New Design
  1. Enable New Design

Remember when cash was king? Some experts say it could all vanish in just three years

News & Politics

Remember when cash was king? Some experts say it could all vanish in just three years

  • Maan
  • By Maan
image2.png Remember when cash was king? Some experts say it could all vanish in just three years
Cashless future debate heats up in Australia. Image source: Pexels/Ivan Samkov | Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.

Australia could be on the brink of a cashless revolution—but not everyone agrees on what that future should look like.



One leading economist claimed the country could eliminate notes and coins within three years.



But new figures revealed Australians were actually withdrawing more cash than ever before.





In this Article


Calls to phase out cash and tackle tax evasion



Professor Richard Holden, from the University of New South Wales, argued that phasing out cash would help stamp out tax evasion and deliver billions in extra GST revenue.



The Harvard-educated economist said the black economy was costing the government $10 billion a year and depriving workers of income tax relief.




‘I acknowledge it would need to be a transition and some people are very attached to cash, but I really think it will go the way of cheques.’

Prof Richard Holden



‘We could transition fully away from cash, I think it could be done in about three years or so—you'd probably start by eliminating the $100 bill and the $50 bill in a year and you work your way through.’



He added that those who used cash to dodge the system were costing honest Australians money.



‘We have very, very high income taxes and if we're leaving several billion dollars a year on the table, by letting tax cheats use cash to evade the taxes the rest of us pay, I just don't have a lot of sympathy for those people,’ he said.





Despite the decline in everyday banknote use, Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced a cash mandate starting in January 2026, which would require businesses to accept cash payments.



‘They're just playing politics,’ Prof Holden said.



‘I'm sure that's been focus grouped to death and that Jim thinks it's a political winner—that's fine, he's a politician, I'm an economist.’



With many banks shutting branches and removing ATMs, Prof Holden suggested Australia Post outlets could offer digital kiosks to help older Australians pay their bills.



‘As far as I'm aware, every town has an Australia Post outlet of some form or another,’ he said.



He dismissed privacy concerns about governments accessing bank records, saying such arguments were more about avoiding the tax office than protecting civil liberties.



‘The government can't just go and get your bank records without the appropriate legal right to do so,’ he said.



‘What are we trying to hide? What's the legitimate purpose of using cash to hide it from the ATO if it's not tax avoidance?’




Source: YouTube/Yahoo Australia





Cash infrastructure under threat as Armaguard struggles



But his call came as serious concerns were raised about Australia’s fragile cash distribution system.



Michelle McPhee, a Reserve Bank assistant governor, said the country’s near-monopoly cash transport company Armaguard was struggling to survive.



‘We saw cash use take a step level down during Covid and that created significant difficulties for those who distribute cash around the economy,’ she told the Economic Society of Australia.



She explained that servicing far-flung towns with dwindling cash demand was proving costly and difficult.



Armaguard, which controls around 90 per cent of the country’s banknote movements, recently merged with Prosegur and received a $25.5 million lifeline from banks, Coles, Woolworths, and Wesfarme


Cash use falls, but circulation hits record highs



Reserve Bank data revealed just 16 per cent of in-person transactions in 2022 were made using cash, fuelling the debate over its future.



Yet paradoxically, the amount of physical cash in circulation reached record highs, with $104.4 billion worth of banknotes currently in use and $245 million issued in just one week.



Cash withdrawals also surged, hitting $9.2 billion in June


The senior cash coalition



The statistics told a compelling story about who would be most affected by any rapid move to eliminate cash.



One in five individuals aged 65 and older still predominantly relied on cash for more than 80 per cent of their transactions.



These weren’t people clinging to outdated habits—they were Australians with legitimate concerns about digital payments.



Baby Boomers, aged 58 and above, had the highest average savings at $61,232, suggesting they had the financial means to adapt to digital payments if they chose to.



The fact that many didn’t spoke to deeper concerns about privacy, security, and simplicity.




Source: YouTube/9 News Australia



National Seniors Australia became a vocal advocate for cash accessibility, launching a ‘Keep Cash’ campaign that resonated with hundreds of thousands of older Australians.



Their concerns extended beyond mere preference—they included legitimate worries about online scams, system outages during natural disasters, and the basic right to financial privacy.



Just over one-quarter of respondents—regardless of how intensively they used cash—reported that they would experience a major inconvenience or genuine hardship if cash was hard to access or use, according to Reserve Bank research.



For a significant portion of the population, cash wasn’t just convenient—it was essential.



Did you know?

Did you know? Several other countries have already implemented cash mandates, including Spain, France, Norway and Denmark. Some US states like Massachusetts and New Jersey have similar laws. Australia wouldn’t be breaking new ground—it would be joining an international trend to protect cash access.




A separate RBA report found only 29 per cent of Australians carried no cash in 2022, meaning the majority still kept notes in their wallets.



