Singapore Airlines apologises to injured Australian couple after flight turbulence

Travelling by air is often seen as a safe and efficient way to traverse the globe, especially for our seasoned travellers who have seen much of the world.

However, the skies can sometimes be unpredictable, and the recent ordeal faced by an Australian couple is a stark reminder of the potential perils of air travel.



The incident, which occurred on Tuesday, 21 May, in Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 from London to Singapore, left 20 people in intensive care, according to hospital officials.

The plane experienced a sudden drop 10 hours into the journey, causing injuries to passengers and crew members alike.


Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 9.22.32 AM.png
Singapore Airlines apologised to an Australian couple after flight turbulence. Credit: ABC News Australia / YouTube


Among the injured, 22 patients suffered spinal cord injuries and six sustained brain and skull injuries. One passenger died of a suspected heart attack.

The oldest patient was 83 years old, and the youngest was a two-year-old child who suffered a concussion.

Adelaide man Keith Davis, who was among the 40 passengers and crew still receiving treatment in Bangkok, expressed his frustration at the lack of direct communication from the airline.

Davis mentioned that it could take several weeks before his wife Kerry, who sustained a spinal injury after being thrown into luggage compartments and landing in the aisle, is able to travel back home.

‘She fell flat straight into the aisle and from that moment, she didn't move,’ he said.

‘That's where she remained for the rest of the flight. It was really horrifying.’



Hospital staff at Samitivej Srinakarin Hospital intervened when Davis tried to speak with journalists about the lack of direct communication from airline representatives with him.

He said he ‘had no information, we’ve been left in limbo’ his attempts to speak to the media were quickly shut down by hospital staff.

The Director of Samitivej Srinakarin Hospital, Adinun Kittiratanapaibool, later apologised as they were only seeking to protect the privacy of patients.

‘The number of patients in ICU remain the same,’ Adinun Kittiratanapaibool said, referring to the hospital’s intensive care unit. ‘The meaning of those in ICU are those that need close attention.’



In response to the situation, Singapore Airlines CEO Goh Choon Phong personally visited the injured in Bangkok.

‘I have given [patients] my personal assurance that we will take care of them during this difficult time,’ he said.

The airline issued an apology to the Australian couple and arranged for family members to join them in Bangkok, where they were receiving medical care.

‘Singapore Airlines apologises to Mr Keith Davis and his wife, and is providing them with the necessary support and assistance they need during this difficult time,’ the airline said.

You can watch Keith Davis’ interview with ABC below:


Credit: ABC News Australia / YouTube

Key Takeaways
  • Singapore Airlines has issued an apology to an Australian couple injured during severe turbulence and is assisting with support and arrangements for family travel.
  • The airline's CEO, Goh Choon Phong, visited the injured passengers in Bangkok personally, assuring them of the airline's care during this difficult period.
  • Twenty people who were aboard the flight remain in intensive care, with Adelaide man Keith Davis and several others still receiving treatment in Bangkok hospitals.
  • Despite initial communication issues, the airline has responded with apologies and support as families and the injured navigate the aftermath of the turbulence incident, which caused multiple injuries and one fatality.
We extend our thoughts to the Davis couple and all those affected by this incident.
 
Sponsored
The operative words here are "in most cases". In most cases, pilots do warn people to make sure their seat belt is on, but sometimes the forces of nature are quite unpredictable.
In any case, all seated people should have had their seat belt on.
It is also the pilot's obligation to the passengers to avoid areas of potential turbulence, rather than throw on the seat belt sign and "ride out the storm".
 
Have been told the dangerous part in flying is the take-off and landing. The amount of people who are walking freely when the plane has just landed, still moving is beyond me, pure stupidity. Turbulence is weather controlled, but slightly agree with cockpit warnings could have diverted this tragedy.
 
It is also the pilot's obligation to the passengers to avoid areas of potential turbulence, rather than throw on the seat belt sign and "ride out the storm".
ONCE AGAIN, you are guessing what happened. How do you KNOW that the pilots knew about the POTENTIAL turbulence. I will not look at any more of your guesses.
 
Have been told the dangerous part in flying is the take-off and landing. The amount of people who are walking freely when the plane has just landed, still moving is beyond me, pure stupidity. Turbulence is weather controlled, but slightly agree with cockpit warnings could have diverted this tragedy.
What if it did not show anything. Do you want the pilots to have a guess and keep changing flight course ?
 
