New Design
  1. Enable New Design

Seniors could pay 60 to 80 per cent tax on extra pension income—are you prepared?

News & Politics

Seniors could pay 60 to 80 per cent tax on extra pension income—are you prepared?

  • Maan
  • By Maan
1759971398947.png Seniors could pay 60 to 80 per cent tax on extra pension income—are you prepared?
When working longer backfires unexpectedly. Image source: Pexels/SHVETS production | Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.

You’ve worked hard all your life, paid taxes, and planned carefully for retirement.



Yet the system designed to support you may punish you for wanting to keep working past 67.



For some older Australians, earning an extra dollar can mean losing more than half of it—or even paying to work.




It sounds like a dystopian tale from a twisted tax fairy story, but the reality is stark: older Australians receiving the Age Pension are often subject to effective marginal tax rates of 60 to 80 per cent, and in extreme cases, these rates can exceed 100 per cent.



That means for every extra dollar earned through work, pensioners might keep only 20 cents—or actually lose money.



In this article


How the Numbers Stack Up



In 2025, a single Age Pensioner receives $1,178.70 per fortnight, which adds up to roughly $30,600 annually including supplements.



Couples receive more, but the calculations quickly become complicated.



Pensioners can earn up to $218 per fortnight (around $5,668 annually) and still retain the full pension.



On top of this, the Work Bonus scheme allows pensioners to earn up to $300 per fortnight ($7,800 annually) without affecting their pension.




Understanding the Work Bonus


Any unused portion of the $300 fortnightly Work Bonus accumulates into a 'Work Bank' up to a maximum of $11,800.


New pensioners automatically receive $4,000 in their Work Bank when they start their Age Pension.


This means a first-year pensioner could potentially earn about $17,000 without reducing their full pension—but only if no previous Work Bonus has been used.





The Pension Trap in Action



The system is straightforward but harsh.



Once income surpasses the threshold, the Age Pension reduces by 50 cents for every extra dollar earned.



This taper rate is only the beginning.



Pensioners also pay income tax on their earnings and pension, and may lose eligibility for concessions and offsets as income rises.




'Age pensioners are hit with far higher effective rates due to the Income Test taper rate.'

HESTA research, September 2025



Take Margaret, a 68-year-old retired nurse from Brisbane.



She receives the full Age Pension and is offered casual shifts at a local medical practice.



Her pension is $30,600 annually, and her job pays $20,000 a year after her Work Bonus is used.



Expected total income would be $50,600, but in reality, she keeps only around $38,000—meaning she retains just $7,400 of her $20,000 wages.



That is an effective tax rate of 63 per cent on additional earnings, a shock for someone who has contributed to the system all her life.




When Working Actually Costs You Money



Did you know?


Did you know? About 63 per cent of Australians over 67 receive either the full Age Pension (39 per cent) or a partial pension (24 per cent), meaning this issue affects nearly two-thirds of older Australians who may wish to work.



The situation becomes even more severe for those just above the asset test threshold.



A small partial pension combined with work income can push total taxable income into a bracket where pensioners lose more than they gain.



HESTA research shows extreme cases where effective marginal tax rates surpass 100 per cent.



Real-World Impact



Behind the statistics are real Australians making hard choices about retirement.



More than 30,000 HESTA members who are pension-eligible remain active in the workforce, often in essential sectors like healthcare, where skilled professionals are urgently needed.



These individuals are not trying to game the system.



They want to contribute, stay engaged, and supplement their retirement income.



Instead, they are penalised financially.



Example Scenario


  1. The Healthcare Worker A retired nurse working two days a week earns about $8 per hour after taper and tax, instead of her $35 wage.

  2. The Tradesperson A retired electrician called for emergency repairs discovers that too much work reduces total annual income.

  3. The Teacher A retired educator doing casual relief teaching faces administrative hurdles and financial penalties that make working hardly worthwhile.




The Broader Cost to Australia



This system is not just unfair to retirees—it is economically damaging.



Australia faces critical skills shortages in healthcare, education, and trades, yet older workers are financially discouraged from staying in the workforce.



Around 70 per cent of HESTA members work in health and community services, Australia’s second-largest industry, which struggles with rising demand due to an ageing and growing population.



The irony is stark: the nation needs more healthcare workers to care for an ageing population, yet the tax system actively discourages experienced professionals from contributing.




Strategies for Pensioners



While the system is punishing, pensioners can take steps to mitigate losses.



Understand Your Thresholds: Centrelink’s online estimators can help identify break-even points where working more may actually reduce total income.



