Rental store ‘rips off’ disability pensioner into paying $6,760 for a phone: ‘It's unconscionable’

The joy of acquiring a new item can often overshadow the financial implications of the purchase.

This was the case for Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner who has been using appliance rental stores for decades. Since she had limited savings, she could not buy things outright.

While it helps her fulfil some needs, the cost of renting some of these items, often inflated to several times their retail value, has left her and many others questioning the ethics of such businesses.


Ms Thacker's story is a cautionary tale for all consumers, particularly those on a tight budget.

In February 2021, Ms Thacker rented a lounge for $4,056. In September, she rented a tablet for her mother for $1,586, and in November, she rented a fridge for $6,240. While these purchases made her feel like she was living a normal life, the financial burden they imposed was far from ordinary.

‘I felt I was up there for a little while, you know what I mean?’ She said.


compressed-pexels-fernando-arcos-696645.jpeg
Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, was charged $6,760 for a phone by a rental store. Credit: Fernando Arcos/Pexels


The most shocking instance was when Rent4Keeps, a rental appliance business, signed Ms Thacker up for a Samsung S21 phone. The phone, which retails for about $1,800, cost her a staggering $6,760.

'They may be brand new products, but you're paying four times the money for them, so how do these companies get away with that?' Ms Thacker asked.


The businesses would deduct payments from Ms Thacker's Centrelink benefits fortnightly using Centrepay, a government-administered service.

This online tool is a bill-paying service connected to a user's Centrelink account. Approved providers arrange contracts with Centrepay's 600,000 monthly users and take repayments before the money is deposited into the user's bank account.

Centrepay was introduced by the Howard government in 1999 to enable Indigenous communities to pay for housing expenses. It was later expanded to other retailers. However, the service has been criticised for enabling predatory practices.

'People are going in with blind faith [thinking] that because it is endorsed by Centrepay, that it's an ethical business and they're going to be treated fairly,' Caitlin Bender, AnglicareNT Financial Counsellor, stated.

‘We're seeing more and more predatory practices emerge in what was originally designed to be a really safe model. It's unconscionable,’ she added.


For Ms Thacker, more than a third of her $971.50 fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies. She soon found herself in financial strife and fell behind in her rent.

'I was already in the contracts, and there was no backing out,' she said. 'I really felt that I had no other choice—that I had to continue to make payments.'

She continued, ‘It was a toss-up… do I feed myself? Do I feed my animals? Do I pay rent? What do I do? I'm stuck.’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced in April 2022 that it was taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia and its Victorian franchisee for alleged violations of the Credit Act.

ASIC accused Rent4Keeps of operating a business model 'designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers'.


According to ASIC’s statement of claim, 92 per cent of the customers were Centrelink recipients, 79 per cent were unemployed, and all were financially vulnerable.

Despite ASIC's announcement, the New South Wales (NSW) Rent4Keeps franchisee signed Ms Thacker up again less than three weeks later. This time, it was for a washing machine that would cost her $2,340—more than three times the model's retail price.

‘They're literally ripping people off and taking advantage of low-income earners,’ Ms Thacker expressed.

The NSW franchise is run by the same person subject to ASIC's legal action—Melbourne-based businessman Kevin Payne.

Mr Payne operates Rent4Keeps Australia and replaced his wife Vikki as the sole director of both the Victorian and NSW franchises in July last year.


In September, financial support service Moneycare assisted Ms Thacker to have her remaining debts waived. The appliance rental companies retained over $14,600 that she had previously paid them.

'I thought they were helpful to me,' Ms Thacker shared. '[But] ever since I've [...] been made more aware…I'm angry.'

'These companies are literally getting away with doing this to innocent people…ruining people's financials, ruining people's lives,' she added.

Labor Senator for Western Australia Louise Pratt is calling on Services Australia, which administers Centrepay, to step up its oversight.

'It's high time they dove right in and cleaned up all of the businesses that sit inside Centrepay that are ripping off consumers,' she said.


