WATCH: Shocking Singapore Airlines re-enactment leaves Sunrise host speechless!

When we tune into our morning news, we expect a certain level of decorum and straightforward reporting, mainly when the news tackles severe issues and current events.

However, viewers of the popular Australian breakfast program Sunrise were in for an unexpected ride when a segment turned bizarre, leaving one of the hosts visibly puzzled.


Sunrise host Nat Barr recently went live to discuss the incident involving Singapore Airlines' flight SQ321 from London to Singapore—a Boeing 777-300ER that encountered severe turbulence 11 hours into the flight.

The turbulence was so extreme that passengers were thrown against the cabin ceiling, which resulted in injuries and one fatality.

Among the passengers were almost 60 Australians, who undoubtedly experienced moments of sheer terror as the plane plunged through the air.


compressed-sq321.jpeg
Sunrise hosted guest aviation expert in their morning news about the Singapore Airlines flight SQ321. Image Credit: YouTube/Sunrise


Sunrise invited CNN aviation expert Richard Quest to the show to shed light on the situation.

Known for his enthusiastic reporting style, Quest brought a level of animation to the interview that no one could have anticipated.


Quest's use of props to illustrate the plane's ordeal was unconventional.

He began with a miniature plane replica to simulate the aircraft's erratic movements through the turbulent weather over Myanmar.

His demonstration also included a piece of paper with numbers highlighted in yellow, which he claimed to represent the altitude changes the plane experienced.

The props continued as Quest scrambled to find a makeup compact representing a passenger flung into the air.

His vivid re-enactment of the passenger hitting the cabin ceiling was as dramatic as unexpected, and left Barr bemused.

The interview concluded with Quest's rhetorical question: 'What sort of idiot would sit in a metal tube bouncing through the air at five or six hundred miles an hour in unpredictable circumstances without being tied down?'

'If I put those facts to you, that's what we're talking about. I'm not going to preach and lecture because I'm as guilty as you are!' he added.


The severity of the incident was underscored by the death of 73-year-old Geoff Kitchen, who suffered a heart attack during the turbulence, and the injuries sustained by 71 other individuals.

The aftermath inside the plane was chaotic, as footage showed a destroyed food preparation area, debris along the aisles, and bloodstains on the cabin's upper sections.

The plane made an emergency landing at Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi Airport, where it was met by a flurry of emergency vehicles.

The airport's medical team was also dispatched to treat the injured passengers.

The airport confirmed the deceased man's age and nationality through their Director, Kittipong Kittikachorn, adding a sombre note to the tragedy.

Watch the full interview here:

Source: 7 News Australia/YouTube

This wild interview reminds us of the unpredictable nature of air travel and the importance of in-flight safety precautions.

It also highlights the role of the media in bringing a human touch to the reporting of such events, even if it seems unconventional.

We wish for the recovery of the injured passengers of Singapore Airlines flight SQ321.
Key Takeaways

  • Nat Barr hosted a surprising interview on Sunrise about the recent Singapore Airlines emergency.
  • Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 encountered severe turbulence, resulting in one death and multiple injuries among passengers and crew.
  • CNN aviation expert Richard Quest used unusual props during the live interview to explain the incident's dynamics.
  • The emergency serves as a reminder of the importance of wearing seatbelts on flights to prevent physical injuries.
What do you think of Richard Quest's reporting style? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
First of all, not very sensitive given the death of one person and multiple serious injuries to others, some possibly permanent with brain and spinal injuries. (referring to passengers as being some sort of idiot's for not having thier seatbelts on). Flight attendants spend most of the flight with no seatbelt on, duh...and to then suggest if you are up to go to toilet put your hand up to luggage compartment for additional support. Good if you are 6 foot tall which I and many definitely are not, and in this instance would have not made a skerrick of difference of not being injured ! Secondly insults the intelligence of all of us with the use of his childish "props". Thirdly, there is plenty of evidence and reports from passengers saying this was not your average air turbulence. Time will tell what happened here..
 
Last edited:
If you don't have your seat belt fastened while flying you deserve all you get. It is no different to people not having the seat belt fastened in a car, except you are moving much faster therefore the damage will be much greater if something unexpected happens. At least in a car, if you see a huge pothole, the chances are the driver can avoid it. The pilot cannot see the pothole they hit the other day, hence the result. There is no need to have your seat belt tight for the whole journey. It can be loosened to allow you to move a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Annna
If you don't have your seat belt fastened while flying you deserve all you get. It is no different to people not having the seat belt fastened in a car, except you are moving much faster therefore the damage will be much greater if something unexpected happens. At least in a car, if you see a huge pothole, the chances are the driver can avoid it. The pilot cannot see the pothole they hit the other day, hence the result. There is no need to have your seat belt tight for the whole journey. It can be loosened to allow you to move a bit.
Except this was a very unusual and onforseen extreme "turbulence" incident. I always have seatbelt on when not moving about the cabin. Flight attendants spend most of their shift out of their seats, but of course warnings of turbulence ahead we ALL get prior warning to sit and ensure seatbelt on. Easy to judge others if not there..
 
An ex-pilot on T.V. Thursday evening stated that, 'a passenger does not need to keep a seat belt tight for the whole journey nor does it have to be loose, just comfortable'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
He had done his research & was passionate about this. As he mentioned who would travel on a flight without their seatbelt on! I have had the misfortune to be in the toilet when a sudden turbulence occurred. No seatbelts in there! I was terrified for those few minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and Ezzy
TVI totally agree, they have lost the plot, and especially Barr, what a smart arse pompous individual, I cannot even watch when the promos come on TV, ever since Sam Armitage and Kochie left I would not even consider watching that dreadful show.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×