Tragic fall at a popular venue leaves woman in her 70s fighting for life—here’s what we know so far

Accidents in public spaces are rare but can have devastating consequences, leaving bystanders and authorities grappling with confronting scenes.

What began as an ordinary Sunday visit to a well-known venue took a sudden and tragic turn, prompting a major emergency response.

Here’s what unfolded in the aftermath of the incident.


A woman remained in a critical condition after suffering a horrific fall from a balcony at a popular RSL club.

Emergency crews rushed to Penrith RSL on Tindale Street, in Sydney’s west, shortly after 11:00 am on 27 April.

It was believed the woman, aged in her 70s, accidentally reversed her mobility scooter through a glass barrier before plummeting several storeys to the ground.


image1.png
Woman critically injured after RSL balcony fall. Image source: TNV


NSW Ambulance confirmed she sustained a ‘long fall’ and suffered multiple life-threatening injuries.

Paramedics treated the woman at the scene for serious facial injuries and deep cuts to her leg.

Photos taken at the site showed shattered glass and blood covering the ground as multiple emergency workers shielded the woman with a green sheet.

A Toll Ambulance Helicopter landed nearby, allowing specialist medical teams to assist in providing critical care.

Despite the helicopter’s arrival, the woman was ultimately transported by road ambulance to Westmead Hospital.

She continued to fight for her life in the hospital as of the latest updates.


Firefighters also attended the scene to assist emergency responders.

Emergency services remained on site for several hours, securing the area and investigating the circumstances of the fall.

The incident unfolded as Penrith RSL hosted its usual Sunday events, leaving many patrons shocked.

The situation attracted widespread attention across social media, where users shared their concerns and well-wishes for the woman’s recovery.

Authorities had yet to release further details pending an ongoing investigation.


In a previous story, a young boy’s tragic accident during a family camping trip also served as a heartbreaking reminder of how quickly disaster can strike.

His experience prompted an urgent warning to all campers about safety around campsites.

You can read more about the devastating incident here.

Key Takeaways
  • A woman in her 70s fell several storeys from a balcony at Penrith RSL after accidentally reversing her scooter through a glass barrier.
  • She suffered a ‘long fall’ with multiple life-threatening injuries and was treated at the scene before being taken to Westmead Hospital.
  • A Toll Ambulance Helicopter and firefighters responded, with emergency crews remaining on site for several hours.
  • The incident shocked patrons and drew widespread concern across social media as investigations continued.

Incidents like this are a stark reminder of how quickly everyday outings can change. Have you ever witnessed an emergency unfold in a public place?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Architects follow the BCA and Australian Standards, they must do that. Maybe it's the builders who take shortcuts. Also I find a lot of glazing on building sites isn't securely framed, usually not very deep frames with a thick rubber seal.
Probably the builder is taking a shortcut to make extra $$$$$ to spend on his mansion.....
 
'Someone' should be more careful. Everybody here seems to be attacking the barrier and it's maker without proof of faulty workmanship. Someone reversed into the barrier, broke it and fell through. That's tragic.
She must have been going a speed....should have had it in snail mode..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
Who is policing those standards to make sure they are adhered to & if those standards aren't stringent enough for today's conditions what body is going to correct this anomaly before someone is killed?
Building consultants, Engineers, Architects, and Council building inspectors are the people that inspect and approve building elements.
If the Building Standards are not stringent enough to prevent failure, then Workcover would get involved after an accident happened, and most probably approach Standards Australia to make changes for more safer requirements.
I think tho, that glass barrier was made and installed in accordance with the Building Standards. A decent hit with the rear of a motor scooter or even a car would break it. I don't think the Building Standard would cover accidents like that in calculating the type and thickness of glass.
 
Last edited:
We have 10mm thick glass on our 19th story apartment bordered with rectangular section steel profile made to AS/NZS 2208:2023 - Safety glazing materials in buildings - Grade A 10 TH (toughened heat-strengthened).

Whether a mobility scooter would penetrate the glass here is unknown, but the woman concerned would have at least a 60 metre fall!
Yes, RHS should do the job, depending on what size it is, and how many panels there are. 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
Building consultants, Engineers, Architects, and Council building inspectors are the people that inspect and approve building elements.
If the Building Standards are not stringent enough to prevent failure, then Workcover would get involved after an accident happened, and most probably approach Standards Australia to make changes for more safer requirements.
I think tho, that glass barrier was made and installed in accordance with the Building Standards. A decent hit with the rear of a motor scooter or even a car would break it. I don't think the Building Standard would cover accidents like that in calculating the type and thickness of glass.
I would suggest that there is an immediate need to review standards for such structures in light of the recent incident taking note of different apparatuses used by people in high rise buildings.

The obvious solution is to do away with aesthetic glass panels which are not safe in upper floor balconies & revert to a solid structure. Time that common sense & safety gave way to architectural designs & people's wims to see outside while seated on the balcony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
I would suggest that there is an immediate need to review standards for such structures in light of the recent incident taking note of different apparatuses used by people in high rise buildings.