Key Takeaways
  • Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, had to pay $6,760 for a Samsung S21 phone that retails for about $1,800 through a rental appliance business, Rent4Keeps.
  • Over a third of Thacker's fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies, leading to financial strife and rent arrears.
  • ASIC is taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia for alleged breaches of the Credit Act, accusing the company of avoiding protections for financially vulnerable consumers.
  • Despite her financial struggles and the ongoing lawsuit against Rent4Keeps, Thacker was signed up for another overpriced appliance, a washing machine costing more than three times its value.

Have you had any experiences with appliance rental stores? Do you think they are helpful? Share your stories in the comments below.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy, janj and Liz
Sponsored
I got a notice from Telstra saying that fortnightly direct debits for paying my phone bill was ceasing in January and one of the options they mentioned was Centrepay. I am so glad that i chose to go with BPAY instead and with the help of my bank I set it up. I feel for this woman but why keep buying from this company at such exhorbant costs and Centrelink should be keeping an eye on things like this when welfare recipients are falling behind and they are responsible for Centrepay. I am a welfare recipient and red flags would be ringing for me.
 
The joy of acquiring a new item can often overshadow the financial implications of the purchase.

This was the case for Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner who has been using appliance rental stores for decades. Since she had limited savings, she could not buy things outright.

While it helps her fulfil some needs, the cost of renting some of these items, often inflated to several times their retail value, has left her and many others questioning the ethics of such businesses.


Ms Thacker's story is a cautionary tale for all consumers, particularly those on a tight budget.

In February 2021, Ms Thacker rented a lounge for $4,056. In September, she rented a tablet for her mother for $1,586, and in November, she rented a fridge for $6,240. While these purchases made her feel like she was living a normal life, the financial burden they imposed was far from ordinary.

‘I felt I was up there for a little while, you know what I mean?’ She said.


View attachment 34964
Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, was charged $6,760 for a phone by a rental store. Credit: Fernando Arcos/Pexels


The most shocking instance was when Rent4Keeps, a rental appliance business, signed Ms Thacker up for a Samsung S21 phone. The phone, which retails for about $1,800, cost her a staggering $6,760.

'They may be brand new products, but you're paying four times the money for them, so how do these companies get away with that?' Ms Thacker asked.


The businesses would deduct payments from Ms Thacker's Centrelink benefits fortnightly using Centrepay, a government-administered service.

This online tool is a bill-paying service connected to a user's Centrelink account. Approved providers arrange contracts with Centrepay's 600,000 monthly users and take repayments before the money is deposited into the user's bank account.

Centrepay was introduced by the Howard government in 1999 to enable Indigenous communities to pay for housing expenses. It was later expanded to other retailers. However, the service has been criticised for enabling predatory practices.

'People are going in with blind faith [thinking] that because it is endorsed by Centrepay, that it's an ethical business and they're going to be treated fairly,' Caitlin Bender, AnglicareNT Financial Counsellor, stated.

‘We're seeing more and more predatory practices emerge in what was originally designed to be a really safe model. It's unconscionable,’ she added.


For Ms Thacker, more than a third of her $971.50 fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies. She soon found herself in financial strife and fell behind in her rent.

'I was already in the contracts, and there was no backing out,' she said. 'I really felt that I had no other choice—that I had to continue to make payments.'

She continued, ‘It was a toss-up… do I feed myself? Do I feed my animals? Do I pay rent? What do I do? I'm stuck.’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced in April 2022 that it was taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia and its Victorian franchisee for alleged violations of the Credit Act.

ASIC accused Rent4Keeps of operating a business model 'designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers'.


According to ASIC’s statement of claim, 92 per cent of the customers were Centrelink recipients, 79 per cent were unemployed, and all were financially vulnerable.

Despite ASIC's announcement, the New South Wales (NSW) Rent4Keeps franchisee signed Ms Thacker up again less than three weeks later. This time, it was for a washing machine that would cost her $2,340—more than three times the model's retail price.

‘They're literally ripping people off and taking advantage of low-income earners,’ Ms Thacker expressed.

The NSW franchise is run by the same person subject to ASIC's legal action—Melbourne-based businessman Kevin Payne.

Mr Payne operates Rent4Keeps Australia and replaced his wife Vikki as the sole director of both the Victorian and NSW franchises in July last year.


In September, financial support service Moneycare assisted Ms Thacker to have her remaining debts waived. The appliance rental companies retained over $14,600 that she had previously paid them.

