A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
  
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
  
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
  
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.
  

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

 

[Luckyus]

A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

View attachment 31750

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

I believe it is up to the Australian Prime Minister to issue an invitation for an official visit, which he seems to be a bit remiss in much the same he has been more than a bit remiss in other affairs that effect the population. Other than the over riding of his pet project referendum!!!!

 

[xxrystl]

Do we welcome the Royal Adulterers? An Australian republic can't come quickly enough for me thanks.

 

[Col@45]

A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

View attachment 31750

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

The King is welcome to visit our country as long as the tax payers don't foot the bill !!

 

[Ronloby]

He is the King and I believe he should be the one to say "I will visit Australia on such a date convenient to all sides." He should not need to be invited. I don't care if he comes or not.

 

[Tamaya]

A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

View attachment 31750

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

I am a true monarchist. King Charles III is my king and will remain so for as long as I live. If he comes to Cairns I will be there to greet him bells on! There is no need to change anything. There are many advantages to be linked with the UK and the monarchy, especially for the young generation. Only the oldie moldies in the Australian government are seeking to change for their own power hungry capriciousness. Period!

 

[Observer]

If you are not a royalist nor a true monarchist, who cares. I don't.

 

[magpie1]

Have always been a proud Monarchist and will forever remain so.....remember Charles visiting long ago when he attended Timbertop as a 17 year old, and being chased in the surf by a young Perth bombshell...he is King and I for one will support his leadership of the Monarchy and the Commonwealth of Nations.

 

[Jest]

so many who are keen to have added expenses to our system and be run by some idiot. take a look at USA. OH WELL! Me, I would rather stay as we are. OH! by the way, who here can say they are the perfect person in a marriage? Think very hard. You could end up with an Albonese??????

 

[lesleywithers]

A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

View attachment 31750

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

Who Cares

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

 

[lesleywithers]

If you are not a royalist nor a true monarchist, who cares. I don't.

I dont either more money than they not to do with help the homeless

 

[Jo Piper3]

I've always liked Charlie.

 

[Brody]

I guess we are ready to look at becoming a Republican. I think with Queen Elizabeth's passing it is reasonable to take a look at the advantages, and the down side. If a clear understanding of all aspects of that were forthcoming with the Pro's and Con's seriously considered it would be apparent which way we should go. I do think rightly or not, most of us have been under the rule of Her Majesty for most of our lives and felt a source of security under her reign, for whatever reason.
I had hoped Charles would have handed the reins over to William. But I guess the loyalty to the Queen has not automatically transferred to Charles. It has been said that Charles has a special place in his heart to Australia due to his spending time during his School Years here.
The younger aged Australians, would probably not have Regardless the same feeling for "The Mother Country" that the older generation may have.
In regard to the visit of Charles and possibly Camilla's arrival, I think it would be with mixed emotions. I would be open to consider it. But I may be in the Minority having that guarded response if wether it is likely to be a success or not.
Interesting days ahead, I believe our
Allegiance to our Allies, would have to be
Maintained for our own Security. We are a small fish in the big pool of life.

 

[Veggiepatch]

As long as he leaves Camilla at home....

 

[Brody]

Veggiepatch, you are definitely of the right opinion.

 

[Luckyus]

Do we welcome the Royal Adulterers? An Australian republic can't come quickly enough for me thanks.

I've always said they put their pants on the same as everyone else, one leg at a time.

 

[gordon1940]

On many occasions, our Members have recorded “ If it ain’t broke why fix it”. I suggest that thinking be applied to this subject.

 

[pammy.pj]

I guess we are ready to look at becoming a Republican. I think with Queen Elizabeth's passing it is reasonable to take a look at the advantages, and the down side. If a clear understanding of all aspects of that were forthcoming with the Pro's and Con's seriously considered it would be apparent which way we should go. I do think rightly or not, most of us have been under the rule of Her Majesty for most of our lives and felt a source of security under her reign, for whatever reason.
I had hoped Charles would have handed the reins over to William. But I guess the loyalty to the Queen has not automatically transferred to Charles. It has been said that Charles has a special place in his heart to Australia due to his spending time during his School Years here.
The younger aged Australians, would probably not have Regardless the same feeling for "The Mother Country" that the older generation may have.
In regard to the visit of Charles and possibly Camilla's arrival, I think it would be with mixed emotions. I would be open to consider it. But I may be in the Minority having that guarded response if wether it is likely to be a success or not.
Interesting days ahead, I believe our
Allegiance to our Allies, would have to be
Maintained for our own Security. We are a small fish in the big pool of life.

