New Design
  1. Enable New Design

Opposition leader signals Centrelink cuts! Here’s what they don't want you to know

News & Politics

Opposition leader signals Centrelink cuts! Here’s what they don't want you to know

1758158671357.png Opposition leader signals Centrelink cuts! Here’s what they don't want you to know
Age Pension lifeline under political threat. Image source: Pexels/Kindel Media | Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.

The numbers painted a sobering picture of modern Australia. Nearly two in three older Australians depended on the Age Pension to survive, with many saying it was the thin line between security and hardship. Now, Sussan Ley’s warning suggested that this fragile balance could soon be under threat.




In her first major economic speech as Opposition Leader, Ley argued that Australia’s welfare system had created too much dependency. She declared it had become ‘taboo’ to suggest that ‘not everyone is entitled to every government benefit.’ For millions of seniors who relied on the pension system, her words raised fears of potential changes that could reshape their financial stability.



In this article



The First Woman at the Helm



Ley made history as the first woman to lead the Liberal Party, the Coalition, and serve as Leader of the Opposition at the federal level. Yet her rise was not built on symbolism alone.



Her background included a Bachelor of Economics, Master of Taxation Law, and a Master of Accounting—credentials that gave her economic arguments weight. Before entering Parliament in 2001, she worked as a commercial pilot, a farmer, and later as a senior officer with the Australian Taxation Office, eventually becoming Director of Technical Training.



Her path was far from smooth. She resigned as Health Minister in 2017 amid controversy over travel expenses. But her narrow victory over Angus Taylor in the leadership ballot, with 29 votes to 25, showed the party placed its confidence in her economic credibility.




‘Unfortunately, in the past few years, the pendulum has swung too far toward dependency.’

Sussan Ley, Committee for Economic Development of Australia




The Age Pension in Real Life



The Age Pension was not simply a number on a government ledger. It was the primary income source for 39 per cent of Australians over 67 receiving the full pension and 24 per cent receiving a part pension.



For single pensioners, the maximum payment was $959.70 per fortnight, or about $24,952 per year. For many, this modest amount allowed them to pay rent, keep food on the table, and maintain independence.



In September 2025, indexation brought a small but welcome rise—an extra $29.70 per fortnight for singles. While a relief, these increases often barely kept pace with rising living costs.



Beyond the base payment, seniors relied on a patchwork of supplements and concessions. The Energy Supplement provided help with power bills. Pharmaceutical allowances cut the cost of essential medicines. The Pensioner Concession Card meant discounted transport, cheaper healthcare, and utility relief. For those living with chronic conditions or in areas with limited public transport, these benefits were not perks but lifelines.




Age Pension Basics (September 2025)


Singles: $959.70 per fortnight ($24,952 per year)


Couples (each): $774.30 per fortnight ($20,132 per year)


Includes pension supplement and energy supplement—Automatic increases every March and September based on inflation—Recipients also receive Pensioner Concession Card benefits





A Spending Debate with High Stakes



Ley argued that government spending had reached 27 per cent of gross domestic product—the highest level outside of a recession since 1986. Her claim tapped into long-standing debates about dependency versus sustainability.



The numbers told another story, however. In 2021–22, welfare services and payments amounted to $212.4 billion, with the Commonwealth funding 88 per cent of that figure.



Compared internationally, Australia’s spending was far from extravagant. Countries like Finland spent 22 per cent of GDP on welfare, while Italy and France hovered around 21 per cent. Australia’s expenditure sat below the OECD median, showing a more restrained system than many believed.




Safety Net or Dependency Trap?



At the heart of Ley’s speech was a philosophical question. She warned that ‘a welfare system that attempts to be all things to all people will eventually collapse under its own weight.’



Critics of welfare expansion argued it discouraged work and saving. Supporters countered that pensions upheld dignity and security for those who had worked all their lives.



For seniors, the debate carried special weight. Unlike unemployment benefits, the Age Pension was not temporary but permanent recognition that decades of labour deserved security in retirement. Many older Australians had spent their working years before compulsory superannuation existed, leaving them reliant on government support as a necessity rather than a choice.




Where Might the Cuts Land?



Ley had not yet specified what changes a Coalition government might pursue. But her emphasis on ‘genuine need’ suggested stricter means testing could be on the horizon.



That could mean part-pension recipients—often with modest savings or assets—might lose access. Supplementary payments, such as the Energy or Pharmaceutical Supplements, might be reduced or eliminated.



Eligibility for concession cards could be tightened, leaving many seniors paying more for healthcare and transport. Home care packages, already stretched thin, could face further delays or reduced funding.



Did you know?


Australia’s Age Pension history Australia’s Age Pension was first introduced in 1909, making it one of the earliest old-age pensions in the world. It began as a means-tested payment for those over 65 who had lived in Australia for at least 25 years. Today, means testing remains, but with more generous income and asset thresholds.