'I thought they were helpful to me,' Ms Thacker shared. '[But] ever since I've [...] been made more aware…I'm angry.'

'These companies are literally getting away with doing this to innocent people…ruining people's financials, ruining people's lives,' she added.

Labor Senator for Western Australia Louise Pratt is calling on Services Australia, which administers Centrepay, to step up its oversight.

'It's high time they dove right in and cleaned up all of the businesses that sit inside Centrepay that are ripping off consumers,' she said.


Key Takeaways

  • Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, had to pay $6,760 for a Samsung S21 phone that retails for about $1,800 through a rental appliance business, Rent4Keeps.
  • Over a third of Thacker's fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies, leading to financial strife and rent arrears.
  • ASIC is taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia for alleged breaches of the Credit Act, accusing the company of avoiding protections for financially vulnerable consumers.
  • Despite her financial struggles and the ongoing lawsuit against Rent4Keeps, Thacker was signed up for another overpriced appliance, a washing machine costing more than three times its value.

Have you had any experiences
The joy of acquiring a new item can often overshadow the financial implications of the purchase.

This was the case for Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner who has been using appliance rental stores for decades. Since she had limited savings, she could not buy things outright.

While it helps her fulfil some needs, the cost of renting some of these items, often inflated to several times their retail value, has left her and many others questioning the ethics of such businesses.


Ms Thacker's story is a cautionary tale for all consumers, particularly those on a tight budget.

In February 2021, Ms Thacker rented a lounge for $4,056. In September, she rented a tablet for her mother for $1,586, and in November, she rented a fridge for $6,240. While these purchases made her feel like she was living a normal life, the financial burden they imposed was far from ordinary.

‘I felt I was up there for a little while, you know what I mean?’ She said.


View attachment 34964
Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, was charged $6,760 for a phone by a rental store. Credit: Fernando Arcos/Pexels


The most shocking instance was when Rent4Keeps, a rental appliance business, signed Ms Thacker up for a Samsung S21 phone. The phone, which retails for about $1,800, cost her a staggering $6,760.

'They may be brand new products, but you're paying four times the money for them, so how do these companies get away with that?' Ms Thacker asked.


The businesses would deduct payments from Ms Thacker's Centrelink benefits fortnightly using Centrepay, a government-administered service.

This online tool is a bill-paying service connected to a user's Centrelink account. Approved providers arrange contracts with Centrepay's 600,000 monthly users and take repayments before the money is deposited into the user's bank account.

Centrepay was introduced by the Howard government in 1999 to enable Indigenous communities to pay for housing expenses. It was later expanded to other retailers. However, the service has been criticised for enabling predatory practices.

'People are going in with blind faith [thinking] that because it is endorsed by Centrepay, that it's an ethical business and they're going to be treated fairly,' Caitlin Bender, AnglicareNT Financial Counsellor, stated.

‘We're seeing more and more predatory practices emerge in what was originally designed to be a really safe model. It's unconscionable,’ she added.


For Ms Thacker, more than a third of her $971.50 fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies. She soon found herself in financial strife and fell behind in her rent.

'I was already in the contracts, and there was no backing out,' she said. 'I really felt that I had no other choice—that I had to continue to make payments.'

She continued, ‘It was a toss-up… do I feed myself? Do I feed my animals? Do I pay rent? What do I do? I'm stuck.’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced in April 2022 that it was taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia and its Victorian franchisee for alleged violations of the Credit Act.

ASIC accused Rent4Keeps of operating a business model 'designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers'.


According to ASIC’s statement of claim, 92 per cent of the customers were Centrelink recipients, 79 per cent were unemployed, and all were financially vulnerable.

Despite ASIC's announcement, the New South Wales (NSW) Rent4Keeps franchisee signed Ms Thacker up again less than three weeks later. This time, it was for a washing machine that would cost her $2,340—more than three times the model's retail price.

‘They're literally ripping people off and taking advantage of low-income earners,’ Ms Thacker expressed.

The NSW franchise is run by the same person subject to ASIC's legal action—Melbourne-based businessman Kevin Payne.

