Shocking incident highlights dangers of reckless driving and importance of road safety

Navigating the roads as a learner driver can be a daunting experience, with the responsibility of adhering to traffic rules and ensuring the safety of oneself and others.

Mastering the intricacies of driving while maintaining focus and composure is a significant challenge for many new drivers.

However, a recent incident serves as a stark reminder of the consequences when these responsibilities are not taken seriously.

The incident underscores the critical importance of proper training, vigilance, and adherence to road safety regulations, highlighting the potential risks and repercussions of negligence on the road.


In a shocking turn of events, a 19-year-old learner driver from New South Wales found himself in a harrowing situation after he was caught driving at a speed more than double the legal limit during one of the busiest times of the day.

The young man was detected by the Auburn Highway Patrol travelling at a staggering 107km/h in a 50km/h zone at 5:10 PM on a Monday evening, right in the midst of peak hour traffic.


467438875_985684680270618_3936346105071786523_n.jpg
A learner driver in New South Wales was fined and had his licence suspended after speeding more than double the limit and crashing into a garage. Credit: Facebook / NSW Police Force


The situation quickly escalated when, before the police could initiate a pursuit, the L-plater lost control of his SUV.

In a scene that could have been ripped from the pages of an action movie, the vehicle crashed through a fence and crashed into the garage of an unsuspecting 86-year-old woman's home.

Miraculously, despite the severity of the crash, neither the driver nor the elderly homeowner was injured.


The aftermath of the incident saw the learner driver arrested at the scene.

He was subjected to roadside drug and alcohol tests, which he passed, indicating that the reckless driving was not a result of substance impairment. Nonetheless, the consequences of his actions were severe.

The young man faced a series of penalties for his dangerous behaviour.


He was issued fines for exceeding the speed limit by more than 45km/h, driving unaccompanied, and failing to display his L-plates—all fundamental breaches of the conditions of his learner's permit.

The fines amounted to a hefty $4,324, and to compound the financial sting, his learner's permit was suspended for six months.

The damage to the property was significant, with the garage and front corner of the Regents Park home bearing the brunt of the impact.

The incident serves as a cautionary tale for all drivers, especially those new to the road, about the importance of adhering to speed limits and driving conditions.


The recent incident where a learner driver was caught speeding at more than twice the legal limit, causing a crash into an elderly woman’s house, serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of reckless driving.

This alarming event not only highlights the risks posed by inexperienced drivers but also underscores the importance of being accountable on the road.

In some cases, drivers attempt to avoid penalties for speeding by offering bold excuses, but as this incident shows, the consequences of such behaviour can be far more severe than just fines and suspensions.
Key Takeaways
  • A learner driver in New South Wales has been fined and had his licence suspended after driving at more than double the speed limit and crashing into a garage.
  • The 19-year-old was caught travelling at 107km/h in a 50km/h zone during peak hour traffic.
  • Despite the high-speed impact, neither the driver nor the elderly resident of the house were injured during the incident.
  • The driver was issued a total of $4,324 in fines, and his learner's permit was suspended for six months after the crash caused significant damage to the property.
Have you or someone you know had a similar experience with a learner driver? Do you have thoughts on how we can improve road safety for all? Share your stories and ideas in the comments below. Let's work together to keep our roads and our loved ones safe.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Of what nationality is the driver.........

Of what nationality is the driver.........
Who cares what nationality he is? He wants to hold an Australian driver's licence. As regards the possibility of a person who is not a natural-born Australian, he MUST be required to have a good, working knowledge of the English language before being granted a learner's permit or, ultimately, a licence to drive. No consideration should be given to those who are not natural-born Australians. They want to drive then they must be able to communicate effectively with the staff in the govt department, the licencing examiner etc.
 
I believe that in NSW the age for obtaining a Learner's permit is 16. So 16 is considered mature enough and responsible.

The 6 months suspension in this case is in my opinion not sufficient.

People may accuse me of being ageist but this driver by his conduct that included:

1. Exceeding speed limit by +45 km/h;

2. Driving unaccompanied;

3. Concealing his 'Learner' status;

4. Endangering the lives of other drivers, pedestrians and the home owner of the property he damaged; and

5. Causing significant damage to the property

has clearly demonstrated that he as an individual despite being +16, has not attained a level of maturity that would allow him to be in control of a motor vehicle.

