Qantas flight attendant faces court after love triangle leads to violent altercation

The skies are often thought of as a place of tranquillity and professionalism, especially when it comes to the flight attendants who ensure passenger comfort and safety.

However, a recent incident involving two Qantas flight attendants has taken a dramatic turn, resulting in one attendant sustaining serious injuries and another's career hanging in the balance.



Arabella Kimberly Mai Lansdown, a 24-year-old Qantas flight attendant, faced the District Court in Brisbane and learned her actions could cost her the job she loved.

The incident in question? A single punch thrown in a moment of emotional turmoil that left her 50-year-old colleague in need of facial surgery, complete with titanium screws.


shutterstock_2235817339.jpg
A Qantas flight attendant violently confronted her colleague. Image source: Shutterstock



The altercation was the culmination of a personal drama that had been brewing for some time.

Lansdown had considered the victim a ‘confidante’, but the revelation that her colleague had been involved with her ex-partner shattered that trust.

On November 26, 2022, Lansdown confronted the woman at her home, and upon the admission and apology for the affair, Lansdown delivered the punch that would have far-reaching consequences.



The victim's injuries were severe, including a fractured cheekbone, upper jaw, and eye socket.

District Court Judge Vicki Loury KC said: ‘It was in that emotional circumstance you delivered the single punch to her face.’

‘Perhaps, unfortunately for you, that single punch caused significant injury,’ the judge added.

The physical damage was compounded by ongoing numbness and psychological distress.

However, Judge Loury mentioned that the woman did not wish harm on Lansdown and urged the court to show leniency in sentencing.

Judge Loury stated: ‘She writes: “May this (victim impact statement) along with your own stress be punishment enough.”’



In court, Lansdown pleaded guilty to a single charge of grievous bodily harm. Her defence highlighted her previously unblemished record and the emotional context of the incident.

Lansdown, who had been with Qantas since high school through an Indigenous traineeship, was described as well-regarded and her actions as entirely out of character.

The defence argued that the injuries were borderline with an assault occasioning actual bodily harm—a point the judge firmly disputed, emphasising the seriousness of the injuries caused by just one blow.

‘She’s responsible for the injuries, whether she intended them or not,’ the judge said.

Lansdown's personal struggles, including prejudice faced in her childhood and the emotional toll of her breakup, were also presented to the court, along with her efforts to make amends through compensation and a letter of remorse.

In the end, Judge Loury handed down an 18-month jail term, suspended for two years, and ordered Lansdown to pay $2,000 in compensation to the victim.
Key Takeaways
  • A Qantas flight attendant punched a colleague after discovering she had been involved with her ex-partner, causing severe injuries requiring surgery.
  • Arabella Kimberly Mai Lansdown faced sentencing in Brisbane's District Court and was convicted of grievous bodily harm.
  • The victim, a 50-year-old woman, suffered a fractured cheekbone, upper jaw, and eye socket, necessitating titanium screws and plates for repair.
  • The judge handed Lansdown an 18-month jail term, suspended for two years, and ordered her to pay $2,000 compensation to the victim.
How do you feel about the court's decision in this case? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Very sad when any one breaks up for a relationship, plus on top a colleague also had been involve romantically seeing the OP.
However. if the colleague is owning up and apologising such a response of punching the person is not the the way of dealing with things no matter how annoying and disappointing that person actions may have been.
But to take violent retribution against the confessor is wrong no matter how instantly reactive is wrong.

We hear and see the continuous narrative about male violence against women but the narrative should be (No violence against any person).
This person caused extensive facial damage to a person face that and may have ongoing compilations.
Not to mention the possibility of a far worse outcome had the assaulted person fallen and possible hit there head or damaged another part of their body as a result of such a blow.
There is no excuse for any violence unless you are put in a position self defense if being physically attacked.

I find the sentence some what lenient but don't know the exact details admittedly but maybe an additional 300hrs community service and an organize tour of an assault ward if such a thing exists in a hospital to see the damage and trauma such actions can cause could have been considered and added at the very least plus payment of all medical bills might have been a better option.
I can't imagine $2000.00 dollars would likely cover all medical bills for such injuries.
I can't help but wonder if the perpetrator had been a male would they have received the same judgment and penalty.
 
Possible loss of job????? No way should she be responsible for other peoples safety. Again is her culture responsible for the light sentence?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: maherdj and Jennie
she should have to pay much more..there is absolutely no case for violence ...EVER And just because you regret it ..is not punishment enough. the injuries the victim received will recur in her life in future, and will never be forgotten. There are things one cant say sorry for, how many "one punch 'deaths have occurred over silly events , how can you say sorry for death and how can one know if a person has a weak heart or something ....there is NEVER a reason for violence
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Was this sentence the result of Police charges or Civil action by the aggrieved person?

If this was Police action does the aggrieved person have an opportunity to sue the lady who did the assault?

In this situation Civil action may see a bigger payout for injury, medical bills, ongoing treatment (if any), etc.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×