believe you don't die from

Her ex husband still believes she did it.

I actually thought she would have responded differently when released. If I had just spent 20 years in jail for murdering all my children , for one it would have broke me and on my release I would have been angry and when interviewed I would have said this and the wrong injustice against me. She was almost smug in her interview, almost happy she is out after what she did

I always thought Lindy Chamberlain was innocent and you even saw this in her interviews after her release , she wasn't happy , she lost so much including her marriage and those years couldn't be given back . She didn't make comments smiling and saying how good it was to use a metal spoon.

I believe this lady did murdered her 4 children as the judge said lightening doesn't strike 4 times
I agree with you, I think she is guilty. Her diaries are enough for me. Her diary states that one of the babies (I don't know about what she wrote concerning the others) "Left with a little help". A grieving mother does not write something like that. 20 years for 4 lives is not enough, 25 years for 4 lives is not enough. Her ex-husband knows her, and is convinced she killed their babies.
 
I just hope the Government pay for the time she has lost in prison! Apparently the 4 babies had some kind of problem that meant they would never live beyond the time they did! This should have been discovered in the beginning. The poor woman going to prison for something she did not do. Why discover it now after 20 years!
From what I have seen of this case the poor woman has been convicted by the court of Popular Opinion; that includes the original investigation by the police or as it now turns out, lack of investigation This is similar to Lindy Chamberlain who was thought to be guilty because she did not show enough emotion, did not cry openly so of course she must be guilty. There was absolutely no proven forensic evidence in either case but even so the Police considered both women guilty and they were convicted because the prosecuters said so. How to get back 20 years of life that was taken by a legal system that only see's things in black and white with no shades of grey. how Kathleen has responded since her release is of no consequence, we are all different and her not showing enough anger now is no more proof that she killed her children than her not crying enough at her trial. She is grateful for her release and just wanting to enjoy the simple things in life that have been denied her for so long, like a decent cup of tea in a cup and the ability to walk in nature under a sunny sky. There is no amount of monetary compensation that would be enough for the life that has been taken from her. I sicerely hope that she continues to receive the emotional support that she will need from the large group of advocates who have been fighting for her over the years that she was locked away.
 
I agree with you, I think she is guilty. Her diaries are enough for me. Her diary states that one of the babies (I don't know about what she wrote concerning the others) "Left with a little help". A grieving mother does not write something like that. 20 years for 4 lives is not enough, 25 years for 4 lives is not enough. Her ex-husband knows her, and is convinced she killed their babies.
There is just something about her that doesn't sit right with me . I remember that coming out what she wrote in her diary and thought how sick she was. Let's hope nothing happens to another child if they are left in her care
 
If you were wrongly imprisoned for 20 years would you come out so happy ?? I'm thinking you would be very angry and mentally drained being accused of killing your babies .

If you did the crime and was released from prison you wouldn't be angry you would be happy exactly like she was . Who cares she can now use a metal spoon!

Her husband would know her the best and he believes she did it.
 
Genetic research has discovered many mutations or combinations of mutations which cause disease or death. If our personal gene pool is weakened by such mutations and we procreate with someone who also has a weakened gene pool, then our offspring may have a 1 in 4 chance of critical health issues or disabilities. I was in my 30’s before it was discovered I had Thalassemia Minor. For years I was treated for repeated anemia with iron tablets. This was the worse possible treatment! So let’s not condemn the advancement of science in discovering new mutations and their consequences to newborns or children. If, as a consequence it leads to there being reasonable doubt in criminal cases, we must err on the side of the reasonable doubt or justice will not be just! Look at QLD. How many unjust determinations may have been caused by the failure of their DNA testing lab!? Our judicial system is based on the premise that a person is only guilty if it is beyond reasonable doubt!
 
From what I have seen of this case the poor woman has been convicted by the court of Popular Opinion; that includes the original investigation by the police or as it now turns out, lack of investigation This is similar to Lindy Chamberlain who was thought to be guilty because she did not show enough emotion, did not cry openly so of course she must be guilty. There was absolutely no proven forensic evidence in either case but even so the Police considered both women guilty and they were convicted because the prosecuters said so. How to get back 20 years of life that was taken by a legal system that only see's things in black and white with no shades of grey. how Kathleen has responded since her release is of no consequence, we are all different and her not showing enough anger now is no more proof that she killed her children than her not crying enough at her trial. She is grateful for her release and just wanting to enjoy the simple things in life that have been denied her for so long, like a decent cup of tea in a cup and the ability to walk in nature under a sunny sky. There is no amount of monetary compensation that would be enough for the life that has been taken from her. I sicerely hope that she continues to receive the emotional support that she will need from the large group of advocates who have been fighting for her over the years that she was locked away.
Well said
 
How can you contributors above voice opinions on the guilt or otherwise of the person in this case. You know nothing. Your opinions are worth nothing!!! Don't get involved in legal cases - especially old ones like this and Lindy Chamberlain. You have no idea what happened - yet you give opinions !!!
 
I had my suspissions about killing her children or not , but now I believe she has not done it . Nothing is said about her husband , he was not very supportive , he should have seen how she had suffered . Of course she is happy to be free if you are not guilty . Hope after a while she’ll find a good person to spend her life with and invests all her money well . She deserved a little happiness.
 
Genetic research has discovered many mutations or combinations of mutations which cause disease or death. If our personal gene pool is weakened by such mutations and we procreate with someone who also has a weakened gene pool, then our offspring may have a 1 in 4 chance of critical health issues or disabilities. I was in my 30’s before it was discovered I had Thalassemia Minor. For years I was treated for repeated anemia with iron tablets. This was the worse possible treatment! So let’s not condemn the advancement of science in discovering new mutations and their consequences to newborns or children. If, as a consequence it leads to there being reasonable doubt in criminal cases, we must err on the side of the reasonable doubt or justice will not be just! Look at QLD. How many unjust determinations may have been caused by the failure of their DNA testing lab!? Our judicial system is based on the premise that a person is only guilty if it is beyond reasonable doubt!
Well said👍
 
Everyone's allowed to have an opinion and voice it in this forum. I've noticed that there are fewer comments on all topics now, maybe because people aren't willing to be shot down just for saying what they think.
Comments should be aimed at the article, not responses.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×