I don't think we can afford another referendum for a few years! The Monarchy does no harm to us and in fact a lot of people get great pleasure from knowing we are part of it. As for Charles passing the crown on to William, he could not have just done that, its not a pass the parcel. He would have had to abdicate and that means he would have given up everything, he would have been outed from the Royal family, he would have lost his son by allowing him to be King and for what reason, he was raised and trained all his life for his role as King, I personally believe he will make a very good one. Let William enjoy these remaining years preparing more for the huge job ahead and be able to enjoy his young family which I am sure he wants.

 

[David Thackrah]

Read "The Secrets of Emu Field" by Elizabeth Tynan and consider the dilemma with the Referendum. I think you will be of the mind to have King stay at home. It is understood The Crown is the End Owner of all land of Australia including magic places like the Abroholos and Cocos Islands, however the indigenous people are saying it is "them" that have proprietorship of all land (Country) thus suggesting The Crown is kidding itself. I am indigenous (born here) and consider I am part owner of the Australian Terra.

 

[Luckyus]

A royal visit is a rare and special occasion, made even more so because the guest of honour is none other than the head of the Commonwealth: King Charles III.

As rumours swirl that Australia will see the King officially visit next year, some people are undoubtedly aware that the trip could renew the debate about Australia becoming a republic.

Last Sunday, October 8, royal aides revealed to a news source that the monarch is allegedly preparing for a visit to Sydney, which will coincide with his first attendance as the Head of the Commonwealth at its summit meeting in Samoa.

View attachment 31750

King Charles III is set to visit Australia next year. Credit: WalesOnline/Facebook

In response, Assistant Minister for the Republic (an anti-monarchist role created in the Australian Labor Party last year) Matt Thistlewaite told a news source: ‘The King will always be welcome in Australia and greeted fondly by the Australian people.’

He continued: ‘But in modern-day Australia, his visit will trigger a renewed conversation about having our own head of state who lives with us, represents us and is an Australian.’

The King will be at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) next October, and it is believed that he will extend the tour to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

He was criticised for not making any official visit to any Commonwealth country during the first year of his reign. Meanwhile, it has also been reported that King Charles III was ‘disquieted’ by the delay in the official invitation from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

‘It is fair to say there has been some disquiet about it. As is protocol, the King cannot act upon anything until he receives an official invite,’ an anonymous source said of the situation between PM Albanese and the King.

But for some, the King’s delayed visit is no issue at all.

‘By the time Charles visits, he’ll have been King of Australia for more than two years. He’s hardly been in a rush to visit us, and that’s fine—we don’t need him,’ Isaac Jeffrey, leader of the Australian Republic Movement protest group, declared.

A survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should pick up the tab for any state visit by the King or Queen.

In 2011, the royal visit cost the taxpayers $2.6 million AUD.

It is also believed that royal aides are closely watching the referendum, where Aussies would vote on whether they would grant permission for an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.

If this is successful, the Labor government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed it will hold a vote to test the country’s interest in being a Republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

A recent YouGov poll found a growing appetite for a republic, with 32 per cent of Australians wanting one 'as soon as possible'— a 12 per cent jump compared to the results from the same survey last year.

Some sources believe that King Charles’s official engagements will be targeted to bring up the case of having a president. They added that ‘conversations on both sides’ have occurred and that ‘the King has made it clear he is keen to meet as many Australians as he can when the opportunity arises’.

The Palace, however, would not comment on the details of Australian Prime Minister Albanese's discussions with the King.

Key Takeaways

• King Charles III is expected to visit Sydney, Australia, next year, coinciding with his first attendance as the head of the Commonwealth at a summit meeting in Samoa.
• Some Australians view this visit as an opportunity to renew discussions about the country becoming a republic and having its own head of state.
• A recent survey found that 78 per cent of 1,500 Australians believe the Royal Family should foot the bill for a state visit.
• The Australian Labor government has indicated it will hold a vote to test the appetite to become a republic if it is elected for a second term in 2025.

What’s your take on this, members? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

If it wasn't for Britain, you would have under Dutch, German, Frebch Spanish or Portugese colonists and I don't we would be having a referendum as there wouldn't a significant amout of Idegenous for Albanese to stir up for his legacy of division.