Park visits could look different under new 'cash grab' regulations

Imagine this: you’re planning a family picnic under the Harbour Bridge, or perhaps a relaxing afternoon stroll with your mates and the grandkids in your favourite local park.

You pack the thermos, the lamingtons, and the footy, only to discover there’s a new sign at the gate: 'Fees Apply for Groups Over 20.'

Sound unbelievable? Well, it could soon be a reality for Sydneysiders—and possibly the rest of Australia—if a controversial new proposal goes ahead.


North Sydney Council is considering a move that’s left many locals gobsmacked: introducing fees for groups of more than 20 people using public parks.

The idea is to target commercial operators—think fitness bootcamps, dog walkers, and even schools—who, according to the council, have been 'hogging' these green spaces, sometimes to the detriment of everyday park-goers.


1756774113960.png
North Sydney Council is weighing up fees for groups of over 20 in public parks, aimed at commercial users such as trainers, schools and dog walkers. Credit: SolStock / iStock


It’s not just about the odd yoga class or a few students kicking a ball around.

Some private schools, like St Aloysius’ College and Marist College, have been using parks such as Bradfield Park and Ted Mack Civic Park for lunch breaks and sports while their own facilities are under renovation.

The council says this has led to overcrowding, noise, and parking headaches for locals.


If the proposal goes through, it won’t just be schools and businesses feeling the pinch. Any group of more than 20 people—think big family reunions, birthday parties, or community gatherings—could be asked to pay up.

And it doesn’t stop there: the council is also looking to ban marquees, tents, confetti, uncooked rice, synthetic flower petals, and coloured powders, making it harder to host weddings and other celebrations in these public spaces.

While North Sydney hasn’t set its prices yet, a look at neighbouring councils gives us a taste of what’s to come.

In Woollahra, hiring a park for a function can set you back $327 per hour. The Northern Beaches? A whopping $483 per hour. Even Lane Cove, which charges a relatively modest $30, asks commercial dog walkers and personal trainers to fork out up to $2,400 a year for a permit.

Mosman tops the charts with fees reaching $1,019 for certain events.


The council insists this isn’t about plugging budget holes or 'revenue raising.' North Sydney Mayor Zoe Baker says it’s about 'fairness and equity'—making sure that those who use public spaces for business or large gatherings contribute to their upkeep.

She points out that ratepayers have complained about parks being turned into 'business hubs' and 'student playgrounds,' leaving less room for everyone else.

But not everyone’s convinced. Some local business owners and celebrants have labelled the move a 'cash grab,' arguing that public parks should remain free for all.

Others admit that a few bad apples—those who leave rubbish behind or blast loud music—have spoiled things for everyone.

Here’s the worrying bit: North Sydney isn’t alone. Councils across Sydney and beyond are already charging for park use, especially for commercial activities. If this trend continues, we could see similar rules popping up in cities and towns across Australia.


And it’s not just about money. The council is also under financial pressure after a failed attempt to hike residential rates by 87 per cent (yes, you read that right!) and ongoing costs from the redevelopment of the North Sydney Olympic Pool.

They’ve even asked private schools to voluntarily pay rates, but most have politely declined.

For many of us, public parks are more than just patches of grass—they’re the heart of our communities.

They’re where we catch up with friends, watch the grandkids play, or simply enjoy a bit of fresh air.

The idea of having to pay for the privilege, or being told we can’t set up a marquee for a special occasion, feels like a step too far.


On the other hand, it’s true that parks need to be looked after, and that costs money. If commercial operators are making a profit from public spaces, is it fair that they chip in? Or does this risk turn our parks into exclusive zones, only accessible to those who can afford the fees?

The council is currently seeking feedback from the community before making a final decision.

So, if you have strong feelings about this—one way or the other—now’s the time to speak up!
Key Takeaways
  • North Sydney Council is considering introducing fees for groups of more than 20 people using public parks, targeting commercial users like fitness trainers, schools, and dog walkers.
  • The proposed fees aim to address complaints from locals about businesses and schools ‘hogging’ public spaces, disturbing others with noise, and contributing to parking issues.
  • The policy would also ban certain park activities – including weddings with marquees, tents, confetti, or synthetic petals – in addition to requiring payment for large group gatherings.
  • Several councils in Sydney already charge for commercial park use, raising concerns that fees could become more widespread, with costs ranging from $30 up to $2,400 depending on the council and activity.
Would you be happy to pay a fee to use your local park for a big family gathering? Do you think commercial operators should pay more, or is this just another way for councils to squeeze more money out of us? Have you noticed your local park getting busier or harder to access? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Read more: NSW national parks proposal to standardise camping fees amid rise in 'ghost camping'
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Commercial operators, yes! If they are using the venue to make money, why shouldn't they pay? They would have to lease premises otherwise.