The obvious solution is to do away with aesthetic glass panels which are not safe in upper floor balconies & revert to a solid structure. Time that common sense & safety gave way to architectural designs & people's wims to see outside while seated on the balcony.
Then we may as well just all live in concrete boxes.
How often have you heard of an accident like this happening?
Structures like these are not designed to withstand someone reversing into it at high speed.
It was human error.
 
Many years ago we were at the beach and we were on large boulders. A woman was walking on the very edge of the rock which was wet and had moss on it. Everyone told her to move away from the edge but she didn't want to get in anyone's way. She fell into the water with the waves crashing against the rocks. She rolled onto her back so she could float out of the way. My husband jumped in to save her while people asked me to ring the police and a couple of young guys swam out to her on their surfboards. My husband got to her first but she'd already passed away. They believe she had a heart attack from the shock. She was elderly and very well known to us. I just wish we could have saved her, she was a lovely lady who cared about everyone around her. I don't think my husband ever forgave himself for not being able to save her.
 
Then we may as well just all live in concrete boxes.
How often have you heard of an accident like this happening?
Structures like these are not designed to withstand someone reversing into it at high speed.
It was human error.
Don't say lightning won't strike more than once in the same place. Human error, yes l agree & common sense should prevail when designing any balcony railing above the 1st floor. Not every person is like you & l & take dangerous situations into account when using these areas. Many people use these areas for a BBQ.

Was this lady affected by a health condition which caused her to err here? Dementia appears to be more prevelant than it was say 20 years ago & is spoken about more often.

The entrance to every doorway has a step which makes me ask, firstly, how did she manoeuvre safely down the step & secondly, how did she expect to get her heavy equipment back into the unit? Some may say she possibly had a ramp for this purpose, but how many balconies are wider than about 1.5 metres? Hardly enough room for this type of equipment to safely turn around l would suggest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
Don't say lightning won't strike more than once in the same place. Human error, yes l agree & common sense should prevail when designing any balcony railing above the 1st floor. Not every person is like you & l & take dangerous situations into account when using these areas. Many people use these areas for a BBQ.

Was this lady affected by a health condition which caused her to err here? Dementia appears to be more prevelant than it was say 20 years ago & is spoken about more often.

The entrance to every doorway has a step which makes me ask, firstly, how did she manoeuvre safely down the step & secondly, how did she expect to get her heavy equipment back into the unit? Some may say she possibly had a ramp for this purpose, but how many balconies are wider than about 1.5 metres? Hardly enough room for this type of equipment to safely turn around l would suggest.
Well, it was a venue that sells booze. Maybe she was as sloshed as newt, and jammed the gearstick into reverse instead of forward before accelerating.
I think as far as design is concerned, the balcony barricade and handrail would have been designed and installed as per the current building standards and referenced Australian Standards at that time, and if the saftety design had changed any time since then, then upgrades would have to be completed before Council would allow that area to be accessed by the public.
 
Well, it was a venue that sells booze. Maybe she was as sloshed as newt, and jammed the gearstick into reverse instead of forward before accelerating.
I think as far as design is concerned, the balcony barricade and handrail would have been designed and installed as per the current building standards and referenced Australian Standards at that time, and if the saftety design had changed any time since then, then upgrades would have to be completed before Council would allow that area to be accessed by the public.
There appear to be a few assumptions in your statement such as 'sloshed' & 'the gearstick position'.
Definitely designed to Australian Standards that prevailed at the time. Upgrades require staff, possibly Inspectors, Rangers or Engineers from the local Council doing their job properly. How often do those people carry out their duties diligently as prescribed in their Employment Contract? Rangers concentrate on illegal Parking & dog acts & know nothing about building matters. How often are Inspectors & Engineers going to visit a location unless a complaint is received? Many grey areas with unknown facts & too much assumption l would suggest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAN3005
There appear to be a few assumptions in your statement such as 'sloshed' & 'the gearstick position'.
Definitely designed to Australian Standards that prevailed at the time. Upgrades require staff, possibly Inspectors, Rangers or Engineers from the local Council doing their job properly. How often do those people carry out their duties diligently as prescribed in their Employment Contract? Rangers concentrate on illegal Parking & dog acts & know nothing about building matters. How often are Inspectors & Engineers going to visit a location unless a complaint is received? Many grey areas with unknown facts & too much assumption l would suggest.
Don't drink and drive...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy and Littleboy8
There appear to be a few assumptions in your statement such as 'sloshed' & 'the gearstick position'.
Definitely designed to Australian Standards that prevailed at the time. Upgrades require staff, possibly Inspectors, Rangers or Engineers from the local Council doing their job properly. How often do those people carry out their duties diligently as prescribed in their Employment Contract? Rangers concentrate on illegal Parking & dog acts & know nothing about building matters. How often are Inspectors & Engineers going to visit a location unless a complaint is received? Many grey areas with unknown facts & too much assumption l would suggest.
Possibly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×