Will this proposal cut your energy bills dramatically? See the government's plans for solar batteries

As the cost of living continues to rise, Australians feel the pinch with every bill.

However, there could be a glimmer of hope on the horizon for those weary of the relentless surge in energy costs.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese recently made a bold pledge that could see homeowners and small businesses breathe a sigh of relief when it comes to their power bills.


Prime Minister Albanese promised a 30 per cent cut in solar battery costs should his government be re-elected.

This initiative was part of the Labor government's Cheaper Home Batteries Program that could roll out starting 1 July 2025.

The program could be a win for individual households, small businesses and community facilities across the country.

According to the Department of Energy's modelling, households equipped with rooftop solar could see an annual reduction of up to $1,100 on their power bills.


compressed-pexels-solar panels.jpeg
Homes who have yet to install solar batteries may benefit from the proposed Cheaper Home Batteries Program. Image Credit: Pexels/Kindel Media


Homeowners who have been considering the installation of both a battery and solar system may see savings of up to $2,300 annually.

This figure represented 90 per cent of an average family's electricity bill—a significant slice of the cost of living pie that the Labor government has been keen to address.

'Delivering cost of living relief is Labor's number one priority,' Prime Minister Albanese stated.

'We want to ensure Australians have access to cheaper, cleaner energy. This is good for power bills and good for the environment.'

'Only Labor has a plan to build Australia's future,' he concluded.


Energy Minister Chris Bowen echoed this sentiment and highlighted the program's potential to allow more homes and businesses to store solar energy for use anytime.

'The contrast is clear—a re-elected Albanese government will take pressure off household energy bills, while Peter Dutton's Liberals will spend $600 billion on a nuclear plan that drives power bills up,' Energy Minister Bowen stated.

Under the Cheaper Home Batteries Program, homeowners could see up to a $4,000 reduction in the upfront cost of installing an 11.5kWh virtual power plant-ready battery.

This discount could decrease over time in line with projected battery cost reductions.

It should be delivered through the existing Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme—effective since 2011.

The government's vision is that the increased uptake of batteries should not only benefit those who install them.

It could also contribute to lower energy prices across the board by reducing overall demand on the grid.

With an additional one million batteries projected to be installed by 2030, the ripple effect could be significant.


Despite the optimism surrounding the policy, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton criticised the plan.

'Mr Albanese is promising higher electricity prices at this election, his admission today that he's going to have to compensate people with batteries because his power prices will go up in the next term of government,' Dutton stated.

'I just think people will see through it.'

St Vincent de Paul's National Director of Energy, Gavin Dufty, warned that the government should be careful when designing the battery subsidy policy.

Should the design be pulled off well, Aussies may benefit from the program.

John Grimes, the Chief Executive of the Smart Energy Council, called it 'the most important development in consumer energy since Australians first gained access to subsidised solar panels'.

Meanwhile, Property Council Chief Executive Mike Zorbas emphasised the importance of electrification as the fastest and cheapest way to decarbonise the built environment.

As the election looms closer, the promise of slashed solar battery costs could be a deciding factor for many Australians eager to take control of their energy bills.
Key Takeaways

  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made an election pledge to cut the cost of solar batteries by 30 per cent.
  • The Cheaper Home Batteries Program is set to commence on 1 July 2025 and is aimed at households, small businesses, and community facilities.
  • Energy Minister Chris Bowen contrasted the Labor Party's renewable energy focus with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's nuclear plans.
  • Experts shared their differing views and opinions about the proposal and how it could benefit Australians.
What are your thoughts on Prime Minister Albanese's solar battery plan? Would it influence your vote in the coming polls? Share your opinions with us in the comments below!
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
bugger wish this had been offered a couple of months ago, we installed a battery in January, obviously minus the discount now being touted which would have saved us over$5,000. Never mind we will just have to be happy with the electricity savings which are considerable already.
 
Wtch the price of batteries suddenly jump if Labor get back in.
The price of solar cells skyrocketed 15 yrs ago when there was a very large subsidy offered. After the subsidy ran out solar cells dropped quite a bit in price. Businesses just made huge profits off the back these subsidies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SandyM and Bridgit
Whilst I'm all for clean energy, this whole net zero business is based on a rubbish premise.

Australia emits 1.019% of the Earth's emissions. If we had zero emissions now it would have virtually no impact on the total.

Having said that, the Earth needs CO2. Flora needs it to survive and replenish our Oxygen.

Reducing CO2 emissions reduces the flora's ability to make oxygen, which we need to survive.

C02 only makes up only .04% of the atmosphere.

We are going through a cycle where the planet is rebuilding it's C02 levels up to required levels.

Nothing we do will or should interfere with thst process.

Hundreds of billions for Australia alone to save a planet that doesn't need saving.
 
Whilst I'm all for clean energy, this whole net zero business is based on a rubbish premise.

Australia emits 1.019% of the Earth's emissions. If we had zero emissions now it would have virtually no impact on the total.

Having said that, the Earth needs CO2. Flora needs it to survive and replenish our Oxygen.

Reducing CO2 emissions reduces the flora's ability to make oxygen, which we need to survive.

C02 only makes up only .04% of the atmosphere.

We are going through a cycle where the planet is rebuilding it's C02 levels up to required levels.

Nothing we do will or should interfere with thst process.

Hundreds of billions for Australia alone to save a planet that doesn't need saving.
Yes we have been cooling for a long time - part of the cycle - the braindead believe that CO2 is poison - maybe they should stop breathing and let the rest of us get on with it!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Mikeyboy2012
Just another attempt at buying votes, by the worst PM Australia has ever had !!
Surely people are not that stupid that they can't see through this carrot dangling, just before an election?
But then again !!
Well, under Dutton`s current plan look forward to paying for Nuclear Power plants an extra $115. billion dollars. They won`t be available until untill 2050 and guess who will be paying for them you and me. Not to mention the risk of catastrophic environmental disasters which will follow if they fail. I think you need to rethink Labour`s plan.
 
Another promise from Albanese whose record for delivering is not great. Tell me, where are you getting all this money from with all these promises! Just another lie, you should be held accountable for all you promise just to get elected.
From our future tax payers. So sad Both parties know how to spend
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54
Whilst I'm all for clean energy, this whole net zero business is based on a rubbish premise.

Australia emits 1.019% of the Earth's emissions. If we had zero emissions now it would have virtually no impact on the total.

Having said that, the Earth needs CO2. Flora needs it to survive and replenish our Oxygen.

Reducing CO2 emissions reduces the flora's ability to make oxygen, which we need to survive.

C02 only makes up only .04% of the atmosphere.

We are going through a cycle where the planet is rebuilding it's C02 levels up to required levels.

Nothing we do will or should interfere with thst process.

Hundreds of billions for Australia alone to save a planet that doesn't need saving.
Are you a scientist and where did you get your information?, that is not what the scientists are saying.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×