This new report reveals a shocking truth about rate peg changes affecting pensioners: ‘It’s hurting big time’

Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


hand-3666974_1280.jpg
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


women-friends-1577910_1280.jpg
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
 
Sponsored
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
I’m already paying $2220 pa after the pension discount where I live in Bendigo, Victoria.
 
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
The rate peg was put forward in our council, the rate pep was ok but our council tried to increase our general rates by around 46.5% plus the rate peg of 3.5% over three years note each year a rate peg always happens, the people in this council objected heavily through meetings etc, the 47.5% increase has been stopped remember a council works for the people and the people here spoke. I believe it is also trying to happen in another council this high increase, most heavy road work is either state government or minor reds in council are paid through grants, councils need to clean up their inside house, ie, staff not really needed, hours reduced etc, but to attack the people in such a way was dispicable.
 
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
That's the rub you never really own your property even though you've made the final payment, you just keep paying rent to bloody ineffectual councils.
 
Last edited:
The rate peg was put forward in our council, the rate pep was ok but our council tried to increase our general rates by around 46.5% plus the rate peg of 3.5% over three years note each year a rate peg always happens, the people in this council objected heavily through meetings etc, the 47.5% increase has been stopped remember a council works for the people and the people here spoke. I believe it is also trying to happen in another council this high increase, most heavy road work is either state government or minor reds in council are paid through grants, councils need to clean up their inside house, ie, staff not really needed, hours reduced etc, but to attack the people in such a way was dispicable.
Our council has just voted on applying for a 44% increase over 3 years, I can assure you, they will not be voted back in at the next election! The increase is blamed on COVID & natural disasters, but I agree with you, they need to put heir house in order first!
 
I wish my rates were $2100. Last year was $3,017.64: next year rate increase 7.5%. The following year 15%. And again the following year.

Kempsey Shire Council.
 
I’m already paying $2220 pa after the pension discount where I live in Bendigo, Victoria.
End the Honoraria paid to Mayors and Councillors. I understand that the Mayor of Melbourne City gets an Honorarium in the hundreds of thousands of dollars ( I think $256 000 pa) and the Deputy Mayor about $125 000 pa with Councillors on $57 000 pa. That stinks whilst single pensioners are means-tested for eligibility for a pitiful $25 000 pa and couples for maybe $38 000pa. Check at your local council office to find out how much you are being ripped off through perks and lurks for your council members
 
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Poor thing. Imagine a pensioner with no house or assets or super or savings. Plenty of us and we have to survive paying exorbitant rents as well!
 
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
This is what happened in Victoria.
The government pays the lawyers for the aboriginals and the Rate payers have to pay their Councils lawyers.
The same thing is happening all over Australia.
The labor government in their wisdom (use the term loosely) decided it would pay for their lawyers with OUR HARD EARNED TAXES.
Plus we have to pay again with our rates for OUR councils to pay for their lawyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob44
Australians, especially struggling pensioners, are facing the escalating cost of living, causing significant financial strain for those relying solely on fixed incomes to support themselves and their families.

One pensioner greatly affected by these rising prices has revealed the grim cost of these rate peg changes should they come to pass.


The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) in New South Wales (NSW) recently released a report detailing changes to the rate pegging system.

The tribunal defines the rate peg as ‘the maximum percentage amount by which a council may increase its general income for the year’.


View attachment 34850
In NSW, one senior came up with an alarming estimate if changes to his local council’s peg rates are applied. Image source: Pixabay


Jim Howard, a Narrandera, New South Wales resident, estimated that he would soon have just $9 left per day for food after he pays his annual rates, bills and insurance if a peg rate change comes to pass.

According to Mr Howard, his rates would increase to $2,100 annually from $1,800 if his local council moves to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV) with IPART.

‘As soon as that $300 extra comes in, it's coming down to about $9 [a day]—you've got to feed yourself with that,’ shared Mr Howard.

‘There's no leeway for a pensioner, he's stuck there whether he likes it or not.’


Mr Howard is one of the many pensioners nationwide who are struggling with the rising cost of living, affecting every aspect of his life.

‘It's hurting big time,’ pointed out by Mr Howard.

‘I've got my wife in care and that costs me extra money, I've got no money left as far as extras.’

‘You don't go out, you don't socialise.’


IPART said it would be changing the way it sets the rate peg to streamline more with how council spending is done.

‘The new methodology will better reflect costs and be more timely and tailored to each council,’ explained an IPART spokesperson.

Among the changes mentioned in the tribunal’s final report is the division of the 128 NSW councils into metropolitan, regional, and rural groups to account for widely different base costs.

A new Base Cost Change (BCC) model will also be adopted to more accurately factor in councils' employee, asset, and operating costs.


View attachment 34851
IPART noted that, despite rate-pegging changes, NSW councils would still face financial challenges. Image source: Pixabay


IPART recognised that NSW councils would continue to face financial difficulties even with changes to the rate-pegging system.

Consequently, it proposed a review of the state government's financial model.

Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig confirmed his request for IPART to conduct this review during budget estimates.

‘Financially, the industry generally is in a fair bit of crisis in terms of their financial sustainability, I want to get to the bottom of why that is,’ noted Mr Hoenig.

‘The solution isn't always throwing them money, the solution is, I think, to give councillors greater oversight and control of their expenditure.’

Meanwhile, councillors can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they deem it necessary to exceed the rate peg for total rates revenue.

This year, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 receiving approval and three partial approval.


Narrandera Shire Council is also considering applying for an SRV, slated to commence next year.

George Cowan, who heads the town’s council, cited the necessity for this variation due to the prolonged impact of the rate pegging system and the need for funding for projects such as stormwater upgrades.

Despite challenges, he sees the recent rate peg changes as a positive step.

‘Most importantly, what the previous system had done was to restrict councils' income to a level below what was needed over a long period of time,’ explained Mr Cowan.

‘The evidence of that failure is the fact that three-quarters of the councils in NSW have had to go through this SRV process [since 2016].’

‘It's simply not good enough.’

IPART avoided addressing inquiries regarding the potential decrease in Special Rate Variation (SRV) applications with the implementation of the new rate peg methodology.

Key Takeaways

  • Pensioners across Australia are struggling financially due to increasing rates, forcing some to spend as low as $9 a day on food.
  • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) is set to change the methodology of setting the rate peg, the maximum amount a council can raise its income from ratepayers in a year.
  • The new process aims to reflect changing council costs more accurately.
  • Despite these modifications to the rate pegging system, NSW councils are still predicted to face financial hardship, and it has been suggested the state government should review its financial model.
  • Councils can request a Special Rate Variation (SRV) if they need total revenue to exceed the rate peg.
  • In 2021, 17 councils applied for SRVs, with 14 approved and three partially approved.
Members, what do you think of this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
This is a good read!
It tell us what jobs they want and what they want us to do for them.
OUR employees are giving all OUR HARD EARNED money away
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob44

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×