Report calls on overhaul of current superannuation system with simpler tax rules

Navigating Australia's superannuation system can be as complex as a game of chess where the rules keep changing.

But what if there was a way to simplify the game, making it fairer for all players involved, from the hardworking employees to the retirees looking forward to their golden years?

Well, it turns out there might just be a strategy on the horizon that could save companies $1 billion in operational costs annually.



The Actuaries Institute has put forth a bold proposal that could revolutionise the current superannuation system.

Their report, crafted by actuaries Richard Dunn, Michael Rice, Jennifer Shaw, and Alun Stevens, suggests a trio of major changes aimed at meaningful tax reform within the $4.1 trillion superannuation industry.


shutterstock_2418702227.jpg
A report proposed simple tax rules on the current superannuation system. Credit: RomanR / Shutterstock


Firstly, the report proposes a uniform tax rate of 10 per cent on all superannuation. This is a significant shift from the current system, where employees pay a 15 per cent tax during the accumulation phase but enjoy a tax-free status in retirement.

‘This would enable a simpler system where people could have just one super account, build stronger balances from when they begin working and save money on fees,’ Actuaries Institute Chief Executive Elayne Grace said.

The second change targets how taxes are levied on retirees who withdraw substantial amounts from their super.



The current loophole allows individuals to take out large sums before claiming the aged pension, but the proposed reform would introduce thresholds for taxing high withdrawals.

‘The thresholds could be set at high levels, such as $250,000 and $150,000 per annum, respectively, with compensation for any retirees adversely impacted provided through adjustments to the age pension, for example,’ the report said.

‘These changes would encourage retirees to use their superannuation in retirement.’

Moreover, the report suggested a fairer tax on bequests. The age at which the 17 per cent rate is applied would be raised from 60 to 67, with the tax-free threshold varying depending on whether the beneficiary is a dependent or non-dependent.

According to report author Jennifer Shaw, the changes, especially the tax on large benefits, aligned with the proposed objective of super: ‘To preserve savings to deliver income for a dignified retirement’.

‘They would leave the system largely unchanged for most retirees and still allow people to make large withdrawals for their immediate needs, for example paying off a mortgage or healthcare,’ Shaw said.



Lastly, the authors recommend abolishing the distinction between the tax treatments for concessional (tax-deductible) and non-concessional contributions once they are invested in a super fund.

This would further simplify the system and encourage the use of super for retirement spending rather than as a means to accumulate tax-free bequests.

‘We have a superannuation system that’s working, but it’s one of the most complex in the world,’ report author Richard Dunn said.

‘Our proposals make super simpler for consumers and funds while improving equity across the system. Further, the reforms encourage people to spend their super by removing the attraction of using super to accumulate tax-free bequests.’
Key Takeaways
  • The Actuaries Institute has proposed major tax changes to Australia's superannuation system to save $1bn in operational costs per year and simplify taxation rules.
  • Under the proposals, all taxes on super would be standardised at 10%, meaning workers would pay less tax upfront but face higher taxes in retirement.
  • The report suggests changing the taxing approach for retirees withdrawing higher amounts, to prevent abuse of the system and ensure superannuation is used for retirement purposes.
  • The proposals also include equalising the tax treatment for concessional and non-concessional contributions and making tax on bequests fairer, reflecting the payment's beneficiary status.
What are your thoughts on these proposed changes? Do you believe they will make the superannuation system more equitable and less complicated? Share your insights and join the conversation below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
It appears to me that the 'TAX" situation dealing with superannuation, becomes more & more complicated by each passing day. This is where total confusion rules supreme. The "Scholars" who write the "lAWS", more than likely don't understand them as well.

They would certainly give you absolute confluting explanations of humble jumble & beating around the bush. What chance do we mere mortal homo sapiens have? Unfortunately, the rules will forever change.

I reckon that, (tongue in cheek) in the unforseeable future, one will more than likely have to reach 99 years of age to receive their super payouts.

Saying all of that, I'm a true believer in super investments, &, have to be just a little bit smart about it.

NOVEZAR.
 
"Firstly, the report proposes a uniform tax rate of 10 per cent on all superannuation."
Surely this should read ". . . on all superannuation contributions."
As written, it is a broad brush and ambiguous statement and there is lots of other ambiguity in this report. I just wish reporters would think more carefully about what they write and explain things more accurately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richmich.4422@gmail
Poiticians,Judges, KC`s and probably Barristers are not under the same rules as working stiffs.
If its good for us then it should be good for them or no changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richmich.4422@gmail
Well what about the divorced man that has his super cut in half well 10% on all superannuation well that’s lining the government's pockets I've moved mine self-funded and lost half too the bitch and that was $250,000 to a 55 year old who doesn't get taxed on it well that's bullshit if they rip you off the money should automatically go to their super account until they reach retirement age not waste it like this bitch will it's a compulsive spender bloody parasite 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
 
  • Like
Reactions: richmich.4422@gmail
Well what about the divorced man that has his super cut in half well 10% on all superannuation well that’s lining the government's pockets I've moved mine self-funded and lost half too the bitch and that was $250,000 to a 55 year old who doesn't get taxed on it well that's bullshit if they rip you off the money should automatically go to their super account until they reach retirement age not waste it like this bitch will it's a compulsive spender bloody parasite 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Dont Understand why if a divorce takes place the funds dont go from Super (Yours to Super Hers) and all rules and restrictions remain inplace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shane O'Neill

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×