Mr Bryce argued this proved ‘that 70 per cent of Aussies carry cash every day’.



Prof Holden, however, maintained that cash was not useful in the kinds of emergencies many thought it was.



‘There's a mass power outage: shops aren't going to be open, supermarkets, convenience stores, nobody opens their shop when the power's out,’ he said.




image1.png
RBA finds majority of Australians carry cash. Source: Pexels/SHVETS production
Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.


What happens next?



The coming months will be crucial for Australia’s cash future.



Armaguard’s funding runs until December, after which major stakeholders must decide whether to continue propping up cash infrastructure or let market forces determine its fate.



Meanwhile, Treasury is consulting on the cash mandate until 14 February 2025, with implementation planned for January 2026.



This timeline puts the government’s protective measures slightly ahead of any resolution to Armaguard’s crisis.



Professor Holden’s three-year elimination timeline seems increasingly unrealistic given political realities.



No government wants to disenfranchise 1.5 million voters, particularly when many of them are seniors who vote reliably.




The cash battleground: what you need to know


Government cash mandate for essential items starts January 2026.


Armaguard’s financial crisis threatens cash infrastructure nationwide.


18% of seniors (65+) are classified as high cash users vs 3% of under-50s.


1 in 5 seniors rely on cash for 80%+ of their transactions.


ATM numbers dropped 11% in just one year (2022–2023).


Over 25% of all Australians would face hardship if cash became difficult to access.




The more likely outcome is a gradual transition to a ‘low cash’ rather than ‘cashless’ society, with cash remaining available for essential purchases and vulnerable populations while digital payments continue to dominate everyday transactions.



What This Means For You


An economics professor argued that Australia could completely phase out cash within just three years, claiming the black economy was costing the government an estimated $10 billion a year in lost GST revenue.



Meanwhile, Armaguard—the country’s largest cash delivery company—needed a $25.5 million bailout just to stay afloat, highlighting the fragility of the system that keeps cash moving. Yet despite predictions that banknotes are on their way out, Australians withdrew a record $9.2 billion in cash this June, proving many still rely on notes and coins in their daily lives.



For older Australians, who have managed money through both change and stability, the question now is whether the nation’s future should be fully digital—or if there’s still a place for the reassurance of cash in hand.







Would you be ready to live in a completely cashless Australia within three years?

Last edited:

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
so, what is going to happen to people who will still be determined to use cash
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
Ah so that is the real reason they want to make a cashless society, to stop black market ,oh they will still find ways around it and still evade the tax.

can the government guarantee that payment methods don't crash. We saw this last year when banks crashed, eftpos machines went down including shops and people who didn't have cash were stuck.
Then SDC publishes this article in this morning's newsletter!

 
Cashless is a subtle con-job. History is important.

1. Banks were invented to securely store gold coins and bullion. It was safer to store a person's gold in a guarded bank vault than it was to keep their gold in the bedside drawer.

2. Money was invented to facilitate trade; it was a standardized means of exchange. In modern times, people no longer need to carry gold bullion.

3. A covenant is that a person could go to their bank and withdraw their gold.

4. In a cashless world, a person can only transfer that money to another financial institution, or turn it into an asset. You've lost the option of putting a $1000 in cash in your wallet, or on the mantle piece and 'doing nothing' with it.

5. What the banks and governments are doing is taking 'the ultimate control of your stored value' out of your hands and putting it in theirs.

6. Once ultimate control of your stored value is removed from your hands, the Banks and Governments have ultimate control over you. They can take your stored value and you've got to try and get it back.

7. The Banks and Government will decide when and if they're going restore permission for you to access and use your stored value. Ergo, they still have 'the ultimate control over your stored value'

8. One of the things I think people forget about new legislation is what else can it be used for?

The pro cashless always pitch it as though a cashless system's benefit is a fairer user pays system.

That is all fine until the day a government decides to raise the basic tax rate from 25% to 35%, or the Banks and Government decide to split the profits of imposing a 'transaction' fee - $1 or $2 a transaction.

9. I don't think many people grasp computer power. There are approximately 5 billion internet users. Each of those 5 billion in theory can open Google and type something into the search box.

Within 4 or 5 characters the computer program behind Google has analysed those characters and produced a drop list of possible results in about 2 or 3 seconds. Your search item is likely in the top 5 or 6 items on that drop list.

While the Google search engine was doing this for you, it was also capable of doing the same thing, at the same time, for the other 5 billion users.

The analytic potential of computing should feared. In a cashless future, computer power will profile people by cross referencing every transaction they make.

You might apply for a bank loan... the bank can look at what you've spent and comment that you spend too much 'luxuries' , or an insurance company could assess your life risk by looking at what you spend each week, the type of food you eat, whether you buy alcohol, or smokes etc.

