When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

 

[Julie1946]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

I always remember the words Germaine Greer said when asked if the Sussexes marriage would last.. she said ‘She will bolt’ and how right she was.
Such disrespect shown to the Queen by both of them, the ‘Curtsy’ was enough to show Meghan’s true colours, maybe her sister spoke the truth all along.

 

[Penny4]

I only watched the 4th episode last night where they showed behind the scenes of their wedding which is lovely - as all weddings are.
Will have to catch up with the other 2 episodes, as I fell asleep listening to Harry saying that Meghan was better at her job 'walkabout' meeting people, than other royals that were trained for it. It then showed videos of Kate & Charles shaking hands with crowds on their 'walkabout.'
I instantly thought Harry was living in a fantasy.
However, won't pass judgement until I see the other 2 episodes.

 

[EILEEN W]

Whinger and Ginger should do what they promised - get out of the spotlight but on incomes (including annual allowances personally from King Charles in the millions) and up to $90 million from Netflix for this series, plus Harry's spiteful book and whatever interviews Meghan can cram into a week, they will never even try to lead "normal" lives. I haven't watched their self-indulgent interviews, nor this series, nor will I read Harry's book as I am too busy leading my 'normal' life and refuse to indulge them in their spiteful whinge fest. It reminds me of the Duke of Windsor and Wallis Simpson only much worse.

 

[Shane O'Neill]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

 

[Nannacas]

I liked Harry and always hoped that he and Meghan would be happy together. I had, and still do, have my doubts and I think it is Harry who will suffer most.

 

[Penny4]

I liked Harry and always hoped that he and Meghan would be happy together. I had, and still do, have my doubts and I think it is Harry who will suffer most.

I agree

 

[Just Jill]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

Meghan is tougher than old boots. There is no more Harry. I would not trust one word from either of them. Just Jill

 

[pbattershill]

They should be known as the Duke and Duchess of Delusion. No evidence to support any of their fiction, and as with any family matters there are 2 sides to every sstory. We have heard one delusional side.



The sadness of this whole saga is that M probably thought she would be a Queen. Ha ha ha.

 

[Tipsy]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

so much crap coming from both sides and all the lies from MSM especially from the British tabloids and so many idiots believing the garbage.... In reality WHO BLOODY CARES... get a life people for crying out loud...

 

[Ronloby]

Do you know who will benefit from all this? The CEOs of all publication companies, that's who. H and M will be shot out of royalty completely and king Charles will be red-faced over some of the stories and maybe step down in favour of William. This sort of happening has been in Royal History for hundreds of years and they don't appear to have learned from it.

 

[Mikeyboy2012]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

It's hard to be on their side or even be impartial when evidence, from reliable and honourable sources, constantly contradicts the couple's (especially Megan's) views.

The rubbish that they were married before their official wedding, for example...and that’s a huge one....was completely contradicted and denied by the Archbishop of Canterbury of all people.

It would have been illegal and the Archbishop would have been put in jail had he married them.

Harry has really hung himself out to dry and I can't see them coming back from this as long as he stays with Meghan.

So disrespectful to the late Queen, ehom he swears he was trying to protect (like she needed his protection) and now the King, his brother etc.

Merry Christmas royal family. Here is your early present from your estranged Prince. Nice timing Harry!

The next step will be to strip them off their royal titles and entitlements. Then they can have the freedom and privacy that they supposedly craved.

 

[Daniel Hill]

Who gives a shit...

 

[Bullwinkle]

Just get over yourselves…

 

[rehandra]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

All I have to say is if this is "their" truth....why did it come with a $100Million or thereabouts price tag. They could have donated all the proceeds to mental health organisations could'nt they? Maybe it would have given it a bit more credibility but I doubt it. In this world at the moment with war in Ukraine, all that is happening in Iran and other countries their troubles (or perceived) do not even rate.

 

[MarieL]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

FFS you toxic media stop with your despicable lies. Your Reinterpretating & twisting everything they say to suit your mendacious agendas. How utterly repugnant. No intelligent decent normal human being believes your nefarious tripe. What type of people believe you and your vindictive nonsense?? - The Netflix series about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle is their voice -not the lying hate-filled toxic tabloids and the far right + racist trolls -We have witnessed the ferocious howls of outrage from the tabloids-because they dare to challenge you . You never thought they would after your attempts to gag them! Meghan suffered abuse from your crap tripe filled gutter Media- and you're still doing now- right on predictable Cue. -Murdoch's gutter Media+ abusive headlines . -Not all abuse is physical, much of it is psychological. Coercive control was at stake here from the RF + palace. -Meghan did everything to try and do what was expected of her, and @KensingtonRoyal still briefed against her.- This is an eye opener from British Counter Intelligence- The RF leaked lies to the toxic gutter British Tabloids which stirred up racists + the looneys- putting Meghan's life + her babies lives in real danger-Even after knowing all this,-the RF kept leaking false stories about Meghan to tabloids.