Family gatherings, charities and not-for-profits, NO. Ratepayer-funded facilities are there for the people. And the people should be able to use them without copping unaffordable costs - though there should be sensible limits on erecting tents or marquees or throwing rice, confetti etc. and penalties for leaving a mess. There should definitely be reasonable limits on noise, to protect the rights of others using the park. And there should be no exclusivity. Telling others they can't use the facilities because a party is in progress should be a punishable offence.

Charging for the use of parks for a child's birthday party or a family reunion effectively makes the park a venue for the more affluent only, and that's not what community facilities should be. Society is in a sad state when a battler can't host a party for the child because parks aren't accessible to groups who can't pay. What next? Fees for everyone? Charges to visit the beach? A society in which only the well-heeled can enjoy outdoor facilities that everyone pays to build and maintain? (Yes, everyone. Because rent and even room-rent costs include a component to cover the rates the landlord pays.)
 
We won’t be able to afford to live in this country soon, it will be just for the rich and famous !
 
I have no problems with commercial enterprises being charged to use public facilities - they are displacing the general public when they do! And the more people invariably means more litter, more damage to be repaired - more cost to the general public in terms of maintenance, normally covered by rates.

BUT it really gives me the horrors to learn that private schools do not pay rates. They are just another business, so why not?
 
Well they have asked the community for feedback.....so let them know loud and clear that we DON'T want charges applied to local community members for their attendance to PUBLIC PARKS AND GARDENS.....SIMPLE.

Who knows what will be next?.....maybe they will start charging the public for all of these protest marches that seem to be popping up every second day of the week....guess that anything is possible these days as our Country's population is rapidly increasing in different ways and more and more people I'm assuming are wanting to use these beautiful outdoor public spaces.
 
I PERSONALLY DON'T USE ANY OF THESE FACILITIES SO AM I ENTITLED TO A REDUCTION OF MY BLOODY EXORBITANT RATES CHARGED. AS SOON AS THEY MAKE THE STATEMENT IT'S NOT ABOOUT REVEMUE RAISING TO USE OUR NOT SO ILLUSTRIOUS P/M'S WORDING IT'S BULLSHIT.
 
Last edited:
Public means for the general population, and provided for the public….but excludes the private sector…..If the private sector wants to make use of a public facility, then they should pay for the use instead of using it to get out of paying for another venue…..After all, the public have to pay a fee to access private facilities and functions……Of course everyone should have access to public parks as long as it’s for leisure and not for hosting an event…..we all pay council rates and we should enjoy and respect all that is available. People wanting to host an event with a probably large attendance, should absolutely pay for the privilege or host it at another venue, even cap the number of children having birthday parties if there is likely to be a lot of noise and running around …….children need to be watched and looked out for because a public park is generally a large area, and children can get lost in seconds, so a smaller number is a little easier to control……..Apparently there is a debate happening on the topic of private schools which do not pay rates…..the question of whether they pay rates or not is made by council and/or government 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Littleboy8
Public means for the general population, and provided for the public….but excludes the private sector…..If the private sector wants to make use of a public facility, then they should pay for the use instead of using it to get out of paying for another venue…..After all, the public have to pay a fee to access private facilities and functions……Of course everyone should have access to public parks as long as it’s for leisure and not for hosting an event…..we all pay council rates and we should enjoy and respect all that is available. People wanting to host an event with a probably large attendance, should absolutely pay for the privilege or host it at another venue, even cap the number of children having birthday parties if there is likely to be a lot of noise and running around …….children need to be watched and looked out for because a public park is generally a large area, and children can get lost in seconds, so a smaller number is a little easier to control……..Apparently there is a debate happening on the topic of private schools which do not pay rates…..the question of whether they pay rates or not is made by council and/or government 🤷‍♂️
You would want to also keep a close eye on young children in large public parks....the parks can also attract some very "disturbed" and/or dangerous people at times.
 
You would want to also keep a close eye on young children in large public parks....the parks can also attract some very "disturbed" and/or dangerous people at times.
Yes, exactly……and children have an inborn ability to want to explore and hide……
 
Yes, exactly……and children have an inborn ability to want to explore and hide……
Yep, that's what we used to do at the local footy park....play hide and seek in all of the bushes and up the Pine trees. ;)
 
OMG please don't anybody tell Jacinta! shudder..
 
I have no problems with commercial enterprises being charged to use public facilities - they are displacing the general public when they do! And the more people invariably means more litter, more damage to be repaired - more cost to the general public in terms of maintenance, normally covered by rates.

BUT it really gives me the horrors to learn that private schools do not pay rates. They are just another business, so why not?
Just another business? I wonder what would be the consequences if they closed down, just like any other business. I know who would not be commenting then!
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×