Tasmanian caravan park won't let terminally ill resident sell home to fund treatment

For about 14 years, Roslyn Grima has lived in her own little home in a seaside caravan park in northern Tasmania.

"It was an amazing place, I'd come to visit a friend and the next week I thought, 'Oh, I'm buying one of these places,'" the 65-year-old said.


"Now it's my home and it's beautiful and I absolutely love it here."

It was once a caravan, like most homes at the Beauty Point Tourist Park.


1756699850216.png
Roslyn Grima lives at a Tasmanian caravan park where she owns her own home. (ABC News: Ashleigh Barraclough)


Over the years, Ms Grima has completed extensive renovations and added multiple rooms to the caravan, estimating its worth now at more than $100,000.

But Ms Grima's life took an unexpected twist when earlier this year she discovered she had stage-four liver and pancreatic cancer.

She now wants to sell her caravan park home to fund her medical expenses, but the park says that is not an option.

Local council says park must 'move back into compliance'​

The caravan park told Ms Grima she cannot sell her place because of an enforcement notice issued by the West Tamar Council in February.

The notice, seen by the ABC, says: "No planning permit exists authorising the use of some or all of the land for 'residential use'."

The council said the park is only approved for visitor accommodation.


1756699865476.png
The Beauty Point Tourist Park sits on a picturesque piece of land in northern Tasmania. (ABC News: Morgan Timms)


"Council's role is to ensure that the park — over time — moves back into compliance with the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act," chief executive Kristen Desmond told the ABC.

"Any arrangements regarding sales are strictly between the residents and the park, which is a privately owned entity.

"Council has ensured that its enforcement action does not require residents to be displaced from the park."


Joshua Manticas is the director of the park and a West Tamar councillor. He says he has always left the council chamber during discussions about the park to avoid any conflict of interest.

"The position of our company is that no new licences will be issued and all guests at the conclusion of their stay must take all belongings with them and restore the caravan site back to that resembling vacant lot," he said.

The situation puts existing residents such as Ms Grima — who did not know of the compliance issues when she bought into the caravan park — in a difficult position.


1756699880004.png
Roslyn Grima has added multiple rooms to the caravan over the years. (ABC News: Ashleigh Barraclough)


They have been told because new residents cannot move in, they cannot sell their homes when they leave — a practice which used to regularly occur.

While residents could move their structures off the park, most are no longer on wheels.

"You might have a caravan in here, but we've got the joint on annexe, we've got carports, got sheds," Ms Grima said.

"It can't be moved, it's like a unit, not a caravan."


After the council first flagged the compliance issue early last year, the relationship between the park and its residents spiralled.

The park banned sales and most modifications to homes, brought in stricter rules, and issued multiple residents with eviction notices.

Some evictions led to legal battles, with resident John Lowe receiving a decision from the Supreme Court in June.


1756699909589.png
Ms Grima has been diagnosed with stage-four cancer. (ABC News: Ashleigh Barraclough)


Acting Justice Shane Marshall said the new park rules, used to evict Mr Lowe, purported to "deprive long-term residents at the caravan park of any rights whatsoever".

He ruled the eviction notice was "invalid and of no effect".

The park is appealing against the verdict.

Lawyer for residents says they have a right to sell​

Lawyer Vanessa Bleyer has represented seven residents of the park, including Mr Lowe and Ms Grima, and anticipates more cases will head to court.

"Unfortunately, it's not looking like those disputes are going to resolve through sensible correspondence," she said.

She said the recent Supreme Court verdict established a "prior use exemption" allowing residents whose structures were in place before 2006, when different planning rules applied, to sell their homes.

"It can be continued to be lived in as a home, and it can be sold as a home," Ms Bleyer said.

She urged the park to comply with the Supreme Court ruling, saying otherwise residents would have to continue pursuing matters in court.

"The residents who I am acting for are all vulnerable people, and aside from having difficulty getting together the money necessary to pay the court costs that can't be avoided, they're also suffering emotionally from the experience that they're having to endure," she said.

West Tamar Council took a different view to Ms Bleyer, saying its position was no residents held prior use rights.

The park's managing director Joshua Manticas said the park's policy complied with the Supreme Court verdict.

State government to regulate caravan park residential use​

Tasmania is the only jurisdiction is Australia that does not regulate the residential use of caravan parks.

Just before the snap state election was called in June, the Liberals committed to introducing legislation to tackle the issue.

It came after more than a year of advocacy from residents at the Beauty Point Tourist Park, the Tasmanian Greens, and a similar commitment from the Labor opposition.

A government spokesperson said the legislation would be introduced within 200 days.

Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he empathised with Ms Grima's situation.

"We don't want anyone to be in that circumstance," he said.

"Prior to the election we were drafting legislation to ensure that we gave greater rights to residents of caravan parks and that work will continue."

