Price tag dilemma: Australians grapple with grocery costs in the age of budgeting
- Replies 15
In the midst of a cost of living crisis, Australians are tightening their belts and looking for every possible way to stretch their dollars further.
Budgeting has become more than just a savvy habit; it's a necessity for many, especially for our senior community members who often live on fixed incomes.
However, what happens when you can't even find out how much your groceries will cost until you reach the checkout?
This is the reality for shoppers in some smaller stores and remote communities across Australia, where there is no legal requirement for price displays on shelves.
The absence of visible pricing is more than just an inconvenience; it's a barrier to effective budgeting and informed decision-making.
Without price tags, how can one compare costs, seek out the best deals, or stick to a budget?
This issue has sparked a debate on whether it's time for Australia to mandate grocery price displays in all stores, regardless of size.
Currently, Australian Consumer Law mandates that larger stores display price-per-unit costs for all goods sold.
This means shoppers at supermarkets like Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI can see the total price as well as the cost per kilogram or item.
However, this requirement does not extend to stores with a physical size of less than 1,000 square metres, leaving a loophole that affects many smaller retailers and disproportionately impacts remote communities.
Consumer advocates and public health experts are raising their voices, calling for change.
They argue that the lack of pricing transparency is leaving shoppers ‘flying blind’, making it harder for people to manage their finances effectively.
Authorities state that they desire and anticipate all stores to display prices; however, there seems to be no specific legislation in place to enforce this requirement.
Shoppers in regional towns find the situation frustrating and perplexing.
‘If this was happening in an urban setting, the outrage that would come from the community would be huge, and the government would be listening,’ consumer advocate Lynda Edwards stated.
‘How are people supposed to budget for their shopping if there are no prices?’
Valerie Cox, a pensioner from Broome in northern Western Australia, reported that she has encountered stores in her area without any displayed prices.
‘When things don't have a price, sometimes you buy it, and it's much more than you thought it was,’ she said.
‘Or you have to go up and ask how much it is. All the shops should have prices on everything.’
The situation is particularly dire in remote Aboriginal communities, where the absence of price tags, especially on healthy food options, is contributing to financial stress and poor dietary choices.
‘In recent trips to Arnhem Land, we noticed it was mostly healthy food that didn't have prices, which is disturbing because people are less likely to buy them,’ Bettina Cooper, lead of the Indigenous consumer support service Mob Strong Debt Help, shared.
‘How can we expect people to improve their quality of life and their health and manage their money if the stores aren't doing things to help them?’
Ms Cooper pointed out a double standard, noting that fundamental consumer rights are frequently neglected in remote areas of the country.
‘We keep talking about closing the gap, yet we don't provide people with the same essential pricing options to be able to buy things that are healthy and affordable,’ she said.
‘We need to provide the same standards as we do for people in the rest of Australia.’
In a joint statement, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones emphasised their desire for stores to display prices.
‘In general, businesses should communicate the total price payable in some way prior to purchase,’ the statement said.
‘If a business does not communicate prices in any way prior to purchase, this may constitute misleading conduct under the Australian Consumer Law.’
However, the legislation permits businesses to convey prices through various means, including verbally.
There seems to be little application or enforcement of the laws regarding the common failure of stores to display visible prices.
In a recent submission to the government, a coalition of consumer advocacy groups highlighted an instance involving an overpriced mop bucket sold in a remote Western Australian community.
‘In this instance, the client purchased a mop bucket from the store for $69,’ the submission stated.
‘The price of the mop bucket was not displayed in the store, and the client was only made aware of the price once it was scanned at the check-out.’
‘Online research later revealed that the bucket and mop was available for $41 at other retail stores,’ it continued.
The complaint was forwarded to Consumer Protection WA, and a regional officer spoke with the store about the issue, but no further action was taken.
Consumer groups are optimistic that mandatory pricing regulations are on the horizon, as the issue is currently under review by two different government bodies.
The federal government has revealed plans to strengthen the Unit Pricing Code, including evaluating whether to ‘expand the scope of retailers covered by the code’.
This could lead to small stores also needing to provide a detailed breakdown of the cost of each item.
The government is also working on a national strategy to enhance food supply in remote communities.
Set to be finalised next year, the strategy aims to establish guidelines that will improve the quality, affordability, and reliability of grocery supplies in Aboriginal communities.
Public health experts are advocating for mandatory price displays as part of these efforts.
‘If prices aren't available in stores, it's difficult for families to prepare that budget and make healthy choices, so that is one area we'd really like to see some action on,’ Curtin University's Melissa Stoneham stated.
‘Imagine if people in Sydney had to go to Woollies or Coles and do their shop without prices—imagine how hard it would make it for you to meet your cost of living goals.’
Ms Edwards, a Wangkumara-Barkindji woman and capability coordinator at Financial Counselling Australia, believes there is a strong case and desire for change.
‘Because these communities are very small, they do seem to be overlooked in terms of what's fair,’ she explained.
‘And it's causing embarrassment and shame for people because they'll take things up to the cash register and realise they don't have enough money to afford it.’
‘People are talking about this now, so we just need to hope there can be some changes to laws that can make it through parliament,’ Ms Edwards added.
As consumers grapple with the frustration of grocery stores lacking visible pricing, the issue of transparency in the food retail sector takes on greater urgency.
With shoppers feeling vulnerable to inconsistent pricing practices, many are left questioning the legitimacy of the labels and claims made by supermarkets.
This concern leads to a broader discussion about whether these retail giants are indeed playing tricks on customers with misleading labels and promotions.
Understanding these tactics is essential for consumers to protect themselves and make informed purchasing decisions.