He should be ordered to:

1. Attend a course of consultations conducted by a mental health practitioner for a determination of the age at which he should be eligible to again hold a Learner's permit.

This should be determined from the results of testing and not simple biological age; and

2. Pay the home owner restitution for the damage sustained to the garage/property.

I realise he may be a student and unemployed at the present time but that should not exonerate him of the blame for the fault of his decisions and behaviour.

Restitution amount could be easily quantified as a debt (like a HECS/HELP debt registered against a TFN) payable from future income from either employment or Centrelink benefits.
well said Anna, totally agree.
 
His licence should have been suspended for much longer....maybe until he is 21 and hopefully a bit more mature to hold a drivers licence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
We were stopped at the lights in Manly years ago and we had just started to move forward when they changed to green Then a car load of young boys flew straight in front of us l will never know to this day how they missed us.
Scary!
 
I have made an observation and I have come to a conclusion, which is bolstered by this idiot's driving. I believe that during their formative years, SOME Children & Teenagers play computer games that involve operating vehicles at erratic speeds and in sticky situations. They find that when they crash or bounce off a wall or roll over, that the vehicle is still in perfect working condition and they just carry on. They also find that those computer crashes don't injure anybody.
NOW, after getting a learners permit or P plates, they apply the same method of driving as they did in the computer games. The amount of times that I observe P Platers driving extremely close behind other vehicles is staggering. I feel that the only reason they don't hit the car in front is because the front driver negotiates a way out of the situation themselves due to being frightened.
There are also those road racing movie franchises. Vin Diesel and his crew have a lot to answer for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: relljube
I believe that in NSW the age for obtaining a Learner's permit is 16. So 16 is considered mature enough and responsible.

The 6 months suspension in this case is in my opinion not sufficient.

People may accuse me of being ageist but this driver by his conduct that included:

1. Exceeding speed limit by +45 km/h;

2. Driving unaccompanied;

3. Concealing his 'Learner' status;

4. Endangering the lives of other drivers, pedestrians and the home owner of the property he damaged; and

5. Causing significant damage to the property

has clearly demonstrated that he as an individual despite being +16, has not attained a level of maturity that would allow him to be in control of a motor vehicle.

He should be ordered to:

1. Attend a course of consultations conducted by a mental health practitioner for a determination of the age at which he should be eligible to again hold a Learner's permit.

This should be determined from the results of testing and not simple biological age; and

2. Pay the home owner restitution for the damage sustained to the garage/property.

I realise he may be a student and unemployed at the present time but that should not exonerate him of the blame for the fault of his decisions and behaviour.

Restitution amount could be easily quantified as a debt (like a HECS/HELP debt registered against a TFN) payable from future income from either employment or Centrelink benefits.
Totally agree with your suggestions Anna. However I see a problem with your last recommendation. While he must pay eventually who will pay to have the house repaired in the meantime so life can continue for the victims without them being impacted requiring accomodation or having to contribute econnomically? Surley not their insurance and what if they didn't have house coverage?
 
Why is it so that learner Motorcycle riders are restricted to power and size of Motorcycle and yet Car learners are not restricted to size and power of car.
I know the answer, Votes, more drive cars then bikes so for the Votes not to restrict them as this learner above is 19 voting age. If that was applied to cars then learners in cars would only drive lets say, a 1.2 litre auto that is not a turbo and being an auto would be slow as well. My car is a 1.6 litre auto and about just under 60bhp and I drive that for the economy not for that power. its a trade off.
 
Last edited:
Totally agree with your suggestions Anna. However I see a problem with your last recommendation. While he must pay eventually who will pay to have the house repaired in the meantime so life can continue for the victims without them being impacted requiring accomodation or having to contribute econnomically? Surley not their insurance and what if they didn't have house coverage?
Perhaps the boys parents !
 
Totally agree with your suggestions Anna. However I see a problem with your last recommendation. While he must pay eventually who will pay to have the house repaired in the meantime so life can continue for the victims without them being impacted requiring accomodation or having to contribute econnomically? Surley not their insurance and what if they didn't have house coverage?
If insurance, the insurer will repair and then pursue the perpetrator.

Problem is, if no insurance 😭.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×