Lawyer Vanessa Bleyer said the legislation should recognise long-term caravan park residents as holders of a lease — which grants residents more rights — rather than a licence, which is easier to terminate.

"And the legislation also needs to recognise if they have prior use rights of the structure being a home, then they're entitled to sell it as a home," she said.

'We just need help', resident says​

Roslyn Grima's doctor has told her she may only live for another few months.

"Most places here are beautiful, they're done up, beautiful," she said.

"I came here with nothing, and this was going to be for my children."

She wants the state government to act quickly to protect residents.

"We've been pushing and pushing for a year and a half, if not more, trying to get this legislation in," she said.

"We just need help from the government to put in rules and regulations to help us, and to be able to sell our homes."

By Ashleigh Barraclough
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
What a terrible situation for this woman to be in.
I don’t understand the rules and regulations regarding caravan parks.
For years many people lived permanently in caravan parks. Who were they hurting.

Then the powers that be decided this was no longer allowed and in most caravan parks you can stay no longer than 3 months, leaving these people to constantly move. Many of them were elderly and no longer had cars or even licences.
In this day and age of abysmal housing shortage surely we could solve some of this problem by creating more parks for permanent residents and at least allow those residing this way to stay put.
You are not allowed to even use a caravan for additional accommodation on your own land.
I know of a lady in a nearby country town who lives on a 1300 square block of land and wanted to have a caravan and annex in her yard for her daughter and two grandchildren who had nowhere to live.
She already owned the caravan herself, it had a double bedroom at one end, two bunks , shower and toilet and the annex was a solid one. not canvasShe was even prepared to have the toilet and water plumbed into the house plumbing
The council answer was "not allowed".
Why. Who was that going to hurt?
She was allowed to build a granny flat, which she can't afford. The caravan was a lot better than some granny flats I have seen. Bureaucracy gone mad.
 
i hope all works out for this lady. what a rotten council. why did they not inform her of such rules.
 
I hate councils they are not needed
 
Maybe I misread the article : as I see it, she has the right to sell the home, provided she or the buyer remove it from the caravan park. Which severely devalues her home!
There's also the problem: should the cancer treatment prove effective (and everyone I've known with pancreatic cancer has died. That's three out of three - a small sample) Ms Grima is going to need somewhere to live.
 
Maybe I misread the article : as I see it, she has the right to sell the home, provided she or the buyer remove it from the caravan park. Which severely devalues her home!
There's also the problem: should the cancer treatment prove effective (and everyone I've known with pancreatic cancer has died. That's three out of three - a small sample) Ms Grima is going to need somewhere to live.
On further reflection, this lady would be wiser to hang onto her home, where she has been happily living for 14 years.
Why does she need to sell her home to fund her treatment. You can get excellent cancer treatment in public hospitals for free.
 
Councils are definitely becoming a total waste of money. They have zero compassion, common sense or any good ideas in today's society. They seem to prefer to just throw their weight around for no good reason and cause chaos.
I feel so sorry for this lady and I am sure she is not the only one in this sort of predicament.
 
Only 2 ways out. Sell the caravan complete with the proviso that the buyer removes the entire thing to their own location. Possible because there's a high need for granny flats nowadays.
Or the caravan park could purchase the set up and rent it for holiday stays. Not sure about Tas, but in NSW most set ups like this people are allowed to stay in for 6 months out of 12.
Either way she is not going to get the amount of money she could have if someone could move in permanently, but I understand the delimma regarding council rules. This is the same everywhere now.
 

An Except from www.dpac.tas.gov.au -

Council functions​

Under the Act, Tasmanian councils have three very broad functions, namely:

  • to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the community;
  • to represent and promote the interests of the community; and
  • to provide for the peace, order and good government of the municipal area.
In performing these functions, councils must consult, involve and be accountable to their residents and ratepayers.

What a farce as with all councils!
 
Oops…I meant an Excerpt not Except 😆
 
hopefully the next council elections are not to far away and all these gutless arsehole will loose their jobs and decent uncorrupt people could be elected in their place
 
hopefully the next council elections are not to far away and all these gutless arsehole will loose their jobs and decent uncorrupt people could be elected in their place
Don’t hold your breath. ☹️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
Councils are definitely becoming a total waste of money. They have zero compassion, common sense or any good ideas in today's society. They seem to prefer to just throw their weight around for no good reason and cause chaos.
I feel so sorry for this lady and I am sure she is not the only one in this sort of predicament.
In days gone by, the little Hitlers would infest clubs like the bowls or tennis clubs.
Now they have progressed to Local Council.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
hopefully the next council elections are not to far away and all these gutless arsehole will loose their jobs and decent uncorrupt people could be elected in their place
One can only hope.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×