Big employers treat workers like numbers in shocking new move
- Replies 9
Ever feel like things just aren’t as personal as they used to be?
Some of Australia’s biggest names are turning to high-tech tools to make big decisions, sparking fresh debate about what we might be giving up in the name of efficiency.
For many, it’s a sign of how fast the world is changing—and not always in ways that feel more human.
These days, even simple processes are getting the high-tech treatment.
Some major retailers have quietly switched to using automated systems for screening people—no handshake, no chat, just a screen and a set of prompts.
While it’s being sold as efficient and modern, others feel it’s all gotten a bit too impersonal.
You don’t need to be applying for anything to notice how often real human contact is being replaced.
It’s not just about jobs—it’s a bigger sign of how things are changing.
And for those who value old-fashioned connection, it can feel like something important is being lost.
The company insists that this approach is fair and impartial, focusing solely on your answers to a standard set of questions.
Sapia, the AI provider, claims their system saves companies up to 20 hours a week in recruitment time and cuts the time-to-hire in half.
They even report a 90 per cent satisfaction rate among applicants.
Not everyone is convinced. Tammie Ballis, a seasoned recruiter and owner of Realistic Careers, isn’t buying the hype.
She calls the process 'dehumanising,' arguing that it reduces applicants to mere numbers in a database.
'It’s a cost-cutting feature, it’s also a screening tool,' she said. 'You are treated like a number now more than ever, especially if you are applying to jobs for the big retailers.'
Her advice is, if you want a more personal experience, try applying to small or medium-sized businesses, where you’re more likely to interact with a real person.
Social media users have also weighed in, with many expressing frustration and concern.
One Reddit user summed it up: 'If they were interested in hiring you, they’d speak to you in person. Don’t put up with this dehumanising c***.'
Others worry that soon, people will be selling 'optimal answers' for AI interviews, much like search engine optimisation (SEO) for Google.
Bunnings’ chief people officer, Damian Zahra, says the company still relies on the 'expertise' of its internal recruitment team.
The AI interview is just one step in the process, and real people review all applications before any in-person interviews take place.
Bunnings also offers the option to contact their talent team directly by phone or through a local store.
Sapia AI, for its part, rejects the idea that its technology dehumanises recruitment.
A spokesperson argues that traditional hiring is already full of bias and inefficiency, often reducing people to their CV or postcode. 'Our AI-led, chat-based interview is designed to give every candidate a fair go, in their own words and on their own time.
No face-to-face bias. No ghosting. And everyone gets meaningful feedback—something that rarely happens in hiring.'
There’s no denying that technology has changed the way we live and work—sometimes for the better, sometimes not.
For older Australians, the shift to online and AI-driven processes can be especially daunting. Not everyone is comfortable with video interviews or chatbots, and there’s a real risk that some people could be left behind.
On the other hand, AI can help level the playing field by removing unconscious bias and making the process more transparent.
It can also speed things up, which is a blessing for anyone who’s ever waited weeks to hear back about a job application.
But at what cost? Are we sacrificing the personal touch that makes work meaningful? Are we missing out on great candidates who just aren’t tech-savvy?
Did you find the process fair, or did it feel a bit too robotic for your liking? Do you think technology is making things better or worse for job seekers, especially for those over 60? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.
Read more: Shocking truth about secret use of AI radio host for hip-hop show
Some of Australia’s biggest names are turning to high-tech tools to make big decisions, sparking fresh debate about what we might be giving up in the name of efficiency.
For many, it’s a sign of how fast the world is changing—and not always in ways that feel more human.
These days, even simple processes are getting the high-tech treatment.
Some major retailers have quietly switched to using automated systems for screening people—no handshake, no chat, just a screen and a set of prompts.
While it’s being sold as efficient and modern, others feel it’s all gotten a bit too impersonal.
Major employers in Australia criticised for using AI in hiring, with applicants treated like numbers. Credit: Craig Dingle / iStock
You don’t need to be applying for anything to notice how often real human contact is being replaced.
It’s not just about jobs—it’s a bigger sign of how things are changing.
And for those who value old-fashioned connection, it can feel like something important is being lost.
The company insists that this approach is fair and impartial, focusing solely on your answers to a standard set of questions.
Sapia, the AI provider, claims their system saves companies up to 20 hours a week in recruitment time and cuts the time-to-hire in half.
They even report a 90 per cent satisfaction rate among applicants.
Not everyone is convinced. Tammie Ballis, a seasoned recruiter and owner of Realistic Careers, isn’t buying the hype.
She calls the process 'dehumanising,' arguing that it reduces applicants to mere numbers in a database.
'It’s a cost-cutting feature, it’s also a screening tool,' she said. 'You are treated like a number now more than ever, especially if you are applying to jobs for the big retailers.'
Her advice is, if you want a more personal experience, try applying to small or medium-sized businesses, where you’re more likely to interact with a real person.
Social media users have also weighed in, with many expressing frustration and concern.
One Reddit user summed it up: 'If they were interested in hiring you, they’d speak to you in person. Don’t put up with this dehumanising c***.'
Others worry that soon, people will be selling 'optimal answers' for AI interviews, much like search engine optimisation (SEO) for Google.
Bunnings’ chief people officer, Damian Zahra, says the company still relies on the 'expertise' of its internal recruitment team.
The AI interview is just one step in the process, and real people review all applications before any in-person interviews take place.
Sapia AI, for its part, rejects the idea that its technology dehumanises recruitment.
A spokesperson argues that traditional hiring is already full of bias and inefficiency, often reducing people to their CV or postcode. 'Our AI-led, chat-based interview is designed to give every candidate a fair go, in their own words and on their own time.
No face-to-face bias. No ghosting. And everyone gets meaningful feedback—something that rarely happens in hiring.'
There’s no denying that technology has changed the way we live and work—sometimes for the better, sometimes not.
For older Australians, the shift to online and AI-driven processes can be especially daunting. Not everyone is comfortable with video interviews or chatbots, and there’s a real risk that some people could be left behind.
It can also speed things up, which is a blessing for anyone who’s ever waited weeks to hear back about a job application.
But at what cost? Are we sacrificing the personal touch that makes work meaningful? Are we missing out on great candidates who just aren’t tech-savvy?
Read more: Shocking truth about secret use of AI radio host for hip-hop show
Last edited:
.png){kind=icon}