Mr Payne operates Rent4Keeps Australia and replaced his wife Vikki as the sole director of both the Victorian and NSW franchises in July last year.


In September, financial support service Moneycare assisted Ms Thacker to have her remaining debts waived. The appliance rental companies retained over $14,600 that she had previously paid them.

'I thought they were helpful to me,' Ms Thacker shared. '[But] ever since I've [...] been made more aware…I'm angry.'

'These companies are literally getting away with doing this to innocent people…ruining people's financials, ruining people's lives,' she added.

Labor Senator for Western Australia Louise Pratt is calling on Services Australia, which administers Centrepay, to step up its oversight.

'It's high time they dove right in and cleaned up all of the businesses that sit inside Centrepay that are ripping off consumers,' she said.


Key Takeaways

  • Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, had to pay $6,760 for a Samsung S21 phone that retails for about $1,800 through a rental appliance business, Rent4Keeps.
  • Over a third of Thacker's fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies, leading to financial strife and rent arrears.
  • ASIC is taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia for alleged breaches of the Credit Act, accusing the company of avoiding protections for financially vulnerable consumers.
  • Despite her financial struggles and the ongoing lawsuit against Rent4Keeps, Thacker was signed up for another overpriced appliance, a washing machine costing more than three times its value.

Have you had any experiences with appliance rental stores? Do you think they are helpful? Share your stories in the comments below.

with appliance rental stores? Do you think they are helpful? Share your stories in the comments below.
I can see how vulnerable people can get into trouble, but do they not have any brains at all. Do they not stop and think if I really need this appliance why would I pay 4 times it's worth. And did she really need to buy her mother a table, surly her mother could have bought it herself. Business are in it to make a profit as is every business in Australia and the world. I think it all comes back to the person silly enough to sign the contract.
 
The joy of acquiring a new item can often overshadow the financial implications of the purchase.

This was the case for Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner who has been using appliance rental stores for decades. Since she had limited savings, she could not buy things outright.

While it helps her fulfil some needs, the cost of renting some of these items, often inflated to several times their retail value, has left her and many others questioning the ethics of such businesses.


Ms Thacker's story is a cautionary tale for all consumers, particularly those on a tight budget.

In February 2021, Ms Thacker rented a lounge for $4,056. In September, she rented a tablet for her mother for $1,586, and in November, she rented a fridge for $6,240. While these purchases made her feel like she was living a normal life, the financial burden they imposed was far from ordinary.

‘I felt I was up there for a little while, you know what I mean?’ She said.


View attachment 34964
Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, was charged $6,760 for a phone by a rental store. Credit: Fernando Arcos/Pexels


The most shocking instance was when Rent4Keeps, a rental appliance business, signed Ms Thacker up for a Samsung S21 phone. The phone, which retails for about $1,800, cost her a staggering $6,760.

'They may be brand new products, but you're paying four times the money for them, so how do these companies get away with that?' Ms Thacker asked.


The businesses would deduct payments from Ms Thacker's Centrelink benefits fortnightly using Centrepay, a government-administered service.

This online tool is a bill-paying service connected to a user's Centrelink account. Approved providers arrange contracts with Centrepay's 600,000 monthly users and take repayments before the money is deposited into the user's bank account.

Centrepay was introduced by the Howard government in 1999 to enable Indigenous communities to pay for housing expenses. It was later expanded to other retailers. However, the service has been criticised for enabling predatory practices.

'People are going in with blind faith [thinking] that because it is endorsed by Centrepay, that it's an ethical business and they're going to be treated fairly,' Caitlin Bender, AnglicareNT Financial Counsellor, stated.

‘We're seeing more and more predatory practices emerge in what was originally designed to be a really safe model. It's unconscionable,’ she added.


For Ms Thacker, more than a third of her $971.50 fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies. She soon found herself in financial strife and fell behind in her rent.

'I was already in the contracts, and there was no backing out,' she said. 'I really felt that I had no other choice—that I had to continue to make payments.'

She continued, ‘It was a toss-up… do I feed myself? Do I feed my animals? Do I pay rent? What do I do? I'm stuck.’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced in April 2022 that it was taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia and its Victorian franchisee for alleged violations of the Credit Act.

