Trump signs controversial executive orders on his first day, sparking outrage!
- Replies 110
In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, presidents' use of executive orders to bypass the slower legislative processes has been a subject of much debate and scrutiny.
This was especially true during President Donald Trump's tenure. Upon returning to office, he wasted no time wielding his executive pen to enact a series of controversial directives that have since sparked legal and ethical uproar.
Critics argued that these actions overstep the boundaries of presidential authority, while supporters view them as necessary moves to address pressing national issues swiftly. As these executive orders continue to make waves, the legal battles and public backlash surrounding them only seem to grow more intense.
From the moment President Trump reassumed the presidency, he revoked several executive actions from the previous administration, signalling a dramatic shift in policy and a return to some of his more contentious campaign promises.
As he sat behind the Resolute Desk, signing one order after another, a flurry of lawsuits began to emerge, challenging the legality and constitutionality of his actions.
It's important to remember that while the president of the United States holds significant power, it is not without its checks and balances.
Congress, for instance, has the authority to review and potentially overturn executive orders.
Dr James Metzger from UNSW Law reminded us, 'If Congress wants to supersede an executive order, then Congress can pass a law that covers the subject area that the executive order covers.'
Moreover, the courts serve as another formidable barrier to unchecked executive power.
They can deem an executive order unconstitutional, as was when President Harry S. Truman attempted to nationalise the steel industry in 1952, only to be rebuffed by the Supreme Court.
Let's delve into some of President Trump's most contentious executive orders that are currently under fire:
1. Ending Automatic Birthright Citizenship:
Trump's executive order to end automatic U.S. citizenship for children born to immigrants without legal status has been met with immediate legal challenges.
Advocacy groups like the ACLU argued that this order violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalised in the United States.
Legal experts and civil rights organisations are fighting to uphold the fundamental American promise of equality at birth.
2. Only Recognising Two Genders:
In a move that has reversed the previous administration's policies on gender identity, Trump's order to remove 'gender ideology guidance' from federal communications has been met with backlash from LGBTQ+ rights groups.
The Human Rights Campaign has vowed to combat the 'harmful provisions' of the order, which they see as an attack on the recognition and protection of all gender identities.
3. Ordering All Federal Employees to Work from the Office:
Trump's directive for all federal workers to cease remote work arrangements and return to the office full-time has raised practical and legal concerns.
Enforcing this order could prove challenging, with a significant portion of the federal workforce covered by union agreements that include remote or hybrid work provisions.
Non-union workers, while subject to return to the office, are entitled to a 30-day notice and an opportunity to respond, complicating the implementation of this order.
4. Labelling Drug Cartels as 'Foreign Terrorist Organisations':
The decision to classify drug cartels as foreign terrorist organisations carries potential national security implications.
While intended to strengthen the fight against narcotics trafficking, experts like Mike Vigil, former head of the DEA's foreign operations, suggested that the impact on cartels' day-to-day operations may be minimal, given that many anti-terrorism powers are already in use in Mexico.
These executive orders have ignited a firestorm of legal battles and public discourse, raising questions about the limits of presidential power and the safeguarding of civil liberties.
As the legal battles unfold, it remains clear that the courts and Congress will play pivotal roles in determining the extent of presidential authority and civil rights protection.
Have you been following the news on these executive orders? What are your thoughts on the balance between executive action and democratic oversight? Share your opinions with us in the comments below, and let's keep the conversation going.
This was especially true during President Donald Trump's tenure. Upon returning to office, he wasted no time wielding his executive pen to enact a series of controversial directives that have since sparked legal and ethical uproar.
Critics argued that these actions overstep the boundaries of presidential authority, while supporters view them as necessary moves to address pressing national issues swiftly. As these executive orders continue to make waves, the legal battles and public backlash surrounding them only seem to grow more intense.
From the moment President Trump reassumed the presidency, he revoked several executive actions from the previous administration, signalling a dramatic shift in policy and a return to some of his more contentious campaign promises.
As he sat behind the Resolute Desk, signing one order after another, a flurry of lawsuits began to emerge, challenging the legality and constitutionality of his actions.
It's important to remember that while the president of the United States holds significant power, it is not without its checks and balances.
President Donald Trump signed several controversial executive orders and may face legal challenges. Credit: Unsplash
Congress, for instance, has the authority to review and potentially overturn executive orders.
Dr James Metzger from UNSW Law reminded us, 'If Congress wants to supersede an executive order, then Congress can pass a law that covers the subject area that the executive order covers.'
Moreover, the courts serve as another formidable barrier to unchecked executive power.
They can deem an executive order unconstitutional, as was when President Harry S. Truman attempted to nationalise the steel industry in 1952, only to be rebuffed by the Supreme Court.
Let's delve into some of President Trump's most contentious executive orders that are currently under fire:
1. Ending Automatic Birthright Citizenship:
Trump's executive order to end automatic U.S. citizenship for children born to immigrants without legal status has been met with immediate legal challenges.
Advocacy groups like the ACLU argued that this order violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalised in the United States.
Legal experts and civil rights organisations are fighting to uphold the fundamental American promise of equality at birth.
2. Only Recognising Two Genders:
In a move that has reversed the previous administration's policies on gender identity, Trump's order to remove 'gender ideology guidance' from federal communications has been met with backlash from LGBTQ+ rights groups.
The Human Rights Campaign has vowed to combat the 'harmful provisions' of the order, which they see as an attack on the recognition and protection of all gender identities.
3. Ordering All Federal Employees to Work from the Office:
Trump's directive for all federal workers to cease remote work arrangements and return to the office full-time has raised practical and legal concerns.
Enforcing this order could prove challenging, with a significant portion of the federal workforce covered by union agreements that include remote or hybrid work provisions.
Non-union workers, while subject to return to the office, are entitled to a 30-day notice and an opportunity to respond, complicating the implementation of this order.
4. Labelling Drug Cartels as 'Foreign Terrorist Organisations':
The decision to classify drug cartels as foreign terrorist organisations carries potential national security implications.
While intended to strengthen the fight against narcotics trafficking, experts like Mike Vigil, former head of the DEA's foreign operations, suggested that the impact on cartels' day-to-day operations may be minimal, given that many anti-terrorism powers are already in use in Mexico.
These executive orders have ignited a firestorm of legal battles and public discourse, raising questions about the limits of presidential power and the safeguarding of civil liberties.
As the legal battles unfold, it remains clear that the courts and Congress will play pivotal roles in determining the extent of presidential authority and civil rights protection.
Last edited:
.png){kind=icon}
then we would see if those so called non racist people stay non racist. 