More than Numbers: The Human Impact



The risks of welfare cuts extended far beyond budget figures. For many seniors, the Age Pension supported basic housing stability. Rent assistance made the difference between keeping a roof overhead or slipping into homelessness.



Healthcare was another critical area. Bulk billing and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme subsidies meant retirees could afford to see doctors and buy prescriptions. Without these, chronic illnesses could quickly spiral into crises.



Even social connection depended on concessions. Discounted fares let seniors visit family, attend community events, and maintain vital support networks.



And then there was dignity. A regular, reliable income allowed older Australians to manage small luxuries, unexpected bills, or simple independence without leaning on family.



The COVID-19 pandemic showed how fragile life could be. Seniors were hit hardest by isolation and rising costs, and government support proved critical. Cuts now, many argued, could leave them dangerously exposed to the next crisis.




Learning from Abroad



Other nations had grappled with similar dilemmas. In the United Kingdom, post-GFC austerity measures slashed services, and older people bore much of the burden. Nordic countries, by contrast, maintained generous welfare and still managed robust growth.



The lesson seemed clear: balance was difficult but possible. Sustainability need not mean stripping away dignity.



The Political Divide



The Albanese Government resisted claims of reckless spending. They pointed to achieving budget surpluses in their first term before a return to deficit, and argued recent spending was necessary to support health, disability services, and cost-of-living relief during inflationary pressures.



Labor claimed that sustaining welfare bolstered consumer confidence and preserved Australia’s AAA credit rating. Cutting payments during a cost-of-living crisis, they warned, risked worsening the economy by slashing the spending power of low-income households.




What This Means for Australian Seniors



  • No immediate changes are proposed—this is opposition policy positioning

  • Any cuts would likely affect part-pension recipients first

  • Supplementary payments and concessions could face review

  • International comparisons suggest Australia’s welfare spending is moderate

  • Stay informed through official government sources about any proposed changes

  • Consider reviewing your financial situation and exploring additional income sources





Preparing for an Uncertain Future



For now, Age Pension recipients continued receiving payments as usual. But the debate stirred unease about what might come next.



Financial experts urged seniors to review income sources, consider whether part-time work or additional super contributions were feasible, and seek advice from financial counsellors where possible.



Community groups and advocacy organisations remained vital voices, providing seniors with updates and pushing back against proposals that threatened vulnerable groups. Staying connected to Services Australia and the Department of Social Services also ensured access to accurate information rather than speculation.



The Bigger Picture



Ley described her approach as ‘sustainable compassion’—an attempt to protect those most in need while trimming what she considered excess. But defining ‘genuine need’ would always be contentious.



With an ageing population and increasing life expectancy, the pressure on welfare would only intensify. For many seniors, the pension was not about dependency but about the social contract that recognised their contribution to the nation.



Her narrow leadership victory suggested even within her own party, opinions differed on how far reforms should go. The future of welfare remained an open debate—one that would likely dominate political discourse in the years to come.



What This Means For You


The Age Pension supported nearly two-thirds of Australians over 67, making it a cornerstone of retirement security for most seniors. Yet Sussan Ley’s warning that welfare dependency had gone too far raised fears that stricter means testing could be on the way. This came despite the fact that Australia’s welfare spending sat below the OECD median, challenging the idea that the nation was overspending.



For older Australians, the reality was clear—any cuts would not just be numbers on a budget sheet but would hit housing, healthcare, and dignity directly. Seniors who had worked their whole lives to build modern Australia deserved stability in retirement, not uncertainty about losing the support that kept them afloat.




The debate over welfare reform isn’t just political—it has very real consequences for those who rely on payments to make ends meet.



One recent change already making waves involves the government’s deeming rates, which directly affect how much support recipients keep in their pocket.



To understand how quickly a policy shift can reduce payments, here’s a closer look at a major update that recently hit thousands of people.



Read more: Your age pension could drop by $203 a fortnight: Major deeming rate changes hit 460,000 Australians





Losing access to a pension is more than losing money—it is losing independence, dignity, and peace of mind—so what part of this welfare debate worries you the most?

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
The liberal leader seems to be out of touch of what’s happening to the dire needs of the Australian seniors nowadays, I don’t think she will be a very popular and wise leader - actually elders pensioners should be at least $1,000 or more each since Australia’s population is only 27 millions compared to US or UK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
If they want to cut money from Centrelink payments, why not target the real drainers in this country - the dole bludgers who have been draining Australia for decades and the ones who refuse to work ..... leave us pensioners alone; we have done our dues!
 
If they want to cut money from Centrelink payments, why not target the real drainers in this country - the dole bludgers who have been draining Australia for decades and the ones who refuse to work ..... leave us pensioners alone; we have done our dues!
Good idea, and includre the aboriginals with their welfare, freebies, and corrupt organisations too.
 