ASIC accused Rent4Keeps of operating a business model 'designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers'.


According to ASIC’s statement of claim, 92 per cent of the customers were Centrelink recipients, 79 per cent were unemployed, and all were financially vulnerable.

Despite ASIC's announcement, the New South Wales (NSW) Rent4Keeps franchisee signed Ms Thacker up again less than three weeks later. This time, it was for a washing machine that would cost her $2,340—more than three times the model's retail price.

‘They're literally ripping people off and taking advantage of low-income earners,’ Ms Thacker expressed.

The NSW franchise is run by the same person subject to ASIC's legal action—Melbourne-based businessman Kevin Payne.

Mr Payne operates Rent4Keeps Australia and replaced his wife Vikki as the sole director of both the Victorian and NSW franchises in July last year.


In September, financial support service Moneycare assisted Ms Thacker to have her remaining debts waived. The appliance rental companies retained over $14,600 that she had previously paid them.

'I thought they were helpful to me,' Ms Thacker shared. '[But] ever since I've [...] been made more aware…I'm angry.'

'These companies are literally getting away with doing this to innocent people…ruining people's financials, ruining people's lives,' she added.

Labor Senator for Western Australia Louise Pratt is calling on Services Australia, which administers Centrepay, to step up its oversight.

'It's high time they dove right in and cleaned up all of the businesses that sit inside Centrepay that are ripping off consumers,' she said.


Key Takeaways

  • Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, had to pay $6,760 for a Samsung S21 phone that retails for about $1,800 through a rental appliance business, Rent4Keeps.
  • Over a third of Thacker's fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies, leading to financial strife and rent arrears.
  • ASIC is taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia for alleged breaches of the Credit Act, accusing the company of avoiding protections for financially vulnerable consumers.
  • Despite her financial struggles and the ongoing lawsuit against Rent4Keeps, Thacker was signed up for another overpriced appliance, a washing machine costing more than three times its value.

Have you had any experiences with appliance rental stores? Do you think they are helpful? Share your stories in the comments below.
Robin Hood's cousin Robin Bastard.
 
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
 
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
Since when, I think you don't realise there aren't.
 
The joy of acquiring a new item can often overshadow the financial implications of the purchase.

This was the case for Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner who has been using appliance rental stores for decades. Since she had limited savings, she could not buy things outright.

While it helps her fulfil some needs, the cost of renting some of these items, often inflated to several times their retail value, has left her and many others questioning the ethics of such businesses.


Ms Thacker's story is a cautionary tale for all consumers, particularly those on a tight budget.

In February 2021, Ms Thacker rented a lounge for $4,056. In September, she rented a tablet for her mother for $1,586, and in November, she rented a fridge for $6,240. While these purchases made her feel like she was living a normal life, the financial burden they imposed was far from ordinary.

‘I felt I was up there for a little while, you know what I mean?’ She said.


View attachment 34964
Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, was charged $6,760 for a phone by a rental store. Credit: Fernando Arcos/Pexels


The most shocking instance was when Rent4Keeps, a rental appliance business, signed Ms Thacker up for a Samsung S21 phone. The phone, which retails for about $1,800, cost her a staggering $6,760.

'They may be brand new products, but you're paying four times the money for them, so how do these companies get away with that?' Ms Thacker asked.


The businesses would deduct payments from Ms Thacker's Centrelink benefits fortnightly using Centrepay, a government-administered service.

This online tool is a bill-paying service connected to a user's Centrelink account. Approved providers arrange contracts with Centrepay's 600,000 monthly users and take repayments before the money is deposited into the user's bank account.

Centrepay was introduced by the Howard government in 1999 to enable Indigenous communities to pay for housing expenses. It was later expanded to other retailers. However, the service has been criticised for enabling predatory practices.

'People are going in with blind faith [thinking] that because it is endorsed by Centrepay, that it's an ethical business and they're going to be treated fairly,' Caitlin Bender, AnglicareNT Financial Counsellor, stated.

‘We're seeing more and more predatory practices emerge in what was originally designed to be a really safe model. It's unconscionable,’ she added.


For Ms Thacker, more than a third of her $971.50 fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies. She soon found herself in financial strife and fell behind in her rent.

