Trump's crackdown sparks funding crisis for Aussie education

Changes in international policy are set to impact research funding at several Australian universities, sparking concern within the academic community.

Multiple institutions are expected to face reductions in financial support following shifts in funding priorities.

The adjustments come amid broader discussions on the future of research investment and institutional initiatives.


Seven top Australian universities are facing significant research funding cuts due to policy changes by the Trump administration.

The Department of Education confirmed that Australian National University, University of Technology Sydney, University of NSW, Monash University, Macquarie University, Darwin University, and the University of Western Australia will lose funding as part of the President's crackdown on DEI (diversity, equality, and inclusion) programs.

This decision is part of the Trump administration's broader trend of funding cuts across the global university sector, which has raised concerns about the potential impact on international research collaborations.


1742777774490.png
Research funding at seven Australian universities is being cut due to Trump administration policies, affecting various projects. Credit: Facebook


Education Minister Jason Clare has acknowledged the situation, stating that 'the US will fund the research it wants to fund.'

Still, he also emphasised the department's commitment to advocating for the benefits of US-Australia research partnerships.

The financial implications are severe, with estimates suggesting that the cuts could total up to $600 million across the affected universities.


According to data obtained by AFR Weekend, the most significant losses are expected in the fields of biomedical and clinical sciences.

This could represent a major setback for research in these critical areas, which often rely on international funding for advancement.

The situation escalated last week when funding was paused after the Trump administration issued a 36-point questionnaire to Australian academics involved in joint-US research.

The questionnaire sought to determine how their projects align with the administration's domestic and foreign policy objectives, sparking fears of foreign interference and the imposition of political agendas on academic research.

In a memo sent to an Australian university project and published by Guardian Australia, the US government cited its desire to avoid 'DEI, woke gender ideology, and the new green deal' as the rationale behind its decision to 'temporarily pause' funding.

This stance has alarmed many in the academic community who view such research areas as vital to social progress and innovation.


The Australian National University (ANU) has been the first affected institution to acknowledge the funding cut publicly.

'We have had the first termination of funding from the United States,' Vice Chancellor Genevieve Bell informed staff.

Bell reassured the university community, stating, 'We are committed to supporting our researchers and the work we do here, in all the ways we can.'

According to the Australian Academy of Science, the US is Australia's largest research partner, having contributed $386 million to Australian research organisations in 2024 alone.

The Academy is now urging the Australian government to engage with the US to mitigate the risks posed by these funding cuts.

Education Minister Clare highlighted Australian universities' strong track record in research, noting that 'Australian universities punch above their weight in research.'

'International partners want to work with our universities because they are the best.'


This reputation for excellence is at risk if the funding cuts proceed as planned.

The uncertainty surrounding research funding is a cause for concern for students and academics at the affected universities.

The potential loss of resources could hinder ongoing projects and discourage future international collaborations, which are essential for tackling global challenges.

As the situation develops, the Australian academic community must stay informed and advocate for the importance of diverse and inclusive research.

The potential impact of these cuts extends beyond the universities themselves, potentially affecting the broader scientific community and society.


Credit: YouTube

Key Takeaways

  • Seven Australian universities are set to face significant cuts to research funding from the Trump administration, impacting a variety of projects.
  • The US government's decision is linked to a ban on DEI projects, grants, and programs as part of broader cuts in the global university sector.
  • The cuts could potentially result in a loss of up to $600 million, particularly affecting biomedical and clinical sciences research.
  • The Australian government and educational institutions are voicing the importance of US-Australia collaborations and are looking for ways to mitigate the impact of these funding cuts.
What are your thoughts on the funding cuts to Australian universities? Have you or someone you know been affected by these changes? Share your experiences and opinions in the comments below.
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
Reactions: janj and Kinchar

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
maybe its time for our own billionaires to start funding things in Australia, and making this country self sufficient again.. we are all being shoved around by the Us and the duck and his monkey finger partner we don't need them we have brilliant people in this ocuntry timeto acknowledge them and use them..
 
I am keeping my eye on Pharmaceuticals.
So many of the drugs we use in Oz, many for severe conditions, come from America. If they stick a tariff on them, you might as well write your own ticket to zero treatment.
It's not good that one country can so easily put many parts of the world on notice, then, kick them when they are down.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: janj and Davmes
Australia has it's own wealthy people. Take Clive Palmer for one. It's about time he stopped with his stupid Trumpet of Patriots crap and started putting money where his mouth is. He could quite easily assist the universities with research funding as well as other wealthy people in Australia. We shouldn't just rely on the USA. We should be developing our own pharmaceuticals anyway.
 