Why is she a racist for pointing out what those low class feral people from the the Middle East are doing to their host country? So why GoodEnough? Answer please.
Racism is the belief or claim that because some members of a particular group are bad people, then all members of that group (that they cannot avoid being pat of (e.g. "from the middle east") are bad people. Writing as if all people from the middle east are low class feral people simply is racism. by definition.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
If they want to cut money from Centrelink payments, why not target the real drainers in this country - the dole bludgers who have been draining Australia for decades and the ones who refuse to work ..... leave us pensioners alone; we have done our dues!
It's not the poorest who are draining Australia. It's the richest, who have obscene wealth and pay no tax..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
Instead of cutting the pension, they should cut the pay of politicians. Also why should politicians get a pension as soon as they finish in politics. They're still young enough to work
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nantes
  • Haha
Reactions: GoodEnough
It's not the poorest who are draining Australia. It's the richest, who have obscene wealth and pay no tax..
Specific examples please.
 
Lets just look at the over payed retirement fund these polies get when they retire, Elbows and his past at that level get free travel not only for them but family as well a commonwealth car complete with driver,PLUS A PENSION that would make one's eyes water about 4 plus times what we get and all on the public purse, Elbows pays no tax at his level of Government, plus all his extras, then look at what the rest get $200,000 plus a year, then a very generous living away from home while at Canberra attending parliament, food etc the list goes on yet the rest of us are expected to pay our own way ?? Yet these people live off the public purse and milk it for all it's worth then say we get to much come down to our level and try it see how long you last with out commonwealth cars all food and bills payed by the public purse, Elbows living in the government house has no bills out going or other wise, all he got is clothes to pay for then gets 500,000 plus tax free each year what a rout and we get screwed to the wall and hear them say sorry while smiling at us they could not give a shit about us at all
You hit the nail right on the head, they don’t give damn about us as long as we’re stupid enough to vote for them again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
Lets just look at the over payed retirement fund these polies get when they retire, Elbows and his past at that level get free travel not only for them but family as well a commonwealth car complete with driver,PLUS A PENSION that would make one's eyes water about 4 plus times what we get and all on the public purse, Elbows pays no tax at his level of Government, plus all his extras, then look at what the rest get $200,000 plus a year, then a very generous living away from home while at Canberra attending parliament, food etc the list goes on yet the rest of us are expected to pay our own way ?? Yet these people live off the public purse and milk it for all it's worth then say we get to much come down to our level and try it see how long you last with out commonwealth cars all food and bills payed by the public purse, Elbows living in the government house has no bills out going or other wise, all he got is clothes to pay for then gets 500,000 plus tax free each year what a rout and we get screwed to the wall and hear them say sorry while smiling at us they could not give a shit about us at all
I don't know where you get your facts from. Pollies do get a very generous pension. The newer pollies don't as they only get the same contribution as do public servants. When in Canberra polls pay for their own accommodation, food and any other private expenses. The food at the Parliament House dining room is expensive and, from my experience, meagre servings. The cafeteria is cheaper and the food typical cafeteria. Pollies, including the PM pay tax where required by law, the same as the rest of us. Government cars cease when they leave office apart for ex PM's who can use them for official business. The Governor General is the best lurk no tax , high salary and fat pension. Is that what you are talking about?
 
Lets just look at the over payed retirement fund these polies get when they retire, Elbows and his past at that level get free travel not only for them but family as well a commonwealth car complete with driver,PLUS A PENSION that would make one's eyes water about 4 plus times what we get and all on the public purse, Elbows pays no tax at his level of Government, plus all his extras, then look at what the rest get $200,000 plus a year, then a very generous living away from home while at Canberra attending parliament, food etc the list goes on yet the rest of us are expected to pay our own way ?? Yet these people live off the public purse and milk it for all it's worth then say we get to much come down to our level and try it see how long you last with out commonwealth cars all food and bills payed by the public purse, Elbows living in the government house has no bills out going or other wise, all he got is clothes to pay for then gets 500,000 plus tax free each year what a rout and we get screwed to the wall and hear them say sorry while smiling at us they could not give a shit about us at all
There's an old saying: It's only a rort, if you're not in on it. 🤔
 
Is it time for Susan to be cut?
Absolutely, she's the worst Lib. leader since that narcissist know-it-all, turnbull. 😫🤮
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
So why do not build a labor camp like Hitler with a huge gas chamber, Liberals like Ley would save a sh.t load of money to put in their own pockets and wealthy friends ! Maybe they have no hearts, compassion...........like Trump, just $$$$$$$$ in their eyes !
 
And how about their wages ? Hundreds of thousands of $$$$$$$$$$$ for what ? to lie and spend tax money like no tomorrow !
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×