This Coles meat tip has shoppers divided—'Cheap and dodgy' or ‘pure genius’?

Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



compressed-Screenshot_2.jpeg
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



compressed-Screenshot_3.jpeg

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


compressed-Screenshot_4.jpeg
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways
  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
 
Sponsored
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
The trouble is we will all have to pay extra for this, they just put up the price to cover the loss.
 
I'm all for it if after you leave the register you look at your receipt and see you were over charged
But to go and look for this I think it's dishonest and yes everyone else will end up paying for it.

If I saw something scan differently at the checkout then I would question it.

If someone is really desperate for food then who knows unless you are in that situation although the author of the original post seemed like they were doing it more for social media and also as a challenge with the added bonus of free meat
 
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
i would say good on them shame kmart hasnt got the same policy lost count of the number of times I have bought something from kmart and it scans at a higher price than tagged price
 
I certainly wouldn't go out to specifically look at only buying meat in the hope the checkout person scans it wrongly, but I would certainly keep an eye on the price the product did scan at and most certainly draw their attention to it. Supermarkets are very quick to increase their prices all the time, so if you can bag a bargain like this, that's fantastic but not just to do this search for discounted goods just hoping to get them for free.
 
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
Very happy to get a freebie if the price is wrong. Bonus! But to continually and purposely aim to get free things based on a technical error says more about people's morals and ethics than their smarts.
 
That started when scanners first came in, it's not a new practice but who takes that much notice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marj53
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
Sounds dishonest to me.
 
I have always thought that this type of action is brought on not by need but greed. It is like the ones who buy all the good bargains when things are marked down. GREED, GREED & more GREED. In my humble opinion!
 
The shops are the problem here, because if they were more diligent in pricing their goods correctly this wouldn't happen.
I think the shops rely on the fact that most people wouldn't notice that they'd paid too much for an item.
I used to shop at Woolies in Northam for years and there'd always be at least one pricing error.
 
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
 
Here at the Seniors Discount Club, we're all about finding ways to save money and stretch our budget. However, a recent revelation about a shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarket checkouts has divided opinions online—with some labelling it as 'cheap and dodgy' while others called it ‘pure genius’.

Aussies recently discovered they could obtain free groceries from Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI by leveraging the Scanning Code of Practice.



View attachment 23449
The customer posted pictures of mispriced meat at Coles, intending to alert fellow shoppers about the discrepancy to help them identify it. Source: Facebook



Under the voluntary code adopted by many retailers, including ALDI, customers are entitled to receive a particular item for free if it scans at a higher price than displayed.

While this code is not a legal requirement, it serves as a customer satisfaction measure to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing.

ALDI, for example, explicitly states on their website that if a regular product scans at a price higher than the displayed amount, customers are entitled to receive the first item for free, while subsequent items will be charged at a lower price.

One Coles customer took to social media to share their savvy scheme, admitting they haven't paid for meat in over a month by seeking out incorrectly marked items to exploit this policy.

While some critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, others have shown support, applauding the customer for taking advantage of store policy and money-saving tips.

According to an anonymous member of a Facebook group for bargain hunters, shoppers should keep an eye out for special yellow stickers that don't match the product's price tag.

The member recounted a recent experience finding four different products mismarked at a supermarket shop. One notable example was lamb cutlets, meant to be on special for $37/kg but mistakenly marked at $43/kg.



View attachment 23450

The customer took photos of improperly priced meat at Coles and shared them to inform and assist other shoppers in recognising the pricing error. Source: Facebook



The shopper made the most of this discrepancy by purchasing a tray of cutlets priced at $42.91, and then requesting a price check at the service desk.

As per the store's policy, since the item was scanned at a higher price than indicated by a yellow 'special' tag on the shelf, the customer was entitled to a full refund.

They went on to reveal that this method resulted in a month of not paying for meat. 'Free meat ALWAYS tastes better.' the customer said, encouraging others to consider the approach, especially if their local Coles store struggles with updating the prices of items on special.

'$138 worth of free meat from three Coles tonight—that's us eating free meat for the week!' the customer added, after a successful evening of hunting price discrepancies at different stores.


However, not everyone approves of this money-saving venture, with one critic commenting, 'To hunt this down and take advantage is just cheap and dodgy.'

The anonymous member defended their actions, citing the cost of living crisis as a reason why some individuals might resort to such measures.

The customer wrote, 'Some people these days are choosing between paying rent, heating or eating, so if they can get a decent meal for free doing this, then I wouldn't call it dodgy.'


View attachment 23452
The shopper documented their successful hunt for price discrepancies at three different Coles stores in one night and shared a subsequent $138 haul that ended up being completely free. Source: Facebook



Others labelled the strategy 'embarrassing', and one even accused the shopper of extortion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential impact on future pricing and the burden that this could place on other customers.

'How about you manage your finances better or get a second job rather than looking for easy hand-outs?' an angry user suggested.

In contrast, many supported the shopper's actions, arguing that the occasional free item won't significantly affect supermarket chains.

'Thank you so much for sharing. I'll definitely be checking now.' one supporter commented.

'I cannot wait to try this!' said another.



Key Takeaways

  • A shopper's strategy for scoring free food at supermarkets such as Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI has ignited a fiery debate online.
  • The shopper leverages the Scanning Code of Practice, which entitles customers to free items if they scan at a higher price than displayed.
  • Critics raised ethical concerns about this approach, while others supported the money-saving tip.
  • The anonymous shopper defended the act, emphasising Australia's cost of living crisis as a compelling reason for some individuals to resort to such measures.
As you can tell, the debate is ongoing. But it raises the question: is this a clever, money-saving tip or a manipulative and unethical practice? We'd love to hear what our members think. Weigh in with your opinions, and happy shopping!
A one off might be acceptable but if a person is making a career of this, as this person has with a month's worth of meat in one foul swoop, can't this be LIKENED TO SHOPLIFTING? Taking something for nothing! The check-out person should have picked up on this discrepancy, perhaps?

Citing rising living costs may seem fair to that person but are they really hard up or is that family on a good income?
These tactics would appear to be scrupulous to me. This person gloatingly shared this information after visiting 3 Coles stores in one night pretending to make others aware of this cheap trick. So what? Sheer greed! Visiting just one store would have been o.k. allowing other low income families to visit other stores or visit each store on different days! A case of the greedy taking from the needy. I am on a Pension but would not stoop to these standards.

Some may say if these packs are not sold they will be tossed. Take what you need & leave some for others!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jo Piper3
This premeditated behavior is tantamount to theft in my book. It highlights the need to review the Scanning Code of Practice and close this 'free' loophole to stop those who deliberately seek to exploit it for their own gain.
I tend to agree but find it difficult to to play the “blame game” when faced with this “manna from heaven” when suffering in tough times.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×