Australia has it's own wealthy people. Take Clive Palmer for one. It's about time he stopped with his stupid Trumpet of Patriots crap and started putting money where his mouth is. He could quite easily assist the universities with research funding as well as other wealthy people in Australia. We shouldn't just rely on the USA.
I know Clive. He's the bloke on the TV who wants to blow his own TRUMpet.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: janj and elaine41
Australia has it's own wealthy people. Take Clive Palmer for one. It's about time he stopped with his stupid Trumpet of Patriots crap and started putting money where his mouth is. He could quite easily assist the universities with research funding as well as other wealthy people in Australia. We shouldn't just rely on the USA. We should be developing our own pharmaceuticals anyway.
Maybe Clive Palmer and other rich Australians already do but don't blow their trumpet?
 
Education Minister (Jason) Clare highlighted Australian universities' strong track record in research, noting that 'Australian universities punch above their weight in research.'

Talk is cheap so put your money where your mouth is, Jason. As of March 2025, Australia has committed over $1.5 billion in aid to Ukraine
but cries poor when it comes to Aussie innovation and research. How is that the USA's problem?
 
I was not aware we relied so much on USA for odd things like this. It is not public knowledge. I am not a Trump supporter but I can sort of understand him looking at ways to cut costs for his own country. We need to stop being the whinging country and go back to what we were, a strong country with industry. We definately need stronger and smarter leadership
 
Is there nowhere that this bloke's tentacles reach? I am worried about the effect on the Pharmaceutical industry which is reliant on US patents etc. Hopefully with a cap on the PBS we will escape any imposition by this sector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Chips and janj
As the mother of a son who got through uni by working Grant programs that gave him money to study his chosen topic which lead to,his honours degree I am appalled by this change from,trump especially removing funding that covers DEI he don't care about australia now because we wouldn't cave to his damn tariffs what a child i believe his brain stopped growing at the age of 3 and he just didn't learn how to care about people.
 
We have to stay strong as a country & not cave to DJT's attacks on DEI. We must continue to regard all people as equal & include anyone who qualifies for a position without going the way the USA did & putting quotas on employment of DEI applicants.
 
I, as with many others didn't know that our universities received funding from the U.S.A.
Just wondering if the defunding has anything to do with the universities supporting antisemitism the way they did.
If so, serves them right.
I shed no tears for the complete & utter stupidity in allowing that sheer crap to continue as they did.
Especially the Dean & his deputy of Sydney university should have both been stood down indefinitely with out pay.
 
About time the universities started back into the real world. Green rid of the Woke rubbish, employ the best person for the job, and get rid of the greenies poliocies on emissions.
All Trump is doing is forcing us to face reality of the real world.
 
I was not aware we relied so much on USA for odd things like this. It is not public knowledge. I am not a Trump supporter but I can sort of understand him looking at ways to cut costs for his own country. We need to stop being the whinging country and go back to what we were, a strong country with industry. We definately need stronger and smarter leadership
So tell me how do you think we can do that . We priced ourselves out of the market a long time ago.
Salaries in Australia are 100.1% above the global average. We are the 8th highest paid country in the world.

Everyone expects the high.life style these days. Young people expect to start off with everything that it has taken their parents a life time to achieve.

Unions have pushed for higher and higher wages and so here we are reliant on the rest of the world to provide our needs.
 
I believe our thinking is a bit wrong regarding the USA sponsoring our universities and research bodies. I too was unaware of the USA's financial influence over our institutions. It is well known throughout the world that Australian research, especially in the medical area is probably the best there is. Why do we not therefore "sell" this research to other countries including the USA for a reasonable fee and call it an income instead of an overseas interest? Someone mentioned we are the 8th highest-paid country in The World, why are we only the 8th, why are we not the 1st? It is something to aim for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Singomate
Clive palmer would support nothing that didn't make money for Clive palmer. And as for the other rich of this s do you think they stay rich by not giving it away.
That is absolute garbage. Countless millions have been given by wealthy people in Australia. Although that's not to say they couldn't give more.
Gina Reinhardt and Twiggy Forrest are just two who come to mind, as being very generous.
It appears the "the tall poppy syndrome is still alive and well in Australia.
Maybe some of those who complain should look in their own backyard. The poorer class in Australia, according to reports, donate more than the middle class.
That means the bulk of us donate the least. Something to think about.
West Australians donate the most.
WA' s Telethon is the highest fund raiser, by population in the world. In 2024 raising $83.26 million.
 
I believe our thinking is a bit wrong regarding the USA sponsoring our universities and research bodies. I too was unaware of the USA's financial influence over our institutions. It is well known throughout the world that Australian research, especially in the medical area is probably the best there is. Why do we not therefore "sell" this research to other countries including the USA for a reasonable fee and call it an income instead of an overseas interest? Someone mentioned we are the 8th highest-paid country in The World, why are we only the 8th, why are we not the 1st? It is something to aim for.
We already can't compete on the world market being the 8th highest paid so we would be even worse off in that regard if we were the highest paid.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×