'I was already in the contracts, and there was no backing out,' she said. 'I really felt that I had no other choice—that I had to continue to make payments.'

She continued, ‘It was a toss-up… do I feed myself? Do I feed my animals? Do I pay rent? What do I do? I'm stuck.’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced in April 2022 that it was taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia and its Victorian franchisee for alleged violations of the Credit Act.

ASIC accused Rent4Keeps of operating a business model 'designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers'.


According to ASIC’s statement of claim, 92 per cent of the customers were Centrelink recipients, 79 per cent were unemployed, and all were financially vulnerable.

Despite ASIC's announcement, the New South Wales (NSW) Rent4Keeps franchisee signed Ms Thacker up again less than three weeks later. This time, it was for a washing machine that would cost her $2,340—more than three times the model's retail price.

‘They're literally ripping people off and taking advantage of low-income earners,’ Ms Thacker expressed.

The NSW franchise is run by the same person subject to ASIC's legal action—Melbourne-based businessman Kevin Payne.

Mr Payne operates Rent4Keeps Australia and replaced his wife Vikki as the sole director of both the Victorian and NSW franchises in July last year.


In September, financial support service Moneycare assisted Ms Thacker to have her remaining debts waived. The appliance rental companies retained over $14,600 that she had previously paid them.

'I thought they were helpful to me,' Ms Thacker shared. '[But] ever since I've [...] been made more aware…I'm angry.'

'These companies are literally getting away with doing this to innocent people…ruining people's financials, ruining people's lives,' she added.

Labor Senator for Western Australia Louise Pratt is calling on Services Australia, which administers Centrepay, to step up its oversight.

'It's high time they dove right in and cleaned up all of the businesses that sit inside Centrepay that are ripping off consumers,' she said.


Key Takeaways

  • Janene Thacker, a disability pensioner, had to pay $6,760 for a Samsung S21 phone that retails for about $1,800 through a rental appliance business, Rent4Keeps.
  • Over a third of Thacker's fortnightly disability pension went to appliance rental companies, leading to financial strife and rent arrears.
  • ASIC is taking legal action against Rent4Keeps Australia for alleged breaches of the Credit Act, accusing the company of avoiding protections for financially vulnerable consumers.
  • Despite her financial struggles and the ongoing lawsuit against Rent4Keeps, Thacker was signed up for another overpriced appliance, a washing machine costing more than three times its value.

Have you had any experiences with appliance rental stores? Do you think they are helpful? Share your stories in the comments below.
i am asking WHY DID SHE DO IT? 2+2=4 Never assume anyone is trying to help in business. I feel for this lady but why purchase for her mother? What a bloody mess.
 
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
52 weeks in a year.
 
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
No
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
No there are 52 WEEKS in a year but only 26 FORTNIGHTS! Are you on another planet?
 
Just maybe the person buying these things is a Mentally disabled person who does not understand how these rogue companies can trick them into believing they are helping people like this. I don't mean this to be nasty of the lady concerned. But people are saying Why does she not realise the actual cost of the items she buys Please do NOT criticise her.
 
This is called a SCAM. I call it stupidity at it's best. To get caught out once should be a lesson. To do it several times over is just crazy. Next time try a layby if you know what that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maggiej and magpie1
these are the worst Company's for anyone with financial problems to deal with....by the time you have ended up paying multiple upon multiple times what the product is actually worth....it's time to buy a new one again and you are out of pocket to the tune of many thousands of dollars. Stay well clear of these Company's...they are absolute disgusting predators and Rip off merchants. 🤬 BE WARNED.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
How many?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Chips
Sorry everyone, must have been suffering a seniors moment, of course there are 52 weeks in a year which obviously means there are 26 fortnights which also relates to there being 4.333 months in a year. I should check my typing before posting or, is it the other way round? Lol. I apologise to anyone who was confused and thank you all for correcting me.
 
Whilst I do not condone the flaunting of consumer laws by unconscionable retailers I would suggest that the simple use of a calculator by potential consumers would be an advantage viz. monthly payment x term of loan = Total cost of purchase. By the way, be careful if the payments are fortnightly, many people do not realize that there are 52 fortnights in a year.
Correction 26 .
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×