Woolworths shopper’s complaint stirs heated debate on social media — are we complaining over unnecessary things?
By
- Replies 6
A Woolworths shopper's complaint about a back-to-school display item has stirred a controversial debate on social media.
Have you spotted the issue?
A Woolies shopper took to Facebook to air her concerns over the pencil cases on display at her local store.
According to the shopper, the pink pencil cases had been labelled as "girl" items on the price tag, while the green and black versions were labelled as "boy" items.
The shopper claimed that the pink pencil cases were labelled as “girl” items while the green and black variations were marked as “boy” items. Credit: Facebook.
“Really Woolworths - girls and boys pencil cases? Why not just ‘pencil cases’?” she wrote, pointing out that the supermarket giant should've refrained from putting gender labels on school items.
The post was met with mixed reactions from Facebook users, with some agreeing that gender-specific labelling was inappropriate and should've been abolished.
One parent wrote: “My daughter, who is 14, would say the same thing and (definitely) would buy the so-called boys one!”
“Apparently colours are owned by the sexes,” another added.
However, some called out the shopper for complaining over "unnecessary" things.
“Nothing stopping any gender purchasing either one. Actually, the world was a better place where people didn’t care about the nitty-gritty. Who cares to be honest,” one person wrote.
Another added: “Who lets a sign dictate what colour they are going to buy?”
Woolworths agreed that marking school items with gender-specific labels is “dated”. Credit: AAP.
Woolworths agreed with the complaint, with its spokesperson telling 7NEWS.com.au that the company believes that the move was "dated" and staff members are now updating the labels on the school items.
“We aim to ensure our products are inclusive and agree the names of these pencil cases are dated,” the spokesperson said.
“We’re working to update the names of these products to better reflect community expectations and provide a more accurate description.”
What are your thoughts? Are gender specifications outdated? Let us know in the comments below!