No it's not, you made the allegation that the pilots were at error for not picking up any turbulence etc. Where is your proof that they missed this ? I really don't like it when people have a guess at things without proof.
Here's the proof.

It's not known at this stage what type of turbulence caused the disruption on the Singapore Airlines flight. Tracking service FlightRadar24 told Reuters there were storms — some severe — in the area at the time.
Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-22/the-link-between-climate-change-and-turbulence/103877522

I read this article BEFORE my initial post. Rarely do I go off "half cocked" as you claimed I have.
 
How many of the injured were hit by the 7kg hard-edged stuff all passengers place in those overhead lockers. A whisky bottle or laptop computer can do a lot of damage if travelling quickly enough, even when one has one's seat belt tight.

As once explained to me by a very experienced commercial pilot who started on DC3 aircraft.
 
It's interesting that all these comments are in support of the airline and for keeping the seat belt on at all times when seated. That simple piece of advice may have saved many injuries and I hope it will be taken into account for anybody that chooses to take action against the airline.
My sympathies lay with the cabin crew for whom such events are an occupational hazard. I'm sure they will be well looked after by SIA.
I agree re cabin crew, they must have been terrified as well, but were professional and assistant everyone. 👏👏👏👏
 
No it's not, you made the allegation that the pilots were at error for not picking up any turbulence etc. Where is your proof that they missed this ? I really don't like it when people have a guess at things without proof.
Re: Vegepatch……..A experienced pilot in Australia was asked, by the media about what happened, his answer was that not all Turbulence is visible to pilots, this particular occurrence was sudden, there is a name for it, sorry cannot remember what it is, however again the pilots did a marvellous job.
Use common sense for your own safety.
 
to not wear your seat belt even loosely for the entire flight is madness. I guess it is okay to sue for madness. How the hell do the pilots know of something such as this, and warn? impossible. keep your bloody seat belt on.
 
Turbulence doesn't happen "out of the blue". It is the result of jet streams and other phenomena. It easily detected in most cases and easily avoided.

I feel that the pilots of Singapore Airlines flight SQ321are to blame here for not taking heed of any warning the aircraft's instrumentation may have afforded.

I am not a pilot so correct me if I'm wrong. But my knowledge of meteorology is a different thing.
another who likes to blame someone else for their madness. you have a seatbelt for a reason. also as you say you are not a pilot. I would not have guessed.
 
I worked at Heathrow in the control tower and the messages that came through about turbulence coming out of the blue was at least 4 or 5 times a shift.
 
My thoughts are with the injured & their families. A timely reminder to always wear your seat belt. It seems these adverse weather conditions are going to become more frequent
 
I did hear a pilot explaining about 'clear air turbulence' (severe turbulence occurring in cloudless areas) can sometimes catch pilots off guard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cblayney
I have travelled many times by air, I always keep my seat belt on while seated as advised by all airlines that I have travelled with, air turbulence is not the fault of he airlines and clear air turbulence is not visible and can not be avoided. What more could the airline do when their passengers do not heed the advice given regarding seat belt usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knell
Air turbulence is a natural occurrence. I don't think Singapore Airlines can be blamed. They are supporting the injured very well. I have flown with a number if airlines including Singapore and they all recommend you keep your seat belts on. Now proven to be good advice
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knell
This was a natural and rare phenomenon so don't see how the airline can be held responsible. I have flown countless times over the years to many countries, and you are always advised to keep your seat belts on during the flight. It's the individual"s choice (mine included) to undo the seatbelt once the plane is in the air - you always hear the cacophony of "clicks" This sounds more like a grab for cash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
While I feel for those injured I hardly think the turbulence was the airline’s fault they do everything they can to avoid it and do tell passengers to keep their seatbelts firmly fastened when seated. I’m sure they will step up and assist staff and those stranded and hospitalised but to sue them or blame them is ridiculous. These are just my thoughts
Totally agree - why do people not listen to cabin staff when they tell you to leave your belt ON. They do this for a reason people - not the airline fault - accidents happen. As for this fellow's massive spray - we can now claim the Ugly Australians. Sure he was probably still in shock - but if that is the case = shut up until you can think logically.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×