Have you encountered difficulties with unmarked prices in your local stores? How important is visible pricing to your budgeting practices? We invite you to share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.
Budgeting has become more than just a savvy habit; it's a necessity for many, especially for our senior community members who often live on fixed incomes.
However, what happens when you can't even find out how much your groceries will cost until you reach the checkout?
This is the reality for shoppers in some smaller stores and remote communities across Australia, where there is no legal requirement for price displays on shelves.
The absence of visible pricing is more than just an inconvenience; it's a barrier to effective budgeting and informed decision-making.
Without price tags, how can one compare costs, seek out the best deals, or stick to a budget?
This issue has sparked a debate on whether it's time for Australia to mandate grocery price displays in all stores, regardless of size.
In Australia, small stores aren’t legally required to display shelf prices, making it challenging for consumers to budget and make informed choices. Credit: Shutterstock
Currently, Australian Consumer Law mandates that larger stores display price-per-unit costs for all goods sold.
This means shoppers at supermarkets like Coles, Woolworths, and ALDI can see the total price as well as the cost per kilogram or item.
However, this requirement does not extend to stores with a physical size of less than 1,000 square metres, leaving a loophole that affects many smaller retailers and disproportionately impacts remote communities.
Consumer advocates and public health experts are raising their voices, calling for change.
They argue that the lack of pricing transparency is leaving shoppers ‘flying blind’, making it harder for people to manage their finances effectively.
Authorities state that they desire and anticipate all stores to display prices; however, there seems to be no specific legislation in place to enforce this requirement.
Shoppers in regional towns find the situation frustrating and perplexing.
‘If this was happening in an urban setting, the outrage that would come from the community would be huge, and the government would be listening,’ consumer advocate Lynda Edwards stated.
‘How are people supposed to budget for their shopping if there are no prices?’
Valerie Cox, a pensioner from Broome in northern Western Australia, reported that she has encountered stores in her area without any displayed prices.
‘When things don't have a price, sometimes you buy it, and it's much more than you thought it was,’ she said.
‘Or you have to go up and ask how much it is. All the shops should have prices on everything.’
The situation is particularly dire in remote Aboriginal communities, where the absence of price tags, especially on healthy food options, is contributing to financial stress and poor dietary choices.
‘In recent trips to Arnhem Land, we noticed it was mostly healthy food that didn't have prices, which is disturbing because people are less likely to buy them,’ Bettina Cooper, lead of the Indigenous consumer support service Mob Strong Debt Help, shared.
‘How can we expect people to improve their quality of life and their health and manage their money if the stores aren't doing things to help them?’
Ms Cooper pointed out a double standard, noting that fundamental consumer rights are frequently neglected in remote areas of the country.
‘We keep talking about closing the gap, yet we don't provide people with the same essential pricing options to be able to buy things that are healthy and affordable,’ she said.
‘We need to provide the same standards as we do for people in the rest of Australia.’
In a joint statement, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones emphasised their desire for stores to display prices.
‘In general, businesses should communicate the total price payable in some way prior to purchase,’ the statement said.
‘If a business does not communicate prices in any way prior to purchase, this may constitute misleading conduct under the Australian Consumer Law.’
However, the legislation permits businesses to convey prices through various means, including verbally.
There seems to be little application or enforcement of the laws regarding the common failure of stores to display visible prices.
In a recent submission to the government, a coalition of consumer advocacy groups highlighted an instance involving an overpriced mop bucket sold in a remote Western Australian community.
‘In this instance, the client purchased a mop bucket from the store for $69,’ the submission stated.
‘The price of the mop bucket was not displayed in the store, and the client was only made aware of the price once it was scanned at the check-out.’
‘Online research later revealed that the bucket and mop was available for $41 at other retail stores,’ it continued.
The complaint was forwarded to Consumer Protection WA, and a regional officer spoke with the store about the issue, but no further action was taken.
Consumer groups are optimistic that mandatory pricing regulations are on the horizon, as the issue is currently under review by two different government bodies.
The federal government has revealed plans to strengthen the Unit Pricing Code, including evaluating whether to ‘expand the scope of retailers covered by the code’.
This could lead to small stores also needing to provide a detailed breakdown of the cost of each item.
The government is also working on a national strategy to enhance food supply in remote communities.
Set to be finalised next year, the strategy aims to establish guidelines that will improve the quality, affordability, and reliability of grocery supplies in Aboriginal communities.
Public health experts are advocating for mandatory price displays as part of these efforts.
‘If prices aren't available in stores, it's difficult for families to prepare that budget and make healthy choices, so that is one area we'd really like to see some action on,’ Curtin University's Melissa Stoneham stated.
‘Imagine if people in Sydney had to go to Woollies or Coles and do their shop without prices—imagine how hard it would make it for you to meet your cost of living goals.’
Ms Edwards, a Wangkumara-Barkindji woman and capability coordinator at Financial Counselling Australia, believes there is a strong case and desire for change.
‘Because these communities are very small, they do seem to be overlooked in terms of what's fair,’ she explained.
‘And it's causing embarrassment and shame for people because they'll take things up to the cash register and realise they don't have enough money to afford it.’
‘People are talking about this now, so we just need to hope there can be some changes to laws that can make it through parliament,’ Ms Edwards added.
As consumers grapple with the frustration of grocery stores lacking visible pricing, the issue of transparency in the food retail sector takes on greater urgency.
With shoppers feeling vulnerable to inconsistent pricing practices, many are left questioning the legitimacy of the labels and claims made by supermarkets.
This concern leads to a broader discussion about whether these retail giants are indeed playing tricks on customers with misleading labels and promotions.
Understanding these tactics is essential for consumers to protect themselves and make informed purchasing decisions.
.png){kind=icon}
️