Plan Your Work Bank: The Work Bonus accumulates to $11,800, with $4,000 granted upfront for new pensioners.



Timing work strategically maximises benefits.



Consider Timing: Adjusting work hours across different periods may optimise annual income.



Seek Professional Advice: The interplay of pensions, tax, and earnings is complex; financial advisers familiar with Age Pension rules can help navigate the system.




Assets Test: A Surprising Twist



Australia’s Age Pension relies on both an income test and an assets test, paying whichever yields a lower pension.



Sometimes, having more assets means the assets test, not the income test, applies—allowing pensioners more freedom to work without reducing their pension.



In this paradox, wealthier retirees may enjoy more flexibility to supplement income through work.




A System That Demands Reform



The message is clear: once Australians reach 67 and receive the Age Pension, their skills and contributions are unwelcome.



HESTA CEO Debby Blakey says the research highlights the need for more flexibility for retirement-age Australians.



Other countries have introduced measures encouraging older workers without penalising them, such as reducing taper rates, increasing Work Bonuses, or creating provisions for essential workers.



Australia, however, has created a system where working can be financially punishing.




Understanding Your Position in the Age Pension Work Trap



  • Check if your total income (including pension) would be higher by working less

  • Use your Work Bonus strategically—it can accumulate up to $11,800

  • Consider whether you’re assessed under the income or assets test—it affects your options

  • Get professional advice before making major work decisions





What This Means For You


Older Australians often face effective marginal tax rates of 60-80 per cent, and in extreme cases, these rates can even surpass 100 per cent.



This means that for every extra dollar earned, a significant portion can be lost to the pension taper and income tax, leaving retirees with far less than they expect.



The Age Pension reduces by 50 cents for every dollar earned above income thresholds, which compounds with regular income tax, creating a system where working more can sometimes feel financially punishing.



Fortunately, the Work Bonus can help offset some of these losses, accumulating up to $11,800 over time, with new pensioners receiving $4,000 upfront, but careful planning is essential.



Pensioners must strategically manage their work and consider professional advice to avoid unexpected financial penalties and maximise total income.



For older Australians who want to stay active and supplement their retirement income, understanding these rules is crucial—without careful planning, you could be working hard but keeping only a fraction of your earnings.




If the complexities of pension taper rates and work income have left you wondering how to keep more of what you earn, there’s a practical guide that dives deeper into this issue.



It explores real-life examples of how additional income interacts with taxes and pension entitlements, showing strategies to navigate the system effectively.



Following these insights can help you plan work and income decisions with confidence, avoiding unexpected financial penalties.



Read more: Tax-Time Traps and Triumphs: How Age Pensioners Navigate the Tax Maze in Retirement





What’s your experience with the Age Pension work rules? Have you been caught in this financial trap, or found ways to work around it?



Share your story in the comments—your insight may help others navigate this complicated system.

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
It's all very obvious.
The least amount of pension the Fed., Gov., has to pay pensions the better they love it.
They have to find ways to help pay for the SHEER RATBAGGERY OF BO-BO BOWEN & HIS COPMPLETE & UTTER STUPIDITY.
Unfortunately, pensioners will pay dearly, as they are a major part of the ANSWER., incl., us on a miserable part pension.
My wife has been given notice that her scungy part pension has ceased.
Screw the pensioners until they're down & out.
I wouldn't mind betting that they pay someone to read the obituary columns in all states, on a daily basis and have them marked off quite a bit quicker who they don't have to pay pensions too, anymore.
 
In 2024-25 I worked over 4 months and earned $7000. My wife as a sole trader earned $6000. I received a part pension of $780 p.f and had rent assistance of $180 p.f. I also had a super pension of $1400 p f. I am 68, my wife is 64 so not eligible for the pension yet. In order to live, I had to go back to work. My tax which I haven't lodged yet because I don't know how Im going to pay it...is estimated at $3800. The tax dept taxed everything, my pension, my super and my wage. ..because it tipped the threshold totalling $53000. Thankyou Albo for nothing!
 
