Unlock the Secret to Intermittent Fasting Success with This Newly Discovered Golden Rule
- Replies 0
Intermittent fasting has become a buzzword in the world of health and wellness, capturing the attention of celebrities and everyday individuals alike. It's a lifestyle choice that promises weight loss, improved metabolism, and better overall health. But as many of our readers might attest, the results can be as varied as the individuals who try it. Now, scientists believe they've cracked the code to making intermittent fasting work more effectively, and it's not as complicated as you might think.
The 'golden rule' for intermittent fasting success, as identified by a group of US researchers, is surprisingly straightforward: focus on caloric intake rather than the timing of your meals. This revelation could be a game-changer for those who have been diligently watching the clock but not the scale.
The study, conducted by a team including Nisa Maruthur, an associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, found that intermittent fasting leads to weight loss and stabilizes blood sugar levels only when participants consume fewer calories than their bodies need. In essence, the quantity of calories trumps the timing of their consumption.

During the 12-week study, obese participants who adhered to a 10-hour eating window from 8 am to 6 pm, with most of their caloric intake in the morning, lost an average of 2.3kg (5.1lbs). In contrast, those who ate between 8 am and midnight, consuming the majority of their calories in the evening, lost slightly more, at 2.6kg (5.7lbs). Both groups followed a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and minimal junk food, with low saturated fat content.
This research suggests that the benefits of time-restricted eating, such as weight loss, are likely due to reduced caloric intake resulting from the shorter eating window, rather than any other factor. It's a finding that resonates with the experiences of many who have tried intermittent fasting with varying degrees of success.
The study also sheds light on the importance of understanding body mass index (BMI), a measure of body fat based on weight and height. While BMI is a useful tool, it's not without its limitations, as it doesn't account for muscle mass and can vary based on age, gender, and ethnicity.
Despite the popularity of intermittent fasting and numerous studies supporting its benefits, experts remain divided. Some caution that fasting can lead to consuming large amounts of food in one sitting, which may not reduce overall caloric intake, a key factor in weight loss. There are also concerns about potential long-term health impacts, such as increased risks of strokes, heart attacks, or early death.
The researchers analyzed data from 41 participants with an average age of 59 and a BMI of 36. They provided prepared meals with identical macronutrient and micronutrient compositions and ensured participants consumed the same number of calories daily. Interestingly, after 12 weeks, there were no significant differences in fasting glucose, waist circumference, blood pressure, or lipid levels.
The findings, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, indicate that time-restricted eating does not decrease weight or improve glucose homeostasis relative to a usual eating pattern. This suggests that any effects of time-restricted eating on weight in prior studies may be due to reductions in caloric intake.
For our readers over 60 who are considering intermittent fasting or are already practicing it, this 'golden rule' could be the key to unlocking its full potential. It's a reminder that while the structure of meal timing can be beneficial, the fundamental principle of weight loss remains rooted in consuming fewer calories than your body expends.
As always, before making any significant changes to your diet or lifestyle, it's important to consult with a healthcare professional, especially if you have pre-existing health conditions. And we'd love to hear from you – have you tried intermittent fasting? What has your experience been? Share your stories in the comments below, and let's navigate the journey to better health together.
The 'golden rule' for intermittent fasting success, as identified by a group of US researchers, is surprisingly straightforward: focus on caloric intake rather than the timing of your meals. This revelation could be a game-changer for those who have been diligently watching the clock but not the scale.
The study, conducted by a team including Nisa Maruthur, an associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, found that intermittent fasting leads to weight loss and stabilizes blood sugar levels only when participants consume fewer calories than their bodies need. In essence, the quantity of calories trumps the timing of their consumption.

Scientists found intermittent fasting aids weight loss and stabilises blood sugar only when it includes calorie restriction. Credit: Shutterstock
During the 12-week study, obese participants who adhered to a 10-hour eating window from 8 am to 6 pm, with most of their caloric intake in the morning, lost an average of 2.3kg (5.1lbs). In contrast, those who ate between 8 am and midnight, consuming the majority of their calories in the evening, lost slightly more, at 2.6kg (5.7lbs). Both groups followed a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and minimal junk food, with low saturated fat content.
This research suggests that the benefits of time-restricted eating, such as weight loss, are likely due to reduced caloric intake resulting from the shorter eating window, rather than any other factor. It's a finding that resonates with the experiences of many who have tried intermittent fasting with varying degrees of success.
The study also sheds light on the importance of understanding body mass index (BMI), a measure of body fat based on weight and height. While BMI is a useful tool, it's not without its limitations, as it doesn't account for muscle mass and can vary based on age, gender, and ethnicity.
Despite the popularity of intermittent fasting and numerous studies supporting its benefits, experts remain divided. Some caution that fasting can lead to consuming large amounts of food in one sitting, which may not reduce overall caloric intake, a key factor in weight loss. There are also concerns about potential long-term health impacts, such as increased risks of strokes, heart attacks, or early death.
The researchers analyzed data from 41 participants with an average age of 59 and a BMI of 36. They provided prepared meals with identical macronutrient and micronutrient compositions and ensured participants consumed the same number of calories daily. Interestingly, after 12 weeks, there were no significant differences in fasting glucose, waist circumference, blood pressure, or lipid levels.
The findings, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, indicate that time-restricted eating does not decrease weight or improve glucose homeostasis relative to a usual eating pattern. This suggests that any effects of time-restricted eating on weight in prior studies may be due to reductions in caloric intake.
For our readers over 60 who are considering intermittent fasting or are already practicing it, this 'golden rule' could be the key to unlocking its full potential. It's a reminder that while the structure of meal timing can be beneficial, the fundamental principle of weight loss remains rooted in consuming fewer calories than your body expends.
Key Takeaways
- Scientists have identified that intermittent fasting is effective for weight loss and stabilising blood sugar only when it involves eating fewer calories than needed.
- Research conducted showed obese individuals lost weight over a 12-week period by adhering to a restricted eating window and a calorie-controlled diet.
- The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found no significant differences in fasting glucose, waist circumference, blood pressure, or lipid levels between the different eating window groups.
- Despite its popularity, opinions on intermittent fasting remain divided among experts, with some cautioning against potential long-term health impacts.