 

[Monty]

Whinger and Ginger should do what they promised - get out of the spotlight but on incomes (including annual allowances personally from King Charles in the millions) and up to $90 million from Netflix for this series, plus Harry's spiteful book and whatever interviews Meghan can cram into a week, they will never even try to lead "normal" lives. I haven't watched their self-indulgent interviews, nor this series, nor will I read Harry's book as I am too busy leading my 'normal' life and refuse to indulge them in their spiteful whinge fest. It reminds me of the Duke of Windsor and Wallis Simpson only much worse.

Harry thinks Whinger is so much like his mother, what a Joke, Dianna would never have lied and run the family down the way this awful woman has.

 

[ShannyN]

it all stems from the fact that Harrys dad had red hair and was never seen again

 

[Patbrad]

All I have to say is if this is "their" truth....why did it come with a $100Million or thereabouts price tag. They could have donated all the proceeds to mental health organisations could'nt they? Maybe it would have given it a bit more credibility but I doubt it. In this world at the moment with war in Ukraine, all that is happening in Iran and other countries their troubles (or perceived) do not even rate.

 

[Lynjw]

When Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, released the first volume of their Netflix series Harry and Meghan last week, royal fans everywhere were both questioning and intrigued.

The couple made several surprising (and damning) accusations, particularly relating to racism and their overall treatment by the Royal Family.

However, the truth of the matter is, not all of the claims they made were actually supported by facts.

To the shame of royal fans, one of the most powerful accusations – Meghan's claim that she had to wear muted tones, opting against the same colour as Her Majesty or any other senior family member to blend in - went largely unnoticed until now.

Royal commentators debunked some of the false claims that Meghan Markle shared in the new Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan. Credit: A screenshot from Netflix's 'Harry and Meghan' docu-series trailer.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsar said: 'To a royal commentator's understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event.

'But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the more senior members of the family.'

'So I was like, “Well, what’s a colour that they’ll probably never wear?” Camel? Beige? White? So I wore a lot of muted tones, but it also was so I could just blend in.’

A quick Google search will reveal a bunch of results hinting at Meghan's stylish and designer-esque ensembles in the neutral colour palette that the former Hollywood star mentioned.

However, there are also occasions during her days with the royal family when the Duchess chose to wear other colours, enough colours to satisfy her fans and oblivious royal analysts. So why did she claim otherwise?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering.

[Photo of Meghan attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in 2019] The Duchess of Sussex can be seen wearing colourful outfits despite her claims that she was made to were muted colours only. Credit: Shutterstock.

However, besides the claim about muted tones, there were also other anecdotes that didn't add up, such as her assertion that she hadn't seen her passport since heading to the UK.

Yet, Meghan was photographed travelling to Amsterdam, New York, Ibiza, and the French Riviera - so the truth remains: how did she do it?

Keeping up this charade of devastation, Meghan had told the interviewer that she didn't have a clue about the protocols planned for her during her time as a working Duchess; 'like what’s a walkabout?'.

And yet, according to one 'well-placed royal source' who spoke to The Times, this was a 'total lie' and that she was given 'a 30-point dossier, studiously researched, brimming with information and contacts for the life she was taking on.

There's also one particular interview in the docu-series that has come under question — the couple's 2017 engagement interview, which was their first official media appearance as an engaged couple.

When the Duchess of Sussex was pressed about the event, she claimed that the exchange was actually 'rehearsed' and called it an 'orchestrated reality show'.

However, BBC's Mishal Hussein, who conducted the interview at the time, had a different recollection of the event, telling the media that they were simply 'asked to do an interview’.

A source who was 'engaged' in the interview was said to have confirmed Hussein's claims, stating that the Duchess 'controlled every micro-detail of how their engagement publicly went' and that 'every word of that interview was what they wanted to say'.

As if that isn't enough, discrepancies have also been exposed around the Duke and Duchess' refusal to invite the family of Meghan's half-sister to their wedding - something that has been heavily discussed in the Netflix series.

The Duchess claimed that despite wanting her niece to attend the wedding, the Royal Family's 'very small comms team' just 'couldn't wrap their heads around it', leaving her feeling frustrated and helpless.

But unsurprisingly, those closest to the couple back then say that's a total fabrication. According to multiple sources, the 'royal press team was desperate for Meghan to have more family and friends at the wedding', and that the claims made were 'a complete lie'.

Key Takeaways

• Claims made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in their Netflix series, Harry and Meghan, were not always supported by facts.
• The Duchess of Sussex's claim that she was told to opt for muted colours in order to blend in with the senior family members at group events was particularly questionable.
• The Sussexes seemingly tried to build up a certain image of themselves, one of tragedy and suffering, which caused further discrepancies when compared to actual events.
• The credibility of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may very well be on the line here, so the world will keep a close eye on the situation to investigate further.

These claims raise a very important question: should we just take Harry and Meghan's version of events at face value? There's no doubt that many of us are in the dark here - and it certainly seems that the only people who know the full and honest truth are those living within the Royal Family circle.

So while we don't have the answer to this one, it's something the world will continue to keep an eye on and investigate, as the Sussexes' credibility may very well be on the line here.

Not surprised. It’s all about sensationalism.