I think people need to consider the worse that cashless can be used for, before being hooked by the convenience.

The Computer that exists in the world today should not be underestimated.

Recently, my computer started using AI... Google AI compiles a brief summary.... Copilot (which I turned off) will rewrite paragraphs and give me three alternate options.

When typing in Word, my autocomplete has become 'predictive'.... it appears to be analysing my document... and predicting what the rest of the sentence will be.... and the scary part of this is it is predicting the endings to sentences I'm copying out of a textbook sitting on my desk. This is making me wonder, has whatever Office 365 got going on managed to analyse the text to determine what book and page I'm using?
as you mentioned, banks and government are controling you. everywhere we are being "controlled" in some way in everything we dofrom walking (crosswalk controls) to flying in a plane (controlled where you sit etc). i don't want to be controlled on how \ where I can spend MY money or how much I am allowed to spen. if government and banks want us to use cards they should pay us to use them, not force us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
Does this professor want AI to also control us, really it isn't just the fact that the banks will charge on using the cards what about all the markets that are on during the weekends that only take cash or people who are on a budget and like using cash so they know how much they have for the week. It is senseless and not necessary to get rid of cash.
 
No i don't like it cashless i want to real MONEY that is not three years bugger Off or things might get WORSE if that happens
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS and Leenie
I was at a major entertainment venue last year when the EFTPOS system went down. They quickly went to 'cash only' until it was fixed. It wasn’t fixed until that night. I always keep some cash in the wallet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
It just isn’t sensable, cash doesn’t get affected by a power outage. I use both. Yesterday I wanted to leave a deposit on new glasses. Computer said no. Fortunately I always have cash, problem solved
 
NO
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
I'm one of those annoying people who doesn't use cash. I do have some in my purse but it's been there so long it's probably covered in cobwebs by now and don't ask me how much it is, I wouldn't have a clue! I drive an electric car so I don't have any fuel payments and about 99% of all my payments are done online. The other 1% is done by swiping my card at the point of payment. Works for me!
and how much do you pay in fees (over the price of the item)
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
If we go cashless are we going to be charged a fee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
A cashless society means that you will lose control of your money in the bank....the banks can control all of your investments with them and can add extra charges for your withdrawals for every purchase that you make, they can if they wanted limit the amount of your withdrawals at any one time and you will have no way of paying for any purchase if the power is disrupted. You effectively have lost all control of your purchasing power.
Cash is king and it should stay that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS and Leenie
I don’t believe that professor Holden lives in the real world. Nobody can pay anything when there’s a power outage and has he ever had his card blocked? I don’t think so. These are the real issues in our lives. He just deals in figures on paper, perhaps he needs to go out and try to survive just on a pension and have his card blocked? If things go the way he is suggesting there will be so many more people homeless and living on the streets, or doesn’t that make a difference to him? These things mean a lot to the older people in our country. Thank you and god bless all
 
I for one could live with a Cash regime of $5, $10 and $20 notes only. How about you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
Cashless society =
- no more garage sales, slipping spare change into charity collecting boxes and similar small transactions
- prices of everything will go up - including at farmers' and craft markets - to cover the costs of transactions
- greater risk of online scammers and thieves accessing your money
- increased banking charges (i.e. higher interests charge, lower interest paid to interest bearing accounts) to cover the increasing costs of trying to keep bank accounts safe from hackers.
- greater risk of getting too deeply into debt when you lose track of just how much you've spent on the 'little things' like the odd snack, coffee break, or lunch bought when doing the week's shopping
- no more tossing the excess change in a moneybox (or equivalent) so you can give yourself a treat when its full. No more kid's money boxes to try to teach them to save money.

Not for me, thanks
 
The government is behind the cashless push you realise
Yes, because they are doing what their masters at the WEF tell them How will they control the masses if we don’t comply. Another one people seem to forget remember Howard when pushing for GST that it would catch all the ones not paying their “Taxes “? and the GST would stop that, and stateswould drop Stamp Duties haaaaa that never happened either did it . We are heading to wards Communism faster than anyone realises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
I for one could live with a Cash regime of $5, $10 and $20 notes only. How about you.
No you would still need coins for change, or are you prepared to pay more for an item that costs less ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
Banks are rubbing their hands together at the thought of a cashless society so those pesky fees can be raised whenever they need a few billion dollars.Fight to keep cash at all costs
And more people will find themselves out of work .
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
I for one could live with a Cash regime of $5, $10 and $20 notes only. How about you.
Most definitely -notes of 50 and 100 are hard to change, however keep coins too
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
No they don't. They can happen any time in the 24 hours you cannot stop vehicles crashing into power poles or lightning striking electrical sub-stations!!!!!
You do realise I was mocking the learned professor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankS
CASH is King! Stupid idea to get rid of cash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: faymenai and FrankS

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×