Someone has to pay for BONEHEAD BOWENS climate change dream looks like easy target The Pensioner
 
Hi people I have sent this article to the treasurer Jim Chalmers we need more people to send it then maybe he might read it acting on it might be a different storie no point sending it to ALBO he’s to thick to understand it email [email protected]
 
Hi people I have sent this article to the treasurer Jim Chalmers we need more people to send it then maybe he might read it acting on it might be a different storie no point sending it to ALBO he’s to thick to understand it email [email protected]
Good idea, but I wish you luck. I don't think Chalmers can understand it either.
Several years ago, I wrote to my local MP (Labor/female) detailing how the means test defeats its own purpose and actually leads to more people relying on the pension. It's not just discouraging work. It's discouraging sensible planning for retirement and saving. You save enough to be just over the asset threshold and you end up with less income than a pensioner and none of the benefits until you drain away enough of your savings to qualify for the OAP. It's stupid. Savings benefit the taxpayer, but not the saver. Now, the deeming rate is in excess of what most banks are paying in interest!
The reply I got from the MP was that Australia's pension system is 'the best in the world' and the means test is carefully designed to ensure fairness. She clearly did not read, or did not understand, one word I wrote. The letter was carefully crafted to explain the flaws in the system, but she ignored all of it.

A far more sensible and productive system would be to replicate the system in NZ and many other countries, where the aged pension is universal but retirement income is taxed. With strong incentives to plan sensibly and save, and to work in retirement where possible, fewer people would rely on the taxpayer to fund their retirement.
 
Look at all the morons blaming the current government as if this all started recently.

The way the pension works hasn't changed much for years, you lose 50 cents in the dollar over set limits, those limits increase regularly. This has been going on for as long as I can remember, through BOTH flavours of government.
 
Ha, so when we are encouraged to help bolster the workforce and here's some incentive, work bonus, we need to take it on the chin and work for 20cenrs in the $$. Nope!
 
I’m sure the Gov don’t read anything the people send them, they have assistants to read mail and only pass on good stuff. Letters we send are probably regarded as from just another whinger and binned.
Gov would like to see everyone on an age pension curl up and die! How often do you see the people complain who have never worked a day in their lives have numerous kids and rely on the Gov to support them ? Gov should go after them instead of pensioners!
 
Hi people I have sent this article to the treasurer Jim Chalmers we need more people to send it then maybe he might read it acting on it might be a different storie no point sending it to ALBO he’s to thick to understand it email [email protected]
Maybe send to Tanya Plibersek. Isn't she the Minister responsible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes and CemisugO
Hi people I have sent this article to the treasurer Jim Chalmers we need more people to send it then maybe he might read it acting on it might be a different storie no point sending it to ALBO he’s to thick to understand it email [email protected]
Too thick, that's funny coming from someone with your grammar and spelling.
 
To all you bone heads blaming the current government, its been the same forever regardless of which party is in govt.
 
To all you bone heads blaming the current government, its been the same forever regardless of which party is in govt.
Exactly, the level of intelligence on this page is very low.
 
Really, it's been like this for as long as I can remember - at least since early in my life as a wage slave! The figures change, the effect is still the same. You struggle to live on your pension, but can't afford to supplement it!
Meanwhile, the super-rich pay what? 20% or less income tax?
Income should be taxed on your income in cash or in kind - so all the extra perks and comforts and most of the rubbery accounting that lets those who can afford to pay accountants to dodge tax will, despite everything, pay some sort of realistic contribution to the upkeep of the nation.
(In kind - living rent-free in a house your company owns; the car and other privileges; the family holiday paid for by the company you own, justifying it as a 'business expense' such as a fact finding tour. For 'company' you could also read 'government', for the businessman (using the generic 'man' to mean human being) , read politician.
 
To all you bone heads blaming the current government, its been the same forever regardless of which party is in govt.
You got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CemisugO
Hi people I have sent this article to the treasurer Jim Chalmers we need more people to send it then maybe he might read it acting on it might be a different storie no point sending it to ALBO he’s to thick to understand it email [email protected]
Hope your letter was more coherent than your post, so the minders might read it rather than bin it out of hand.
 
I’m sure the Gov don’t read anything the people send them, they have assistants to read mail and only pass on good stuff. Letters we send are probably regarded as from just another whinger and binned.
Gov would like to see everyone on an age pension curl up and die! How often do you see the people complain who have never worked a day in their lives have numerous kids and rely on the Gov to support them ? Gov should go after them instead of pensioners!
Hear hear to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CemisugO
No mention of Senior Australians and Pensioners Tax Offset which is deducted from the amount of tax you have to pay.
 
"Some are more equal than others" ... ring a bell, anybody?
 
What many of our governing members fail to understand is that Super only became mandatory in 1992. The rate was fairly low. I was in my own business until 1997 when at 50 years old I joined a company and started to accumulate super even tho' the rate was nowhere near the 12% it is today, Earning between $70 - $8O year I worked until I was 69 . My super was around $180k. Not exactly retirement level ! So I still work and now at 78 I'm lucky to avoid living in a tent. Could I have increased my super. No. Not allowed over 70.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×